山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 26-31.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2019.049

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

静脉源性搏动性耳鸣手术治疗的疗效分析

郑永波,赵宇(),娄麟,宋瑶,董怡君,任建君,王晶,许洋,雷蕾   

  1. 四川大学华西医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,四川 成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-25 修回日期:2019-07-29 出版日期:2019-09-20 发布日期:2019-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 赵宇 E-mail:yutzhao@163.com

Effects of surgery in patients with venous pulsatile tinnitus

Yongbo ZHENG,Yu ZHAO(),Lin LOU,Yao SONG,Yijun DONG,Jianjun REN,Jing WANG,Yang XU,Lei LEI   

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2019-07-25 Revised:2019-07-29 Online:2019-09-20 Published:2019-10-15
  • Contact: Yu ZHAO E-mail:yutzhao@163.com

摘要: 目的

对静脉源性搏动性耳鸣患者的发病特征进行总结,为该疾病的临床诊疗提供参考。

方法

收集分析25例静脉源性搏动性耳鸣行手术治疗患者的临床资料。手术主要采用局麻下耳后小切口行乳突探查加乙状窦缩窄术或乙状窦回纳术。对患者术前及术后1个月、3个月及6个月的耳鸣情况采用耳鸣评价量表(TEQ)进行评分,量化评估患者术后耳鸣的改善效果。同时比较患者术前与术后1个月的听力检查结果,评估手术是否对听力产生不良影响。

结果

根据患者主诉,21例患者术后随访期内搏动性耳鸣消失,4例患者在术后第6个月随访时仍有轻微搏动性耳鸣,但患者自觉耳鸣对日常生活无影响。本组患者术前TEQ评分为10.44±3.08,术后1个月TEQ评分为3.68±1.75,术后3个月TEQ评分为2.76±1.23,术后6个月TEQ评分为2.72±1.17。术后1个月、术后3个月及术后6个月TEQ评分均低于术前,表明患者术后耳鸣症状得到明显改善。术后3个月及术后6个月的TEQ评分低于术后1个月,但术后3个月与术后6个月的TEQ评分比较无统计学意义,表明患者术后耳鸣的改善程度逐渐趋于稳定。本组患者术后1个月听力检查结果与术前相比较无统计学差异。

结论

静脉源性搏动性耳鸣可通过仔细询问病史、查体及影像学检查进行诊断。采用局麻下手术治疗便于术者术中观察患者耳鸣改善情况,准确掌握对乙状窦的塑形程度,减少并发症发生率。

关键词: 搏动性耳鸣, 手术, 疗效

Abstract: Objective

To summarize the clinical characteristics of patients with venous pulsatile tinnitus and provide reference data for clinical diagnosis and treatment of this disease.

Methods

Clinical data of 25 patients with venous pulsatile tinnitus were analyzed. During surgery, a small incision was made in the posterior auricular region under local anesthesia, and mastoid exploration plus sigmoid sinus constriction or sigmoid sinus retraction were performed. The tinnitus evaluation questionnaire (TEQ) was used to quantify improvement in tinnitus after the operation (1st, 3rd, and 6th months). The preoperative hearing test results were compared with those obtained in the 1st month postoperatively to determine whether the surgery had adverse effects on hearing.

Results

As reported by the patients, pulsatile tinnitus had disappeared during the follow-up period in 21 patients. Four patients had mild pulsatile tinnitus in the 6th month postoperatively; however, this conscious tinnitus did not affect the patients’daily lives. The preoperative TEQ score of the patients was 10.44±3.08. The postoperative TEQ scores in the 1st, 3rd, and 6th months were 3.68±1.75, 2.76±1.23, and 2.72±1.17, respectively, which were significantly lower than the preoperative TEQ score. The postoperative TEQ scores in the 3rd and 6th months were lower than that in the 1st month postoperatively, but there was no statistical difference between the TEQ scores in the 3rd and 6th months postoperatively. It was observed that the improvement in postoperative tinnitus stabilized gradually. There was no significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative hearing test results.

Conclusion

Venous pulsatile tinnitus can be diagnosed by careful medical history taking, physical examination, and imaging. Surgery under local anesthesia is convenient for the surgeon to observe real-time improvement in tinnitus, which aids in accurate evaluation of the shape of the sigmoid sinus and reducing the incidence of complications. Therefore, its clinical application is recommended.

Key words: Pulsatile tinnitus, Surgery, Therapeutic effect

中图分类号: 

  • R764.65

图1

右侧乙状窦及颈静脉球异常 A~C:右侧乙状窦扩张前置; D~F:右侧乙状窦扩张前置及右侧颈静脉球高位伴扩张。"

图3

右侧颈静脉球及双侧乳突导静脉异常 A:右侧颈静脉球高位;B:左侧乳突导静脉位置异常伴扩张;C:右侧乳突导静脉畸形。"

图2

右侧乙状窦及乳突导静脉异常 A:右侧乙状窦憩室;B:右侧乳突导静脉扩张;C~D:右侧乙状窦及颈静脉球扩张。"

图4

耳后切口示例"

图5

乙状窦异常部位的术中暴露及填塞 A~B:乙状窦异常部位的暴露; C~D:示术中采用颞肌瓣填塞乙状窦。"

1 Baguley D , McFerran D , Hall D . Tinnitus[J]. Lancet, 2013, 382(9904): 1600-1607. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60142-7 .
doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60142-7
2 Stouffer JL , Tyler RS . Characterization of tinnitus by tinnitus patients[J]. J Speech Hear Disord, 1990, 55(3): 439-453.
3 曾嵘, 王国鹏, 龚树生 . 搏动性耳鸣研究进展[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2011, 46(11): 957-961. doi:10. 3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2011.11.024 .
doi: 10. 3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2011.11.024
4 刘蓬, 徐桂丽, 李明, 等 . 耳鸣评价量表的信度与效度研究[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2012, 47(9): 716-719. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2012.09.004 .
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2012.09.004
LIU Peng , XU Guili , LI Ming , et al . Study on reliability and validity of the Tinnitus Evaluation Questionnaire[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2012, 47(9): 716-719. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2012.09.004 .
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2012.09.004
5 陈知己, 郑芸, 钟萍, 等 . 耳鸣评价量表的临床应用价值研究[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2017, 25(3): 242-246. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2017.03.006 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2017.03.006
CHEN Zhiji , ZHENG Yun , ZHONG Ping , et al . The investigation of clinical value of tinnitus evaluation questionnaire[J]. Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology, 2017, 25(3): 242-246. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2017.03.006 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2017.03.006
6 侯志强 . 静脉源性搏动性耳鸣[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2011, 19(6): 573-575. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2011.06.029 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2011.06.029
7 Amans MR , Haraldsson H , Kao E , et al . MR venous flow in sigmoid sinus diverticulum[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2018, 39(11): 2108-2113. doi:10.3174/ajnr.a5833 .
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.a5833
8 Li YD , Chen HJ , He L , et al . Hemodynamic assessments of venous pulsatile tinnitus using 4D-flow MRI[J]. Neurology, 2018, 91(6): e586-e593. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000005948 .
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005948
9 Lansley JA , Tucker W , Eriksen MR , et al . Sigmoid sinus diverticulum, dehiscence, and venous sinus stenosis: potential causes of pulsatile tinnitus in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension?[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2017, 38(9): 1783-1788. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5277 .
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5277
10 Wang AC , Nelson AN, Pino C , et al . Management of sigmoid sinus associated pulsatile tinnitus: A systematic review of the literature[J]. And, 2017, 38(10): 1390-1396. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001612 .
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001612
11 梁熙虹, 王振常, 龚树生, 等 . 乙状窦沟异常致搏动性耳鸣的影像分析[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2010, 44(4): 361-364.doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2010.04. 006 .
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2010.04.006
LIANG Xihong , WANG Zhenchang , GONG Shusheng , et al . Imaging findings of pulsatile tinnitus caused by sigmoid sinus abnormalities[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiology, 2010, 44(4): 361-364. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2010.04.006 .
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2010.04.006
12 Eisenman DJ , Raghavan P , Hertzano R , et al . Evaluation and treatment of pulsatile tinnitus associated with sigmoid sinus wall anomalies[J]. Laryngoscope, 2018, 128: S1-S13. doi:10.1002/lary.27218 .
doi: 10.1002/lary.27218
13 Houdart E , Chapot R , Merland JJ . Aneurysm of a dural sigmoid sinus: a novel vascular cause of pulsatile tinnitus[J]. Ann Neurol, 2000, 48(4): 669-671.doi:10.1002/1531-8249(200010)48:4<669::aid-ana16>3.3.co;2-y .
doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(200010)48:4<669::aid-ana16>3.3.co;2-y
14 Sanchez TG , Murao M , de Medeiros IR , et al . A new therapeutic procedure for treatment of objective venous pulsatile tinnitus[J]. Int Tinnitus J, 2002, 8(1): 54-57.
15 Otto KJ , Hudgins PA , Abdelkafy W , et al . Sigmoid sinus diverticulum: a new surgical approach to the correction of pulsatile tinnitus[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2007, 28(1): 48-53. doi:10.1097/01.mao.0000247814.85829.f6 .
doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000247814.85829.f6
16 Duvillard C , Ballester M , Redon E , et al . Pulsatile tinnitus cured by mastoidectomy[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2004, 113(9): 730-733. doi:10.1177/000348940411300910.
doi: 10.1177/000348940411300910.
17 Overton SB , Ritter FN . A high placed jugular bulb in the middle ear: a clinical and temporal bone study[J]. Laryngoscope, 1973, 83(12): 1986-1991. doi:10.1288/00005537-197312000-00008 .
doi: 10.1288/00005537-197312000-00008
18 Wadin K , Wilbrand H . The jugular bulb diverticulum. A radioanatomic investigation[J]. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh), 1986, 27(4): 395-401.
19 Madani G , Connor SE . Imaging in pulsatile tinnitus[J]. Clin Radiol, 2009, 64(3): 319-328. doi:10.1016/j.crad. 2008.08.014 .
doi: 10.1016/j.crad. 2008.08.014
20 Zenteno M , Murillo-Bonilla L , Martínez S , et al . Endovascular treatment of a transverse-sigmoid sinus aneurysm presenting as pulsatile tinnitus. Case report[J]. J Neurosurg, 2004, 100(1): 120-122. doi:10.3171/jns. 2004.100.1.0120 .
doi: 10.3171/jns. 2004.100.1.0120
21 Park YH , Kwon HJ . Awake embolization of sigmoid sinus diverticulum causing pulsatile tinnitus: simultaneous confirmative diagnosis and treatment[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2011, 17(3): 376-379. doi:10.1177/15910-1991101700316 .
doi: 10.1177/15910-1991101700316
22 Su H , Li BM , Wang J , et al . Headache attributed to cranial venous sinus stenting: A case series and literature review[J]. Cephalalgia, 2019: 333102419847752. doi:10.1177/0333102419847752 .
doi: 10.1177/0333102419847752
23 吴松林, 李茜, 龚元, 等 . 乙状窦憩室致搏动性耳鸣手术治疗的疗效分析[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2015, 22(7): 337-340. doi:10.16066/j.1672-7002.2015.07.004 .
doi: 10.16066/j.1672-7002. 2015.07.004
WU Songlin , LI Qian , GONG Yuan , et al . Analysis of the surgical effect of the pulsatile tinnitus caused by sigmoid sinus diverticulum[J]. Chinese Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2015, 22(7): 337-340. doi:10.16066/j.1672-7002. 2015.07.004 .
doi: 10.16066/j.1672-7002. 2015.07.004
24 郭平, 王武庆 . 乙状窦缩窄术治疗乙状窦相关静脉源性搏动性耳鸣的疗效分析[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2013, 48(4): 265-269. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2013.04.001 .
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn. 1673-0860.2013.04.001
GUO Ping , WANG Wuqing . Effect of sigmoid sinus plasty in sigmoid sinus original pulsatile tinnitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2013, 48(4): 265-269. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn. 1673-0860.2013.04.001 .
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn. 1673-0860.2013.04.001
25 Zhang C , Li Q , Li SF . Physical and psychological outcomes of simple sigmoid sinus bony wall repair for pulsatile tinnitus due to sigmoid sinus wall anomalies[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2019, 276(5): 1327-1334. doi:10.1007/s00405-019-05380-1 .
doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05380-1
[1] 刘佳,付勇. 儿童慢性鼻窦炎的外科治疗研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(6): 29-33.
[2] 宋颖,潘忠,傅敏仪. 喉镜评分预测支撑喉镜手术暴露的临床意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(6): 81-84.
[3] 谭燕,李灿. 人工晶体度数计算公式的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(6): 95-98.
[4] 李强,刘志元,周涵. 鼻内镜下蝶腭动脉阻断术治疗老年难治性鼻出血[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 92-95.
[5] 郑美君,杨慧,胡娟娟. 喉显微外科治疗声门型喉蹼的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 144-147.
[6] 张瑞,龚春蓓,于文春,王贞,姚春莲. 眼科手术场景预适应在恐惧症患者中的临床应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 125-128.
[7] 王海英. 鼻内镜下二线减张鼻中隔矫正术43例临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 166-168.
[8] 陈国辉,和守睆,孙青,高天乐,白广平. 鼻内镜术中不同中鼻甲处理方式治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉效果比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 82-86.
[9] 刘玉柱,高英恺,蒋贵云,裴皓旭,岳小雪. 经上颌窦径路修复眶下壁骨折伴眶内容脱垂及下直肌嵌顿[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 79-81.
[10] 李晓明. 喉癌治疗中喉功能保留的历史、现状和未来[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 1-5.
[11] 刘鸣. 早期声门癌的内镜治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 6-9.
[12] 丁洁,孙彦. 142例喉癌术后患者整体睡眠质量状况调查分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 76-81.
[13] 黄若飞,陈立晓,陈歆维,於子卫,金斌,祝江才,董频. 喉异期喉重复癌[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 36-39.
[14] 孙笑晗,李娜. 喉保留策略在喉癌治疗中的应用—美国临床肿瘤学会临床实践指南更新(2017)介绍[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 40-42.
[15] 张俊军,刘海莉,刘加福,秦小奉,杜洪明,王厚慧. 糖皮质激素不同给药方式治疗突发性聋的临床疗效及安全性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 52-55.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨长亮,黄治物,姚行齐,诸勇,孙艺 . 正常气骨导听性脑干反应及其应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 9 -13 .
[2] 曹忠良 . 颌面复合伤155例临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 89 -89 .
[3] 毕景云 . 鼻中隔矫正术后血肿的处理[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 90 -91 .
[4] 刘大昱,潘新良,雷大鹏,许风雷,张立强,栾信庸 . 梨状窝内侧壁癌的手术治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2007, 21(1): 8 -11 .
[5] 楼正才 . 掌拳击伤鼓膜损伤机制及临床特点分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(2): 188 -188 .
[6] 刘 艳,刘新义,王金平,李大健 . 后鼓室解剖结构测量观察及临床意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 218 -221 .
[7] 赵 敏,王守森,甄泽年,陈贤明,王茂鑫 . 鼻内镜联合显微镜行蝶窦及经蝶鞍区微创手术[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 244 -245 .
[8] 伦 杰,吕心红 . 鼻部脂溢性角化病1例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 252 -252 .
[9] 王红霞,王鹏程 . NSE、S100及GFAP在视网膜母细胞瘤中的表达及意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 263 -264 .
[10] 黄 方,黄海琼,黄建强,何荷蕃 . 支气管内镜视频监视系统在小儿气管-支气管异物诊治中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 276 -277 .