山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 71-74.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2016.346

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

深圳小学高年级学生嗅觉功能的初步调查及与成绩的相关性初探

潘宏光1,王菊梅2,陈国威1,吴泽斌1   

  1. 1.深圳市儿童医院耳鼻咽喉科, 广东 深圳 518033;
    2.深圳市南山小学校医务室, 广东 深圳 518052
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-09 出版日期:2017-06-16 发布日期:2017-06-16
  • 通讯作者: 潘宏光. E-mail:1481717890@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    深圳市科技创新委员会资助项目(JCYJ20140416141331540)

Olfactory function in healthy senior grade students in Shenzhen city.

PAN Hongguang1, WANG Jumei2, CHEN Guowei1, WU Zebin1   

  1. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Shenzhen Childrens Hospital, Shenzhen 518033, Guangdong, China;2. Department of School Clinic, Shenzhen Nanshan Primary School, Shenzhen 518052, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2016-08-09 Online:2017-06-16 Published:2017-06-16

HTML

PDF (PC)

570

摘要： 目的 探讨SniffinSticks在儿童嗅觉功能检查中的应用可行性。 方法 2015年4月至7月采用SniffinSticks法检测嗅觉正常的深圳某小学五、六年级小学生共70名,比较嗅觉评分与期末考试各科成绩的相互关联,探讨嗅觉记忆与学习能力的可能联系。 结果 选取对象中五年级30名,男17名,女13名;六年级40名,男22名,女18名。70名学生的SniffinSticks正常参考值是:气味阈值(OT):10.95±2.7,气味辨别值(OD):12.92±1.0,气味鉴别值(OI):13.74±1.6;嗅觉功能总分(TDI):37.54±2.2。男女间OT、OD、OI、TDI值差异无统计学意义,五、六年级间OT、OD、OI、TDI值差异亦无统计学意义。OT、TDI与英语成绩呈负相关(P<0.01)。 结论 SniffinSticks嗅觉检测方法能被较大儿童理解和接受,可用于儿童嗅觉测试。高年级男女学生嗅觉功能差异无统计学意义。

关键词: 气味, 嗅觉, 儿童, SniffinSticks检查

Abstract: Objective To explore the clinical value of SniffinSticks test in detection of the olfactory function of children. Methods A total of 70 healthy volunteer senior students were chosen from the Shenzhen Nanshan Primary School from April to July in 2015. Afte detection, the relationship between olfactory function and learning achievement was analyzed. Results Of the 70 students, 30 were the Grade 5 group of which 17 were males and 13 were females, and 40 were the Grade 6 group of which 22 were males, 18 were females. The normal mean of odor threshold test(OT)scores was 10.95±2.7, the mean of the odor discrimination(OD)scores was 12.92±1.0, the mean of odor identification test(OI)scores was 13.74±1.6, the mean of TDI was 37.54±2.2. The differences of OT, OD, OI and TDI between boys and girls were not significant,and the differences between the Grade 5 and Grade 6 groups were not significant either. OT and TDI value were negatively correlated with the score of English achievement(P<0.01). Conclusion SniffinSticks olfactory detection method can be used for childrens olfactory function test. There was no gender difference in the olfactory function of senior students.

Key words: Children, SniffinStick test, Odors, Smell

中图分类号: 

  • R339.12
[1] Lenk S, Bluschke A, Beste C, et al. Olfactory short-term memory encoding and maintenance-an event-related potential study[J]. Neuroimage, 2014, 98(9):475-486.
[2] 倪道凤.嗅觉基础与临床[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010: 62-67.
[3] Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf S, et al. “SniffinSticks”: olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold[J]. Chem Senses, 1997, 22(1):39-52.
[4] Hummel T, Kobal G, Gudziol H, et al. Normative data for the “SniffinSticks” including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2007, 264(3):237-243.
[5] Katotomichelakis M, Balatsouras D, Tripsianis G, et al. Normative values of olfactory function testing using the ‘Sniffin Sticks’[J]. Laryngoscope, 2007, 117(1):114-120.
[6] Sorokowska A, Schriever VA, Gudziol V, et al. Changes of olfactory abilities in relation to age: odor identification in more than 1400 people aged 4 to 80 years[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2015, 272(8):1937-1944.
[7] van Spronsen E, Ebbens FA, Fokkens WJ. Olfactory function in healthy children: normative data for odor identification[J]. Am J Rhinol Allergy, 2013, 27(3):197-201.
[8] Yuan BC, Lee PL, Lee YL, et al. Investigation of the SniffinSticks olfactory test in taiwan and comparison with different continents[J]. J Chin Med Assoc, 2010, 73(9):483-486.
[9] Hummel T, Bensafi M, Nikolaus J, et al. Olfactory function in children assessed with psychophysical and electrophysiological techniques[J]. Behav Brain Res, 2007, 180(2):133-138.
[10] Liu J, Pinto JM, Yang L, et al. Gender difference in Chinese adults with post-viral olfactory disorder: a hospital-based study[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2016, 27(4):1-6.
[11] Nováková L, Valentová JV, Havlícek J. Olfactory performance is predicted by individual sex-atypicality, but not sexual orientation[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(11):234-244.
[12] Kobal G, Klimek L, Wolfensberger M, et al. Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2000, 257(4):205-211.
[13] Chen G, Wei Y, Miao X, et al. Clinical features of olfactory disorders in patients seeking medical consultation[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2013, 19(6):444-450.
[14] Romanos M, Renner TJ, Schecklmann M, et al. Improved odor sensitivity in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder[J]. Psychiatry, 2008, 64(11):938-940.
[1] 刘冰,李蓓,张莉,陈敏,张杰. 学龄前和学龄期BPV患儿临床特征比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 58-60.
[2] 许明,罗兴谷,唐洪波,江青山. 儿童突发性聋的临床特征及预后相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 41-44.
[3] 刘大炜,张宇,李成林,陈秀梅,宋西成. 加速康复外科在儿童OSAS围手术期中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 19-22.
[4] 徐宏鸣,顾美珍,陈芳,蒋钰钢,李晓艳. 小儿喉腔三维有限元模型构建的方法及意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 82-85.
[5] 刘大波. 重视儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征睡眠结构紊乱[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 6-8.
[6] 李延忠,张泰. 关于儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征我们面临的问题[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 1-5.
[7] 许志飞,倪鑫. 重视阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征儿童腺样体[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 9-13.
[8] 王岩,师晓丽. 变态反应与儿童OSAHS的关系[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 14-18.
[9] 杨微,郑莉,许志飞. 中重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征儿童无创正压[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 19-24.
[10] 仇书要,刘大波,钟建文,杨李强. 儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征等离子[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 34-37.
[11] 钟建文,刘大波,罗向前,黄振云,仇书要,程超,杨李强,易新华,曾锦鸿. 可穿戴设备在儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停诊断中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 30-33.
[12] 孙国臣,孙彦,张虹,王保为. 儿童分化型甲状腺癌的临床特征及治疗体会[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(6): 25-28.
[13] 潘永杰,庞文会,孙国臣,孙彦,张虹. 乙酰肝素酶和D2-40在儿童甲状腺癌中的表达及临床意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(6): 29-32.
[14] 徐书杭, 李春睿, 刘超. 儿童甲状腺癌的规范化诊治[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(6): 12-15.
[15] 林兴,林宗通,沈翎. 鼻窦球囊扩张治疗儿童慢性鼻窦炎的系统评价及Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(6): 79-86.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
网站版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》编辑部　
地址：山东省济南市山大南路27号（250100）电话：+86-0531-88366912 E-mail: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发