Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University ›› 2020, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 77-81.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2020.043

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Improvement of the sniffing position for microlaryngoscopic surgery with a self-retaining laryngoscope

GU Xiaona1,2, CHENG Xiangrong1,2, ZHANG Peng1,2, ZHU Liang1,2, TENG Hua1,2, WANG Yong1,2, HU Xiaoyan1,2,   

  1. LIU Xiaojing1, 21. Department of Otolaryngology, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210028, Jiangsu, China;
    2. Jiangsu Province Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210028, Jiangsu, China
  • Published:2021-01-11

PDF (PC)

328

Abstract: Objective To explore the advantages of the sniffing position during exposure to the surgical field in microlaryngoscopic surgery with a self-retaining laryngoscope. Methods Sixty patients with voice disorders who were enrolled for microlaryngoscopic surgery with a self-retaining laryngoscope under general anesthesia were selected and randomly divided into two groups: the sniffing position group(group A)and the horizontal recumbent position group(group B). Thirty patients were in each group. The time to glottis exposure and VAS scores for postoperative laryngeal pain, tongue numbness, pharyngeal or laryngeal mucosal injury and intraoperative or postoperative tooth injury were observed and recorded in all patients. The exposure of the visual field during the surgery was evaluated. Results (1) The time to glottis exposure was significantly shorter in group A(2.42±1.04 minutes)than in group B(3.20±0.95 minutes), and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). (2) Surgical complications: the VAS scores for postoperative laryngeal pain was significantly lower in group A than in group B(P<0.05). The incidence of pharyngeal or laryngeal mucosal injury was significantly lower in group A(6.7%)than in group B(30.0%). Postoperative tongue numbness and intraoperative or postoperative tooth injury did not occur almost. Overall, the postoperative recovery of group A was better, and surgical complications were less compared with those in group B. Conclusion Compared with the horizontal recumbent position, the sniffing position is more conducive for glottis exposure in microlaryngoscopic surgery using a self-retaining laryngoscope, as it takes less time and causes fewer surgical complications.

Key words: Sniffing position, Self-retaining laryngoscope, Exposure of glottis, Microlaryngoscopic surgery

CLC Number: 

  • R767
[1] 王天铎. 喉科手术学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2007: 54.
[2] Tong BS, Fang R, Smith BL. Study of the head and neck position in microlaryngoscopy using magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2013, 270(1): 243-247. doi:10.1007/s00405-012-2168-3.
[3] Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics[J]. Anaesthesia, 1984, 39(11): 1105-1111. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1984.tb08932.x.
[4] Hsiung MW, Pai L, Kang BH, et al. Clinical predictors of difficult laryngeal exposure[J]. Laryngoscope, 2004, 114(2): 358-363. doi:10.1097/00005537-200402000-00033.
[5] RUI Fang, HAO Chen, SUN Jingwu. Analysis of pressure applied during microlaryngoscopy[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2012, 269(5):1471-1476. doi:10.1007/s00405-012-1929-3.
[6] 宋颖, 潘忠, 傅敏仪. 喉镜评分预测支撑喉镜手术暴露的临床意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(6): 81-84. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2019.303. SONG Ying, PAN Zhong, FU Minyi. Clinical significance of laryngoscope scoring system in predicting the laryngeal exposure[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2019, 33(6): 81-84. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2019.303.
[7] 黄晨, 莫江. 影响显微支撑喉镜下声门暴露的相关因素研究[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志, 2016, 22(4): 317-319, 322. doi: 10.11798/j.issn.1007-1520.201604015. HUANG Chen, MO Jiang. Study on affect factors related to laryngeal exposure in self-retaining microscopic surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Skull Base Surgery, 2016, 22(4): 317-319, 322.doi: 10.11798/j.issn.1007-1520.201604015.
[8] 邓小明, 姚尚龙, 于布为. 现代麻醉学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2014: 975.
[9] 魏薇, 黄施伟, 裘毅敏, 等. 3种气管插管头位上气道CT三维图像的比较分析[J]. 复旦学报(医学版), 2015, 42(2): 239-244. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8467.2015.02.017. WEI Wei, HUANG Shiwei, QIU Yimin, et al. The comparative analysis for 3D CT images of upper airway in 3 different head positions for tracheal intubation[J]. Fudan University Journal of Medical Sciences, 2015, 42(2): 239-244. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8467.2015.02.017.
[10] El-Orbany MI, Getachew YB, Joseph NJ, et al. Head elevation improves laryngeal exposure with direct laryngoscopy[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2015, 27(2): 153-158. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.09.012.
[11] Akhtar M, Ali Z, Hassan N, et al. A randomized study comparing the sniffing position with simple head extension for glottis visualization and difficulty in intubation during direct laryngoscopy[J]. Anesth Essays Res, 2017, 11(3): 762-766. doi:10.4103/0259-1162.204206.
[12] Acharya P, Shrestha A, Gurung A, et al. Effect of head elevation to different heights in laryngeal exposure with direct laryngoscopy[J]. J Nepal Health Res Counc, 2019, 17(2): 168-172. doi:10.33314/jnhrc.v0i0.1721.
[13] Takenaka I, Aoyama K, Iwagaki T, et al. The sniffing position provides greater occipito-atlanto-axial angulation than simple head extension: a radiological study[J]. J Can D'anesthesie, 2007, 54(2): 129-133. doi:10.1007/BF03022009.
[14] 柴茂, 汪小海. 患者头部后仰角度对声门暴露的影响: 基于CT上呼吸道矢状面图像的模拟评估方法[J]. 医学研究杂志,2017, 46(8): 169-171. doi:10.11969/j.issn.1673-548X.2017.08.042. CHAI Mao, WANG Xiaohai. Effect of head extension angle to glottis exposure: a simulation evaluation based on CT reconstruction images of upper airway[J]. Journal of Medical Research, 2017, 46(8): 169-171. doi:10.11969/j.issn.1673-548X.2017.08.042.
[1] LI De-Sheng, LI Gong-Xia. Postoperative parageusia following self-retaining laryngoscopic operations [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2009, 23(3): 65-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YANG Changliang,HUANG Zhiwu,YAO Hangqi,ZHU Yong,SNU Yi . Study on auditory brainstem response[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2006, 20(1): 9 -13 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2006, 20(1): 89 -89 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2006, 20(1): 90 -91 .
[4] LIU Da-yu,PAN Xin-liang,LEI Da-peng,ZHANG Li-qiang,LUAN Xin-yong . Surgical treatment for medial wall pyriform sinus cancer[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2007, 21(1): 8 -11 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(2): 188 -188 .
[6] LIU Yan,LIU Xin-yi,WANG Jin-ping,LI Da-jian . Measurement of the posterior tympanum and its clinical significance [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(3): 218 -221 .
[7] ZHAO Min,WANG Shou-sen,ZHEN Ze-nian,CHEN Xian-ming,WANG Mao-xin . Sphenoid sinus and trans-sphenoid surgery under nasal endoscopy and microscopy [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(3): 244 -245 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(3): 252 -252 .
[9] WANG Hong-xia,WANG Peng-cheng . Expression of NSE,S100 and GFAP in retinoblastoma and its clinical significance[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(3): 263 -264 .
[10] HUANG Fang,HUANG Hai-qiong,HUANG Jian-qiang,HE He-fan . Bronchoscopic video supervision system in infant bronchial foreign bodies[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(3): 276 -277 .
Website Copyright: Editorial Office of Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University
Address: No.27 Shanda South Road, Jinan, Shandong, China. Post code: 250100 Tel: +86-0531-88366912 Email: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd