鼻内镜下选择性翼管神经切断术对伴有变应性鼻炎的慢性鼻窦炎的疗效观察

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2018.028

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨鼻内镜下选择性翼管神经切断术治疗伴有中重度变应性鼻炎的慢性鼻窦炎的临床效果。方法选择2015年9月至2016年9月在首都医科大学宣武医院就诊的伴有中重度持续性变应性鼻炎(AR)的慢性鼻窦炎鼻息肉的患者132例。所有患者分为两组,对照组62例采取常规手术方法治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎,变应性鼻炎选择保守治疗。观察组70例患者在常规手术基础上行选择性翼管神经切断术,包括鼻后神经切断术和翼管神经咽支的切断。应用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Lund-Kennedy内镜黏膜形态评分、Lund-Mackay鼻窦CT扫描病变范围评分来对术后随访资料收集分析评估,对患者治疗前和治疗结束后随访情况做自身对比,记录治疗前,手术后6个月、1年、2年的数据。结果随访2年,对研究终止时随访成功且临床资料完整的106例病例进行分析,观察组56例,对照组50例。观察组病例治疗前VAS评分为(7.6±2.2)分,治疗后6个月VAS评分为(2.3±1.2)分,治疗后1年VAS评分为(2.6±1.7)分,治疗后2年VAS评分为(2.8±1.8)分,与治疗前比较差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组采用选择性翼管神经切断术治疗伴有中重度变应性鼻炎的慢性鼻窦炎总的有效率94.6%(53/56)。与对照组相比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。通过对并发症的统计分析发现观察组未发生泪液分泌障碍、萎缩性鼻炎等并发症。其并发症的发生与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。将术后2年观察组的疗效评估结果与手术前过敏原检测结果进行相关性分析,显示手术疗效与过敏的严重程度并无明确相关性(P>0.05)。结论鼻内镜下选择性翼管神经切断术是治疗伴有中重度持续性变应性鼻炎的慢性鼻窦炎的安全、有效的手段。

关键词: 鼻内镜外科手术, 翼管神经切断, 变应性鼻炎, 慢性鼻-鼻窦炎

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of endoscopic elective vidian neurectomy in the management of moderate-severe persistent allergic rhinitis with chronic sinusitis and to explore its possible mechanism. Methods One hundred thirty-two patients with moderate-severe persistent allergic rhinitis and chronic sinusitis who visited Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University from September 2015 to September 2016 were divided into two groups. Endoscopic elective vidian neurectomy was performed in 70 patients in the observation group, including amputation of the posterior nasal nerve and pharyngeal branch; 62 patients in the control group underwent conventional operation and conservative treatment. The visual analogue scale(VAS)score and Lund-Mackay score were assessed at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after operation. Results One hundred and six cases had complete follow-up data. The average VAS score decreased significantly from 7.6±2.2 to 2.3±1.2 at 6 months, to 2.6±1.7 at 1 year, and to 2.8±1.8 at 2 years after operation in the observation group(n= 56, P<0.05). The observation group had a complete control rate of 94.6%(53/56), which was significantly lower than the control group(n=50)at the same period after treatment. There was no severe complication such as xeroma and atrophic rhinitis in both groups. Furthermore, the difference in complications in the observation and control groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05). When correlation analysis of therapeutic efficacy 2 years after operation and the allergen test before operation was performed in the observation group, no significant correlation was observed(P>0.05). Conclusion Endoscopic elective vidian neurectomy is an effective and safe technique in the management of moderate-severe persistent allergic rhinitis with chronic sinusitis.

Key words: Nasal endoscopic surgical procedures, operative, Vidian neurectomy, Allergic rhinitis, Chronic sinusitis

中图分类号:

R765

齐岩,刘俊其,彭舒娅,罗凯,张名霞,王振霖. 鼻内镜下选择性翼管神经切断术对伴有变应性鼻炎的慢性鼻窦炎的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(1): 109-113.

QI Yan, LIU Junqi, PENG Shuya, LUO Kai, ZHANG Mingxia, WANG Zhenlin. Therapeutic ecacy of endoscopic elective vidian neurectomy for moderate-severe persistent allergic rhinitis with chronic sinusitis[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2019, 33(1): 109-113.

参考文献 19

[1]	中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会鼻科组,中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会鼻科学组.变应性鼻炎诊断和治疗指南(2015年,天津)[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2016,51(1):6-24.
[2]	Greiner AN, Hellings PW, Rotiroti G, et al. Allergic rhinitis[J]. Lancet, 2011, 378(9809):2112-2122. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60130-X.
[3]	谭国林, 马艳红, 刘更盛, 等. 鼻内镜下翼管神经切断术治疗中-重度持续性变应性鼻炎的远期临床疗效[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2011, 46(6):449-454. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2011.06.003. TAN Guolin, MA Yanhong, LIU Gengsheng, et al. Therapeutic effect of endoscopic vidian neurectomy on moderate-severe persistent allergic rhinitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2011, 46(6):449-454. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2011.06.003.
[4]	冀永进, 张艳廷, 赵长青, 等. 鼻内镜下经蝶窦翼管神经切断术的手术探讨[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志, 2014, 20(6):483-486. doi:10.11798/j.issn.1007-1520.201406004. JI Yongjin, ZHANG Yanting, ZHAO Changqing, et al. A modified endoscopic transsphenoidal vidian neurectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Skull Base Surgery, 2014, 20(6):483-486. doi:10.11798/j.issn.1007-1520.201406004.
[5]	Fokkens W J, Lund V J, Mullol J, et al. European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012.[J]. Rhinol Suppl, 2012, 23(3):1-298.
[6]	中华医学会耳鼻咽喉科学分会,中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志编辑委员会.慢性鼻窦炎鼻息肉临床分型分期及内窥镜鼻窦手术疗效评定标准(1997年,海口)[J].中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志,1998,33(3):134-135.
[7]	金加欣, 殷敏, 程雷. 慢性鼻-鼻窦炎诊断和治疗指南(2012年,昆明)解读[J]. 中国中西医结合耳鼻咽喉科杂志, 2013, 21(5):388-391. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-4856.2013.05.021.
[8]	Meltzer EO, Blaiss MS, Derebery MJ, et al. Burden of allergic rhinitis: results from the Pediatric Allergies in America survey[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2009, 124(3 Suppl):S43-S70. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2009.05.013.
[9]	朱亚琼, 刘月辉. 2型固有淋巴细胞和miR-155在变应性鼻炎中的研究现状[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2017, 31(24):1940-1943. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2017.24.019. ZHU Yaqiong, LIU Yuehui. A review on group 2 innate lymphoid cells and miR-155 in allergic rhinitis[J]. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2017, 31(24):1940-1943. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2017.24.019.
[10]	赵长青, 张艳廷, 何敏. 翼管神经切断术在变应性鼻炎治疗中的作用[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2017, 52(7):484-490. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2017.07.002. ZHAO Changqing, ZHANG Yanting, HE Min. Effects of vidian neurectomy on allergic rhinitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2017, 52(7):484-490. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2017.07.002.
[11]	李超, 曹永华, 张艳廷, 等. 鼻内镜下手术治疗鼻高反应性疾病进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(1):77-81. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.324 LI Chao, CAO Yonghua, ZHANG Yanting, et al. Nasal endoscopy in the treatment of nasal mucosal hyperreactive rhinopathy[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2018, 32(1):77-81. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.324
[12]	Undem BJ, Taylor-Clark T. Mechanisms underlying the neuronal-based symptoms of allergy[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2014, 133(6):1521-1534. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2013.11.027.
[13]	谭国林. 难治性变应性鼻炎的外科治疗[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志, 2016, 22(1):1-4. doi:10.11798/j.issn.1007-1520.201601001.
[14]	黄钦辉, 阙镇如. 鼻内镜下翼管神经切断术治疗持续性变应性鼻炎近远期疗效[J]. 中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2015, 18(12):95-96. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5110.2015.12.062.
[15]	陈江波, 谭国林. 鼻内窥镜下翼管神经切断术对血管运动性鼻炎的治疗作用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2007, 32(5):913-916. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1672-7347.2007.05.036. CHEN Jiangbo, TAN Guolin. Therapeutic effect of vadian neurectomy under the nasal endoscope on the vasomotor rhinitis[J]. Journal of Central South University(Medical Science), 2007, 32(5):913-916. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1672-7347.2007.05.036.
[16]	Ikeda K, Yokoi H, Saito T, et al. Effect of resection of the posterior nasal nerve on functional and morphological changes in the inferior turbinate mucosa[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2008, 128(12):1337-1341. doi:10.1080/00016480801935525.
[17]	Ogawa T, Takeno S, Ishino T, et al. Submucous turbinectomy combined with posterior nasal neurectomy in the management of severe allergic rhinitis: clinical outcomes and local cytokine changes[J]. Auris Nasus Larynx, 2007, 34(3):319-326. doi:10.1016/j.anl.2007.01.008.
[18]	Kanaya T, Kikawada T. Endoscopic posterior nasal neurectomy: an alternative to Vidian neurectomy[J]. Clin Exper Allergy Rev, 2009, 9(1):24-27. doi:10.1111/j.1472-9733.2009.01145.x.
[19]	Bleier BS, Schlosser RJ. Endoscopic anatomy of the postganglionic pterygopalatine innervation of the posterolateral nasal mucosa[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2011, 1(2):113-117. doi:10.1002/alr.20011.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed