Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 142-146.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2020.521

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research progress and clinical application of Catquest-9SF

HAI Yue1,2,LIAO Xuan1,2   

  1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan, China;
    2. Department of Ophthalmology & Optometry, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan, China
  • Published:2021-12-10

PDF (PC)

592

Abstract: With the development of surgical technology, materials, and equipment, cataract surgery has become refractive, and its treatment goals have evolved from early simple rehabilitation to functional vision and precision medicine. Although subjective and objective visual qualities of some patients with cataract recover well, they are dissatisfied with postoperative results. As a tool to evaluate effects of cataract surgery, visual function-related quality of life research can provide information other than the aforementioned indicators and has been receiving increasing clinical attention. Catquest-9SF, which is a scale to evaluate the quality of life related to cataract visual function, has been widely used worldwide after translation, back translation, and cross-cultural debugging. In this article, we will review its evolution and application in clinical and scientific research in recent years.

Key words: Cataract, Visual performance, Catquest-9SF, Scale, Clinical application

CLC Number: 

  • R776.1
[1] 文佰伟, 兰长骏, 廖萱. 视觉质量评价方法的研究进展[J]. 眼科新进展, 2017, 37(8): 793-796. doi: 10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0201. WEN Baiwei, LAN Changjun, LIAO Xuan. Research progress on visual quality assessment methods[J]. Rec Adv Ophthalmol, 2017, 37(8): 793-796. doi: 10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0201.
[2] Dean S, Mathers JM, Calvert M, et al. “The patient is speaking”: discovering the patient voice in ophthalmology[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2017, 101(6): 700-708. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309955.
[3] Nichols KK, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. Performance and repeatability of the NEI-VFQ-25 in patients with dry eye[J]. Cornea, 2002, 21(6): 578-583. doi:10.1097/00003226-200208000-00009.
[4] Lundström M, Roos P, Jensen S, et al. Catquest questionnaire for use in cataract surgery care: description, validity, and reliability[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1997, 23(8): 1226-1236. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(97)80321-5.
[5] Lundström M, Pesudovs K. Catquest-9SF patient outcomes questionnaire: nine-item short-form Rasch-scaled revision of the Catquest questionnaire[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2009, 35(3): 504-513. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.11.038.
[6] Lundstrom M, Behndig A, Kugelberg M, et al. The outcome of cataract surgery measured with the Catquest-9SF[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2011, 89(8): 718-723. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01801.x.
[7] Behndig A, Montan P, Stenevi U, et al. One million cataract surgeries: Swedish National Cataract Register 1992-2009[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2011, 37(8): 1539-1545. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.021.
[8] Kabanovski A, Hatch W, Chaudhary V, et al. Validation and application of Catquest-9SF in various populations: a systematic review[J]. Surv Ophthalmol, 2020, 65(3): 348-360. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.12.002.
[9] Skiadaresi E, Ravalico G, Polizzi S, et al. The Italian Catquest-9SF cataract questionnaire: translation, validation and application[J]. Eye Vis(Lond), 2016, 3: 12. doi:10.1186/s40662-016-0043-9.
[10] Grimfors M, Lundström M, Hammar U, et al. Patient-reported visual function outcome in cataract surgery: test-retest reliability of the Catquest-9SF questionnaire[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2020, 98(8): 828-832. doi:10.1111/aos.14461.
[11] Visser MS, Dieleman M, Klijn S, et al. Validation, test-retest reliability and norm scores for the Dutch Catquest-9SF[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2017, 95(3): 312-319. doi:10.1111/aos.13287.
[12] Nielsen E, Lundström M, Pesudovs K, et al. Validation of Catquest-9SF in Danish: developing a revised form of the Catquest-9SF-the Danish Catquest-7SF[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2019, 97(2): 173-177. doi:10.1111/aos.13921.
[13] Khadka J, Huang JH, Chen HS, et al. Assessment of cataract surgery outcome using the modified catquest short-form instrument in China[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(10): e0164182. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164182.
[14] Adnan TH, Mohamed Apandi M, Kamaruddin H, et al. Catquest-9SF questionnaire: validation of Malay and Chinese-language versions using Rasch analysis[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2018, 16(1): 5. doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0833-3.
[15] To QG, Huynh VAN, Do DV, et al. Psychometric properties of the Vietnamese catquest-9 short form questionnaire[J]. Optom Vis Sci, 2020, 97(3): 192-197. doi:10.1097/opx.0000000000001493.
[16] Gothwal VK, Wright TA, Lamoureux EL, et al. Catquest questionnaire: re-validation in an Australian cataract population[J]. Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2009, 37(8): 785-794. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02133.x.
[17] Sparrow JM, Grzeda MT, Frost NA, et al. Cataract surgery patient-reported outcome measures: a head-to-head comparison of the psychometric performance and patient acceptability of the Cat-PROM5 and Catquest-9SF self-report questionnaires[J]. Eye(Lond), 2018, 32(4): 788-795. doi:10.1038/eye.2017.297.
[18] Schlenker MB, Minotti SC, Kabanovski A, et al. Catquest-9SF questionnaire and eCAPS: Validation in a Canadian population[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(9): e0237788. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237788.
[19] Lin X, Li M, Wang M, et al. Validation of Catquest-9SF questionnaire in a Chinese cataract population[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(8): e103860. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103860.
[20] 黄锦海, 陈海丝, 高蓉蓉, 等. 国人白内障视功能相关生存质量简表的研制及其测量特性评价[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2015, 17(7): 402-406. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2015.07.005. HUANG Jinhai, CHEN Haisi, GAO Rongrong, et al. Development and assessment of a revised Chinese version of the catquest 9SF questionnaire for a Chinese cataract population[J]. Chin J Optom Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2015, 17(7): 402-406. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2015.07.005.
[21] Xu Z, Wu S, Li W, et al. The Chinese Catquest-9SF: validation and application in community screenings[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2018, 18(1): 77. doi:10.1186/s12886-018-0743-0.
[22] Stolk-Vos AC, Visser MS, Klijn S, et al. Effects of clinical parameters on patient-reported outcome in cataract patients: a multicentre study[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2018, 96(6): 586-591. doi:10.1111/aos.13747.
[23] Samadi B, Lundström M, Kugelberg M. Improving patient-assessed outcomes after cataract surgery[J]. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2017, 27(4): 454-459. doi:10.5301/ejo.5000927.
[24] Grimfors M, Lundström M, Höijer J, et al. Intraoperative difficulties, complications and self-assessed visual function in cataract surgery[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2018, 96(6): 592-599. doi:10.1111/aos.13757.
[25] Mollazadegan K, Lundström M. A study of the correlation between patient-reported outcomes and clinical outcomes after cataract surgery in ophthalmic clinics[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2015, 93(3): 293-298. doi:10.1111/aos.12490.
[26] Harrer A, Gerstmeyer K, Hirnschall N, et al. Impact of bilateral cataract surgery on vision-related activity limitations[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2013, 39(5): 680-685. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.11.028.
[27] Rönbeck M, Lundström M, Kugelberg M. Study of possible predictors associated with self-assessed visual function after cataract surgery[J]. Ophthalmology, 2011, 118(9): 1732-1738. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.04.013.
[28] Hammond MD, Potvin R. Visual outcomes, visual quality and patient satisfaction: comparing a blended bifocal approach to bilateral extended depth of focus intraocular lens implantation[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2019, 13: 2325-2332. doi:10.2147/opth.s232800.
[29] Rementería-Capelo LA, Contreras I, García-Pérez JL, et al. Visual quality and patient satisfaction with a trifocal intraocular lens and its new toric version[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2019, 45(11): 1584-1590. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.06.014.
[30] Claesson M, Armitage WJ, Byström B, et al. Validation of catquest-9SF-A visual disability instrument to evaluate patient function after corneal transplantation[J]. Cornea, 2017, 36(9): 1083-1088. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001255.
[31] Bohman E, Wyon M, Lundström M, et al. A comparison between patients with Epiphora and cataract of the activity limitations they experience in daily life due to their visual disability[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2018, 96(1): 77-80. doi:10.1111/aos.13447.
[1] WANG Xinmeng, JI Junya, YU Haonan, FU Hongchen, WANG Xiang, ZHENG Zekun, LI Yan, ZHONG Yingying. Analysis of refractive prediction accuracy after phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis in acute Angle closure glaucoma [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2026, 40(2): 74-79.
[2] LIU Zhen, ZHOU Weiwei, LIU Hanjing, ZHANG Yi, ZHU Yuguang, ZHU Yan. Influence of Alpha angle of intraocular lens on visual quality after the implantation of extended depth-of-field intraocular lens [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2026, 40(1): 47-53.
[3] LI Shiqiang, MA Yan, WANG Jiawei. Advances in clinical applications of optical coherence tomography angiography in systemic diseases [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2026, 40(1): 127-134.
[4] HUANG Qi, DENG Xuwen, WANG Peipei, CHEN Yequn, GU Xuejun. Research on evaluating the cataract surgery level of ophthalmologists using eyeSi surgical simulator [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2025, 39(5): 83-88.
[5] WANG Sheng, HUANG Xudong. Recent advancements in the research on ferroptosis and age-related cataracts [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2025, 39(5): 161-168.
[6] ZHANG Zhuping, PENG Zican, XIAO Zhenlong, LI Cheng, YU Di, WANG Xinglong, CHEN Wei, Guo Bei. The value of a novel nasal secretion eosinophil cationic protein-myeloperoxidase test paper assay in allergic rhinitis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2025, 39(3): 129-134.
[7] SUN Hongxiang, CAO Juan. Status of mental fragility in elderly cataract patients and its correlation with hope level and alexithymia [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2025, 39(1): 89-95.
[8] MA Jiling, WANG Xiaoming, LI Yan, MU Yanxiao, JIN Lin, KONG Hui, YANG Naifu, DANG Guangfu. Evaluation of three different aspheric intraocular lens tilts and decentrations in capsular bags after cataract surgery based on CASIA2 [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2024, 38(4): 76-85.
[9] YUSUFU·Maierhaba, ABULA·Kelimujiang, DING Lin, QIN Yanli, CHEN Xueyi. Fundus changes in high myopia cataract with posterior scleral staphyloma [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(5): 107-114.
[10] XU Haiyan, CAO Wei, FAN Dachuan. Efficacy of compound sound therapy for patients with tinnitus and sudden deafness [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(4): 38-45.
[11] WU Bo, HUANG Tiande, YAN Bin, CHEN Yi, TANG Yong. Correlation between the anxiety-depression state and idiopathic tinnitus prognosis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(4): 46-52.
[12] LI Wanyu, GU Xuejun. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody associated vasculitis complicated with scleritis and cataract: a case study and literature review [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(4): 149-152.
[13] HAN Yiping, ZHANG Han. Research progress on the pathogenesis of posterior capsular opacification and on anterior capsular polishing [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(4): 181-186.
[14] ZHANG Huaxiu, LIU Qin, LUO Wugen, YANG Jian, CHEN Lingyun. Clinical effect of new neck brace receiver in external auditory canal irrigation [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(3): 7-10.
[15] ZHANG Yi, TANG Li. Oculocerebrorenal syndrome of lowe with glaucoma: a case report [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(3): 93-97.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Website Copyright: Editorial Office of Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University
Address: No.27 Shanda South Road, Jinan, Shandong, China. Post code: 250100 Tel: +86-0531-88366912 Email: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd