山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

带蒂颊肌瓣鼻底转移术与硅胶鼻底植入术治疗萎缩性鼻炎的疗效比较

马鲲鹏1, 马丽敏2,刘清明1   

  1. 1. 潍坊医学院, 山东 潍坊 261042; 2. 潍坊医学院整形外科医院, 山东 潍坊 261042
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-06-24 发布日期:2007-06-24
  • 通讯作者: 马鲲鹏

A comparison of pedicle buccinator flap transplantation and silicagel implantatipn into the nasal basis for atrophic rhinitis

MA Kun-peng1, MA Li-min2, LIU Qing-ming1   

  1. 1. Weifang Medical College, Weifang 261042, Shandong, China;2. Plastic and Reconstruction Hospital of Weifang Medical College, Weifang 261042, Shandong, China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-06-24 Published:2007-06-24
  • Contact: MA Kun-peng

摘要: 目的:比较带蒂颊肌瓣鼻底转移术与硅胶鼻底植入术治疗萎缩性鼻炎的疗效。方法:将80例萎缩性鼻炎患者分为2组,43例行带蒂颊肌瓣鼻底转移术(A组),37例行硅胶鼻底植入术(B组)。结果:手术治疗后总有效率A组高于B组(P<0.05),术后并发症A组少于B组(P<0.05)。结论:带蒂颊肌瓣鼻底转移术治疗萎缩性鼻炎具有更好的疗效。

关键词: 萎缩性鼻炎, 带蒂颊肌瓣鼻底转移术, 硅胶鼻底植入术

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic effect of pedicle buccinator flap transplantation and silica gel implantation into the nasal basis for atrophic rhinitis. Method: Eighty patients with atrophic rhinitis were randomly divided into two groups: the pedicle buccinator flap transplantation group (group A, n=43) and the silica gel implantation group (group B, n=37). Result: The total effective rate of group A was significantly higher than that of group B (P<0.05), and the incidence of complications of group A was significantly lower than that of group B(P<0.05). Conclusion: Pedicle buccinator flap transplantation is great for atrophic rhinitis.

Key words: Atrophic rhinitis, Pedicle buccinator flap transplantation, Silica gel implantation into basis nasal

中图分类号: 

  • R765.21
[1] 韩乃刚,李晓红. 异体骨粉黏骨膜下填充治疗萎缩性鼻炎疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(3): 33-35.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!