Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University ›› 2019, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 105-110.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.430

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical analysis of posterior intraocular lens dislocation

JIANG Xiuying1, LI Yuanbin1,2   

  1. Medical College, Graduate School of Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, Shandong, China;
  • Published:2019-03-28

PDF (PC)

815

Abstract: Objective To identify the predisposing factors and clinical characteristics of posterior intraocular lens dislocation, and to compare the surgical outcomes following treatment of dislocated intraocular lens. Methods This study is a retrospective evaluation of all cases with posterior intraocular lens dislocation that presented at the Yuhuangding Hospital from September 2007 until September 2017. All cases were divided into an early intraocular lens dislocation group(<3 months)and a late intraocular lens dislocation group(≧3 months)according to the time of occurrence. The medical records of 73 eyes of 70 patients were evaluated. The main outcome measures were primary disease and surgery, previous surgical history, ocular complications, axial, causes of dislocation, interval between cataract surgery and dislocation, type and degree of dislocation of intraocular lens, and surgical method for treatment of the dislocation. Results There were 11 eyes in the early intraocular lens dislocation group, including 9 eyes(81.8%)with posterior capsule rupture, 1 eye(9.1%)with history of trauma, 2 eyes(18.2%)with high myopia, and 4 eyes(36.4%)with prior vitrectomy. There were 62 eyes in the late intraocular lens dislocation group, including 12 eyes(19.4%)with history of trauma, 16 eyes(25.8%)with posterior capsule rupture, 27 eyes(43.5%)with zonular dehiscence, 20 eyes(32.3%)with high myopia, 7 eyes(11.3%)with uveitis, 4 eyes(6.5%)with retinitis pigmentosa, 11 eyes(17.7%)with prior vitrectomy, and 4 eyes(6.5%)with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. There were significant differences in the UCVA between the preoperative and postoperative stages. There was no significant difference in the UCVA between reposition and exchange. Conclusion Early dislocation of the intraocular lens is associated with surgical factors, such as posterior capsule rupture and improper placement of the intraocular lens. Late dislocation of the intraocular lens is associated with posterior capsule rupture and zonular dehiscence. High myopia, prior vitrectomy, and uveitis are risk factors for dislocation of the intraocular lens. It is necessary to choose the appropriate surgical method based on the complexity of dislocation of the intraocular lens.

Key words: Intraocular lens dislocation, Postoperative complications, Posterior capsule rupture, Risk factors

CLC Number: 

  • R776
[1] Lorente R, de Rojas V, Vazquez de Parga P, et al. Management of late spontaneous in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation: Retrospective analysis of 45 cases[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2010, 36(8): 1270-1282.doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.01.035.
[2] Chai F, Ma B, Yang XG, et al. A pilot study of intraocular lens explantation in 69 eyes in Chinese patients[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2017, 10(4): 579-585.doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.04.13.
[3] 李厚秀, 刘中华, 陈智. 白内障超声乳化术中后囊膜破裂风险因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 88-90. LI Houxiu, LIU Zhonghua, CHEN Zhi. Risk factors for rupture of the capsule membrane during phacoemulsification cataract surgery[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2018, 32(2): 88-90.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.267.
[4] Ascaso FJ, Huerva V, Grzybowski A. Epidemiology, etiology, and prevention of late IOL-capsular bag complex dislocation: review of the literature[J]. J Ophthalmol, 2015, 2015: 805706.doi: 10.1155/2015/805706.
[5] Dabrowska-Kloda K, Kloda T, Boudiaf S, et al. Incidence and risk factors of late in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation: evaluation of 140 eyes between 1992 and 2012[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2015, 41(7): 1376-1382.doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.10.040.
[6] Kristianslund O, Råen M, Østern AE, et al. Late in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation[J]. Ophthalmology, 2017, 124(2): 151-159.doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.10.024.
[7] Fontana L, Coassin M, Iovieno A, et al. Cataract surgery in patients with pseudoex-foliation syndrome: current updates[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2017, 11: 1377-1383.doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S142870.
[8] Fernández-Buenaga R, Alio JL, Pérez-Ardoy AL, et al. Late in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation requiring explantation: risk factors and outcomes[J]. Eye(Lond), 2013, 27(7): 795-801.doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.95.
[9] Fujikawa A, Mohamed YH, Kinoshita H, et al. Spontaneous dislocation of the posterior chamber intraocular lens[J]. Int Ophthalmol, 2018, 38(3): 1111-1117.doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0567-6.
[10] Hocaoglu M, Karacorlu M, Sayman Muslubas I, et al. Incidence and factors associated with complications of sutured and sutureless cataract surgery following pars plana vitrectomy at a tertiary referral centre in Turkey[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2016, 100(9): 1206-1210.doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307001.
[11] Pueringer SL, Hodge DO, Erie JC. Risk of late intraocular lens dislocation after cataract surgery, 1980-2009: a population-based study[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2011, 152(4): 618-623.doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.03.009.
[12] Kr(·overe)pšt(·overe)L, Kuzmien(·overe)L, Miliauskas A, et al. Possible predisposing factors for late intraocular lens dislocation after routine cataract surgery[J]. Medicina(Kaunas), 2013, 49(5): 229-234.
[13] Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050[J]. Ophthalmology, 2016, 123(5): 1036-1042.doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006.
[14] Verkicharla PK, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Current and predicted demographics of high myopia and an update of its associated pathological changes[J]. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2015, 35(5): 465-475.doi:10.1111/opo.12238.
[15] Davis D, Brubaker J, Espandar L, et al. Late in-the-bag spontaneous intraocular lens dislocation[J]. Ophthalmology, 2009, 116(4): 664-670.doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.11.018.
[16] Matsumoto M, Yamada K, Uematsu M, et al. Spontaneous dislocation of in-the-bag intraocular lens primarily in cases with prior vitrectomy[J]. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2012, 22(3): 363-367.doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000046.
[17] Tsinopoulos IT, Tsaousis KT, Kymionis GD, et al. Comparison of anterior capsule contraction between hydrophobic and hydrophilic intraocular lens models[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2010, 248(8): 1155-1158.doi:10.1007/s00417-010-1373-2.
[18] Abela-Formanek C, Amon M, Kahraman G, et al. Biocompatibility of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses in eyes with uveitis having cataract surgery: Long-term follow-up[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2011, 37(1): 104-112.doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.038.
[19] Rönbeck M, Zetterström C, Wejde G, et al. Comparison of posterior capsule opacification development with 3 intraocular lens types: five-year prospective study[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2009, 35(11): 1935-1940.doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.048.
[20] Choi M, Lazo MZ, Kang MJ, et al. Effect of number and position of intraocular lens haptics on anterior capsule contraction: a randomized, prospective trial[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2018, 18(1): 78.doi:10.1186/s12886-018-0742-1.
[21] 郝燕生. 后房型人工晶状体脱位于前玻璃体腔的原因及其处理方法[J]. 中华眼科杂志, 2003, 39(4): 228-230.doi: 10.3760/j: issn: 0412-4081.2003.04.009. HAO Yansheng. The cause and management of intraocular lens dislocation into anterior vitreous cavity[J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology, 2003, 39(4): 228-230.doi:10.3760/j:issn:0412-4081.2003.04.009.
[22] Gul A, Duran M, Can E, et al. Surgical management of intraocular lens dislocations[J]. Arq Bras Oftalmol, 2015, 78(5): 313-317.doi:10.5935/0004-2749.20150082.
[23] Nadal J, Kudsieh B, Casaroli-Marano RP. Scleral fixation of posteriorly dislocated intraocular lenses by 23-gauge vitrectomy without anterior segment approach[J]. J Ophthalmol, 2015, 2015: 391619.doi:10.1155/2015/391619.
[24] 吕林, 谭显里. 人工晶体脱入玻璃体腔的手术处理[J]. 中华眼科杂志, 1999(2): 101.doi:10.3760/j:issn:0412-4081.1999.02.006.
[25] Obeng FK, Vig VK, Singh P, et al. Posterior chamber scleral fixation of intraocular lenses in post-vitrectomised aphakic eyes[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2017, 11(3): NC09-NC13.doi:10.7860/JCDR/2017/20989.9533.
[26] 李元彬, 高磊, 姜鹏飞. 巩膜板层迂回缝线人工晶体固定法临床观察[J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2011, 10(7): 516-517.doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2011.07.026.
[27] Baba T, Nizawa T, Oshitari T, et al. Comparisons of visual and surgical outcomes after reuse or replacement of dislocated in-the-bag intraocular lens[J]. J Ophthalmol, 2018, 2018: 7342917.doi: 10.1155/2018/7342917.
[28] Gimbel HV, Condon GP, Kohnen T, et al. Late in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation: incidence, prevention, and management[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005, 31(11): 2193-2204. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.06.053.
[1] WANG Huanxia, WANG Shuya, WANG Ying, SUN Xuan, HUANG Jie, WANG Xingrong. Risk factors for epiretinal membrane formation following pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2025, 39(4): 181-185.
[2] LI Lu, ZHAO Jie, ZHAO Bojun. Research progress on the pathogenesis and treatments of central serous chorioretinopathy [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(3): 118-124.
[3] XIAO Fuliang, LIN Yun, PAN Xinliang. A clinical study on prophylactic central lymph node dissection in early cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(1): 64-71.
[4] ZHANG Lijun, XU Ran, LUO Jifang, LIU Guoqi, HE Qian, LI Wei, JIANG Zhenhua. Factors affecting flap neurosis and other postoperative flap-related complications after free-flap reconstruction of head and neck tumors [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(4): 86-90.
[5] LIU Shanshan, HAN Shujing, WANG Xiaoxu, LI Yanhong, NI Xin, ZHANG Jie. Hearing loss in children after bacterial meningitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(1): 48-54.
[6] To describe characteristics and risk factors associated with central serous chorioretinopathy(CSC)in a hospital-based outpatient sample population. MethodsIn this hospital-based cross-sectional study, CSC patients were recruited from the Beijing Friendship Hospital from 01/2019 to 12/2019. All participants underwent a standardized interview. Logistic regression models were used to assess the risk factors associated with CSC. ResultsA total of 23,878 outpatients were recorded during the period 01/2019-12/2019. Of these, 45 patients(0.19%)were diagnosed with CSC, divided in 37 male patients(82.22%)and 8 female patients(17.78%). The patients′ age ranged from 21 to 65(42.3±10.1)years. Three patients(6.67%)presented a bilateral involvement. Of all the patients, 39 were included in the present analysis. Control patients were matched for age and sex at a ratio of 1:1. The presence of CSC was associated with exposure to steroids(OR=5.04, 95% CI:1.11-22.89), sleep time(going to sleep after 12 pm)(OR=4.16, 95% CI:1.33-13.04)),and shift-work(OR=5.74, 95% CI:1.47-22.45).ConclusionsOur data showed that CSC prevalence in the analyzed outpatients was 0.19%. Exposure to steroids, sleep time, and shift-work were factors related with CSC in the observed population.. Prevalence and risk factors of central serous chorioretinopathy in a hospital-based population YANG Xiufen, YOU Ran, MA Xiumei, WANG Kang, WANG Yanling Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, ChinaAbstract:Objective〓 [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(4): 75-79.
[7] This study was conducted to explore the preoperative risk factors for postoperative adhesion in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis(CRS)undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery(FESS), and to construct a risk score model to evaluate their predictive effect. MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on 323 patients with CRS who underwent FESS at our hospital between January 2015 and June 2018. The risk factors for postoperative adhesion were screened using a multivariate logistic regression analysis. The risk score was assigned according to the odds ratio(OR)value, and a receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was drawn to evaluate the predictive effect. ResultsPostoperative adhesion occurred in 35 patients(10.8%). The logistic regression results showed that concha bullosa, primary FESS, operative experience less than 10 years, and a history of middle turbinate resection were independent risk factors for postoperative adhesion in FESS. The OR values were 1.12(95% CI: 1.06-1.18), 3.87(95% CI: 2.23-5.51), 3.19(95% CI: 2.07-4.31), and 2.24(95% CI:1.95-2.53), respectively. The risk score model assigned 1 point for vesicular middle turbinate, 4 points for first time FESS, 3 points for operative experience less than 10 years, and 2 points for middle turbinate resection. The ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve(AUC)was 0.784(95% CI: 0.672-0.896, P<0.05). When 4 points were selected as the cut-off point, the Jordan index was the largest, with a sensitivity of 75.1% and a specificity of 73.6%. ConclusionThe incidence of postoperative adhesion in 323 patients with CRS who underwent FESS was 10.8%. The risk score model has certain reference value for predicting high-risk postoperative adhesion.. Potential risk factors and evaluation of a predictive risk score model for postoperative adhesion in functional endoscopic sinus surgeryCHEN Dong1, YU Hong2, LI Yang1, HUANG Qiang1, FANG Min1 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Jiangyou Peoples Hospital, Jiangyou 621700, Sichuan, China; 2. Department of Pathology, Jiangyou Peoples Hospital, Jiangyou 621700, Sichuan, ChinaAbstract:Objective〓 [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(4): 87-91.
[8] FANG Zhongju, ZHANG Yongxia, ZHAO Jiandong, ZONG Liang, ZHAI Xingyou, LI Xinjian, PENG Xin, REN Nan, CHEN Liwei, LIU Mingbo. Combined treatment of chylous leakage after lymph node dissection for thyroid cancer [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(3): 64-68.
[9] HAO Wenpei, ZHAI Hualei, SUN Xiaotong, ZHANG Yani, ZHU Yanhui, KONG Qianqian, CHENG Jun, ZHANG Ting. Etiology of repeat keratoplasty and risk factors for failure of corneal grafts [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(3): 134-140.
[10] HUANG He, OUYANG Hui. Risk factors and prognosis of esophageal cancer with hypopharyngeal carcinoma [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2019, 33(4): 82-86.
[11] Yongyao LANG,Yun YANG,Qing LIU,Lindi XU,Ziping LIN. Analysis of influencing factors and observation of therapeutic effects in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2019, 33(3): 119-123.
[12] CUI Le, GUAN Kai, LI Lisha, LI Junda, WANG Zixi, XU Yingyang, WANG Lianglu, YIN Jia. Analysis of prevalence and related risk factors of bee venom in bee research population [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2019, 33(1): 63-66.
[13] SHEN Ling, LIN Zongtong, LIN Xing, YANG Zhongjie. Risk factors associated with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome in children: a retrospective case-control study [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2018, 32(2): 25-29.
[14] LI Houxiu, LIU Zhonghua, CHEN Zhi. Risk factors for rupture of the capsule membrane during phacoemulsification cataract surgery [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2018, 32(2): 88-90.
[15] HUO Hong, LI Wuyi, WANG Jian, YANG Dahai, JIN Xiaofeng, TIAN Xu, NIU Yanyan.. Treatment of pharyngeal stenosis following uvulopalatopharyngoplasty with coblation. [J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2017, 31(6): 58-61.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Website Copyright: Editorial Office of Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University
Address: No.27 Shanda South Road, Jinan, Shandong, China. Post code: 250100 Tel: +86-0531-88366912 Email: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd