客观视觉质量分析系统测量人工晶体伪调节力的临床研究

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2015.057

山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 84-85.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2015.057

客观视觉质量分析系统测量人工晶体伪调节力的临床研究

王晶^1,2, 武芹², 吴昊³, 刘春雷², 毕宏生⁴

1. 山东中医药大学2012级硕士研究生, 山东济南 250355;
2. 济南市第二人民医院眼科, 山东济南 250001;
3. 济南市第五人民医院眼科, 山东济南 250022;
4. 山东中医药大学附属眼科医院, 山东济南 250002

收稿日期:2015-01-28 修回日期:2015-04-17 发布日期:2015-06-16
作者简介:王晶。E-mail:eye8088@163.com

Comparison of pseudoaccommodation measured by optical quality analysis system

WANG Jing^1,2, WU Qin², WU Hao³, LIU Chunlei², BI Hongsheng⁴

1. Graduate Student of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, Shandong, China;
2. Departement of Ophthalmology, Jinan Second People's Hospital, Jinan 250001, Shandong, China;
3. Department of Ophthalmology, The 5th People's Hospital Of Jinan, Jinan 250022, Shandong, China;
4. Ophthalmology Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250002, Shandong, China

Received:2015-01-28 Revised:2015-04-17 Published:2015-06-16
Contact: 毕宏生。E-mail:hongshengbi@126.com E-mail:hongshengbi@126.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的运用双通道视觉质量分析系统(OQAS)测量白内障患者人工晶体植入术后的伪调节力, 并与传统的主观检测手段进行对比, 比较三种方法的差异性和一致性。方法于济南第二人民医院眼科门诊随机选择30例(30眼)年龄相关性白内障患者, 手术植入同类型两袢单焦点非球面人工晶体, 术后1个月用OQAS检查、离焦法、推进法测量每位白内障患者人工晶体植入术后的伪调节力。结果 OQAS检查、离焦法、推进法测得的人工晶体伪调节力平均值分别为2.34D、2.5D和2.93D;OQAS检查与离焦法差异无统计学意义, OQAS检查与推进法的测量值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 OQAS检查测量的伪调节力相对较小, 其测量结果与离焦法所测结果数值相近。

关键词: 视觉质量分析系统, 离焦法, 推进法, 人工晶状体, 伪调节力

Abstract: Objective To study pseudoaccommodation of different intraocular lenses with a double-pass system, and the results were compared with those by the defocus method and push-up method. Methods A total of 30 outpatients with age-related cataract were selected in this study. All the enrolled eyes were implanted with the same aspheric intraocular lens. The pseudoaccommodation of each selected eye was measured by optical quality analysis system(OQAS), defocus system and push-up method one month after the operation. Results The average pseudoaccommodation by OQAS examination, defocus method and push-up method was 2.34D, 2.5D and 2.93D, respectively. There's no statistical difference between OQAS examination and defocus method(P>0.05). But there's statistical difference between OQAS examination and push-up method(P<0.05). Conclusion The pseudoaccommodation measured by OQAS was relatively small. The results measured by OQAS was in close agreement with that measured by defocus method.

Key words: Pseudoaccommodation, Optical quality analysis system, Push-up method, Intraocular lens, Defocus method

中图分类号:

R779.66

王晶, 武芹, 吴昊, 刘春雷, 毕宏生. 客观视觉质量分析系统测量人工晶体伪调节力的临床研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(3): 84-85.

WANG Jing, WU Qin, WU Hao, LIU Chunlei, BI Hongsheng. Comparison of pseudoaccommodation measured by optical quality analysis system[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2015, 29(3): 84-85.

参考文献

[1] Naka Zawa M, Ohtsuki K. Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 1983, 96(5):435.
[2] 杨亚波, 姚克, 姜节凯, 等.单焦点后房型人工晶状体眼的调节[J].中华眼科杂志, 1996, 32(1):98-100.YANG Yabo, YAO Ke, JIANG Jiekai, et al. Accommodation in pseudophakic eyes with monofocal posterior chamber intraocular lens[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol, 1996, 32(1):98-100.
[3] 吴宪巍, 何伟.人工晶状体眼伪调节研究进展[J].国际眼科杂志, 2008, 8(7):1423-1425.WU Xianwei, HE Wei. Advanced research on pseudophakic accommodation ofeyes with artificial lens[J]. Inter J Ophthalmol, 2008, 8(7):1423-1425.
[4] Saad A, Saad M, Gatinel D. Repeatability of measurements with a double-pass system[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2010, 36(1):28-33.
[5] Díaz-Doutón F, Benito A, Pujol J, et al. Comparision of the retinal image quality with a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor and double-pass instrument[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006, 47(4):1710-1716.
[6] Artal P. Understanding aberrations by using double-pass techniques[J]. J Refract Surg, 2000, 16(5):S560-562.
[7] 年婉青, 周艳峰, 何亚芬. 人工晶状体眼调节力的研究进展[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2012, 12(1):1672-1674. NIAN Wanqing, ZHOU Yanfeng, HE Yafen. Progress in the study of pseudophakic accommodation[J].Inter Eye Sci, 2012, 12(1):1672-1674.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

客观视觉质量分析系统测量人工晶体伪调节力的临床研究

Comparison of pseudoaccommodation measured by optical quality analysis system

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

多维度评价

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	魏超, 张晗. 多焦点人工晶状体的临床应用进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 29-35.
[2]	田靖,廖萱,兰长骏,谭青青,林佳,文佰伟. 不同球差非球面人工晶状体眼高阶像差比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 13-17.
[3]	冀帅飞,张婕,严宏. 年龄相关性黄斑变性患者人工晶状体的选择[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 36-39.
[4]	朱子诚, 温跃春, 吴章友, 柯根杰. 高度近视合并白内障患者植入不同人工晶状体术后黄斑区视网膜厚度的变化[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(1): 40-43.
[5]	闻华明1，李海祥2. 应用三角函数法估算LASIK术后人工晶状体度数[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(5): 74-76.
[6]	唐东永，谭少健，梁皓，何剑，李霞. Bigbag人工晶状体应用于高度近视白内障眼玻璃体后脱离的临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(3): 50-53.
[7]	杨志强,王改霞 . 新型弹性开放袢前房型人工晶状体植入术27例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 269-270 .