山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 175-178.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.386

• 护理园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

强化自我护理对喉镜辅助声带息肉切除术后患者嗓音恢复及心理情绪的影响

赵艳,程四华,童巧珍   

  1. 深圳市龙华区中心医院耳鼻喉科, 广东 深圳 518110
  • 出版日期:2019-07-20 发布日期:2019-07-22

Effects of intensive self-care on voice recovery and psychological emotions in patients undergoing laryngoscope-assisted vocal cord polypectomy

ZHAO Yan, CHENG Sihua, TONG Qiaozhen   

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Central Hospital of Longhua District, Shenzhen 518110, Guangdong, China
  • Online:2019-07-20 Published:2019-07-22

PDF (PC)

593

摘要： 目的 研究强化自我护理对喉镜辅助声带息肉切除术后患者嗓音及心理情绪的影响。 方法 选取2016年3月~2018年3月接受喉镜辅助声带息肉切除术治疗的患者94例为研究对象,将其按随机数字表法分成研究组与对照组各47例。对照组予以常规护理干预,研究组则予以强化自我护理干预。比较两组嗓音恢复情况,干预前后汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、数字分级法(NRS)及生存质量测定量表(QOL)评分变化。 结果 研究组基频微扰、振幅围绕、自主发音能力比对照组低(t分别为5.181、3.355、11.017,P分别为0.001、<0.001、<0.001),而声音障碍指数比对照组高(t=4.550, P<0.001)。干预后研究组与对照组HAMA评分比干预前低(t分别为15.069、8.539, P均<0.001),且研究组比对照组低(t=6.935, P<0.001)。干预后研究组与对照组NRS评分比干预前低(t分别为4.788、2.535, P均<0.001),且研究组比对照组低(t=2.548, P=0.013)。干预后研究组与对照组QOL评分比干预前高(t分别为7.292、2.671, P分别为0.000、0.009),且研究组比对照组高(t=4.698, P<0.001)。 结论 强化自我护理有助于喉镜辅助声带息肉切除术患者嗓音的恢复,同时降低HAMA、NRS评分,提高QOL评分。

关键词: 声带息肉, 声带息肉切除术, 强化自我护理, 汉密尔顿焦虑量表, 数字分级法, 生存质量测定量表

Abstract: Objective To study and analyze the effects of intensive self-care on the Hamilton anxiety scale(HAMA), a digital grading method(NRS), and the QOL scores in patients with laryngoscope-assisted vocal cord polypectomy. Methods Between March 2016 and March 2018, 94 patients who underwent laryngoscope-assisted vocal cord polypectomy at our hospital were selected as the study subjects. They were divided into the study and control groups according to a random number table, with 47 patients in each group. The control group received routine nursing intervention, while the study group received intensive self-care intervention. Voice restoration in the two groups as well as the changes in the HAMA, NRS, and QOL scores before and after intervention were compared. Results The fundamental frequency perturbation, amplitude circumference, and independent articulation ability of the study group were lower than those of the control group(t=5.181, 3.355, and 11.017, respectively; P=0.001, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively). However, the voice disturbance index was higher in the study group than in the control group (t=4.550; P<0.001). The post-intervention HAMA score of the study group was lower than the pre-intervention score of the control group(t=15.069 and 8.539, respectively; P<0.001), and the study group had a lower HAMA score than did the control group(t=6.935; P<0.001). The post-intervention NRS score of the study group was lower than the pre-intervention score of the control group(t=4.788 and 2.535, respectively; P<0.001), and the study group had a lower NRS score than did the control group(t=2.548; P=0.013). The post-intervention QOL score of the study group was higher than the pre-intervention score of the control group(t=7.292 and 2.671, respectively; P<0.001 and 0.009, respectively), and the study group had a higher QOL score than did the control group(t=4.698; P<0.001). Conclusion Intensive self-care is helpful for voice recovery in patients undergoing laryngoscope-assisted vocal cord polypectomy, while reducing the HAMA and NRS scores and improving the QOL scores.

Key words: Vocal cord polypectomy, Strengthening self-care, Hamilton anxiety scale, Digital classification, Quality of life scale

中图分类号: 

  • R767.4
[1] Lin YH, Wang CT, Lin FC, et al. Treatment outcomes and adverse events following in-office angiolytic laser with or without concurrent polypectomy for vocal fold polyps[J]. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2018, 144(3):222-230.
[2] 秦辉.支撑喉镜和纤维喉镜下声带息肉切除术疗效分析[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2016,23(8):487-489. QIN Hui. Clinical effects of vocal cord polyp surgery under micro-laryngoscope and fiberoptic laryngoscope[J]. Chinese Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2016, 23(8):487-489.
[3] 林妙英,郭翠兰,李秋萍,等.声带息肉术后病人应用布地奈德雾化吸入的疗效及护理[J].全科护理,2013,11(26):2443-2444. LIN Miaoying, GUO Cuilan, LI Qiuping, et al. Curative effect and nursing care of budesonide inhalation for vocal cord polyp patients after surgery[J]. Chinese General Practice Nursing, 2013, 11(26):2443-2444.
[4] 马连山,董文会,李学昌,等.支撑喉镜声带息肉切除术后并发舌下神经麻痹[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2006,41(5):323-323. MA Lianshan, DONG Wenhui, LI Xuechang, et al. Hypoglossal nerve paralysis complicated by ablation of polyp of vocal cord under self-retaining laryngoscope[J]. Chinese Journal Of Otorhinolaryngology Head And Neck Surgery, 2006, 41(5):323-323.
[5] 金磊,丁可.联合护理干预对喉癌患者术后生活质量的影响[J].中华灾害救援医学,2018,6(1):39-42. JIN Lei, DING Ke. The effectiveness of combined nursing intervention on post-operation life quality of patients with laryngeal carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Disaster Medicine, 2018, 6(1):39-42.
[6] 孙海涛,许梅,陈国莲,等.右美托咪啶和瑞芬太尼用于肝肿瘤射频消融患者清醒镇静效果的临床观察[J].中华医学杂志,2018,98(8):576-580. SUN Haitao, XU Mei, CHEN Guolian, et al. Study of comparing dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for conscious sedation during radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. National Medical Journal of China, 2018, 98(8):576-580.
[7] 王珊珊,顾莹,刘敏,等.口肌生物反馈训练结合常规吞咽康复训练治疗脑卒中后吞咽障碍的疗效观察[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2017,39(1):27-29. WANG Shanshan, GU Ying, LIU Min, et al. Therapeutic effect of oral muscle biofeedback training combined with routine swallowing rehabilitation training on dysphagia after stroke[J]. Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2017, 39(1):27-29.
[8] Wang CT, Liao LJ, Huang TW, et al. Comparison of treatment outcomes of transnasal vocal fold polypectomy versus microlaryngoscopic surgery[J]. Laryngoscope, 2015, 125(5):1155-1160.
[9] 黄水莲.声带息肉切除术后延续性护理管理措施应用效果分析[J].中国医院统计,2017,24(5):340-343. HUANG Shuilian. Statistical analysis of the application of continuity nursing management measures after resection of vocal cord polypecto-my[J]. Chinese Journal of Hospital Statistics, 2017, 24(5):340-343.
[10] 毛承刚,万俐佳,周小淳,等.支撑喉镜下声带白斑的手术治疗及预后分析[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2017,23(5):461-465. MAO Chenggang, WAN Lijia, ZHOU Xiaochun, et al. Surgical treatment under laryngoscope and prognosis of vocal cords leukoplakia[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-skull Base Surgery, 2017, 23(5):461-465.
[11] 葛晴霞,李舒,蔡冰琳,等.医养护一体化服务对社区失能老人自我护理能力的影响[J].中华现代护理杂志,2018,24(15):1797-1800. GE Qingxia, LI Shu, CAI Binglin, et al. Effects of medical care and nursing service integration on self-care agency in disabled elders of community[J]. Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing, 2018, 24(15):1797-1800.
[12] 孟庆利.自我护理干预对鼻息肉切除患者自我管理能力的影响[J].中国药物与临床,2018,18(5):863-865. MENG Qingli. Effect of self-nursing intervention on self-management ability of patients with nasal polyposis resection[J]. Chinese Remedies & Clinics, 2018, 18(5):863-865.
[13] 李诗涵,宋应寒,杜姣姣,等.加强自我护理干预在日间支撑喉镜下声带息肉切除术患者中的应用[J].中华现代护理杂志,2018,24(12):1375-1378. LI Shihan, SONG Yinghan, DU Jiaojiao, et al. Effects of intensive self-care intervention in patients undergoing day self-retaining laryngoscope vocal polyp resection[J]. Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing, 2018, 24(12):1375-1378.
[14] 马丽娟.临床护理路径在声带息肉患者护理中的应用效果[J].国际护理学杂志,2016,35(19):2637-2639. MA Lijuan. Application of clinical nursing pathway in nursing care of patients with vocal cord polyps[J]. International Journal of Nursing, 2016, 35(19):2637-2639.
[15] 李毅,徐宇红,王珂,等.临床护理路径在声带息肉切除术病人中的应用[J].护理研究,2014,28(6):715-716. LI Yi, XU Yuhong, WANG Ke, et al. Application of clinical nursing pathway for patients undergoing vocal cords polyp resection[J]. Chinese Nursing Research, 2014, 28(6):715-716.
[16] Lin L, Sun N, Yang Q, et al. Effect of voice training in the voice rehabilitation of patients with vocal cord polyps after surgery[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2014,7(4):877-880.
[1] 鞠丽娴,李井成,夏克玉,董伟达. 鼻内镜下联合自制角度喉钳切除声门暴露困难声带息肉23例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(3): 116-118.
[2] 郝艳,李栋才,蓝建平. CO2激光显微手术与传统显微手术切除声带息肉疗效比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(6): 68-70.
[3] 陈闽琪, 彭文静, 陈舒华. 阿克森疗法对声带息肉术后嗓音恢复的疗效探讨[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(6): 61-64.
[4] 王艳红. 56例Bell′s面瘫患者焦虑症状分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(5): 28-30.
[5] 任庆,王景和. 鼻内镜引导下支撑喉镜治疗声带息肉研究(附114例)[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(4): 69-70.
[6] 杨烨 高下 陈峰. 术前使用布地奈德对声带息肉手术疗效的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2009, 23(4): 58-.
[7] 吴治钦 . 声带小结、声带息肉823例手术分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2007, 21(6): 572-573 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 林彬,王挥戈 . 功能性内镜鼻窦手术后鼻黏膜纤毛转归的研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(6): 481 -487 .
[2] 张晗,黄一飞 . 抗角膜移植排斥的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 84 -87 .
[3] 邓基波,孙奉乾,许安廷 . 大前庭导水管综合征[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(2): 116 -118 .
[4] 公 蕾,孙 洁,薛子超,李敬华,薛卫国 . 鼻腔鼻窦恶性肿瘤细胞周期的DNA分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 193 -195 .
[5] 陈文文 . 1例T/NK淋巴瘤17年演进[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(5): 472 -472 .
[6] 周斌,李滨 . 鼻内窥镜下鼻窦鼻息肉手术75例疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 24 -26 .
[7] 杨长亮,黄治物,姚行齐,诸勇,孙艺 . 正常气骨导听性脑干反应及其应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 9 -13 .
[8] 曹忠良 . 颌面复合伤155例临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 89 -89 .
[9] 牛善利,柴茂文,李振秀 . 鼻内镜下鼻甲成形术治疗慢性肥厚性鼻炎60例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 16 -18 .
[10] 马敬, 钟翠萍 . 手术治疗侵犯翼腭窝的鼻咽纤维血管瘤的方法（附5例报告）[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 30 -32 .
网站版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》编辑部　
地址：山东省济南市山大南路27号（250100）电话：+86-0531-88366912 E-mail: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发