FS-LASIK与SMILE术后角膜上皮重塑的比较

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2020.003

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的观察飞秒激光制瓣联合准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术( femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis,FS-LASIK)与飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术(small incision lenticular extraction,SMILE)术后角膜上皮重塑的特征。方法按照手术方式分为两组,FS-LASIK组29例(58眼),SMILE组31例(61眼),年龄(26±6.5)岁,术前等效球镜度数为(-5.25±2)D,分别于术前,术后1个月、3个月及6个月应用眼前节OCT对患者角膜中央2 mm、2~5 mm上皮厚度进行测量。结果术后1个月FS-LAISK组角膜中央2 mm与角膜2~5 mm范围内的平均角膜上皮增厚差异存在统计学意义(P=0.036);术后3个月2~5 mm范围,角膜上皮在上方、鼻上方、颞上方与下方、颞下方、鼻下方相比,增厚更轻微,差异均有统计学意义(P=0.042,P=0.031,P=0.049);术后6个月SMILE组角膜中央2 mm、角膜2~5 mm的角膜上皮增厚差异存在统计学意义(P=0.047),2~5 mm范围内,角膜上皮在上方、鼻上方、颞上方与下方、颞下方、鼻下方相比,增厚更轻微,差异均有统计学意义(P=0.012,P=0.035,P=0.009),上方与鼻侧、颞侧相比,增厚更少,差异有统计学意义(P=0.045,P=0.017);FS-LASIK组,术后1至6个月角膜上皮增厚在0~2 mm内逐渐下降,差异有统计学意义(P=0.035);术后各个时间段中,FS-LASIK组与SMILE组角膜上皮厚度在0~5 mm范围内各个位点差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 FS-LASIK术后角膜上皮增厚较SMILE术后更加明显。FS-LASIK术后角膜上皮增厚在角膜切削中央区域变化更加明显,SMILE术后角膜上皮增厚在角膜切除周边区域变化更加明显。随着时间推移,两种手术术后均出现与切口位置相反的角膜上皮局部继续增厚的表现。

关键词: 飞秒激光制瓣联合准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术, 全飞秒激光小切口角膜透镜取出术, 角膜上皮重塑, 相干光断层扫描

Abstract: Objective To compare the characteristics of corneal epithelial remodeling after FS-LASIK and SMILE. Methods There were 33 males(65 eyes)and 27 females(54 eyes)with an average age of 26±6.5years. The mean spherical equivalent was -5.25±2 D. Patients were divided into two groups: the FS-LASIK group(29 patients, 58 eyes)or SMILE group(31 patients, 61 eyes). The RTvue-OCT system was used to measure the epithelium thickness within 0-2 mm and 2-5 mm from the central cornea of patients before and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Results One month after surgery, however, there was a statistical difference between the average corneal epithelium thickness within 2 mm and 2-5 mm from the cornea in the FS-LASIK group (P=0.036). In the superior, nasal superior, temporal superior region, the thickness of the corneal epithelium within 2-5 mm increased less than the inferior, nasal inferior, and temporal inferior regions. These differences were statistically significant (P=0.042, P=0.031, P=0.049, respectively). There was a statistically significant difference between the average corneal epithelium thickness within 2 mm and 2-5 mm of the cornea in the SMILE group at 6 months after operation (P=0.047). In the range of 2-5 mm, the corneal epithelium thickness increased less in the superior, nasal superior, temporal superior regions than the thickness in the inferior, nasal inferior, and temporal inferior regions. These differences were statistically significant (P=0.012, P=0.035, P=0.009, respectively). Compared with the nasal and temporal sides, the thickness of the superior part was less, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.045, P=0.017, respectively). For the FS-LASIK group, the corneal epithelium thickened from 1 to 6 months after surgery. It gradually decreased within 2 mm, and this difference was statistically significant (P=0.035). During this time period, the corneal epithelial thickness of the FS-LASIK group and the SMILE group was statistically significant at each position within a range of 0-5 mm (P<0.05). Conclusion Corneal epithelium thickening is more pronounced in FS-LASIK than in SMILE post-operation. The corneal epithelium thickening in FS-LASIK changes more obviously in the central area of the corneal resection. The corneal epithelium thickening in SMILE changes more obviously in the peripheral area of the corneal resection. Over time, the localized thickening of the corneal epithelium, which is located opposite to the incision location, continued after both procedures.

Key words: Femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis, Small incision lenticular extraction, Corneal epithelium remodeling, Optical coherence tomography

中图分类号:

R777

陶冶,周跃华,李福生,王燊,尹鸿芝,祁思,杨海红,单天凤,王芳. FS-LASIK与SMILE术后角膜上皮重塑的比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(2): 61-66.

TAO Ye, ZHOU Yuehua, LI Fusheng, WANG Shen, YIN Hongzhi, QI Si, YANG Haihong, SHAN Tianfeng,. Comparison of corneal epithelial remodeling after FS-LASIK and SMILE treatment for myopia and astigmatism[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(2): 61-66.

参考文献

[1] Fisher RF. Textbook and atlas of slit lamp microscopy of the living eye[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 1980, 64(5): 381. doi:10.1136/bjo.64.5.381-a.
[2] Patel SV, McLaren JW, Kittleson KM, et al. Subbasal nerve density and corneal sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis: femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratome[J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 2010, 128(11): 1413-1419. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.253.
[3] Ishii R, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, et al. Influence of femtosecond lenticule extraction and small incision lenticule extraction on corneal nerve density and ocular surface: a 1-year prospective, confocal, microscopic study[J]. J Refract Surg, 2015, 31(1): 10-15. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20141218-01.
[4] Li MY, Niu LL, Qin B, et al. Confocal comparison of corneal reinnervation after small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE)and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis(FS-LASIK)[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(12): e81435. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081435.
[5] 王力翔. SMILE、Fs-LASIK及T-PRK后患者主观视觉质量与共聚焦显微镜、波前像差仪结果的相关性研究[D]. 北京:北京协和医学院,2018.
[6] Liu ML, Zhang T, Zhou YG, et al. Corneal regeneration after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction: a prospective study[J]. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Fur Klinische Und Exp Ophthalmol, 2015, 253(7): 1035-1042. doi:10.1007/s00417-015-2971-9.
[7] Li MY, Zhao J, Shen Y, et al. Comparison of dry eye and corneal sensitivity between small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond LASIK for myopia[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(10): e77797. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077797.
[8] Xu YS, Yang YB. Dry eye after small incision lenticule extraction and LASIK for myopia[J]. J Refract Surg, 2014, 30(3): 186-190. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20140219-02.
[9] Denoyer A, Landman E, Trinh L, et al. Dry eye disease after refractive surgery: comparative outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction versus LASIK[J]. Ophthalmology, 2015, 122(4): 669-676. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.10.004.
[10] Li Y, Tan O, Brass R, et al. Corneal epithelial thickness mapping by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography in normal and keratoconic eyes[J]. Ophthalmology, 2012, 119(12): 2425-2433. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.023.
[11] Maltsev DS, Kudryashova EV, Kulikov AN, et al. Relationship between central epithelial thickness and central corneal thickness in healthy eyes and eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. Cornea, 2018, 37(8): 1053-1057. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001568.
[12] Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Change in epithelial thickness profile 24 hours and longitudinally for 1 year after myopic LASIK: three-dimensional display with Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound[J]. J Refract Surg, 2012, 28(3): 195-201. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20120127-02.
[13] Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, et al. Epithelial thickness in the normal cornea: three-dimensional display with Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound[J]. J Refract Surg, 2008, 24(6): 571-581. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20080601-05.
[14] Tang ML, Li Y, Huang D. Corneal epithelial remodeling after LASIK measured by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography[J]. J Ophthalmol, 2015, 2015: 860313. doi:10.1155/2015/860313.
[15] Rocha KM, Krueger RR. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography epithelial and flap thickness mapping in femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2014, 158(2): 293-301.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2014.04.012.
[16] 郑林, 林青鸿, 沈政伟. 飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术后角膜上皮厚度的变化[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2019, 19(9): 1479-1482. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2019.9.07. ZHENG Lin, LIN Qinghong, SHEN Zhengwei. Study on corneal epithelial thickness changes after small incision lenticule extraction[J]. International Eye Science, 2019, 19(9): 1479-1482. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2019.9.07.
[17] Lee BH, McLaren JW, Erie JC, et al. Reinnervation in the cornea after LASIK[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2002, 43(12): 3660-3664.
[18] Li MY, Zhou ZM, Shen Y, et al. Comparison of corneal sensation between small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE)and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia[J]. J Refract Surg, 2014, 30(2): 94-100. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20140120-04.
[19] Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. In vivo three-dimensional corneal epithelium imaging in normal eyes by anterior-segment optical coherence tomography: a clinical reference study[J]. Cornea, 2013, 32(11): 1493-1498. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182a15cee.
[20] Hou J, Wang Y, Lei YL, et al. Corneal epithelial remodeling and its effect on corneal asphericity after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy for myopia[J]. J Ophthalmol, 2016, 2016: 8582362. doi:10.1155/2016/8582362.
[21] 刘淑娟, 侯杰, 张乐乐, 等. SMILE手术矫治中高度近视术后角膜上皮重塑及其与屈光度的关系[J]. 眼科新进展, 2017, 37(11): 1060-1063. doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0268. LIU Shujuan, HOU Jie, ZHANG Lele, et al. Corneal epithelial remodeling and its relationship with diopter after SMILE for moderate and high myopia[J]. Recent Advances in Ophthalmology, 2017, 37(11): 1060-1063. doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0268.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed