山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 72-75.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.094

• 论著 • 上一篇    

咽鼓管功能障碍的慢性化脓性中耳炎治疗分析

张浩亮,于锋,吴云文   

  1. 广州医科大学附属广州第十二人民医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 广东 广州 510620
  • 发布日期:2019-03-28
  • 作者简介:张浩亮. E-mail:fridge22@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    广州市科技计划项目(201607010375)

Analysis of treatment approaches for chronic suppurative otitis media with eustachian tube dysfunction

ZHANG Haoliang, YU Feng, WU Yunwen   

  1. Department of Otolaryngology, The twelfth Affiliated Guangzhou Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510620, Guangdong, China
  • Published:2019-03-28

摘要: 目的 探讨合并咽鼓管功能障碍的慢性化脓性中耳炎病例的适宜手术方案。 方法 收集咽鼓管功能障碍的慢性化脓性中耳炎病例68耳,分为观察组(28耳),同期行中耳乳突手术及咽鼓管球囊扩张术,对照组(40耳),仅行中耳乳突手术。术前,术后3个月、6个月、12个月分别以ETDQ-7评分、听阈、气骨导差进行对比。 结果 观察组术后6~12个月随访气导平均听力改善率为89%(25/28),干耳率93%(26/28)。对照组听力改善率为75%(30/40),干耳率95%(38/40)。观察组术后3~6个月EDDQ-7评分及听阈达到较明显缓解,但术后6~12个月上述指标有加重趋势。观察组及对照组术后听力均比术前听力提高,有统计学差异,两组的术后听力相对比,观察组优于对照组,有统计学意义。 结论 在咽鼓管功能障碍的慢性化脓性中耳炎患者中,中耳手术同期咽鼓管球囊扩张术较单纯中耳手术的听力改善率高,改善程度高,重新内陷率低,重新粘连率低,干耳率无明显差别。术后3~6个月患者咽鼓管相应症状达到较明显缓解,6~12个月症状有反复。

关键词: 咽鼓管球囊扩张术, 慢性化脓性中耳炎, 咽鼓管功能障碍

Abstract: Objective To investigate the improved techniques for middle ear surgery in patients with chronic suppurative otitis media and eustachian tube dysfunction. Methods A total of 68 ears with chronic suppurative otitis media and eustachian tube dysfunction were analyzed. The observation group included 28 ears and underwent balloon eustachian tuboplasty and middle ear surgery at the same time. The control group included 40 ears and underwent middle ear surgery only. The Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7(ETDQ-7)scores, auditory thresholds, and air-bone gap before and 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment were compared between the groups. Results The rate of improvement in auditory threshold in the observation group was 89%(25/28)and the frequency of dry ear was 93%(26/28). The rate of improvement in auditory threshold in the control group was 75%(30/40)and the frequency of dry ear was 95%(38/40). From 3 to 6 months after the operation, the observation group was satisfied with the treatment; however, symptoms of eustachian tube dysfunction recurred partially 6 to 12 months after the operation. Conclusion Results from this small sample indicate that middle ear surgery combined with balloon eustachian tuboplasty may be more effective in improving auditory thresholds than middle ear surgery alone. The frequency of dry ear was similar in both groups. Two simultaneous operations may yield good treatment effects in patients with chronic suppurative otitis media 3 to 6 months postoperatively, but symptoms are likely to recur partially 6 to 12 months after the operation.

Key words: Balloon eustachian tuboplasty, Chronic otitis media, Eustachian tube dysfunction

中图分类号: 

  • R764.2
[1] Kobayashi T, Morita M, Yoshioka S, et al. Diagnostic criteria for patulous eustachian tube: a proposal by the japan otological society[J]. Auris Nasus Larynx, 2018, 45(1): 1-5. doi:10.1016/j.anl.2017.09.017.
[2] Smith ME, Tysome JR. Middle ear pressure changes during balloon eustachian tuboplasty[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2017, 156(1): 161-165. doi:10.1177/0194599816672842.
[3] Marino MJ, Ling LC, Yao WC, et al. Eustachian tube dysfunction symptoms in patients treated in a tertiary rhinology clinic[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2017, 7(12): 1135-1139. doi:10.1002/alr.22030.
[4] Ockermann T, Reineke U, Upile T, et al. Balloon dilatation eustachian tuboplasty: a clinical study[J]. Laryngoscope, 2010, 120(7): 1411-1416. doi:10.1002/lary.20950.
[5] Zirkler J, Rahne T, Lautenschläger C, et al. Balloon dilatation of the Eustachian tube during middle ear surgery: Study planning and first experiences during recruitment[J]. HNO, 2016, 64(4): 237-242. doi:10.1007/s00106-016-0146-6.
[6] Van Roeyen S, Van de Heyning P, Van Rompaey V. Responsiveness of the 7-item eustachian tube dysfunction questionnaire[J]. J Int Adv Otol, 2016, 12(1): 106-108. doi:10.5152/iao.2016.2086.
[7] Luukkainen V, Kivekäs I, Hammarén-Malmi S, et al. Balloon Eustachian tuboplasty under local anesthesia: Is it feasible?[J]. The Laryngoscope, 2017, 127(5): 1021-1025. doi:10.1002/lary.26488.
[8] Silvola J, Kivekäs I, Poe DS. Balloon dilation of the cartilaginous portion of the eustachian tube[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2014, 151(1): 125-130. doi:10.1177/0194599814529538.
[9] Jurkiewicz D, Bień D, Szczygielski K, et al. Clinical evaluation of balloon dilation Eustachian tuboplasty in the Eustachian tube dysfunction[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2013, 270(3): 1157-1160. doi:10.1007/s00405-012-2243-9.
[10] Luukkainen V, Vnencak M, Aarnisalo AA, et al. Patient satisfaction in the long-term effects of Eustachian tube balloon dilation is encouraging[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2018, 138(2): 122-127. doi:10.1080/00016489.2017.1384568.
[11] Heo KW, Kang MK, Park JY. Alternative to canal wall-down mastoidectomy for sclerotic mastoid cavities: epitympanoplasty with mastoid obliteration[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2014, 123(1): 47-52. doi:10.1177/0003489414521387.
[12] Bhutta MF, Thornton RB, Kirkham LS, et al. Understanding the aetiology and resolution of chronic otitis media from animal and human studies[J]. Dis Model Mech, 2017, 10(11): 1289-1300. doi:10.1242/dmm.029983.
[1] 马钊恩, 翟锦明, 廖礼兵, 杨震. 咽鼓管球囊扩张术治疗慢性分泌性中耳炎的短期疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(5): 54-56.
[2] 赵新星, 张龙城. 咽鼓管功能障碍与球囊咽鼓管扩张技术的应用进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(5): 83-86.
[3] 李兆生, 洪斌, 黄前进, 蒲伟民, 许振跃. 耳源性小脑脓肿2例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(5): 32-37.
[4] 吴佳欐,陈淑梅,田欣,赵利敏,倪坤,顾美珍,陈佳瑞,周佳蕾,李晓艳 . 腺样体肥大儿童伴变应性鼻炎与分泌性中耳炎的相关性分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(6): 53-56.
[5] 王进,何跃. 慢性化脓性中耳炎及中耳胆脂瘤术前颞骨CT及耳内镜评估的意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(6): 45-47.
[6] 周洁,何源萍,曾旭东,潘芳名,李泽文
. 手术治疗儿童慢性化脓性中耳炎82例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2009, 23(2): 45-46 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!