山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

正常新生儿226Hz及1000Hz探测音鼓室导抗测试

杨 琨1,刘志奇2,黄治物1   

  1. 1. 武汉大学人民医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 武汉 430060;2. 湖北省妇女儿童医院耳鼻咽喉科, 武汉 430070
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-10-16 发布日期:2008-10-16
  • 通讯作者: 黄治物

Clinical guidelines for usage of 226- and 1,000-Hz tympanometry in
normal neonates

YANG Kun1, LIU Zhi-qi2, HUANG Zhi-wu1   

  1. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China;
    2. Department of Otolaryngology, Hubei Provincial Women and Children Hospital, Wuhan 430070, China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-10-16 Published:2008-10-16
  • Contact: HUANG Zhi-wu

摘要: 探讨通过瞬态诱发耳声发射(TEOAE)筛查的正常新生儿低频(226Hz)及高频(1000Hz)探测音鼓室导抗图的特点、获得峰声导纳值等指标的正常值范围,为临床新生儿及婴幼儿中耳功能评估和诊断提供依据。方法采用中耳分析仪(GSI-33型)对足月顺产,并通过TEOAE筛查的正常新生儿分别进行低、高频探测音下的鼓室导抗测试,分析鼓室导抗图形态特征并对峰声导纳值等重要数据进行统计。结果在100例首次双耳通过TEOAE筛查的新生儿鼓室导抗测试中,低频鼓室导抗图以双峰型为主(占96%),高频鼓室导抗图以单峰型为主(占90%);低频探测音鼓室导抗图为双峰型而其高频探测音鼓室导抗图为单峰型的有174耳(占总耳数87%);低频及高频探测音鼓室导抗图均为单峰型的仅有6耳(占总耳数3%)。结论正常新生儿低频探测音鼓室导抗图以双峰型为主,高频探测音鼓室导抗图以单峰型为主,应将两者结合来对新生儿及婴幼儿中耳功能进行评估;所获得相应的峰声导纳值、峰声导纳值处外耳道压力、外耳道容积等指标的正常值可以用于初步评估新生儿中耳功能状态。

关键词: 鼓室导抗测试, 新生儿, 听力筛查, 中耳

Abstract: To evaluate the clinical characteristics of tympanograms using 226- and 1,000-Hz probe frequencies and to provide a clinical guideline. MethodsHearing of all subjects was screened by means of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Tympanograms, recorded with probe-tone frequencies of 226- and 1,000-Hz, were classified based on the Liden/Jerger model of shapes. Furthermore, equivalent ear canal volume, tympanometric peak pressure and other important tympanometric parameters were calculated for each tympanogram. ResultsBoth ears of the 100 neonates passed the TEOAE Screening. Most tympanograms obtained from the 226 Hz tympanometric data were double-peaked (96.0%). The 1000Hz tympanometric data obtained showed a single - peaked tympangram in 180 ears (90.0%). 174 (87.0%) ears were either double-peaked in 226Hz tympanogram or single-peaked in 1000Hz. 6 ears had a single peak both in 226Hz and in 1,000Hz tympanogram. ConclusionThese results have led to the successful implementation of 1,000-Hz tympanometry in neonatal hearing assessment.

Key words: Neonate, Hearing screening, Tympanometry, Ear, middle

中图分类号: 

  • R764.04
[1] 孟玮,于振坤,郑雅丽,李光飞,梁龙君,王小敏. 术前模拟力学研究在拟植入耳赝附体先天性外中耳畸形患者中的应用价值[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 27-30.
[2] 孟立新,李健,韦善文. 鼓膜微管置入术治疗中耳不张76例临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 61-65.
[3] 周佳蕾,孙世冰,李晓艳. 婴幼儿宽频声导抗测试[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 91-94.
[4] 谢日林,张志平. 布地奈德体位滴鼻治疗伴腺样体肥大的小儿分泌性中耳炎31例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(1): 65-67.
[5] 张孟璐,李永团. 继发性胆脂瘤中CCL27的定位及检测[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(6): 46-48.
[6] 马钊恩, 翟锦明, 廖礼兵, 杨震. 咽鼓管球囊扩张术治疗慢性分泌性中耳炎的短期疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(5): 54-56.
[7] 郭颖媛,张德军,朱琳,马帅帅,管国芳. 一例中耳腺瘤的诊疗体会并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 111-114.
[8] 吴允刚,张辉,刘黎明,庞太忠,李晓瑜. 鼓膜激光打孔治疗分泌性中耳炎20例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(1): 85-87.
[9] 杜丽君,童军,陈文文,邓亚新,蔡勋华,单良. 单侧听力耳中耳炎手术经验再探讨[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(6): 8-10.
[10] 孙娜综述,陈晓平审校. 咽喉反流与耳鼻咽喉科疾病[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(6): 85-89.
[11] 王晓燕,郑燕青,郑昊,叶青. 脉冲CO2激光与Er:YAG激光中耳骨消融的实验研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(4): 75-79.
[12] 刘斌,江育玲,肖旭平. 钛质人工听小骨在开放式鼓室成形术中的疗效观察与应用体会[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(4): 80-83.
[13] 吕丹, 杨慧, 尹锐, 辜德英, 郑义涛. 中耳耵聍腺肿瘤3例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(6): 8-12.
[14] 王雅丛, 耿韶辉, 李艳涛, 王玉芳, 张红, 张婷婷, 张佳佳, 张炜. Retcam-3检查足月新生儿视网膜出血分级的初步探讨[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(6): 78-81.
[15] 李兆生, 洪斌, 黄前进, 蒲伟民, 许振跃. 耳源性小脑脓肿2例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(5): 32-37.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!