Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 31-36.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2020.108

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Narrow band imaging might contribute to the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux

WU Dipanpan1, CUI Xinhua2, GUO Ying2, GENG Bo2, GAO Fangfang2, LIANG Hui2   

  1. 1. Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng 252000, Shandong, China;
    2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China
  • Published:2021-05-14

PDF (PC)

287

Abstract: Objective To explore the possible role of narrow band imaging(NBI)in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux(LPR). Methods According to the Chinese domestic expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux(LPR), we recruited 39 LPR patients who visited our outpatient department. All patients were assessed using the reflux symptom index(RSI)and questionnaires on the reflux finding score(RFS)and NBI endoscopy before and after treatment. At the same time, we selected 19 symptom-negative controls and completed the above examinations. Results Initially, we recruited 39 LPR-positive patients, although two were lost. Compared with the consensus standard, the sensitivity of NBI was 94.6%, its specificity was 78.9%,(Kappa=0.755, P<0.001). Before treatment: According to NBI, the positivity rate was 94.6%. In the control group, the positivity rate was 21.1%. The positivity rates based on RSI and RFS were 24.3% and 94.6%, respectively. The results showed that NBI was as effective as RFS(P=0.003), and the consistency between NBI and RSI was poor(P=0.040). The positivity rate of the study group was significantly different from that of the control group(P<0.001). After treatment, only 21 patients with LPR agreed to undergo post-treatment. The positivity rate of NBI was 71.4%, while that of RSI was 9.5%, indicating poor consistency(P<0.001). The positivity rate of RFS was 61.9%, which was relatively better than that of NBI(Kappa=0.576, P=0.007), showing statistical significance. Compared with the pre-study, the positive rate dropped from 90.5% to 71.4%, although the difference was not statistically significant(P=0.119). Conclusion NBI is valuable for LPR diagnosis.

Key words: Laryngopharyngeal reflux, Narrowband imaging, Diagnosis, Microvessel images, Reflux symptom Index, Reflux finding score

CLC Number: 

  • R766.5
[1] Koufman JA, Aviv JE, Casiano RR, et al. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: position statement of the committee on speech, voice, and swallowing disorders of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2002, 127(1): 32-35. doi:10.1067/mhn.2002.125760.
[2] Sen P, Georgalas C, Bhattacharyya AK. A systematic review of the role of proton pump inhibitors for symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. Clin Otolaryngol, 2006, 31(1): 20-24;discussion24. doi:10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01134.x.
[3] Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index(RSI)[J]. J Voice, 2002, 16(2): 274-277. doi:10.1016/s0892-1997(02)00097-8.
[4] Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score(RFS)[J]. Laryngoscope, 2001, 111(8): 1313-1317. doi:10.1097/00005537-200108000-00001.
[5] Merati AL, Ulualp SO, Lim HJ, et al. Meta-analysis of upper probe measurements in normal subjects and patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2005, 114(3): 177-182. doi:10.1177/000348940511400302.
[6] Altman KW, Prufer N, Vaezi MF. The challenge of protocols for reflux disease: a review and development of a critical pathway[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2011, 145(1): 7-14. doi:10.1177/0194599811403885.
[7] Irjala H, Matar N, Remacle M, et al. Pharyngo-laryngeal examination with the narrow band imaging technology: early experience[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2011, 268(6): 801-806. doi:10.1007/s00405-011-1516-z.
[8] He CD, Yu JC, Huang F, et al. The utility of narrow band imaging in endoscopic diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. Am J Otolaryngol, 2019, 40(5): 715-719. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.06.009.
[9] 何宁, 司勇锋, 杨涌, 等. 窄带成像高清电子鼻咽喉镜对咽喉反流病的诊疗价值[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2012,26(18): 776-778. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2012.18.011. HE Ning, SI Yongfeng, YANG Yong, et al. The value of narrow band imaging laryngoscope for laryngopharyngeal reflux desease[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2012, 26(18): 776-778. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2012.18.011.
[10] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会咽喉组, 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会咽喉学组. 咽喉反流性疾病诊断与治疗专家共识(2015年)[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2016, 51(5): 324-326. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2016.05.002. Subspecialty Group of Laryngopharyngology, Editori, Subspecialty Group of Laryngopharyngology, Society. Experts consensus on diagnosis and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease(2015)[J]. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2016, 51(5): 324-326. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2016.05.002.
[11] Lechien JR, Schindler A, Hamdan AL, et al. The development of new clinical instruments in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: The international project of young otolaryngologists of the International Federation of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies[J]. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis, 2018, 135(5s): S85-S91. doi:10.1016/j.anorl.2018.05.013.
[12] Formánek M, Jancatová D, Komínek P, et al. Laryngopharyngeal reflux and Herpes simplex virus type 2 are possible risk factors for adult-onset recurrent respiratory papillomatosis(prospective case-control study)[J]. Clin Otolaryngol, 2017, 42(3): 597-601. doi:10.1111/coa.12779.
[13] Ren JJ, Zhao Y, Wang J, et al. PepsinA as a marker of laryngopharyngeal reflux detected in chronic rhinosinusitis patients[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2017, 156(5): 893-900. doi:10.1177/0194599817697055.
[14] Barry DW, Vaezi MF. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: More questions than answers[J]. Cleve Clin J Med, 2010, 77(5): 327-334. doi:10.3949/ccjm.77a.09121.
[15] Vaezi MF, Hicks DM, Abelson TI, et al. Laryngeal signs and symptoms and gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD): a critical assessment of cause and effect association[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2003, 1(5): 333-344. doi:10.1053/s1542-3565(03)00177-0.
[16] Gupta R, Sataloff RT. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: current concepts and questions[J]. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2009, 17(3): 143-148. doi:10.1097/MOO.0b013e32832b2581.
[17] Maldonado A, Diederich L, Castell DO, et al. Laryngopharyngeal reflux identified using a new catheter design: defining normal values and excluding artifacts[J]. Laryngoscope, 2003, 113(2): 349-355. doi:10.1097/00005537-200302000-00027.
[18] Harrell SP, Koopman J, Woosley S, et al. Exclusion of pH artifacts is essential for hypopharyngeal pH monitoring[J]. Laryngoscope, 2007, 117(3): 470-474. doi:10.1097/MLG.0b013e31802d344c.
[19] Mazzoleni G, Vailati C, Lisma DG, et al. Correlation between oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and esophageal pH-impedance monitoring in patients with suspected GERD-related extra-esophageal symptoms[J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2014, 26(11): 1557-1564. doi:10.1111/nmo.12422.
[20] Kim SI, Kwon OE, Na SY, et al. Association between 24-hour combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring and symptoms or quality of life in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. Clin Otolaryngol, 2017, 42(3): 584-591. doi:10.1111/coa.12817.
[21] Golub JS, Johns MM III, Lim JH, et al. Comparison of an oropharyngeal pH probe and a standard dual pH probe for diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2009, 118(1): 1-5. doi:10.1177/000348940911800101.
[22] Park KH, Choi SM, Kwon SU, et al. Diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux among globus patients[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2006, 134(1): 81-85. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2005.08.025.
[23] Lechien JR, Saussez S, Schindler A, et al. Clinical outcomes of laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Laryngoscope, 2019, 129(5): 1174-1187. doi:10.1002/lary.27591.
[24] Lechien JR, Finck C, Khalife M, et al. Change of signs, symptoms and voice quality evaluations throughout a 3- to 6-month empirical treatment for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease[J]. Clin Otolaryngol, 2018, 43(5): 1273-1282. doi:10.1111/coa.13140.
[25] Lee YS, Choi SH, Son YI, et al. Prospective, observational study using rabeprazole in 455 patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2011, 268(6): 863-869. doi:10.1007/s00405-010-1475-9.
[26] Habermann W, Schmid C, Neumann K, et al. Reflux symptom index and reflux finding score in otolaryngologic practice[J]. J Voice, 2012, 26(3): e123-e127. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.02.004.
[27] Mahieu HF, Smit CF. Diagnosis and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease[J]. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2006, 14(3): 133-137. doi:10.1097/01.moo.0000193192.01978.a5.
[28] Larghi A, Lecca PG, Costamagna G. High-resolution narrow band imaging endoscopy[J]. Gut, 2008, 57(7): 976-986. doi:10.1136/gut.2007.127845.
[29] Wen YH. Narrow-band ImagingA novel screening tool for early nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2012, 138(2): 183. doi:10.1001/archoto.2011.1111.
[30] Piazza C, Dessouky O, Peretti G, et al. Narrow-band imaging: a new tool for evaluation of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Review of the literature[J]. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital, 2008, 28(2): 49-54.
[31] Kraft M, Fostiropoulos K, Gürtler N, et al. Value of narrow band imaging in the early diagnosis of laryngeal cancer[J]. Head Neck, 2016, 38(1): 15-20. doi:10.1002/hed.23838.
[32] Wang WH, Tsai KY. Narrow-band imaging of laryngeal images and endoscopically proven reflux esophagitis[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015, 152(5): 874-880. doi:10.1177/0194599814568285.
[33] Galli J, Settimi S, Salonna G, et al. Narrow Band Imaging for lingual tonsil hypertrophy and inflammation, in laryngo-pharyngeal reflux disease[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2020, 277(3): 819-825. doi:10.1007/s00405-019-05765-2.
[34] Galli J, Meucci D, Salonna G, et al. Use OF NBI for the assessment of clinical signs of rhino-pharyngo-laryngeal reflux in pediatric age: preliminary results[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2020, 128: 109733. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109733.
[1] HUANG Yangzhou, FU Lihua, WU Qiaolian, HUANG Xia, LIN Jun, YE Qing. Misdiagnosis of nodular fasciitis of mastoid process: a case report [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(5): 119-121.
[2] CHENG Lei, XU Qiuyan, CHEN Hao. Clinical use and significance of allergy testing and diagnostics [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(3): 1-6.
[3] XIONG Panhui, SHEN Yang,YANG Yucheng. Advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic sinusitis based on phenotypes and endotypes [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(3): 15-19.
[4] QIN Ming, SUN Zhanwei, WANG Weiwei, LI Shichao, WU Tianyi, WANG Guangke. Efficacy of alkaline isotonic saline in laryngopharyngeal reflux symptom-positive or finding score-positive patients with chronic rhinosinusitis following endoscopic sinus surgery [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(3): 147-153.
[5] ZENG Xianting, WANG Guangke, SUN Zhanwei, WU Tianyi, LI Shichao, WANG Weiwei. Postoperative efficacy of proton pump inhibitor in the treatment of difficult-to-treat rhinosinusitis with laryngopharyngeal reflux [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(3): 189-194.
[6] HOU Bo, LIANG Chengcheng, WEI Dongmin, YONG Rong, LEI Dapeng, LI Mei. Laryngoscopy observation and voice acoustic analysis of elderly patients with benign laryngopharyngeal lesions in an ENT out-patient clinic [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(2): 20-25.
[7] HUA Hongli, LI Song,TAO Zezhang. Research progress of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(2): 113-119.
[8] LU Xiaoyan, WEN Shuxin. Advances in the treatment of congenital choanal atresia [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(1): 138-142.
[9] WAN Yining, ZHANG Dejun, FU Zeming, GUO Fang, GUO Yingyuan, GUAN Guofang. Diffusion-weighted imaging for accurate diagnosis of congenital middle ear cholesteatoma and JOS staging [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(6): 65-69.
[10] LIU Zhai，,YING Minzheng. Research progress on circRNAs in allergic rhinitis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(5): 105-112.
[11] HUANG Yongwang, FU Dehui. Category and disease classification of voice medicine [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(3): 1-4.
[12] JI Yanping, XUE Yu, LIN Lan. Clinicopathological analysis of nodular fasciitis of head and neck [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(2): 76-79.
[13] YUAN KanglongOverview,XIAO XupingGuidance. Progress in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of cervical necrotizing fasciitis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(6): 135-138.
[14] Vertigo is one of the most important symptom of peripheral vestibular diseases which are difficult to differentially diagnose and manage because multiple disciplines are involved. The premise of effective management is accurate diagnosis of vestibular diseases. With the development of vestibular function examination technology and the deepening of vestibular disease research, great progress has been made in the diagnosis and management of vestibular diseases. The establishment and publication of international classification of vestibular diseases, the introduction of diagnostic standards for various vestibular diseases in the world, the formulation of vestibular disease drugs, surgical specifications and the rapid development of vestibular rehabilitation technology make the diagnosis and management of vestibular diseases more and more standardized and accurate.. Diagnosis and management of peripheral vestibular diseases [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(5): 1-6.
[15] Superior semicircular canal dehiscence(SSCD)syndrome occurs as a result of a bony defect of the skull base involving the superior semicircular canal, particularly at the arcuate eminence. The bony labyrinthine defect creates a direct communication between the dura and the labyrinthine membranous structure and acts as a mobile third window which may result in various auditory and vestibular manifestations. Tinnitus and autophony are the most common audiological manifestations. Dizziness and disequilibrium are the most common vestibular manifestations. Audiometric findings vary based on the severity of the disease. Low-frequency conductive hearing loss is a common finding. Bone conduction thresholds may be negative. A patient with SSCD will typically have a lower Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials(VEMP)threshold response in the affected ear and may also have a larger than normal VEMP amplitude. High-resolution computed tomography(CT)scan of temporal bone plays an important role in confirming the diagnosis of SSCD. Pöschl and Stenver reformatted views are often recommended. Surgical treatment is reserved for patients presenting with debilitating vestibular and auditory manifestations that substantially interfere with their quality of life. There are two main surgical approaches(middle fossa, trans-mastoid)and several techniques(plugging, capping, resurfacing and combination). Presently, there is insufficient evidence to clearly determine which surgical approach or technique is superior. Surgical repair of SSCD through either the middle cranial fossa approach or trans-mastoid approach is highly effective for auditory and vestibular symptom improvement and is associated with a low risk of complications.. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(5): 89-96.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2006, 20(1): 84 -87 .
[2] NIU Shanli,CHAI Maowen,LI Zhenxiu . Endoscopic rhinoplasty of inferior turbinate in 60 patients with chronic hypertrophic rhinitis[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2006, 20(1): 16 -18 .
[3] MENG Qing-guo,LU Yong-tian,FAN Xian-liang .

Association of killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor gene polymorphisms with nasopharyngeal carcinoma

[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(3): 196 -199 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(3): 199 -199 .
[5] WAN Li-jia,LU Hai-tao,JIANG Yi-dao,LIU Hui,LI Qin,SHE La-zhi . Effect of H-uvulopalatopharyngoplasty on obstructive sleep apnea
hypopnea syndrome[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(3): 204 -205 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(3): 222 -224 .
[7] JI Xiao-bin,DENG Jia-de,ZANG Lin-quan,WANG Lei,XIE Jun . Blood histamine in guinea pigs with allergic rhinitis[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(3): 228 -230 .
[8] XIANG Deng,LU Yong-tian,SUN Huan-ji . Endoscopic repair for cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea in 19 cases and a literature review [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(3): 234 -236 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(3): 253 -257 .
[10]
YIN Guo-hua,ZHONG Xiao . Long-term effect of laser reduction on lingua adenoids
[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(3): 280 -282 .
Website Copyright: Editorial Office of Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University
Address: No.27 Shanda South Road, Jinan, Shandong, China. Post code: 250100 Tel: +86-0531-88366912 Email: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd