Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 75-83.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.532

• 论著 • Previous Articles    

Agreement of intraocular pressure measured by Icare Home tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer: a Meta-analysis

YIN Kexin1, SUN Wu1,2, LIU Hongyan1, XIA Yanting1, WEI Qiping1, ZHOU Jian1   

  1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100078, China2. Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
  • Published:2023-03-30

PDF (PC)

69

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the consistency between Icare Home tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer. Methods Systematic evaluation and meta-analysis were conducted on the consistency of intraocular measured by Icare Home tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer. Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, WANFANG and Sinomed databases were retrieved from inception to November 26, 2021. Stata 14 and Review Manager 5.3 software were used for data processing. Results A total of 12 studies were included, with a total sample size of 922 people(1 284 eyes). The results of the meta-analysis indicated that there was no statistical difference between Icare Home and Goldmann tonometers in measuring intraocular pressure ［MD=0.12, 95%CI(-0.07,0.10), P=0.691, I2=30%］; the difference between the two tonometers was ［MD=0.01,95%CI(-0.16,0.17), I2=86.3%］. Conclusion The results of intraocular pressure measured by Icare Home and Goldmann tonometer are consistent.

Key words: Icare rebound home tonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, Intraocular pressure, Meta-analysis

CLC Number: 

  • R764.23
[1] Jonas JB, Aung T, Bourne RR, et al. Glaucoma[J]. Lancet, 2017, 390(10108): 2183-2193. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31469-1
[2] Mudie LI, LaBarre S, Varadaraj V, et al. The icare HOME(TA022)study: performance of an intraocular pressure measuring device for self-tonometry by glaucoma patients[J]. Ophthalmology, 2016, 123(8): 1675-1684. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.04.044
[3] Nakakura S. Icare® rebound tonometers: review of their characteristics and ease of use[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2018, 12: 1245-1253. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S163092
[4] Cvenkel B, Velkovska MA, Jordanova VD. Self-measurement with Icare HOME tonometer, patients'; feasibility and acceptability[J]. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2020, 30(2): 258-263. doi:10.1177/1120672118823124
[5] Quérat L, Chen E. Clinical use of iCare home® tonometer[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2020, 98(1): e131-e132. doi:10.1111/aos.14169
[6] Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, et al. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2003, 3: 25. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-3-25
[7] Termühlen J, Mihailovic N, Alnawaiseh M, et al. Accuracy of measurements with the iCare HOME rebound tonometer[J]. J Glaucoma, 2016, 25(6): 533-538. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000390
[8] McGarva E, Farr J, Dabasia P, et al. Initial experience in self-monitoring of intraocular pressure[J]. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2021, 31(3): 1326-1332. doi:10.1177/1120672120920217
[9] Ogle JJ, Soo Hoo WC, Chua CH, et al. Accuracy and reliability of self-measured intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients using the iCare HOME tonometer[J]. J Glaucoma, 2021, 30(12): 1027-1032. doi:10.1097/ijg.0000000000001945
[10] 谭娟, 赵平, 刘瑞, 等. iCare HOME眼压计测量眼压的准确性评估[J]. 眼科, 2018, 27(4): 286-290. doi:10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2018.04.009 TAN Juan, ZHAO Ping, LIU Rui, et al. Evaluation of accuracy of measuring intraocular pressure using iCare HOME tonometer[J]. Ophthalmology in China, 2018, 27(4): 286-290. doi:10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2018.04.009
[11] Valero B, Fénolland JR, Rosenberg R, et al. Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure(IOP)measurement with the Icare® Home rebound tonometer(model TA022)and comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients[J]. J Fr Ophtalmol, 2017, 40(10): 865-875. doi:10.1016/j.jfo.2017.06.008
[12] Takagi D, Sawada A, Yamamoto T. Evaluation of a new rebound self-tonometer, icare HOME: comparison with goldmann applanation tonometer[J]. J Glaucoma, 2017, 26(7): 613-618. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000674
[13] Quérat L, Chen E. Monitoring daily intraocular pressure fluctuations with self-tonometry in healthy subjects[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2017, 95(5): 525-529. doi:10.1111/aos.13389
[14] Dabasia PL, Lawrenson JG, Murdoch IE. Evaluation of a new rebound tonometer for self-measurement of intraocular pressure[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2016, 100(8): 1139-1143. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307674
[15] Chen E, Quérat L, Åkerstedt C. Self-tonometry as a complement in the investigation of glaucoma patients[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2016, 94(8): 788-792. doi:10.1111/aos.13129
[16] 张婷婷, 孟京亚, 江俊宏, 等. Icare回弹式家用眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计眼压测量的一致性分析[J]. 眼科, 2018, 27(6): 423-426. doi:10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2018.06.006 ZHANG Tingting, MENG Jingya, JIANG Junhong, et al. Agreement of intraocular pressure measurements between Icare rebound home tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer[J]. Ophthalmology in China, 2018, 27(6): 423-426. doi:10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2018.06.006
[17] Kass MA. Standardizing the measurement of intraocular pressure for clinical research. Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum[J]. Ophthalmology, 1996, 103(1): 183-185. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30741-0
[18] Rosentreter A, Neuburger M, Jordan JF, et al. Factors influencing applanation tonometry-a practical approach[J]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd, 2011, 228(2): 109-113. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1246037
[19] Junk AK, Chang TC, Vanner E, et al. Current trends in tonometry and tonometer tip disinfection[J]. J Glaucoma, 2020, 29(7): 507-512. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001566
[20] Okafor KC, Brandt JD. Measuring intraocular pressure[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2015, 26(2): 103-109. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000129
[21] Noguchi A, Nakakura S, Fujio Y, et al. A pilot evaluation assessing the ease of use and accuracy of the new self/home-tonometer IcareHOME in healthy young subjects[J]. J Glaucoma, 2016, 25(10): 835-841. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000457
[22] Liu J, De Francesco T, Schlenker M, et al. Icare home tonometer: a review of characteristics and clinical utility[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2020, 14: 4031-4045. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S284844
[23] Rojas CD, Reed DM, Moroi SE. Usefulness of icare home in telemedicine workflow to detect real-world intraocular pressure response to glaucoma medication change[J]. Ophthalmol Glaucoma, 2020, 3(5): 403-405. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2020.04.017
[24] Awadalla MS, Qassim A, Hassall M, et al. Using Icare HOME tonometry for follow-up of patients with open-angle glaucoma before and after selective laser trabeculoplasty[J]. Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2020, 48(3): 328-333. doi:10.1111/ceo.13686
[25] 包宇涵, 律鹏, 张文芳, 等. 非接触式眼压计与回弹式眼压计在眼压测量中的准确度分析[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2019, 19(8): 1406-1410. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2019.8.34 BAO Yuhan, LV Peng, ZHANG Wenfang, et al. Accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometer and ICare rebound tonometer[J]. International Eye Science, 2019, 19(8): 1406-1410. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2019.8.34
[26] Pronin S, Brown L, Megaw R, et al. Measurement of intraocular pressure by patients with glaucoma[J]. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2017, 135(10): 1030-1036. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.3151
[27] Rosentreter A, Jablonski KS, Mellein AC, et al. A new rebound tonometer for home monitoring of intraocular pressure[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2011, 249(11): 1713-1719. doi:10.1007/s00417-011-1785-7
[28] Sakamoto M, Kanamori A, Fujihara M, et al. Assessment of IcareONE rebound tonometer for self-measuring intraocular pressure[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2014, 92(3): 243-248. doi:10.1111/aos.12108
[29] Kelekele JK, Kayembe DL, Mwanza JC. Profile of central corneal thickness and corneal endothelial cell Morpho-density of in healthy Congolese eyes[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2021, 21(1): 185. doi:10.1186/s12886-021-01947-x
[30] Chen Y, Rong H, Liu W, et al. Agreement of corrected intraocular pressure values between corvis ST and pentacam in patients with keratoconus, subclinical keratoconus, and normal cornea[J]. Cornea, 2021, 40(11): 1426-1432. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000002707
[31] Colakoglu A, Colakoglu IE, Cosar CB. Correlation between corneal thickness, keratometry, age, and differential pressure difference in healthy eyes[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 4133. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-83683-2
[32] 宋丽华, 陶远, 崔凤华, 等. 屏气对非接触眼压计测量值的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(6): 108-111. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2019.579 SONG Lihua, TAO Yuan, CUI Fenghua, et al. Influence of breath holding on intraocular pressure measured by non-contact tonometry[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(6): 108-111. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2019.579
[33] 席玲, 袁满红, 过朵芳, 等. LASIK患者眼压测量的多因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(2): 99-103. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2016.458 XI Ling, YUAN Manhong, GUO Duofang, et al. Influencing factors of tonometry of intraocular pressure following LASIK[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2017, 31(2): 99-103. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2016.458
[34] Brown L, Foulsham W, Pronin S, et al. The influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using a rebound self-tonometer[J]. J Glaucoma, 2018, 27(6): 511-518. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000948
[1] LIN Manqing, ZHOU Min, CHEN Tengyu, LI-Dan, FANG Caishan, WANG Ruizhi, ZHU Jinxiang, RUAN-Yan, XU Huixian, WANG Peiyuan. Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for nasal irrigation in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(3): 209-225.
[2] JIANG Xuelian, ZHANG Jingyue, WEI Xudong. Evaluation of the efficacy and potential mechanism of biyuan tongqiao granules in chronic sinusitis treatment based on Meta-analysis bridging network pharmacology [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(3): 226-236.
[3] HUANG Kaiyue, LI Xueqing, HAN Gouxin, ZHANG Qinxiu. Meta-analysis of acupoint catgut embedding in the treatment of allergic rhinitis based on the theory of “lung and spleen” [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(3): 266-274.
[4] LIU Shanshan, HAN Shujing, WANG Xiaoxu, LI Yanhong, NI Xin, ZHANG Jie. Hearing loss in children after bacterial meningitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(1): 48-54.
[5] LIU Yi, YU Mingkun, SUN Wei, SHAO Zhen, HU Yuanyuan, BI Hongsheng. The effectiveness and safety of orthokeratology on controlling myopia of children: a meta-analysis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(6): 92-100.
[6] ZHONG Liping, GUAN Xilong, WANG Jingjing, TANG Yong. Intratympanic injections and systemic glucocorticoid treatment for sudden hearing loss: a systematic review and Meta-analysis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(5): 1-10.
[7] LIU Ling,ZHANG Meixia. Drug therapy for myopia [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(4): 123-128.
[8] LIN Xiaoyan, LI Jing, MA Zhiqi, LI Yilin, GAO Xinyi, LI Yong. Therapeutic and anti-allergic effects of probiotics on allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(3): 70-80.
[9] TAN Fengwu, DENG Yaping, LI Kehua. The therapeutic effects of low temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation and CO2 laser surgery on early glottic carcinoma: a Meta-analysis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(6): 63-71.
[10] SONG Lihua, TAO Yuan,CUI Fenghua, GUO Yuanyuan, WANG Hong. Influence of breath holding on intraocular pressure measured by non-contact tonometry [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(6): 108-111.
[11] ObjectiveTo compare the effects of intra-arterial thrombolysis and traditional treatment in central retinal artery occlusion(CRAO). MethodsWe searched the Pubmed, Embase, Clinical.gov, CNKI, and Wan Fang databases for related studies that were published up to May , . We included clinical controls that compared intra-arterial thrombolysis and conventional treatment in CRAO. The random effect model and R software were used for data analysis. ResultsWe identified seven studies including CRAO patients. Meta-analysis results of two randomized controlled trials(RCTs)showed that there was no significant difference in visual acuity improvement between CRAO patients treated with arterial thrombolysis therapy and those with conventional therapy(RR: ., % confidence interval .-., P=.). Meta-analysis results of five cohort studies indicated that compared with conventional therapy, arterial thrombolysis therapy significantly improved visual acuity(RR: ., % confidence interval .-., P<.). The difference between thrombolysis therapy and conventional therapy may be caused by the different treatment time windows in patients. Concerning the adverse reactions after treatment, two RCTs and five cohort studies showed that the adverse reactions in the thrombolysis group are significantly higher than those in the conventional treatment group. ConclusionAlthough intra-arterial thrombolysis therapy has therapeutic potential in CRAO patients, there is still insufficient clinical evidence to prove its effectiveness and safety. Further studies with a large sample and high quality RCTs are required.. Intra-arterial thrombolysis for central retinal artery occlusion: a Meta-analysisCHEN Xi, LI Shanshan, ZHAO Lu, YOU Ran, WANG Yanling Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, ChinaAbstract: [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(4): 28-34.
[12] LI Rui, LI Yong, XIE Hongtao, YUE ZhangXian, LIU Zhaochen, YUAN huimin. Effects of intraocular lens implantation and postoperative intraocular pressure fluctuations on the fundus macular and optic disc vascular density [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(1): 89-92.
[13] JI Di, CHEN Xiang, YU Lin. Soft palate surgeries with hyoid bone suspension for obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome with glossoptosis: a meta-analysis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2019, 33(4): 124-130.
[14] LIU Lin, ZHENG Hua, CHEN Shaolin, DUAN Xuanchu. Neuroprotective effects and safety of stem cell transplantation in rats with experimental glaucoma: a systematic review [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2019, 33(4): 138-144.
[15] LIN Xing, LIN Zongtong, SHEN Ling.. Outcomes of sinus balloon catheter dilation in treatment of pediatric chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2017, 31(6): 79-86.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Website Copyright: Editorial Office of Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University
Address: No.27 Shanda South Road, Jinan, Shandong, China. Post code: 250100 Tel: +86-0531-88366912 Email: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd