Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 142-146.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2020.521

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research progress and clinical application of Catquest-9SF

HAI Yue1,2,LIAO Xuan1,2   

  1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan, China;
    2. Department of Ophthalmology & Optometry, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan, China
  • Published:2021-12-10

Abstract: With the development of surgical technology, materials, and equipment, cataract surgery has become refractive, and its treatment goals have evolved from early simple rehabilitation to functional vision and precision medicine. Although subjective and objective visual qualities of some patients with cataract recover well, they are dissatisfied with postoperative results. As a tool to evaluate effects of cataract surgery, visual function-related quality of life research can provide information other than the aforementioned indicators and has been receiving increasing clinical attention. Catquest-9SF, which is a scale to evaluate the quality of life related to cataract visual function, has been widely used worldwide after translation, back translation, and cross-cultural debugging. In this article, we will review its evolution and application in clinical and scientific research in recent years.

Key words: Cataract, Visual performance, Catquest-9SF, Scale, Clinical application

CLC Number: 

  • R776.1
[1] 文佰伟, 兰长骏, 廖萱. 视觉质量评价方法的研究进展[J]. 眼科新进展, 2017, 37(8): 793-796. doi: 10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0201. WEN Baiwei, LAN Changjun, LIAO Xuan. Research progress on visual quality assessment methods[J]. Rec Adv Ophthalmol, 2017, 37(8): 793-796. doi: 10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0201.
[2] Dean S, Mathers JM, Calvert M, et al. “The patient is speaking”: discovering the patient voice in ophthalmology[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2017, 101(6): 700-708. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309955.
[3] Nichols KK, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. Performance and repeatability of the NEI-VFQ-25 in patients with dry eye[J]. Cornea, 2002, 21(6): 578-583. doi:10.1097/00003226-200208000-00009.
[4] Lundström M, Roos P, Jensen S, et al. Catquest questionnaire for use in cataract surgery care: description, validity, and reliability[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1997, 23(8): 1226-1236. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(97)80321-5.
[5] Lundström M, Pesudovs K. Catquest-9SF patient outcomes questionnaire: nine-item short-form Rasch-scaled revision of the Catquest questionnaire[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2009, 35(3): 504-513. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.11.038.
[6] Lundstrom M, Behndig A, Kugelberg M, et al. The outcome of cataract surgery measured with the Catquest-9SF[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2011, 89(8): 718-723. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01801.x.
[7] Behndig A, Montan P, Stenevi U, et al. One million cataract surgeries: Swedish National Cataract Register 1992-2009[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2011, 37(8): 1539-1545. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.021.
[8] Kabanovski A, Hatch W, Chaudhary V, et al. Validation and application of Catquest-9SF in various populations: a systematic review[J]. Surv Ophthalmol, 2020, 65(3): 348-360. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.12.002.
[9] Skiadaresi E, Ravalico G, Polizzi S, et al. The Italian Catquest-9SF cataract questionnaire: translation, validation and application[J]. Eye Vis(Lond), 2016, 3: 12. doi:10.1186/s40662-016-0043-9.
[10] Grimfors M, Lundström M, Hammar U, et al. Patient-reported visual function outcome in cataract surgery: test-retest reliability of the Catquest-9SF questionnaire[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2020, 98(8): 828-832. doi:10.1111/aos.14461.
[11] Visser MS, Dieleman M, Klijn S, et al. Validation, test-retest reliability and norm scores for the Dutch Catquest-9SF[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2017, 95(3): 312-319. doi:10.1111/aos.13287.
[12] Nielsen E, Lundström M, Pesudovs K, et al. Validation of Catquest-9SF in Danish: developing a revised form of the Catquest-9SF-the Danish Catquest-7SF[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2019, 97(2): 173-177. doi:10.1111/aos.13921.
[13] Khadka J, Huang JH, Chen HS, et al. Assessment of cataract surgery outcome using the modified catquest short-form instrument in China[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(10): e0164182. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164182.
[14] Adnan TH, Mohamed Apandi M, Kamaruddin H, et al. Catquest-9SF questionnaire: validation of Malay and Chinese-language versions using Rasch analysis[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2018, 16(1): 5. doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0833-3.
[15] To QG, Huynh VAN, Do DV, et al. Psychometric properties of the Vietnamese catquest-9 short form questionnaire[J]. Optom Vis Sci, 2020, 97(3): 192-197. doi:10.1097/opx.0000000000001493.
[16] Gothwal VK, Wright TA, Lamoureux EL, et al. Catquest questionnaire: re-validation in an Australian cataract population[J]. Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2009, 37(8): 785-794. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02133.x.
[17] Sparrow JM, Grzeda MT, Frost NA, et al. Cataract surgery patient-reported outcome measures: a head-to-head comparison of the psychometric performance and patient acceptability of the Cat-PROM5 and Catquest-9SF self-report questionnaires[J]. Eye(Lond), 2018, 32(4): 788-795. doi:10.1038/eye.2017.297.
[18] Schlenker MB, Minotti SC, Kabanovski A, et al. Catquest-9SF questionnaire and eCAPS: Validation in a Canadian population[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(9): e0237788. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237788.
[19] Lin X, Li M, Wang M, et al. Validation of Catquest-9SF questionnaire in a Chinese cataract population[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(8): e103860. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103860.
[20] 黄锦海, 陈海丝, 高蓉蓉, 等. 国人白内障视功能相关生存质量简表的研制及其测量特性评价[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2015, 17(7): 402-406. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2015.07.005. HUANG Jinhai, CHEN Haisi, GAO Rongrong, et al. Development and assessment of a revised Chinese version of the catquest 9SF questionnaire for a Chinese cataract population[J]. Chin J Optom Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2015, 17(7): 402-406. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2015.07.005.
[21] Xu Z, Wu S, Li W, et al. The Chinese Catquest-9SF: validation and application in community screenings[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2018, 18(1): 77. doi:10.1186/s12886-018-0743-0.
[22] Stolk-Vos AC, Visser MS, Klijn S, et al. Effects of clinical parameters on patient-reported outcome in cataract patients: a multicentre study[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2018, 96(6): 586-591. doi:10.1111/aos.13747.
[23] Samadi B, Lundström M, Kugelberg M. Improving patient-assessed outcomes after cataract surgery[J]. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2017, 27(4): 454-459. doi:10.5301/ejo.5000927.
[24] Grimfors M, Lundström M, Höijer J, et al. Intraoperative difficulties, complications and self-assessed visual function in cataract surgery[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2018, 96(6): 592-599. doi:10.1111/aos.13757.
[25] Mollazadegan K, Lundström M. A study of the correlation between patient-reported outcomes and clinical outcomes after cataract surgery in ophthalmic clinics[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2015, 93(3): 293-298. doi:10.1111/aos.12490.
[26] Harrer A, Gerstmeyer K, Hirnschall N, et al. Impact of bilateral cataract surgery on vision-related activity limitations[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2013, 39(5): 680-685. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.11.028.
[27] Rönbeck M, Lundström M, Kugelberg M. Study of possible predictors associated with self-assessed visual function after cataract surgery[J]. Ophthalmology, 2011, 118(9): 1732-1738. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.04.013.
[28] Hammond MD, Potvin R. Visual outcomes, visual quality and patient satisfaction: comparing a blended bifocal approach to bilateral extended depth of focus intraocular lens implantation[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2019, 13: 2325-2332. doi:10.2147/opth.s232800.
[29] Rementería-Capelo LA, Contreras I, García-Pérez JL, et al. Visual quality and patient satisfaction with a trifocal intraocular lens and its new toric version[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2019, 45(11): 1584-1590. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.06.014.
[30] Claesson M, Armitage WJ, Byström B, et al. Validation of catquest-9SF-A visual disability instrument to evaluate patient function after corneal transplantation[J]. Cornea, 2017, 36(9): 1083-1088. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001255.
[31] Bohman E, Wyon M, Lundström M, et al. A comparison between patients with Epiphora and cataract of the activity limitations they experience in daily life due to their visual disability[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2018, 96(1): 77-80. doi:10.1111/aos.13447.
[1] LI Dingbo, TANG Zhiyuan, DENG Zhiyi, ZENG Xianhai, ZHANG Qiuhang, WANG Zaixing. Curative effect analysis of low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation in 27 cases of drug-related rhinitis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(5): 11-17.
[2] HU Zunxia, SIMA Jing, QIN Bo, CAO Jiaguo, PAN Wei. Comparative study on the use of contact lens in Nd: YAG laser posterior capsulotomy [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(5): 41-45.
[3] YANG Ru, ZHANG Yuguang, XU Xianghui, WU Xuelian, TAO Yuan, TAN Yue. A clinical study on the effect of phacoemulsification on the retinal structure in the macular region of senile cataract [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(4): 97-102.
[4] CHEN Shiqin, WEI Pingcun, HU Yunlong, HU Jinwang. Effects of three different nasal uses of glucocorticoid on mucosal outcome after endoscopic sinus surgery [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(3): 195-201.
[5] ZHOU Lamei, JIANG Wen, LIU Wen, QIAO Yuehua. Analysis of factors related to the severity of persistent idiopathic tinnitus [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(6): 70-76.
[6] CHEN Jinhui, HUANG Ting, DONG Jie, XU Yong, HAN Jibo, LUO Zhihong, TAO Zezhang. Analysis of the characteristics of excessive daytime sleepiness in adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(4): 22-29.
[7] WANG Shushu, FU Yahui, YU Ruoyu, HOU Yi, YANG Jiguo. The law of medication for the treatment of endogenous eye disease in chinese medical code based on data mining [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(4): 81-87.
[8] XIAO Yu, ZHANG Youyin, DENG Yingping. Comparison of pain between two eye operations in patients undergoing implantable collamer lens implantation [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(4): 88-95.
[9] ZHANG Kaiting, LIU Jie, XU Zhenju, ZHANG Xiaoxue, CAO Songli, HAN Min. Evaluation of voice and mental state in patients with functional dysphonia [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(3): 37-41.
[10] XING Dongsheng, DI Quanhong, YIN Youliang, XIU Shiguo, ZHANG Minglong. Application of the Chinese version of the vocal fatigue index scale to self-assessment of vocal fatigue of professional voice users [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(3): 59-64.
[11] SUN Xiaohan, LI Na, CHEN Kaixuan, CHEN Min, YAN Shu, CHE Fei. Application of the ROE scale to the evaluation of the quality of life of patients with external nose deformity and nasal septum deviation before and after surgery [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(3): 87-91.
[12] FU Yihao, XU YixuanOverview,YAN Hong, ZHANG JieGuidance. Recent research advances in the role of glutaredoxin in oculopathy [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(3): 125-130.
[13] ZHANG Yitong, LIU HaiqinOverview,REN XiaoyongGuidance. Cognitive and behavioral dysfunction related to obstructive sleep apnea in children: current status, problems, and prospects [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(2): 119-124.
[14] WEI PeipeiOverview,LI CanGuidance. Visual quality and complications after implantation of multifocal intraocular lens [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(2): 141-146.
[15] LI Jiawei, LIU Xiaoyang, YANG Xingyu, SUN Xiaoming, LI Xidan. Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on chronic vestibular syndrome [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(1): 7-10.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2006, 20(1): 84 -87 .
[2] NIU Shanli,CHAI Maowen,LI Zhenxiu . Endoscopic rhinoplasty of inferior turbinate in 60 patients with chronic hypertrophic rhinitis[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2006, 20(1): 16 -18 .
[3] MENG Qing-guo,LU Yong-tian,FAN Xian-liang .

Association of killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor gene polymorphisms with nasopharyngeal carcinoma

[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(3): 196 -199 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(3): 199 -199 .
[5] WAN Li-jia,LU Hai-tao,JIANG Yi-dao,LIU Hui,LI Qin,SHE La-zhi . Effect of H-uvulopalatopharyngoplasty on obstructive sleep apnea
hypopnea syndrome
[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(3): 204 -205 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(3): 222 -224 .
[7] JI Xiao-bin,DENG Jia-de,ZANG Lin-quan,WANG Lei,XIE Jun . Blood histamine in guinea pigs with allergic rhinitis[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(3): 228 -230 .
[8] XIANG Deng,LU Yong-tian,SUN Huan-ji . Endoscopic repair for cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea in 19 cases and a literature review [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(3): 234 -236 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(3): 253 -257 .
[10]
YIN Guo-hua,ZHONG Xiao . Long-term effect of laser reduction on lingua adenoids
[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(3): 280 -282 .