山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

内舒拿与雷诺考特治疗变应性鼻炎疗效比较

解晓帅1,李 亮2   

  1. 天津市第一中心医院 1. 药剂科; 2. 耳鼻咽喉科, 天津 300192
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-02-24 发布日期:2008-02-24
  • 通讯作者: 解晓帅

A contrast of the therapeutic effects of Nasonex and Rhinocort in the treatment of allergic rhinitis

XIE Xiao-shuai1, LI Liang2   

  1. 1. Department of Pharmacy; 2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin 300192, China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-02-24 Published:2008-02-24
  • Contact: XIE Xiao-shuai

摘要: 目的对比内舒拿(糠酸莫米松)鼻喷剂和雷诺考特(布地奈德)鼻喷剂治疗变应性鼻炎的临床疗效。方法将临床确诊为常年性变应性鼻炎160例患者随机分为两组:内舒拿组80例,雷诺考特组80例。内舒拿鼻喷剂每次每侧鼻孔2喷(50μg/喷),1次/d(总量200μg),于早晨喷入。雷诺考特鼻喷剂每侧鼻腔喷两喷(64μg/喷),1次/d(总量256μg) ,早晨喷入。两组疗程均为4周。观察两种药物的临床疗效及不良反应。结果内舒拿组和雷诺考特组治疗前后均自身对比,治疗前后症状和体征评分差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。总有效率:内舒拿组为97.5%,雷诺考特组为92.5%,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组均无严重的不良反应。结论两种药物治疗变应性鼻炎均有良好疗效,具有高效、安全、方便、依从性好、不良反应少等优点,均可单独用于治疗变应性鼻炎,改善患者生活质量。

关键词: 鼻炎, 变应性, 常年性, 糠酸莫米松, 布地奈德, 临床对照试验

Abstract: To investigate the therapeutic effects of Nasonex Nasal Spray(momestasone furoate) and Rhinocort Nasal Spray(budesonide) on allergic rhinitis(AR). Methods160 patients with AR were randomly divided into two groups: the Nasonex group (n=80) were treated with Nasonex once daily (total 200μg) and the Rhinocort group (n=80) were treated with Rhinocort once daily (total 256μg) for 4 weeks. Clinical effects and adverse drug reactions were observed. ResultsThere were statistical differences between the pre-and post-treatment groups (both P<0.05). The total effective rate was 97.5% in the Nasonex group and 92.5% in the Rhinocort group, however, there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.05). No severe adverse drug reaction was found in either group. ConclusionsBoth medicines have good therapeutic effects on allergic rhinitis. Either one can be used for allergic rhinitis alone and achieve ideal therapeutic efficacies.

Key words: allergic, perennial, Rhinitis, Momestasone furoate, Budesonide, Controlled clinical trials

中图分类号: 

  • R987
[1] 王坛,武珂,李连庆,宫丽丽. 皮下免疫治疗注射后出现全身不良反应的伴发因素及处理[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 71-74.
[2] 卢汉桂,林歆胜,姚丹勉,魏永新,李创伟. 变应性鼻炎大鼠IL-35的表达及对辅助性T细胞免疫调节的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 66-70.
[3] 浦洪波,杜晓东. 无锡地区2 000例变应性鼻炎变应原检测结果分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 105-107.
[4] 陈鸣,俞雪飞. 浅谈伴有变应性鼻炎的慢性鼻窦炎的治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 18-22.
[5] 郑雅霓, 刘鹤, 马亮, 张明生, 孙中武. 布地奈德联合生理盐水鼻腔冲洗对慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的疗效及对鼻腔分泌物IL-6、IL-8、TNF-α的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 58-62.
[6] 吴湘萍. 患者管理方式对变应性鼻炎舌下含服粉尘螨滴剂疗效的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 68-72.
[7] 李松,王宗贵,杨景朴,张竹萍. 鼻内镜下翼管神经切断术进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(1): 72-76.
[8] 谢日林,张志平. 布地奈德体位滴鼻治疗伴腺样体肥大的小儿分泌性中耳炎31例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(1): 65-67.
[9] 郅莉莉,宋道亮. 嗜酸性粒细胞及IL5在上颌窦后鼻孔息肉与鼻息肉中表达的差异[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 43-46.
[10] 万文锦,王文,程雷. 尘螨变应性鼻炎皮下免疫治疗与舌下免疫治疗的荟萃分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 103-108.
[11] 史丽,赵莉,张红萍. 变应性鼻炎的长期抗炎治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 9-12.
[12] 刘静. 基于整体观念变应性鼻炎的中医辨证论治[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 28-30.
[13] 接英,卢红双. 变应性结膜炎的诊疗策略[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 31-36.
[14] 程雷,钱俊俊,田慧琴. 变应性鼻炎研究的若干进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 1-3.
[15] 许昱,陶泽璋. 重视变应性鼻炎药物治疗的规范化和个体化[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 4-8.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!