JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY) ›› 2018, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 68-71.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.512

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of two intraocular lens measurement formulas for prediction of postoperative refraction accuracy in patients with angle closure glaucoma and cataract

GAO Xue, HAO Linlin, LIU Shaohua, ZHANG Han   

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong, China
  • Received:2017-12-06 Online:2018-01-20 Published:2018-01-20

PDF (PC)

409

Abstract: Objective This study compared the SRK-T and Haigis intraocular lens(IOL)measurement formulas for prediction of accuracy in angle closure glaucoma(ACG)combined with cataract. Methods This prospective study of 46 patients(46 eyes)with ACG was performed between January and August 2017. All patients underwent vision, best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), intraocular pressure(IOP), and central anterior chamber depth(ACD)testing, with subsequent phacoemulsification and cataract extraction with IOL implantation. We used two IOL measurement formulas for prediction of postoperative refraction accuracy and compared the mean absolute refractive error(ME)of the two formulas. Results The differences in vision, BCVA, IOP, and ACD were statistically significant(all P<0.01). The ME using the SRK-T formula was significantly smaller than the ME using the Haigis formula(P<0.05). The AL was negatively correlated with the ME measured with the SRK-T formula and showed no significant correlation with the ME measured with the Haigis formula. Conclusion Simple phacoemulsification and cataract extraction with IOL implantation is effective for ACG. The SRK-T formula showed greater predictive accuracy in the ACG group.

Key words: Angle closure, Phacoemulsification, Refractive error, Glaucoma, Intraocular lens measurement formula

CLC Number: 

  • R775
[1] Nongpiur ME, He M, Amerasinghe N, et al. Lens vault, thickness, andposition in Chinese subjects with angle closure[J]. Ophthalmology, 2011, 118(3):474-479.
[2] Prager TC, Hardten DR, Fogal BJ. Enhancing intraocular lens outcome precision: an evaluation of axial length determinations, keratometry, and IOL formulas[J]. Ophthalmol Clin North Am, 2006, 19(4):435-448.
[3] Hoffer KJ. The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1993, 19(6):700-712.
[4] Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review[J]. Acta Ophthalmol Scand, 2007, 85(5):472-485.
[5] 黄振平.屈光手术的最新技术及其临床应用[J].医学研究生学报,2007,20(4):337-342.
[6] Binkhorst RD. The optical design of intraocular lens implants[J]. Ophthalmic Surg, 1975, 6(3):17-31.
[7] Aphinives P, Vachirodom D, Thanapaisal C, et al. A comparison of letrozole and anastrozole followed by letrozole in breast cancer patients[J]. Breast Cancer, 2015, 20(7):37-41.
[8] Schroder S, Wagenpfeil S, Leydolt C, et al. Interpretation of the intraocular lens constants for the haigis formula[J]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd, 2017, 234(8):975-978.
[9] 冯小赛,辛延峰,陈舒,等.人工晶体植入术后前房深度变化的分析[J].浙江临床医学,2007,9(6):807.
[10] 张劲松.白内障超声乳化手术设备的新进展[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2009,27(6):553-555.
[11] Zhao ZF, Duan XX, Song YL. Therapeutic effects study of phacoemulsification and manual sutureless small-incision extracapsular cataract surgery[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2011, 11(8):1407-1408.
[12] Liu XY. The post-operation survival quality comparison between cataract phacoemulsification and small incision extracapsular cataract extraction[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2006, 6(5):1153-1155.
[13] Varma DK, Kletke SN, Rai AS, et al. Proportion of undetected narrow angles or angle closure in cataract surgery referrals[J]. Can J Ophthalmol, 2017, 52(4):366-372.
[14] Stark WJ, Worthen D, Holladay JT, et al. Neodymium: YAG lasers. An FDA report[J]. Ophthalmology, 1985, 92(2):209-212.
[15] Wunder H. Increase A-scan accuracy for improved outcomes[J]. Rev Ophthalmol, 2003, 10(1):36-38.
[16] Joo J, Whang WJ, Oh TH, et al. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in primary angle closure glaucoma[J]. Korean J Ophthalmol, 2011, 25(6):375-379.
[17] Mezer E, Rootman DS, Abdolell M, et al. Early postoperative refractive outcomes of pediatric intraocular lens implantation[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 30(3):603-610.
[18] Seitz B, Bebren SA, Langerburcher A. Cornea topography[J]. Curt Opinion Ophthalmol, 1999, 8(2):8-24.
[19] Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Nguyen NX, et al. Underestimation of intraoeular lens power for cataract surgery after myopic photo refractive kerateotomy[J]. Ophthalmol, 1999, 106(4):693-702.
[20] Haigis W. IOL power calculations[J]. Ophthalmology, 2010, 117(2):400-401.
[21] Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC. Development of the SRK T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1990, 16(3):333-340.
[1] WANG Xinmeng, JI Junya, YU Haonan, FU Hongchen, WANG Xiang, ZHENG Zekun, LI Yan, ZHONG Yingying. Analysis of refractive prediction accuracy after phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis in acute Angle closure glaucoma [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2026, 40(2): 74-79.
[2] YANG Zhen, MENG Sukun, ZHANG Chun. Ophthalmotonic consensual reaction in the fellow eye following unilateral trabectome [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2024, 38(5): 43-51.
[3] LI Yang, MA Ping, ZHANG Han. Effect of different Glaucoma surgery on induced astigmatism [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2024, 38(3): 137-143.
[4] DING Xiaomin, CUI Yan. Advances in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 study about ophthalmology [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2024, 38(1): 122-127.
[5] MENG Sukun, ZHANG Chun. Long-term progress of visual field defect for open-angle glaucoma patients with ab interno trabeculotomy with the trabectome [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(4): 139-148.
[6] HE Meng, TANG Li. Application progress of telemedicine in the management of glaucoma diagnosis and treatment [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(4): 187-195.
[7] ZHANG Yi, TANG Li. Oculocerebrorenal syndrome of lowe with glaucoma: a case report [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(3): 93-97.
[8] DONG Shuguang, GUO Fengfei, MENG Xuxia, YAN Shilong. Retrospective analysis of the causes of anterior capsular tear in early femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(1): 110-114.
[9] ZHONG Yu, LIAO Zhimin, DUAN Xuanchu. Progress in the applications of XEN microstent in glaucoma surgery [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(1): 145-151.
[10] SUN JiOverview,LI CanGuidance. Prediction and stability of axial intraocular lens position after cataract surgery [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(6): 7-12.
[11] LI YansongOverview,ZHU YuguangGuidance. Research progress on the effects of tear film stability on visual quality after phacoemulsification [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(6): 19-25.
[12] SHI Boying, LIANG Hao, LI Yihong, TANG Dongyong. Surgical treatment of a cataract complicated by anti-glaucoma surgery in an adult patient with Blau syndrome [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(6): 60-65.
[13] REN Qing, ZHANG Feng. A case of oculocutaneous albinism combined with bilateral complicated cataract and literature review [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(6): 66-69.
[14] LIU Lele, KONG XiangyunOverview,SHEN JiaquanGuidance. Progress of cyclodestructive surgeries for treating glaucoma [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(6): 123-128.
[15] TANG Feiran, KONG XiangyunOverview,SHEN JiaquanGuidance. Research progress in the role of OCTA in measuring superficial peripapillary vessel density in the diagnosis and treatment of glaucoma [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(5): 77-82.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Website Copyright: Editorial Office of Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University
Address: No.27 Shanda South Road, Jinan, Shandong, China. Post code: 250100 Tel: +86-0531-88366912 Email: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd