山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 21-25.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2015.512

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

伴有嗅觉障碍的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者鼻内镜术后嗅觉及生活质量转归的研究

訾晓雪1,赵莉1,金鹏1,屠燕怡1,李昂1,史丽2   

  1. 1. 山东大学医学院, 山东 济南 250012;
    2. 山东大学第二医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 山东 济南 250033
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-04 出版日期:2016-02-16 发布日期:2016-02-16
  • 通讯作者: 史丽. E-mail:shili126@sina.com E-mail:zxx201313669@126.co
  • 作者简介:訾晓雪. E-mail:zxx201313669@126.co
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81441028)

Improvement of the olfaction and quality of life of the chronic rhinosinusitis patients with olfactory disorders.

ZI Xiaoxue1, ZHAO Li1, JIN Peng1, TU Yanyi1, LI Ang1, SHI Li2.   

  1. 1. Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;2.Department of Otolaryngology &Head and Neck Surgery, Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong, China
  • Received:2015-12-04 Online:2016-02-16 Published:2016-02-16

PDF (PC)

1367

被引次数

17

摘要： 目的 探讨伴有嗅觉障碍的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRS)(伴有/不伴有鼻息肉)患者经鼻内镜手术后嗅觉的转归及其生活质量(QOL)的改善情况。 方法 伴有嗅觉障碍的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者44例,其中伴有鼻息肉的患者33例,不伴有鼻息肉的患者11例,于术前行鼻部CT检查(冠状位+矢状位),Lund-Mackay CT评分,并分别于术前、术后4周及12周行T& T嗅觉测试、嗅觉VSA评分及鼻腔鼻窦结局测试(SNOT-20)。 结果 术后4周嗅觉T& T测试59.5%的患者嗅觉有改善,术后12周73.0%的患者嗅觉有改善。术后4周嗅觉vas评分有77.3%的患者嗅觉有改善,术后12周86.4%的患者嗅觉有改善。统计学显示嗅觉T& T测试及嗅觉VAS评分术后4周及12周的得分较术前明显改善(P<0.000 1),术后4周及12周差异无统计学意义(P=0.720,0.147)。SNOT-20评分术前与术后4周及12周均有统计学差异(P<0.000 1),术后4周与12周差异无统计学意义(P=0.055)。术前Lund-Mackay CT评分与T& T嗅觉测试、嗅觉VAS评分呈正相关(r=0.569,P<0.000 1;r=0.782,P<0.000 1)。 结论 鼻内镜术后患者嗅觉及QOL均明显改善,术后4周与12周改善程度差异无统计学意义。患者术前病变范围与嗅觉障碍程度呈正比。

关键词: 鼻内镜外科手术, Lund-Mackay CT评分, 生活质量, SNOT-20评分, 慢性鼻-鼻窦炎, 嗅觉, T&, T嗅觉测试

Abstract: Objective To explore the improvements of olfaction and quality of life(QOL)of the chronic rhinosinusitis(CRS)patients(with / without nasal polyps)with olfactory disorders. Methods 44 CRS patients with olfactory disorders were involved in this study and accepted CT scanning and Lund-Mackay CT score investigation before treatments. VAS score, SNOT-20 score and T&T test were taken before the operation, and 4 weeks and 12 weeks after the operation. Results In the T& T test, there were 59.5% and 73.0% of the patients whose olfaction were improved 4 and 12 weeks after the operation. The improvement rates were 77.3% and 86.4% in the VAS score. There were statistical difference between the pre-operation and post-operative 4 and 12 weeks(P<0.0001)in the T& T test and the VAS score, while the difference between the 4 weeks and 12 weeks after the operation were statistical insignificant(P=0.720,0.147). There was statistical difference between the pre-operation and post-operative 4 and 12 weeks(P<0.000 1)in the SNOT-20 test, while the difference between the 4 weeks and 12 weeks after the operation was statistically insignificant(P=0.055). Lund-Mackay CT score, T & T test, and VAS scores were positively correlated(r=0.569,P<0.000 1;r=0.782,P<0.000 1). Conclusion The olfaction and QOL of the patients significantly improve after endoscopic sinus surgery, and the difference between the 4 weeks and 12 weeks after the operation is statistically insignificant. The extent of the disease in the CRS and the degree of olfactory disorder are positively correlated.

Key words: T test, Endoscopic sinus surgical procedures, operative, Quality of life, Lund-Mackay CT score, Olfaction, Chronic rhinosinusitis, T&, SNOT-20 score

中图分类号: 

  • R765.4
[1] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编委会,中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会鼻科学组.慢性鼻-鼻窦炎诊断和治疗指南(2008年,南昌)[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2009,44(1):6.
[2] 左可军,许庚,王德云,等.慢性鼻-鼻窦炎鼻息肉内镜鼻窦手术前后症状与生存质量的评估[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2007,42(4):245-249. ZUO Kejun, XU Geng, WANG Deyun, et al. Postoperative symptoms and life quality assessment of chronic rhinosinusitis patients received endoscopic sinus surgery[J].Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2007, 42(4):245-249.
[3] Litvack J R, Mace J C, Smith T L. Olfactory function and disease severity in chronic rhinosinusitis[J].Am J Rhinol Allergy, 2009, 23(2):139-144.
[4] Soler Z M, Mace J, Smith T L. Symptom-based presentation of chronic rhinosinusitis and symptom-specific outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery[J]. Am J Rhinol, 2008, 22(3):297-301.
[5] Jiang R S, Lu F J, Liang K L, et al. Olfactory function in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis before and after functional endoscopic sinus surgery[J]. Am J Rhinol, 2008, 22(4):445-448.
[6] 许庚,李源.功能性内窥镜真窦外科[J].中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志,1995,30(2):119.
[7] Yamagishi M, Hasegawa S, Suzuki S, et al. Effect of surgicaltreatment of olfactory disturbance caused by localized ethmoiditis[J]. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci, 1989, 14(5):405-409.
[8] Pade J, Hummel T. Olfactory function following nasal surgery[J]. Laryngoscope, 2008, 118(7):1260-1264.
[9] Soler Z M, Sauer D A, Mace J C, et al. Ethmoid histopathology does not predict olfactory outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery[J]. Am J Rhinol Allergy,2010,24(3):281-285.
[10] 边志刚,姜涛,曹志伟,等.鼻窦炎鼻息肉患者鼻内镜手术后嗅觉功能障碍转归因素分析[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2008,14(3):192. BIAN Zhi-gang, JIANG Tao, CAO Zhiwei, et al. Olfactory rehabilitation and relative influencing factors in sinusitis and nasal polyp patients after endoscopic sinus surgery[J]. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Skull Base Surg, 2008, 14(3):192.
[11] Smith T L. Outcomes research in rhinology: chronic rhinosinusitis[J]. Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 2004,66(2):202-206.
[12] Smith T L, Rhee J D, Loehrl T A, et al. Objective testing and quality-of-life evaluationin surgical candidates with chronic rhinosinusitis[J]. Am J Rhinol, 2003,17(6):351-355.
[13] Wabnitz D A, Nair S, Wormald P J. Correlation between preoperative symptom scores,quality-of-life questionnaires, and staging with computed tomography in patients withchronic rhinosinusitis [J]. Am J Rhinol, 2005, 19(1):91-96.
[14] Michael K,Efthimios S,Gregory T,et al.Predictors of quality of life outcomes in chronic rhinosinusitis after sinus surgery[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2014, 271(4):733-741.
[15] Miwa T, Furukawa M, Tsukatani T, et al. Impact of olfactory impairment on quality of life and disability[J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2001, 127(5):497-503.
[16] Ashraf N, Bhattacharyya N. Determination of the“incidental”Lund score for the staging ofchronic rhinosinustis [J ]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2001, 125(5):483-486.
[17] 赵红, 魏永祥, 苗旭涛,等. 嗅觉障碍与慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者鼻腔鼻窦形态的相关性研究[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2007, 21(17):771-774. ZHAO Hong, WEI Yongxiang, MIAO Xutao, et al. Correlation between olfactory disorders and morphology of nasal cavity[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2007, 21(17):771-774.
[1] 李仕运,谢艳,潘佳煜,陈美馨,龙丹,张春林. 人工耳蜗植入对老年语后聋患者疗效的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(3): 20-30.
[2] 冯思聪,于晓岚,娄丹. 基于囊泡组织Ki67、GM-CSF表达评估Messerklinger中鼻甲成形术对慢性鼻-鼻窦炎合并鼻息肉的效果[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(3): 31-39.
[3] 赵春蓉,杨森,李春燕,王东海,杨宇,杨晓英. 持续正压通气治疗对中-重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者嗅觉及认知功能的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(3): 68-73.
[4] 辛敏,王少明. 炎症与感染性嗅觉功能障碍的神经免疫机制及治疗策略[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(2): 111-124.
[5] 李晗,乔晓峰. 嗅觉训练改善认知功能的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(5): 132-138.
[6] 曹正勇,李小波. 慢性鼻-鼻窦炎合并哮喘术后短程局部使用糖皮质激素辅助治疗的安全性和有效性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 43-50.
[7] 李志成,闫亚,戴梁平,应俊杰, 王仁忠. 嗅觉障碍小鼠和大鼠模型的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 158-167.
[8] 周纯祎,胡慧,张艾琳,王云翠. 嗅觉测试在轻度认知障碍患者早期诊断中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 119-125.
[9] 李霞,侯冉,王丽萍. 基于Web of Science近10年鼻腔冲洗治疗鼻腔疾病的文献计量学分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(2): 52-60.
[10] 王佳慧,刘学勤. 全球近10年干眼相关生活质量研究——基于VOSviewer和CiteSpace的文献计量学及可视化分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(2): 61-72.
[11] 金婧, 冷辉. SARS-CoV-2感染后嗅觉功能障碍治疗的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(5): 162-174.
[12] 朱锦祥,周敏,王睿智,李丹,方彩珊,陈腾宇,林曼青,阮岩. 中医古籍中治疗嗅觉障碍的用药规律分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 86-95.
[13] 李丹, 陈腾宇, 黄演芬, 周敏, 周熠星, 阮岩, 闫亚杰. 国内嗅觉障碍相关研究——基于Citespace的可视化分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(4): 40-48.
[14] 王欢,胡俐,余洪猛. 慢性鼻窦炎相关嗅觉功能障碍研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 43-49.
[15] 宜若男,陈福权. 嗜酸性粒细胞与嗅觉功能障碍[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 50-55.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
网站版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》编辑部　
地址：山东省济南市山大南路27号（250100）电话：+86-0531-88366912 E-mail: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发