山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 75-79.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2015.552

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

脉冲CO2激光与Er:YAG激光中耳骨消融的实验研究

王晓燕1,郑燕青2,郑昊1,叶青1   

  1. 1.福建医科大学省立临床医学院耳鼻咽喉科, 福建 福州 350001;
    2.泉州市妇幼保健院·儿童医院, 福建 泉州 362000
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-29 出版日期:2016-08-16 发布日期:2016-08-16
  • 通讯作者: 叶青. E-mail:1158113213@qq.com E-mail:wxiaoyan0407@163.co
  • 作者简介:王晓燕. E-mail:wxiaoyan0407@163.co
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(61475036);福建省自然科学基金项目(2011J01135);福建省临床重点专科建设项目［闽卫医政(2015)593号］

Bone ablation in middle ear with pulsed CO2 laser and Er:YAG laser: an experimental study.

WANG Xiaoyan1, ZHENG Yanqing2, ZHENG Hao1, YE Qing   

  1. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Provincial Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, China;2. Quanzhou Women and Childrens Hospital, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, China
  • Received:2015-12-29 Online:2016-08-16 Published:2016-08-16

HTML

PDF (PC)

1095

摘要： 目的 建立激光中耳骨消融的活体动物模型,初步研究脉冲CO2激光及Er:YAG激光中耳骨消融的可行性,在耳科手术中寻求除电钻外另一快速、安全的手术工具方式。 方法 24只兔分为三组,分别采用电钻、CO2激光、Er:YAG激光为手术工具,研磨或消融中耳骨至暴露中耳腔,比较三种工具活体动物中实际操作的可行性,观察实验现象,比较手术速度,并利用连续组织切片HE染色技术检测周围组织形态改变。 结果 在活体兔实验模型中,两种激光系统及传统电钻都可达到有效开窗,三组手术工具开窗所用时间长短不一;三组暴露中耳腔所用时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);电钻磨骨与激光消融骨组织形态改变相似。 结论 使用激光可迅速消融骨质暴露中耳腔,激光可作为除电钻外的另一耳科手术工具。

关键词: 电钻, 中耳, CO2激光, Er:YAG激光, 骨消融

Abstract: Objective To study the feasibility of bone ablation in middle ear with pulsed CO2 laser and Er:YAG laser in rabbit models, in order to provide a new and safe tool for fenestration operation in middle ear. Methods A total of 24 New Zealand rabbits were randomly divided into 3 groups: drill group, CO2 laser group, and Er:YAG laser group. The three tools were used to perform fenestration operation of middle ear. The feasibility of bone ablation, experimental phenomena, total operation time and light irradiation time, and opening efficiency were compared. The morphologic changes of adjacent tissues were observed with tissue slicing and HE staining after irradiation. Results All of the three approaches were suitable for fenestration operation of middle ear bone, with different operation time, but there was no statistical difference(P>0.05). The three groups had similar morphologic characteristics after fenestration. Conclusion Both pulsed CO2 laser and Er:YAG laser can ablate bone rapidly in the fenestration operation, which can serve as a new tool in otological surgeries besides electric drill.

Key words: Middle ear, Er:YAG laser, Bone ablation, Electric drill, CO2 laser

中图分类号: 

  • R764.9
[1] Michaelides E M, Kartush J M. Implications of sound levels generated by otologic devices[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2001, 125(4): 361-363.
[2] Szyfter W, Mielcarek-Kuchta D, Modkowska A, et al. Stapedotomie with the use of CO2 laser-“one shot” technique[J]. Otolaryngol Pol, 2013, 67(2): 87-94.
[3] Albers A E, Schönfeld U, Kandilakis K, et al. CO2 laser revision stapedotomy[J]. Laryngoscope, 2013, 123(6): 1519-1526.
[4] 李永新, 张国平, 王顺成, 等. 耳道内径路CO2激光镫骨手术治疗耳硬化症[J]. 中国医学文摘: 耳鼻咽喉科学, 2011, 26(6):324-325. LI Yongxin, ZHANG Guoping, WANG Shuncheng, et al. CO2 laser stape surgery through the ear canal on the treatment of otosclerosis[J]. Chin Med Digest: Otolaryngol, 2011, 26(6):324-325.
[5] Elmadag M, Uzer G, Yildiz F, et al. Comparison of four different techniques for performing an osteotomy: a biomechanical, radiological and histological study on rabbits tibias[J]. Bone Joint J, 2015, 97-B(12):1628-1633.
[6] Panduric D G, Juric I B, Music S, et al. Morphological and ultrastructural comparative analysis of bone tissue after Er:YAG laser and surgical drill osteotomy[J]. Photomed Laser Surg, 2014, 32(7):401-408.
[7] Stefan Stübinger. Advances in bone surgery: the Er:YAG laser in oral surgery and implant dentistry[J]. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent, 2010, 2:47-62.
[8] 王晓燕, 叶青, 沈帆, 等. 兔中耳进路及中耳解剖结构的研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(6):37-40. WANG Xiaoyan, YE Qing, SHEN Fan, et al. Rabbits middle ear approach and its anatomic structure[J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2011, 25(6):37-40.
[9] Zhang X, Zhan Z, Liu H, et al. Influence of water layer thickness on hard tissue ablation with pulsed CO2 laser[J]. J Biomed Opt, 2012, 17(3):038003.
[1] 孟玮,于振坤,郑雅丽,李光飞,梁龙君,王小敏. 术前模拟力学研究在拟植入耳赝附体先天性外中耳畸形患者中的应用价值[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 27-30.
[2] 孟立新,李健,韦善文. 鼓膜微管置入术治疗中耳不张76例临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 61-65.
[3] 周佳蕾,孙世冰,李晓艳. 婴幼儿宽频声导抗测试[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 91-94.
[4] 谢日林,张志平. 布地奈德体位滴鼻治疗伴腺样体肥大的小儿分泌性中耳炎31例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(1): 65-67.
[5] 张孟璐,李永团. 继发性胆脂瘤中CCL27的定位及检测[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(6): 46-48.
[6] 郝艳,李栋才,蓝建平. CO2激光显微手术与传统显微手术切除声带息肉疗效比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(6): 68-70.
[7] 马钊恩, 翟锦明, 廖礼兵, 杨震. 咽鼓管球囊扩张术治疗慢性分泌性中耳炎的短期疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(5): 54-56.
[8] 郭颖媛,张德军,朱琳,马帅帅,管国芳. 一例中耳腺瘤的诊疗体会并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 111-114.
[9] 吴允刚,张辉,刘黎明,庞太忠,李晓瑜. 鼓膜激光打孔治疗分泌性中耳炎20例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(1): 85-87.
[10] 孙娜综述,陈晓平审校. 咽喉反流与耳鼻咽喉科疾病[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(6): 85-89.
[11] 杜丽君,童军,陈文文,邓亚新,蔡勋华,单良. 单侧听力耳中耳炎手术经验再探讨[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(6): 8-10.
[12] 薛建军. CO2激光治疗舌根部肿物18例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(6): 61-62.
[13] 贾岩峰,杨春伟,宋富春,杨相立,王林,刘吉祥. CO2激光联合质子泵抑制剂治疗复发性声带突肉芽肿的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(5): 106-109.
[14] 马玲国,郑朝攀,周敬淳,张博,龚桃根,张云静. CO2激光治疗声门型喉癌远期疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(5): 98-100.
[15] 刘斌,江育玲,肖旭平. 钛质人工听小骨在开放式鼓室成形术中的疗效观察与应用体会[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(4): 80-83.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
网站版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》编辑部　
地址：山东省济南市山大南路27号（250100）电话：+86-0531-88366912 E-mail: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发