JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY) ›› 2015, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 84-85.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2015.057

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of pseudoaccommodation measured by optical quality analysis system

WANG Jing1,2, WU Qin2, WU Hao3, LIU Chunlei2, BI Hongsheng4   

  1. 1. Graduate Student of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, Shandong, China;
    2. Departement of Ophthalmology, Jinan Second People's Hospital, Jinan 250001, Shandong, China;
    3. Department of Ophthalmology, The 5th People's Hospital Of Jinan, Jinan 250022, Shandong, China;
    4. Ophthalmology Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250002, Shandong, China
  • Received:2015-01-28 Revised:2015-04-17 Published:2015-06-16
  • Contact: 毕宏生。E-mail:hongshengbi@126.com E-mail:hongshengbi@126.com

PDF (PC)

410

Abstract: Objective To study pseudoaccommodation of different intraocular lenses with a double-pass system, and the results were compared with those by the defocus method and push-up method. Methods A total of 30 outpatients with age-related cataract were selected in this study. All the enrolled eyes were implanted with the same aspheric intraocular lens. The pseudoaccommodation of each selected eye was measured by optical quality analysis system(OQAS), defocus system and push-up method one month after the operation. Results The average pseudoaccommodation by OQAS examination, defocus method and push-up method was 2.34D, 2.5D and 2.93D, respectively. There's no statistical difference between OQAS examination and defocus method(P>0.05). But there's statistical difference between OQAS examination and push-up method(P<0.05). Conclusion The pseudoaccommodation measured by OQAS was relatively small. The results measured by OQAS was in close agreement with that measured by defocus method.

Key words: Pseudoaccommodation, Optical quality analysis system, Push-up method, Intraocular lens, Defocus method

CLC Number: 

  • R779.66
[1] Naka Zawa M, Ohtsuki K. Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 1983, 96(5):435.
[2] 杨亚波, 姚克, 姜节凯, 等.单焦点后房型人工晶状体眼的调节[J].中华眼科杂志, 1996, 32(1):98-100.YANG Yabo, YAO Ke, JIANG Jiekai, et al. Accommodation in pseudophakic eyes with monofocal posterior chamber intraocular lens[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol, 1996, 32(1):98-100.
[3] 吴宪巍, 何伟.人工晶状体眼伪调节研究进展[J].国际眼科杂志, 2008, 8(7):1423-1425.WU Xianwei, HE Wei. Advanced research on pseudophakic accommodation ofeyes with artificial lens[J]. Inter J Ophthalmol, 2008, 8(7):1423-1425.
[4] Saad A, Saad M, Gatinel D. Repeatability of measurements with a double-pass system[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2010, 36(1):28-33.
[5] Díaz-Doutón F, Benito A, Pujol J, et al. Comparision of the retinal image quality with a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor and double-pass instrument[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006, 47(4):1710-1716.
[6] Artal P. Understanding aberrations by using double-pass techniques[J]. J Refract Surg, 2000, 16(5):S560-562.
[7] 年婉青, 周艳峰, 何亚芬. 人工晶状体眼调节力的研究进展[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2012, 12(1):1672-1674. NIAN Wanqing, ZHOU Yanfeng, HE Yafen. Progress in the study of pseudophakic accommodation[J].Inter Eye Sci, 2012, 12(1):1672-1674.
[1] GAO Xue, HAO Linlin, LIU Shaohua, ZHANG Han. Comparison of two intraocular lens measurement formulas for prediction of postoperative refraction accuracy in patients with angle closure glaucoma and cataract [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2018, 32(1): 68-71.
[2] WANG Lei, ZHANG Han. The calculation of intraocular lens refractive power [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2017, 31(4): 21-28.
[3] WEI Chao, ZHANG Han. Multifocal intraocular lens: progress in clinical application. [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2017, 31(4): 29-35.
[4] TIAN Jing, LIAO Xuan, LAN Changjun, TAN Qingqing, LIN Jia, WEN Baiwei. Comparison of high order aberrations in pseudophakia with spherical intraocular lens and aspheric intraocular lens implantation. [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2017, 31(4): 13-17.
[5] JI Shuaifei, ZHANG Jie, YAN Hong. Selection of intraocular lens for patients with age-related macular degeneration. [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2017, 31(4): 36-39.
[6] ZHU Zi-cheng, WEN Yue-chun, WU Zhang-you, KE Gen-jie. Effects of different intraocular lens on macula area of high myopia associated with cataract [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2015, 29(1): 40-43.
[7] WANG Jing, LI Bin, BI Hong-sheng, ZHANG Miao-miao, LI Ying-mei, DING Gang. Comparison of visual performance after implantation of intraocular lenses: accommodative, spherical monofocal and aspheric monofocal [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2014, 28(6): 68-71.
[8] TANG Dong-yong, TAN Shao-jian, LIANG Hao, HE Jian, LI Xia. Effect of posterior vitreous detachment in high myopia eyes after Bigbag intraocular lens implantation [J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2013, 27(3): 50-53.
[9] LI Jian-ping，ZHU Wei. Clinical individual case analysis of poor cases after cataract surgery [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2012, 26(2): 1-1.
[10] LIU Bei1, WANG Lili2, ZHU Zhongqiao1, DU Shanshuang1. Clinical curative effect of vitrectomy combined with implantation of Artisan iris-fixated intraocular  lens in traumatic dislocation of the lens [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2011, 25(4): 87-89.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Website Copyright: Editorial Office of Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University
Address: No.27 Shanda South Road, Jinan, Shandong, China. Post code: 250100 Tel: +86-0531-88366912 Email: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd