山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 67-71.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2020.071

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

气导声刺激前庭诱发肌源性电位在正常儿童中的表现

黄玉宇,孙夏雨,陈建勇,沈佳丽,王璐,贺宽,李姝娜,杨军   

  1. 黄玉宇, 孙夏雨, 陈建勇, 沈佳丽, 王璐, 贺宽, 李姝娜, 杨军上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院 耳鼻咽喉头颈外科/上海交通大学医学院耳科学研究所/上海市耳鼻疾病转化医学重点实验室, 上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-23 发布日期:2020-11-17
  • 作者简介:黄玉宇、孙夏雨,共同第一作者
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(8187040430);上海交通大学医工交叉重点项目(ZH2018ZDA11);上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院院级临床研究培育基金项目(17CSK03,18JXO04)

Characteristics of air-conducted vestibular-evoked myogenic potential in normal children

  • Received:2020-07-23 Published:2020-11-17

摘要: 目的 探讨研究正常儿童中气导声刺激诱发的眼性前庭诱发肌源性电位(oVEMP)和颈性前庭肌源性诱发电位(cVEMP)的各项参数指标,并对正常值进行统计学处理分析。 方法 选择4~10岁听力正常健康儿童52例,以500 Hz短纯音作为刺激音,分别行 oVEMP和cVEMP检测,记录左、右耳引出率及波形参数,并采用SPSS统计软件进行统计学处理分析。 结果 双耳皆未引出oVEMP 2例,单耳可引出oVEMP4例,oVEMP总体引出率为92%。双耳皆未引出cVEMP 2例,cVEMP总体引出率为96%。oVEMP与cVEMP的P1潜伏期分别为(17.07±0.89)ms、(15.55±1.58)ms;N1潜伏期分别为(12.39±0.91)ms、(23.10±2.29)ms;N1P1间期分别为(4.68±0.88)ms、(7.83±1.56)ms;oVEMP与cVEMP的振幅分别为(7.24±4.79)μV、(197.40±118.37)μV。双耳间oVEMP及cVEMP振幅不对称比分别为(19.03±12.50)%、(22.16±18.64)%。患儿左右耳的潜伏期,P1N1间期及振幅差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 绝大部分正常儿童经气导声刺激可引出oVEMP与cVEMP。该检测患儿依从性高,可用来评估儿童前庭功能。此研究结果可为我国的儿童气导VEMP提供正常参考值范围。

关键词: 眼性前庭诱发肌源性电位, 颈性前庭肌源性诱发电位, 气导声刺激, 前庭功能, 正常儿童

Abstract: Objective To study the characteristics of air-conducted ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential(AC-oVEMP)and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential(AC-cVEMP)in normal Chinese children. Methods Fifty-two 4-10-year-old children with normal hearing(male 30, female11, 104 female)were recruited. Using 500-Hz air-conducted pure tone burst as a stimulus, oVEMP and cVEMP were assessed. The response rates and waveform parameters of the left and right ears were recorded and analyzed statistically using SPSS software. Results The respective findings for oVEMP and cVEMP were as follows: response rates: 92% and 96%; P1 latencies:(17.07±0.89)ms and(15.55±1.58)ms; N1 latencies:(12.39±0.91)ms and(23.10±2.29)ms; N1P1 latencies:(4.68±0.88)ms and(7.83±1.56)ms; amplitudes:(7.24±4.79)μV and(197.40±118.37)μV; interaural asymmetry ratios(AR,%):(19.03±12.50)% and(22.16±18.64)%. There were no significant differences between the latencies, N1P1 latencies, or amplitudes of the left and right ears(P>0.05). Conclusion oVEMP and cVEMP can be elicited by the stimuli of air-conducted pure tone bursts in the majority of normal children. They can be used to evaluate vestibular function, as they are feasible and compliance in children is high. The results provide the normal reference range of VEMP for children in China.

Key words: Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential, Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential, Air-conducted pure tone burst, Vestibular function, Normal children

中图分类号: 

  • R764.43
[1] Akin FW, Murnane OD, Proffitt TM. The effects of click and tone-burst stimulus parameters on the vestibular evoked myogenic potential(VEMP)[J]. J Am Acad Audiol, 2003, 14(9):500-509. doi:10.3766/jaaa.14.9.5.
[2] Papathanasiou ES, Murofushi T, Akin FW, et al. International guidelines for the clinical application of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: an expert consensus report[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2014, 125(4):658-666. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2013.11.042.
[3] Janky KL, Shepard N. Vestibular evoked myogenic potential(VEMP)testing: normative threshold response curves and effects of age[J]. J Am Acad Audiol, 2009, 20(8):514-522. doi:10.3766/jaaa.20.8.6.
[4] Kelsch TA, Schaefer LA, Esquivel CR. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in young children: test parameters and normative data[J]. Laryngoscope, 2006, 116(6):895-900. doi:10.1097/01.mlg.0000214664.97049.3e.
[5] Curthoys IS. A critical review of the neurophysiological evidence underlying clinical vestibular testing using sound, vibration and galvanic stimuli[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2010, 121(2):132-144. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.09.027.
[6] Wang SJ, Hsieh WS, Young YH. Development of ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in small children[J]. Laryngoscope, 2013, 123(2):512-517. doi:10.1002/lary.23535.
[7] Inoue A, Iwasaki S, Ushio M, et al. Effect of vestibular dysfunction on the development of gross motor function in children with profound hearing loss[J]. Audiol Neurotol, 2013, 18(3):143-151. doi:10.1159/000346344.
[8] Tribukait A, Brantberg K, Bergenius J. Function of semicircular canals, utricles and saccules in deaf children[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2004, 124(1):41-48. doi:10.1080/00016480310002113.
[9] Hsu YS, Wang SJ, Young YH. Ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in children using air conducted sound stimulation[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2009, 120(7):1381-1385. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.04.009.
[10] 胡琛, 孔维佳, 钟刚, 等. 前庭诱发肌源性电位的正常人群观察[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志, 2005, 19(22):1012-1014. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1781.2005.22.002. HU Chen, KONG Weijia, ZHONG Gang, et al. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in normal young people[J]. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology, 2005, 19(22):1012-1014. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1781.2005.22.002.
[11] 张青, 宋辉, 胡娟, 等. 气导短纯音诱发的眼肌前庭诱发肌源性电位在健康青年人群中的波形特征[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2012, 47(1):15-18. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2012.01.005. ZHANG Qing, SONG Hui, HU Juan, et al. Characteristics of the air-conducted ocular evoked myogenic potential in the young normal Chinese subjects[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2012, 47(1):15-18. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2012.01.005.
[12] Park HJ, Lee IS, Shin JE, et al. Frequency-tuning characteristics of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials induced by air-conducted tone bursts[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2010, 121(1):85-89. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.10.003.
[13] Rodriguez AI, Thomas MLA, Fitzpatrick D, et al. Effects of high sound exposure during air-conducted vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing in children and young adults[J]. Ear Hear, 2018, 39(2):269-277. doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000484.
[14] 张青, 许信达, 牛晓蓉, 等. 年龄因素对气导声刺激诱发的眼肌和颈肌前庭诱发肌源性电位的影响[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2014, 49(11):897-901. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2014.11.005. ZHANG Qing, XU Xinda, NIU Xiaorong, et al. Effects of aging on air-conducted sound elicited ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2014, 49(11):897-901. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2014.11.005.
[15] Piker EG, Jacobson GP, Burkard RF, et al. Effects of age on the tuning of the cVEMP and oVEMP[J]. Ear Hear, 2013, 34(6):e65-e73. doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e31828fc9f2.
[16] Strömberg AK, Olofsson Å, Westin M, et al. Changes in cochlear function related to acoustic stimulation of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential stimulation[J]. Hear Res, 2016, 340:43-49. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2015.12.022.
[17] Rodriguez AI, Thomas MLA, Janky KL. Air-conducted vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing in children, adolescents, and young adults: thresholds, frequency tuning, and effects of sound exposure[J]. Ear Hear, 2019, 40(1):192-203. doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000607.
[1] 杨军,郑贵亮. 外周前庭疾病的诊断和治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 1-6.
[2] 刘宇鹏,梁敏,何景春,郑贵亮,李姝娜,张青,杨军. 梅尼埃病前庭功能分级的探讨[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 14-19.
[3] 梁敏,吴悔,陈建勇,张勤,李姝娜,郑贵亮,何景春,陈向平,杨军. 前庭诱发肌源性电位预测突聋患者疗效的临床价值[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 27-32.
[4] 吴悔,梁敏,陈建勇,张勤,李姝娜,郑贵亮,何景春,陈向平,杨军. 全聋型突发性耳聋患者的预后与前庭症状及前庭功能关系的回顾性分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 33-38.
[5] 胡娟,陈耔辰,陈飞云,张玉忠,魏馨雨,赵欢娣,史文迪,杨军,张青. 非综合征型听神经病患者前庭上下成分功能障碍定位研究与频率特征[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 39-45.
[6] 沈佳丽, 孙夏雨, 陈向平, 杨军, 陈建勇, 汪玮, 张勤, 王璐, 马孝宝, 贺宽, 沈敏. 听力正常儿童骨导前庭诱发肌源性电位正常值的建立[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 72-77.
[7] 孙夏雨,陈建勇 段茂利,杨军. 新生儿婴幼儿前庭功能发育和评估的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 82-88.
[8] 杨怡和. 前庭诱发肌源性电位检查的点评[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 113-117.
[9] 刘冰,李蓓,张莉,陈敏,张杰. 学龄前和学龄期BPV患儿临床特征比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 58-60.
[10] 刘叶,孙殿水,殷进军,夏明,徐英,孙建华. 鼻咽癌调强放疗后前庭功能损伤的机制研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(6): 14-17.
[11] 尹雪玲. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者前庭功能的状态表现[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(3): 9-12.
[12] 菅慧蓉,于刚,陈刚,林乃芬,王海波. 绝经后梅尼埃病女性雌激素水平与听-前庭功能关系的研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2012, 26(2): 39-41.
[13] 李亮1,林鹏2,陈太生2. 眼震图优势偏向参数研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2009, 23(5): 66-70.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 林彬,王挥戈 . 功能性内镜鼻窦手术后鼻黏膜纤毛转归的研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(6): 481 -487 .
[2] 公 蕾,孙 洁,薛子超,李敬华,薛卫国 . 鼻腔鼻窦恶性肿瘤细胞周期的DNA分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 193 -195 .
[3] 陈文文 . 1例T/NK淋巴瘤17年演进[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(5): 472 -472 .
[4] 栾建刚,梁传余,文艳君,李炯 . 抑制表皮生长因子受体基因表达的pSIREN-ShuttleRNAi表达载体的构建[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 4 -8 .
[5] 马敬, 钟翠萍 . 手术治疗侵犯翼腭窝的鼻咽纤维血管瘤的方法(附5例报告)[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 30 -32 .
[6] 刘强和,罗香林,耿宛平,陈 晨,雷 迅,刘芳贤,邓 明 . 快速老化小鼠的听功能和耳蜗螺旋神经元的增龄性变化[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 215 -217 .
[7] 郑鹏凌,陈卫国,易笃友,黄清秀,卢 俊 . 耳内镜下吸引清除耳道耵聍55例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 223 -226 .
[8] 马 敬,钟翠萍,严 星,安 飞 . 耳屏软骨修补无残余软骨的鼻中隔穿孔15例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 246 -247 .
[9] 崔哲洙,严永峰,崔春莲,金顺吉 . 嗜酸性粒细胞在变应性鼻炎合并慢性鼻窦炎的分布特点[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 250 -252 .
[10] 赵鲁新,翟 洪,潘 洁 . 超声乳化吸除联合晶状体植入治疗急性闭角型青光眼伴白内障23例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 260 -262 .