等离子点状激发射频消融技术治疗早期声门型喉癌(Tis-T1b)31例

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2020.102

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨等离子点状激发射频消融技术治疗早期声门型喉癌(Tis-T1b)的疗效。方法收集58例早期声门型喉癌(T_is-T_1b)患者,均为男性,根据手术方式分为两组。等离子手术组31例,平均(52.1±8.7)岁,TNM分期为T_is6例,T_1a23例,T_1b2例;CO₂激光手术组27例,平均(55.6±10.3)岁,TNM分期为T_is3例,T_1a22例,T_1b2例。随访6~18个月,记录手术时间、术后疼痛评分和呛咳评分,术后1、3、6个月复查电子喉镜。结果 (1)等离子组手术时间(11.81±2.97)min低于接受CO₂激光组(16.77±2.71)min(P<0.001)。两组患者住院时间、术中出血量、疼痛评分、呛咳评分、前联合粘连率、肉芽增生发生率比较差异均无统计学意义(P=0.676,0.390,0.483,0.483,0.094,0.788);(2)术后所有患者均获得门诊随访,随访期(6~18个月)内无死亡病例。4例患者局部复发,其中等离子组1例T1a,1例累及前联合为T1b,均再次行等离子手术;CO₂激光组2例均累及前联合,其中1例再次行CO₂激光扩大切除;1例合并单侧颈部淋巴结转移,改行环舌根吻合术并择区颈部淋巴结清扫术,随访期内均无复发。两组患者局部复发率差异均无统计学意义(P=0.276);(3)所有患者术后不同时间点的声学参数指标Jitter、Shimer和NHR均逐渐恢复(均P<0.05);等离子组术后嗓音学参数恢复优于CO₂激光组(P=0.000,0.001,0.000)。结论低温等离子点状激发射频消融技术治疗早期声门型喉癌(Tis-T1b)是值得探讨的一种方法,具有手术时间短、黏膜损伤小、嗓音功能保存好等优点,但远期肿瘤控制率及生存率有待进一步观察。

关键词: 低温等离子, 点状激发, 声门型喉癌, 嗓音

Abstract: Objective This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of radiofrequency coblation(RFC)in the treatment of early glottic carcinoma(T_is-T_1b). Methods A total of 58 patients with early glottic carcinoma(T_is-T_1b)at People's Hospital were enrolled from October 2018 to April 2020. All patients were men. According to the surgical method, 31 and 27 patients were included in the RFC and CO₂ laser groups, respectively. The average patient age was 52.1±8.7 and 55.6±10.3 years in the RFC and CO₂ laser groups, respectively. In the RFC group, the tumor-node-metastasis(TNM)stage was T_is, T_1a, and T_1b in 6, 23, and 2 patients, respectively, while in the CO₂ laser surgery group, the TNM stage was T_is, T_1a, and T_1b in 3, 22, and 2 patients, respectively. All patients were followed up for 6-18 months, and the operation time, postoperative pain score, and cough score were recorded. All patients underwent reassessment at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery using an electronic laryngoscope. Results The operation time was shorter in the RFC group than in CO₂ laser group(11.81 vs. 16.77 min, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in the length of hospital stay, blood loss, pain score, cough score, anterior conglutination rate, and granulomatous hyperplasia between the groups(P=0.676,0.390,0.483,0.483,0.094,0.788). All patients were followed up in the outpatient department. No deaths occurred during the follow-up period. Four patients developed local recurrence, including 2 patients(1 patient with T1b involving anterior commissure and 1 patient with T1a)in the RFC group and 2 patients(2 patients with T1b involving anterior commissure)in the CO₂ laser group. Both patients in the RFC group underwent repeat plasma surgery and 1 patient in the CO₂ laser group underwent CO₂ laser extended resection. In one patient with unilateral cervical lymph node metastasis, the surgery was converted to open surgery. There was no significant difference in the local recurrence rate between the groups(P=0.276). The acoustic parameters of Jitter, Shimer, and NHR recovered gradually in all patients at different time points postoperatively(P<0.05), and the acoustic parameters of the RFC group were better than those of the CO₂ laser group(P=0.000,0.001,0.000). Conclusion Radiofrequency ablation with the plasma spot excitation technique is safe and effective for the treatment of early glottic carcinoma(T_is-T_1b). It has the advantages of short operation time, small mucosal injury, and good preservation of voice function. However, the long-term tumor control rate and survival rate need to be further observed.

Key words: Radiofrequency ablation, Plasma spot excitation, Glottic carcinoma, Voice function

中图分类号:

R767.91

肖旭平,周恩,肖禹. 等离子点状激发射频消融技术治疗早期声门型喉癌(T_is-T_1b)31例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(2): 60-66.

XIAO Xuping, ZHOU En, XIAO Yu. Application of radiofrequency ablation with plasma spot excitation in early glottic carcinoma(T_is-T_1b)[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(2): 60-66.

参考文献

[1] Takes RP, Strojan P, Silver CE, et al. Current trends in initial management of hypopharyngeal cancer: the declining use of open surgery[J]. Head Neck, 2012, 34(2): 270-281. doi:10.1002/hed.21613.
[2] Ansarin M, Cattaneo A, de Benedetto L, et al. Retrospective analysis of factors influencing oncologic outcome in 590 patients with early-intermediate glottic cancer treated by transoral laser microsurgery[J]. Head Neck, 2017, 39(1): 71-81. doi:10.1002/hed.24534.
[3] 黄冠江, 罗梦思, 张靖萱, 等. T1a声门型喉癌患者激光和放射治疗后嗓音功能评估文献的Meta分析[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2017, 25(5): 529-535. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2017.05.021. HUANG Guanjiang, LUO Mengsi, ZHANG Jingxuan, et al. A comparative assessment of voice after laser surgery versus radiotherapy of T1a glottic carcinoma: a meta-analysis[J]. J Audiol Speech Pathol, 2017, 25(5): 529-535. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2017.05.021.
[4] Greulich MT, Parker NP, Lee P, et al. Voice outcomes following radiation versus laser microsurgery for T1 glottic carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015, 152(5): 811-819. doi:10.1177/0194599815577103.
[5] 周天骄, 易红良. 等离子射频消融技术治疗早期声门型喉癌的研究进展[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2015, 29(6): 577-580. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2015.06.029. ZHOU Tianjiao, YI Hongliang. The progress of radiofrequency ablation technique in the early glottic cancer[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015, 29(6): 577-580. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2015.06.029.
[6] Chun YS, Pawlik TM, Vauthey JN. 8th edition of the ajcc cancer staging manual: pancreas and hepatobiliary cancers[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2018, 25(4):845-847. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6025-x.
[7] 徐夏, 邓文婷, 黄成志, 等. 喉内镜下等离子消融术与开放性手术治疗早期喉癌的疗效对比[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(2): 81-85. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.177. XU Xia, DENG Wenting, HUANG Chengzhi, et al. Curative effect analysis of endoscopic laryngeal surgery with plasma radiofrequency ablation versus open surgery to treat early glottic cancer[J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2019, 33(2): 81-85. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.177.
[8] Shuang Y, Li C, Zhou X, et al. Outcomes of radiofrequency ablation(RFA)and CO₂ laser for early glottic cancer[J]. Am J Otolaryngol, 2016, 37(4): 311-316. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2016.03.002.
[9] Zhang Y, Wang BR, Sun GB, et al. Carbon dioxide laser microsurgery versus low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation for T1a glottic cancer: a single-blind randomized clinical trial[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2018, 2018: 4295960. doi:10.1155/2018/4295960.
[10] 杨淑芝, 周成勇, 王丰, 等. 经口低温等离子手术治疗侵犯前连合的早期声门型喉癌[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2018, 53(2): 86-91. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2018.02.002. YANG Shuzhi, ZHOU Chengyong, WANG Feng, et al. Analysis of curative effect of transoral radiofrequency ablation microsurgery on glottic carcinoma with anterior commissure involvement at the early stage[J]. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2018, 53(2): 86-91. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2018.02.002.
[11] 刘卫兴, 陈桂, 宋丽娟, 等. 早期声门型喉癌经低温等离子射频消融术和CO₂激光治疗的Meta分析[J]. 中华生物医学工程杂志, 2020, 26(1): 15-20. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-1927.2020.01.003. LIU Weixing, CHEN Gui, SONG Lijuan, et al. Low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation and CO₂ laser treatment for early glottic laryngeal cancer: a meta-analysis[J]. Chin J Biomed Eng, 2020, 26(1): 15-20.doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-1927.2020.01.003.
[12] Canis M, Ihler F, Martin A, et al. Transoral laser microsurgery for T1a glottic cancer: review of 404 cases[J]. Head Neck, 2015, 37(6): 889-895. doi:10.1002/hed.23688.
[13] 谭凤武, 邓亚萍, 黎可华. 低温等离子射频消融与CO₂激光手术治疗早期声门型喉癌疗效的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(6): 63-71. TAN Fengwu, DENG Yaping, LI Kehua. The therapeutic effects of low temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation and CO₂ laser surgery on early glottic carcinoma: a Meta-analysis[J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2020, 34(6): 63-71.
[14] 折素珍, 王斌全, 李莹, 等. CO₂激光治疗前连合受累的早期声门型喉癌的预后分析[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2015, 29(24): 2121-2125. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2015.24.005. SHE Suzhen, WANG Binquan, LI Ying, et al. Prognostic analysis of CO₂ laser surgery for early glottic cancer with anterior commissure involvement[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015, 29(24): 2121-2125. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2015.24.005.
[15] Campo F, Zocchi J, Ralli M, et al. Laser microsurgery versus radiotherapy versus open partial laryngectomy for T2 laryngeal carcinoma: a systematic review of oncological outcomes[J]. Ear Nose Throat J, 2021, 100(1_suppl): 51S-58S. doi:10.1177/0145561320928198.
[16] 周剑盛. CO₂激光治疗早期声门型喉癌疗效的影响因素分析[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2018.
[17] Peretti G, Piazza C, Cocco D, et al. Transoral CO₂ laser treatment for Tis-T3 glottic cancer: The University of Brescia experience on 595 patients[J]. Head Neck, 2009, 32(8): 977-983. doi:10.1002/hed.21278.

相关文章 15

[1]	刘梓琪,黄佳丽,汪李琴,陈曦,张立庆,周涵. 窄带成像内镜联合嗓音声学分析在声带白斑鉴别诊断中的价值[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(6): 87-96.
[2]	邹嵩,许保源,张金星,陈巧婷,李健祥. ABCLOVE嗓音训练法对声带良性增生性病变手术患者嗓音功能的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(3): 32-37.
[3]	罗露,周恩,肖旭平,林志强,方志杰,吕晓虹. 等离子点状激发技术在儿童OSA扁桃体腺样体切除术联合围手术期快速康复中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 26-30.
[4]	王婷玉,吕正华,韩茜茜,孙臻,张海燕,徐伟. 单侧声带麻痹为首发症状的甲状旁腺腺瘤1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(1): 59-65.
[5]	佘志强,刘继远. 不典型喉旁间隙异物1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(3): 60-63.
[6]	马志强,宋惠芸,于海玲. 扁桃体、腺样体切除术对语音及嗓音影响研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(1): 120-123.
[7]	李定波,唐志元,邓智毅,曾宪海,张秋航,王再兴. 低温等离子射频消融术治疗药物性鼻炎27例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(5): 11-17.
[8]	朱晶,张睿,赵媛,李炀,樊孟耘,赵昱. 内镜下低温等离子消融治疗不同炎症分期先天性梨状窝瘘45例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(5): 24-29.
[9]	李利杰,田秀芬. CO₂激光联合低温等离子治疗早期声门型喉癌40例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(4): 79-85.
[10]	侯波,梁程程,魏东敏,雍蓉,雷大鹏,李梅. 耳鼻咽喉门诊咽喉良性病变老年患者喉镜观察与嗓音声学分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(2): 20-25.
[11]	张旻, 刘永亮, 宋道亮, 韩学锋, 封新荣, 赵允沛. 鼻内镜下改良下鼻甲成形术与下鼻甲低温等离子消融加骨折外移术治疗重度慢性肥厚性鼻炎的临床对比研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(6): 83-88.
[12]	陈国平,傅敏仪,叶飞,徐建慧. 早期声门型喉癌钬激光与CO₂激光手术对比研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(4): 8-11.
[13]	吴允刚,张辉,孙聚兴,刘涛,王彩华,杨欣欣,马林祥,李笑颖,庞太忠,李晓瑜. 环甲膜联合喉室入路切除T1B声门型喉癌临床疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(4): 30-34.
[14]	牛子捷,肖洋,王军,马丽晶. 喉乳头状瘤手术治疗的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(4): 96-100.
[15]	黄永望,傅德慧. 嗓音医学的范畴和疾病分类[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(3): 1-4.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed