Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 75-83.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.532

• 论著 • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Agreement of intraocular pressure measured by Icare Home tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer: a Meta-analysis

YIN Kexin1, SUN Wu1,2, LIU Hongyan1, XIA Yanting1, WEI Qiping1, ZHOU Jian1   

  1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100078, China2. Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
  • Published:2023-03-30

PDF (PC)

205

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the consistency between Icare Home tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer. Methods Systematic evaluation and meta-analysis were conducted on the consistency of intraocular measured by Icare Home tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer. Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, WANFANG and Sinomed databases were retrieved from inception to November 26, 2021. Stata 14 and Review Manager 5.3 software were used for data processing. Results A total of 12 studies were included, with a total sample size of 922 people(1 284 eyes). The results of the meta-analysis indicated that there was no statistical difference between Icare Home and Goldmann tonometers in measuring intraocular pressure ［MD=0.12, 95%CI(-0.07,0.10), P=0.691, I2=30%］; the difference between the two tonometers was ［MD=0.01,95%CI(-0.16,0.17), I2=86.3%］. Conclusion The results of intraocular pressure measured by Icare Home and Goldmann tonometer are consistent.

Key words: Icare rebound home tonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, Intraocular pressure, Meta-analysis

CLC Number: 

  • R764.23
[1] Jonas JB, Aung T, Bourne RR, et al. Glaucoma[J]. Lancet, 2017, 390(10108): 2183-2193. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31469-1
[2] Mudie LI, LaBarre S, Varadaraj V, et al. The icare HOME(TA022)study: performance of an intraocular pressure measuring device for self-tonometry by glaucoma patients[J]. Ophthalmology, 2016, 123(8): 1675-1684. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.04.044
[3] Nakakura S. Icare® rebound tonometers: review of their characteristics and ease of use[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2018, 12: 1245-1253. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S163092
[4] Cvenkel B, Velkovska MA, Jordanova VD. Self-measurement with Icare HOME tonometer, patients'; feasibility and acceptability[J]. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2020, 30(2): 258-263. doi:10.1177/1120672118823124
[5] Quérat L, Chen E. Clinical use of iCare home® tonometer[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2020, 98(1): e131-e132. doi:10.1111/aos.14169
[6] Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, et al. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2003, 3: 25. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-3-25
[7] Termühlen J, Mihailovic N, Alnawaiseh M, et al. Accuracy of measurements with the iCare HOME rebound tonometer[J]. J Glaucoma, 2016, 25(6): 533-538. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000390
[8] McGarva E, Farr J, Dabasia P, et al. Initial experience in self-monitoring of intraocular pressure[J]. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2021, 31(3): 1326-1332. doi:10.1177/1120672120920217
[9] Ogle JJ, Soo Hoo WC, Chua CH, et al. Accuracy and reliability of self-measured intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients using the iCare HOME tonometer[J]. J Glaucoma, 2021, 30(12): 1027-1032. doi:10.1097/ijg.0000000000001945
[10] 谭娟, 赵平, 刘瑞, 等. iCare HOME眼压计测量眼压的准确性评估[J]. 眼科, 2018, 27(4): 286-290. doi:10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2018.04.009 TAN Juan, ZHAO Ping, LIU Rui, et al. Evaluation of accuracy of measuring intraocular pressure using iCare HOME tonometer[J]. Ophthalmology in China, 2018, 27(4): 286-290. doi:10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2018.04.009
[11] Valero B, Fénolland JR, Rosenberg R, et al. Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure(IOP)measurement with the Icare® Home rebound tonometer(model TA022)and comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients[J]. J Fr Ophtalmol, 2017, 40(10): 865-875. doi:10.1016/j.jfo.2017.06.008
[12] Takagi D, Sawada A, Yamamoto T. Evaluation of a new rebound self-tonometer, icare HOME: comparison with goldmann applanation tonometer[J]. J Glaucoma, 2017, 26(7): 613-618. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000674
[13] Quérat L, Chen E. Monitoring daily intraocular pressure fluctuations with self-tonometry in healthy subjects[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2017, 95(5): 525-529. doi:10.1111/aos.13389
[14] Dabasia PL, Lawrenson JG, Murdoch IE. Evaluation of a new rebound tonometer for self-measurement of intraocular pressure[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2016, 100(8): 1139-1143. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307674
[15] Chen E, Quérat L, Åkerstedt C. Self-tonometry as a complement in the investigation of glaucoma patients[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2016, 94(8): 788-792. doi:10.1111/aos.13129
[16] 张婷婷, 孟京亚, 江俊宏, 等. Icare回弹式家用眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计眼压测量的一致性分析[J]. 眼科, 2018, 27(6): 423-426. doi:10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2018.06.006 ZHANG Tingting, MENG Jingya, JIANG Junhong, et al. Agreement of intraocular pressure measurements between Icare rebound home tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer[J]. Ophthalmology in China, 2018, 27(6): 423-426. doi:10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2018.06.006
[17] Kass MA. Standardizing the measurement of intraocular pressure for clinical research. Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum[J]. Ophthalmology, 1996, 103(1): 183-185. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30741-0
[18] Rosentreter A, Neuburger M, Jordan JF, et al. Factors influencing applanation tonometry-a practical approach[J]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd, 2011, 228(2): 109-113. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1246037
[19] Junk AK, Chang TC, Vanner E, et al. Current trends in tonometry and tonometer tip disinfection[J]. J Glaucoma, 2020, 29(7): 507-512. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001566
[20] Okafor KC, Brandt JD. Measuring intraocular pressure[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2015, 26(2): 103-109. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000129
[21] Noguchi A, Nakakura S, Fujio Y, et al. A pilot evaluation assessing the ease of use and accuracy of the new self/home-tonometer IcareHOME in healthy young subjects[J]. J Glaucoma, 2016, 25(10): 835-841. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000457
[22] Liu J, De Francesco T, Schlenker M, et al. Icare home tonometer: a review of characteristics and clinical utility[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2020, 14: 4031-4045. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S284844
[23] Rojas CD, Reed DM, Moroi SE. Usefulness of icare home in telemedicine workflow to detect real-world intraocular pressure response to glaucoma medication change[J]. Ophthalmol Glaucoma, 2020, 3(5): 403-405. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2020.04.017
[24] Awadalla MS, Qassim A, Hassall M, et al. Using Icare HOME tonometry for follow-up of patients with open-angle glaucoma before and after selective laser trabeculoplasty[J]. Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2020, 48(3): 328-333. doi:10.1111/ceo.13686
[25] 包宇涵, 律鹏, 张文芳, 等. 非接触式眼压计与回弹式眼压计在眼压测量中的准确度分析[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2019, 19(8): 1406-1410. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2019.8.34 BAO Yuhan, LV Peng, ZHANG Wenfang, et al. Accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometer and ICare rebound tonometer[J]. International Eye Science, 2019, 19(8): 1406-1410. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2019.8.34
[26] Pronin S, Brown L, Megaw R, et al. Measurement of intraocular pressure by patients with glaucoma[J]. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2017, 135(10): 1030-1036. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.3151
[27] Rosentreter A, Jablonski KS, Mellein AC, et al. A new rebound tonometer for home monitoring of intraocular pressure[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2011, 249(11): 1713-1719. doi:10.1007/s00417-011-1785-7
[28] Sakamoto M, Kanamori A, Fujihara M, et al. Assessment of IcareONE rebound tonometer for self-measuring intraocular pressure[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2014, 92(3): 243-248. doi:10.1111/aos.12108
[29] Kelekele JK, Kayembe DL, Mwanza JC. Profile of central corneal thickness and corneal endothelial cell Morpho-density of in healthy Congolese eyes[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2021, 21(1): 185. doi:10.1186/s12886-021-01947-x
[30] Chen Y, Rong H, Liu W, et al. Agreement of corrected intraocular pressure values between corvis ST and pentacam in patients with keratoconus, subclinical keratoconus, and normal cornea[J]. Cornea, 2021, 40(11): 1426-1432. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000002707
[31] Colakoglu A, Colakoglu IE, Cosar CB. Correlation between corneal thickness, keratometry, age, and differential pressure difference in healthy eyes[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 4133. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-83683-2
[32] 宋丽华, 陶远, 崔凤华, 等. 屏气对非接触眼压计测量值的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(6): 108-111. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2019.579 SONG Lihua, TAO Yuan, CUI Fenghua, et al. Influence of breath holding on intraocular pressure measured by non-contact tonometry[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(6): 108-111. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2019.579
[33] 席玲, 袁满红, 过朵芳, 等. LASIK患者眼压测量的多因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(2): 99-103. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2016.458 XI Ling, YUAN Manhong, GUO Duofang, et al. Influencing factors of tonometry of intraocular pressure following LASIK[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2017, 31(2): 99-103. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2016.458
[34] Brown L, Foulsham W, Pronin S, et al. The influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using a rebound self-tonometer[J]. J Glaucoma, 2018, 27(6): 511-518. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000948
[1] FANG Lu, LEI Yudan, WANG Hua. Meta-analysis of clinical effect of cyclosporine eye drops in combination with sodium hyaluronate eye drops in the treatment of dry eye syndrome [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2026, 40(2): 65-73.
[2] LEI Yudan, FANG Lu, CHEN Jian, PENG Changfu. Meta-analysis of clinical Efficacy of tocilizumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy with steroid resistance or intolerance [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2026, 40(1): 54-67.
[3] XU Xuemeng, FAN Lei, YU Wangbo, JIANG Zhiyue, PAN Chen, HUANG Yongqin. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of omalizumab in combination with specific immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2025, 39(5): 26-33.
[4] SUN Chunxiao, WANG Wenqing, YUE Tian, LIU Jisheng. Efficacy analysis of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with high and low cumulative cisplatin doses in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2025, 39(4): 31-41.
[5] ZHENG Zehao, WEI Jiali, LIU Jiatao, ZHOU Yuqi, SUN Wenting, LI Yuxuan, BAI Peng. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of site-specific acupuncture for the treatment of sudden hearing loss: a systematic review and network Meta-analysis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2025, 39(4): 114-127.
[6] MI Xueqin, LI Songzhe, DENG Yingjie, LI Shengyang, XIAO Dingqi, FAN Lei. Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitors versus gastric mucosal protective agents in the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2024, 38(6): 136-142.
[7] WANG Kaijian, CHEN Xuesheng, WANG Wei. A meta-analysis of the correlation between platelet-lymphocyte ratio and prognosis of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2024, 38(3): 67-73.
[8] LI Yang, LIU Dong, CAO Wenjie. Meta-analysis of the effect of red-light therapy on spherical equivalent, axial length, and choroidal thickness in myopic children [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2024, 38(3): 74-81.
[9] ZHANG Zhen, YANG Zhuoying, ZHOU Jiani, ZHANG Dawei, CHEN Renjie. Efficacy and safety of ciclesonide nasal spray in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis:a Meta-analysis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2024, 38(1): 13-20.
[10] BI Xiaoyun, MA Benxu, WANG Xinru, LI Xuhao, YANG Jiguo. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of acupoint application in treatment of children with allergic rhinitis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(4): 75-85.
[11] LI Zepeng, LI Wenjian, SUN Zhijia. Net Meta-analysis and data mining of patients with acute pharyngitis managed with Chinese medicine [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(4): 111-118.
[12] ZHAI Rui, LI Yuan, YU Jinglong, CHEN Xi, ZHENG Youyou, LIU Zhaolan, WANG Junhong. Meta-analysis of clinical intradermal acupuncture efficacy for treatment of allergic rhinitis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(3): 35-45.
[13] LIN Manqing, ZHOU Min, CHEN Tengyu, LI-Dan, FANG Caishan, WANG Ruizhi, ZHU Jinxiang, RUAN-Yan, XU Huixian, WANG Peiyuan. Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for nasal irrigation in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(3): 209-225.
[14] JIANG Xuelian, ZHANG Jingyue, WEI Xudong. Evaluation of the efficacy and potential mechanism of biyuan tongqiao granules in chronic sinusitis treatment based on Meta-analysis bridging network pharmacology [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(3): 226-236.
[15] HUANG Kaiyue, LI Xueqing, HAN Gouxin, ZHANG Qinxiu. Meta-analysis of acupoint catgut embedding in the treatment of allergic rhinitis based on the theory of “lung and spleen” [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(3): 266-274.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Website Copyright: Editorial Office of Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University
Address: No.27 Shanda South Road, Jinan, Shandong, China. Post code: 250100 Tel: +86-0531-88366912 Email: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd