山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3): 47-49.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2013.014

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

继发性黄斑前膜的病因分析及手术疗效观察

冉莉莉1,2,原公强2,董晓光2   

  1. 1.青岛大学医学院, 山东 青岛 266021; 2.山东省眼科研究所青岛眼科医院, 山东 青岛 266071
  • 收稿日期:2013-01-10 发布日期:2013-06-16
  • 通讯作者: 董晓光,教授,博士生导师。Email:dxgdoctor@hotmail.com
  • 作者简介:冉莉莉。Email:ranlilirll@126.com

Causes and efficacy of vitrectomy for secondary epiretinal membrane

RAN Li-li1,2, YUAN Gong-qiang2, DONG Xiao-guang2.   

  1. 1.Medical College of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, Shandong,  China; 2.Shandong Eye Institute, Qingdao Eye Hospital, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, China
  • Received:2013-01-10 Published:2013-06-16

摘要:

目的   观察各种原因引起的继发性黄斑前膜眼的黄斑形态及功能变化,探讨手术治疗的意义。方法   回顾性分析2008年10月至2012年8月因“继发性黄斑前膜”行剥除黄斑前膜手术55例(55眼)的临床资料,对继发性黄斑前膜的病因及发病情况作分类和比较,应用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)观察黄斑形态的变化、黄斑中心神经上皮层厚度(CMT)、IS/OS层的完整性,比较手术前后最佳矫正视力(BCVA,logMAR)的变化。手术前后视力的比较用配对t检验,IS/OS层完整组与不完整组的视力及CMT比较用独立样本t检验。结果   造成继发性黄斑前膜的病因有眼外伤、白内障手术、激光视网膜光凝术、视网膜静脉栓塞等。除5例失访(9.09%)外,完成随访的50例视力与术前相比,40例(80.00%)提高,10例(20.00%)不变;术后BCVA较术前相比,差异有统计学意义(t=-7.467, P<0.001)。IS/OS层完整组的术后BCVA好于IS/OS不完整组(t=-4.437, P<0.001),而两组间CMT差异无统计学意义(t=-0.990, P=0.329)。结论   继发性黄斑前膜对黄斑功能影响显著,手术治疗可以保存或改善患者的视功能。

关键词: 继发性黄斑前膜, 视力, 光学相干断层扫描, 外科手术

Abstract:

Objective   To observe morphological and functional changes in the macular in eyes with different kinds of secondary epiretinal membranes (SEM) and to explore the significance of surgical treatment. Methods   A retrospective, observational case series of 55 patients with SEM who underwent pars plana vitrectomy and membrane peeling during October 2008 and August 2012 were included. The causes of SEM were classified. Changes in macular morphology before and after the surgery were observed by optical coherence tomography. The thickness of neuroepithelium in the central macular area(CMT) and the integrity of its IS/OS layer were recorded, as well as best corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR). Paired t test was used to compare pre-operative and post-operative BCVA. Independent sample t test was used to compare BCVA and CMT between group of IS/OS layer integrity and unintegrity. Results   Trauma, cataract surgery,laser photocoagulation,and retinal vein occlusion etc had relation with this disease.5 patients(9.09%) were lost for follow-up. In the other 50 patients, 40 eyes (80.00%) had their vision improved and 10 eyes (20.00%) had no changed. Postoperative BCVA was improved (t=-7.467, P<0.001).The eyes with intact IS/OS layer had better post-operative BCVA than the other eyes(t=-4.437, P<0.001),but CMT did not(t=-0.990, P=0.329). Conclusion   Secondary epiretinal membrane has significant influence on macular function. Surgical treatment can save or improve the patients’ visual quality.

Key words: Optical coherence tomography, Surgical procedures, operative, Secondary epiretinal membrane, Vision

中图分类号: 

  • R779.62
[1] 王丽,张宇,张华,刘雪艳,宋西成. 加速康复外科理念在鼻窦外科手术的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 23-26.
[2] 王春雨,张芬,王贝贝,李宇玥,王小雨,李志云,张庆泉. 喉白斑32例临床诊治分析及再认识[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 114-116.
[3] 宋西成. 加速康复外科理念在头颈肿瘤手术的应用价值[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 1-4.
[4] 李华斌, 赖玉婷. 慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的发病机制及诊疗进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 4-9.
[5] 张炜,曾昱菡,余先崧. 慢性鼻窦炎手术前后ECP、EGF、IL-6的水平变化及临床意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 63-67.
[6] 刘晓静,王愿,张立庆,冯剑,赵青,宋圣花,周涵,董伟达. 鼻窦骨纤维异常增殖症36例临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 73-78.
[7] 王愿,周涵,刘晓静,张立庆,赵青,冯剑,董伟达. 鼻内翻性乳头状瘤的术式选择和疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 79-83.
[8] 朱丽. 近期鼻骨与鼻中隔复合外伤鼻内镜下成形术[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(1): 7-9.
[9] 李娜. 美容与功能兼顾——浅谈鼻畸形整复与鼻中隔成形术[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(1): 1-2.
[10] 吴晴伟,赵影颖,王珮华,王钟颖,陈东. 鼻尖鼻背缺损延期局部皮瓣修复的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(1): 14-17.
[11] 华骋, 陈振雨,张维娜,李娜. 鼻内镜辅助下外鼻整形同期鼻中隔偏曲矫正术[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(1): 33-36.
[12] 姜震,雷大鹏,刘大昱,孙睿杰,于学民,李学新,林云,潘新良. 颈根部占位性病变的诊断与治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(1): 53-55.
[13] 李俏丽,李超,王薇,蔡永聪,孙荣昊,周雨秋,税春燕, 黄璐,涂静. 术后放化疗后复发并侵及侧颅底的原发性腮腺鳞状细胞癌一例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(1): 87-88.
[14] 江英,陈玥竹,饶郁芳,唐玥玓. 鼻中隔-鼻整形术矫正严重外伤性鼻畸形伴鼻中隔偏曲一例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(1): 45-47.
[15] 孙国臣,孙彦,张虹,王保为. 儿童分化型甲状腺癌的临床特征及治疗体会[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(6): 25-28.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!