带蒂颊肌瓣鼻底转移术与硅胶鼻底植入术治疗萎缩性鼻炎的疗效比较

JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY)

• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles

A comparison of pedicle buccinator flap transplantation and silicagel implantatipn into the nasal basis for atrophic rhinitis

MA Kun-peng¹， MA Li-min²， LIU Qing-ming¹

1. Weifang Medical College， Weifang 261042， Shandong， China；2. Plastic and Reconstruction Hospital of Weifang Medical College， Weifang 261042， Shandong， China

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-06-24 Published:2007-06-24
Contact: MA Kun-peng

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic effect of pedicle buccinator flap transplantation and silica gel implantation into the nasal basis for atrophic rhinitis. Method: Eighty patients with atrophic rhinitis were randomly divided into two groups: the pedicle buccinator flap transplantation group (group A, n=43) and the silica gel implantation group (group B, n=37). Result: The total effective rate of group A was significantly higher than that of group B (P＜0.05), and the incidence of complications of group A was significantly lower than that of group B(P＜0.05). Conclusion: Pedicle buccinator flap transplantation is great for atrophic rhinitis.

Key words: Atrophic rhinitis, Pedicle buccinator flap transplantation, Silica gel implantation into basis nasal

CLC Number:

R765.21

MA Kun-peng,MA Li-min,LIU Qing-ming . A comparison of pedicle buccinator flap transplantation and silicagel implantatipn into the nasal basis for atrophic rhinitis[J].JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2007, 21(3): 212-213 .