山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 84-85.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2015.057

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

客观视觉质量分析系统测量人工晶体伪调节力的临床研究

王晶1,2, 武芹2, 吴昊3, 刘春雷2, 毕宏生4   

  1. 1. 山东中医药大学2012级硕士研究生, 山东 济南 250355;
    2. 济南市第二人民医院眼科, 山东 济南 250001;
    3. 济南市第五人民医院眼科, 山东 济南 250022;
    4. 山东中医药大学附属眼科医院, 山东 济南 250002
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-28 修回日期:2015-04-17 发布日期:2015-06-16
  • 作者简介:王晶。E-mail:eye8088@163.com

Comparison of pseudoaccommodation measured by optical quality analysis system

WANG Jing1,2, WU Qin2, WU Hao3, LIU Chunlei2, BI Hongsheng4   

  1. 1. Graduate Student of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, Shandong, China;
    2. Departement of Ophthalmology, Jinan Second People's Hospital, Jinan 250001, Shandong, China;
    3. Department of Ophthalmology, The 5th People's Hospital Of Jinan, Jinan 250022, Shandong, China;
    4. Ophthalmology Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250002, Shandong, China
  • Received:2015-01-28 Revised:2015-04-17 Published:2015-06-16
  • Contact: 毕宏生。E-mail:hongshengbi@126.com E-mail:hongshengbi@126.com

PDF (PC)

734

被引次数

4

摘要： 目的 运用双通道视觉质量分析系统(OQAS)测量白内障患者人工晶体植入术后的伪调节力, 并与传统的主观检测手段进行对比, 比较三种方法的差异性和一致性。方法 于济南第二人民医院眼科门诊随机选择30例(30眼)年龄相关性白内障患者, 手术植入同类型两袢单焦点非球面人工晶体, 术后1个月用OQAS检查、离焦法、推进法测量每位白内障患者人工晶体植入术后的伪调节力。结果 OQAS检查、离焦法、推进法测得的人工晶体伪调节力平均值分别为2.34D、2.5D和2.93D;OQAS检查与离焦法差异无统计学意义, OQAS检查与推进法的测量值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 OQAS检查测量的伪调节力相对较小, 其测量结果与离焦法所测结果数值相近。

关键词: 视觉质量分析系统, 离焦法, 推进法, 人工晶状体, 伪调节力

Abstract: Objective To study pseudoaccommodation of different intraocular lenses with a double-pass system, and the results were compared with those by the defocus method and push-up method. Methods A total of 30 outpatients with age-related cataract were selected in this study. All the enrolled eyes were implanted with the same aspheric intraocular lens. The pseudoaccommodation of each selected eye was measured by optical quality analysis system(OQAS), defocus system and push-up method one month after the operation. Results The average pseudoaccommodation by OQAS examination, defocus method and push-up method was 2.34D, 2.5D and 2.93D, respectively. There's no statistical difference between OQAS examination and defocus method(P>0.05). But there's statistical difference between OQAS examination and push-up method(P<0.05). Conclusion The pseudoaccommodation measured by OQAS was relatively small. The results measured by OQAS was in close agreement with that measured by defocus method.

Key words: Pseudoaccommodation, Optical quality analysis system, Push-up method, Intraocular lens, Defocus method

中图分类号: 

  • R779.66
[1] Naka Zawa M, Ohtsuki K. Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 1983, 96(5):435.
[2] 杨亚波, 姚克, 姜节凯, 等.单焦点后房型人工晶状体眼的调节[J].中华眼科杂志, 1996, 32(1):98-100.YANG Yabo, YAO Ke, JIANG Jiekai, et al. Accommodation in pseudophakic eyes with monofocal posterior chamber intraocular lens[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol, 1996, 32(1):98-100.
[3] 吴宪巍, 何伟.人工晶状体眼伪调节研究进展[J].国际眼科杂志, 2008, 8(7):1423-1425.WU Xianwei, HE Wei. Advanced research on pseudophakic accommodation ofeyes with artificial lens[J]. Inter J Ophthalmol, 2008, 8(7):1423-1425.
[4] Saad A, Saad M, Gatinel D. Repeatability of measurements with a double-pass system[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2010, 36(1):28-33.
[5] Díaz-Doutón F, Benito A, Pujol J, et al. Comparision of the retinal image quality with a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor and double-pass instrument[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006, 47(4):1710-1716.
[6] Artal P. Understanding aberrations by using double-pass techniques[J]. J Refract Surg, 2000, 16(5):S560-562.
[7] 年婉青, 周艳峰, 何亚芬. 人工晶状体眼调节力的研究进展[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2012, 12(1):1672-1674. NIAN Wanqing, ZHOU Yanfeng, HE Yafen. Progress in the study of pseudophakic accommodation[J].Inter Eye Sci, 2012, 12(1):1672-1674.
[1] 王新萌,姬俊雅,于浩南,付鸿臣,王翔,郑泽坤,李艳,钟莹莹. 急性闭角型青光眼超声乳化联合房角分离术后屈光预测准确性分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(2): 74-79.
[2] 潘若琳,廖萱,兰长骏,谭青青,谢丽暄,黄欢,秦苏云,王艳. 偏心和倾斜对不同屈光度的单焦点人工晶状体光学性能影响的实验研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(1): 38-46.
[3] 郝文娜,孟微,邵震,刘冬梅. 陡峭轴透明角膜切口植入Toric人工晶状体的长期旋转稳定性和视觉质量观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(6): 108-112.
[4] 王道光,马元孝,王玉成,任梦佳,蔡可丽. AT LISA 809M双焦点及Proming A1-UV单焦点人工晶状体植入术后视功能的对照研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(1): 39-45.
[5] 段练,孟凡兰,党光福. 干眼对屈光性白内障手术的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 1-6.
[6] 孙极综述李灿审校. 白内障术后人工晶状体轴向位置预测与稳定性相关影响因素[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 7-12.
[7] 黄子彦综述 段国平审校. 高阶像差对白内障人工晶状体植入术后视觉质量的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 13-18.
[8] 黄子彦综述段国平审校. 不同类型人工晶状体植入术后倾斜和偏心影响视觉质量的研究现状[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 26-31.
[9] 孙璐,张顺华,吴昱舟,陈露璐,曹迪,干霖洋. 关于Alpha角0.5~0.8 mm的患者植入区域折射型人工晶状体的短期临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 32-37.
[10] 任晴,张枫. 眼皮肤白化病合并双眼白内障1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 66-69.
[11] 李璟,张辉,王晶. 不同人工晶状体植入对视觉质量影响的临床研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(2): 90-95.
[12] 厉斌,方学军,吴德,黄敏. 基于NK公式和KS公式预测ICL术后早期拱高的一致性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(6): 33-41.
[13] 林佳, 廖萱, 兰长骏, 谭青青, 文佰伟, 田靖. 球面与非球面人工晶状体植入术后视觉质量的对比研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 109-114.
[14] 陈莹,李元彬. 先天性白内障治疗新进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(2): 143-148.
[15] 田靖,廖萱,兰长骏,谭青青,林佳,文佰伟. 不同球差非球面人工晶状体眼高阶像差比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 13-17.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
网站版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》编辑部　
地址：山东省济南市山大南路27号（250100）电话：+86-0531-88366912 E-mail: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发