JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY) ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 104-111.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2016.230

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Efficacy and safety of EX-PRESS implanation versus trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma: a meta-analysis.

  

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, Hubei, China
  • Received:2016-05-24 Online:2017-04-16 Published:2017-04-16

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of EX-PRESS implantation(EX-PRESS)compared with trabeculectomy(Trab)in open-angle glaucoma(OAG). Methods Databases including PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were electronically searched for all randomized controlled trials(RCTs)about comparing the efficacy and safety between EX-PRESS implantation and trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma before the date of March 31, 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and evaluated the included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3 software. Results A total 7 RCTs involving 447 patients with 462 eyes were included, 234 eyes in the EX-PRESS group and 228 eyes in the Trab group. The results of meta-analysis showed that there was significant difference between EX-PRESS and Trab in the postoperative 6 months and 1 year IOPR% [WMD=-7.67, 95%CI(-14.85, -0.50), P=0.04] and [WMD=11.38, 95%CI(1.55, 21.22, P=0.02], there was no significant difference between EX-PRESS and Trab in 24 months and end of follow-up after surgery IOPR%. The pooled OR was [OR=2.29, 95%CI(1.27, 4.13), P=0.006] comparing EX-PRESS with Trab for the complete success rate at one year after surgery and there was no significant difference between Ex-PRESS and Trab in the qualified success rate at one year after surgery [OR=1.59, 95%CI(0.73, 3.44), P= 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报31卷2期 -王越,等.EX-PRESS引流器植入术与小梁切除术治疗开角型青光眼有效性和安全性的Meta分析 \=-0.24] and the number of anti-glaucoma medication [WMD=-0.10, 95%CI(-0.36, 0.17), P=0.48]. But postoperative 2 year visual acuity [WMD=-0.12, 95%CI(-0.23,-0.00), P=0.04] had difference compared EX-PRESS with Trab. The pooled ORs of shallow or flat anterior chamber, hypotony, encapsulated bleb, wound leak, and choroidal effusion respectively was [OR=1.43, 95%CI(0.71, 2.87), P=0.32], [OR=1.03, 95%CI(0.54, 1.96), P=0.94], [OR=0.25, 95%CI(0.05, 1.25), P=0.09], [OR=0.96, 95%CI(0.35, 2.64), P=0.94], and [OR=0.69, 95%CI(0.28, 1.72, P=0.43] compared EX-PRESS with Trab. But EX-PRESS compared to Trab, with pooled ORs of hyphema [OR=0.13, 95% CI(0.04, 0.42), P=0.0006]. Conclusion Trab had a better effect in IOPR% at 6 months after surgery, but EX-PRESS had a better effect in 1 year after surgery. But EX-PRESS surgery complete success rate was higher and EX-PRESS was associated with a significantly lower frequency of the hyphema compared to trabeculectomy. Moreover, Trab got better recovery of visual acuity. And there was no difference in the number of anti-glaucoma medication for the people need medications control the IOP between the two surgeries.

Key words: Meta-analysis, EX-PRESS implanation, Trabeculectomy, Open-angle glaucoma

CLC Number: 

  • R775.2
[1] Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2006, 90(3):262-267.
[2] Gedde SJ. Surgical complications in the tube versus trabeculectomy study during the first year of follow-up[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2007, 143(1):23-31.e2.
[3] Borisuth NS, Phillips B, Krupin T. The risk profile of glaucoma filtration surgery[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 1999,10(2):112-116.
[4] Mermoud A. EX-PRESS implant[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2005, 89(4):396-397.
[5] Stewart RM, Diamond JG, Ashmore ED, et al. Complications following EX-PRESS glaucoma shunt implantation[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2005, 140(2):340-341.
[6] Jr MP, Ishida K, Netland PA. Comparison of trabeculectomy with EX-PRESS miniature glaucoma device implanted under scleral flap[J]. J Glaucoma, 2007, 16(1):14-19.
[7] Dahan E, Ben Simon GJ, Lafuma A. Comparison of trabeculectomy and EX-PRESS implantation in fellow eyes of the same patient: a prospective, randomised study[J]. Eye(Lond), 2012, 26(5):703-710.
[8] Jong LD, Lafuma A, Aguadé AS, et al. Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2011, 5(1):527-533.
[9] Netland PA, Jr SS, Moster MR, et al. Randomized, prospective, comparative trial of EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device versus trabeculectomy(XVT Study)[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2014, 157(2):433-440.e3.
[10] Beltran-Agullo L, Trope GE, Jin Y, et al. Comparison of visual recovery following EX-PRESS versus trabeculectomy[J]. J Glaucoma, 2015, 24(3):181-186.
[11] Seider MI, Rofagha S, Lin SC, et al. Resident-performed EX-PRESS shunt implantation versus trabeculectomy[J]. J Glaucoma, 2012, 21(7):469-474.
[12] Good TJ, Kahook MY. Assessment of bleb morphologic features and postoperative outcomes after EX-PRESS drainage device implantation versus trabeculectomy[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2011, 151(3):507-513.e1.
[13] Moisseiev E, Zunz E, Tzur R, et al. Standard Trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS Miniature Glaucoma Shunt[J]. J Glaucoma, 2015, 24(6):410-416.
[14] Kato N, Takahashi G, Kumegawa K, et al. Indications and postoperative treatment for Ex-PRESS® insertion in Japanese patients with glaucoma: comparison with standard trabeculectomy[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2014, 9:1491-1498.
[15] Chen G, Li W, Jiang F, et al. Ex-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(1):e86045.
[16] Wang W, Zhou M, Huang W, et al. Ex-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy in uncontrolled glaucoma: a meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(5):e63591.
[17] Wang W, Zhang X. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing EX-PRESS implantation with trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(6):e100578.
[18] Patel HY, Wagschal LD, Trope GE, et al. Economic analysis of the EX-PRESS miniature glaucoma device versus trabeculectomy[J]. J Glaucoma, 2014, 23(6):385-390.
[19] Wagschal LD, Trope GE, Jinapriya D, et al. Prospective randomized study comparing EX-PRESS to trabeculectomy: 1-year result[J]. J Glaucoma, 2015, 24(8):624-629.
[20] Gonzalez-Rodriguez JM, Trope GE, Drori-Wagschal L, et al. Comparison of trabeculectomy versus EX-PRESS: 3-year follow-up[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2015: bjophthalmol-2015-307161.
[21] Cheng JW, Cai JP, Li Y, et al. Intraoperative mitomycin C for nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Glaucoma, 2011, 20(5):322-326.
[22] Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0[updated March 2011]. 2011.
[23] Nyska A, Glovinsky Y, Belkin M, et al. Biocompatibility of the Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma drainage implant[J]. J Glaucoma, 2003, 12(3):275-280.
[24] Dahan E, Carmichael TR. Carmichael, implantation of a miniature glaucoma device under a scleral flap[J]. J Glaucoma, 2005, 14(2):98-102.
[25] Kahook MY, Schuman JS, Noecker RJ. Needle bleb revision of encapsulated filtering bleb with bevacizumab[J]. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imag, 2006, 37(2):148-150.
[1] FANG Lu, LEI Yudan, WANG Hua. Meta-analysis of clinical effect of cyclosporine eye drops in combination with sodium hyaluronate eye drops in the treatment of dry eye syndrome [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2026, 40(2): 65-73.
[2] LEI Yudan, FANG Lu, CHEN Jian, PENG Changfu. Meta-analysis of clinical Efficacy of tocilizumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy with steroid resistance or intolerance [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2026, 40(1): 54-67.
[3] XU Xuemeng, FAN Lei, YU Wangbo, JIANG Zhiyue, PAN Chen, HUANG Yongqin. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of omalizumab in combination with specific immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2025, 39(5): 26-33.
[4] SUN Chunxiao, WANG Wenqing, YUE Tian, LIU Jisheng. Efficacy analysis of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with high and low cumulative cisplatin doses in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2025, 39(4): 31-41.
[5] ZHENG Zehao, WEI Jiali, LIU Jiatao, ZHOU Yuqi, SUN Wenting, LI Yuxuan, BAI Peng. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of site-specific acupuncture for the treatment of sudden hearing loss: a systematic review and network Meta-analysis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2025, 39(4): 114-127.
[6] MI Xueqin, LI Songzhe, DENG Yingjie, LI Shengyang, XIAO Dingqi, FAN Lei. Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitors versus gastric mucosal protective agents in the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2024, 38(6): 136-142.
[7] YANG Zhen, MENG Sukun, ZHANG Chun. Ophthalmotonic consensual reaction in the fellow eye following unilateral trabectome [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2024, 38(5): 43-51.
[8] WANG Kaijian, CHEN Xuesheng, WANG Wei. A meta-analysis of the correlation between platelet-lymphocyte ratio and prognosis of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2024, 38(3): 67-73.
[9] LI Yang, LIU Dong, CAO Wenjie. Meta-analysis of the effect of red-light therapy on spherical equivalent, axial length, and choroidal thickness in myopic children [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2024, 38(3): 74-81.
[10] ZHANG Zhen, YANG Zhuoying, ZHOU Jiani, ZHANG Dawei, CHEN Renjie. Efficacy and safety of ciclesonide nasal spray in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis:a Meta-analysis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2024, 38(1): 13-20.
[11] BI Xiaoyun, MA Benxu, WANG Xinru, LI Xuhao, YANG Jiguo. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of acupoint application in treatment of children with allergic rhinitis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(4): 75-85.
[12] LI Zepeng, LI Wenjian, SUN Zhijia. Net Meta-analysis and data mining of patients with acute pharyngitis managed with Chinese medicine [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(4): 111-118.
[13] MENG Sukun, ZHANG Chun. Long-term progress of visual field defect for open-angle glaucoma patients with ab interno trabeculotomy with the trabectome [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(4): 139-148.
[14] ZHAI Rui, LI Yuan, YU Jinglong, CHEN Xi, ZHENG Youyou, LIU Zhaolan, WANG Junhong. Meta-analysis of clinical intradermal acupuncture efficacy for treatment of allergic rhinitis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(3): 35-45.
[15] YIN Kexin, SUN Wu, LIU Hongyan, XIA Yanting, WEI Qiping, ZHOU Jian. Agreement of intraocular pressure measured by Icare Home tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer: a Meta-analysis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(2): 75-83.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!