山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 41-44.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.204

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

长时程低强度噪声暴露对豚鼠内毛细胞带状突触的影响分析

宋峰1,甘彬1,许安廷2,王坚3   

  1. 1.山东大学临床医学院, 山东 济南 250012;
    2.山东大学第二医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 山东 济南 250033;
    3.东南大学医学院听觉研究所, 江苏 南京 210009
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-11 出版日期:2017-10-16 发布日期:2017-10-16
  • 通讯作者: 许安廷. E-mail:1462684580@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81371084)

Long-term low intensity noise exposure reduce the number of ribbon synapses in guinea pigs.

SONG Feng1, GAN Bin1, XU Anting2, WANG Jian3   

  1. 1. School of Clinical Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong, China;3. Institute of Hearing, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2017-05-11 Online:2017-10-16 Published:2017-10-16

摘要: 目的 观察日常生活可遇低强度噪声多次暴露对豚鼠耳蜗带状体突触的损失和恢复,以及对听觉功能的影响。 方法 对豚鼠行95 dB声压级白噪声环境下4 h/d暴露,连续暴露7 d,于噪声后1 d、1周、1个月分组行听力学检查,并与对照组动物比较(每组10只),以免疫荧光法双标法对突触前膜Ctbp2和突触后膜PSD95进行标记并计数。 结果 长时程、低强度噪声暴露后听觉脑干诱发电位阈值提高(P<0.05),豚鼠内毛细胞排布形态数量均无明显改变,但内毛细胞带状突触数量有明显减少(P<0.05)并有不完全恢复。 结论 “安全剂量”低强度噪声多次暴露后可造成可逆听觉阈值升高,伴随内毛细胞带状体突触的明显减少和不完全恢复。

关键词: 听性脑干反应, 低强度噪声, 带状突触

Abstract: Objective To observe the possible loss and recovery of ribbon synapses in the cochlea of guinea pigs repeatedly exposed to low-intensity noise. Methods Guinea pigs were exposed to 95 dB sound pressure level of white noise for 4 hours per day, continuously for 7 days. The animals were then divided into three groups, and respectively named group 1DPN(1 day post-noise), 1WPN(1 week post-noise), and 1MPN(1 month post-noise), with each group containing 10 guinea pigs. Audiological examinations(auditory brainstem response)and immunofluorescence staining were performed,and the number of ribbon synapses were counted by observing double staining results of C-terminal-binding protein 2 and postsynaptic density protein 95 labeling. Results After long-term low-intensity noise exposure, the auditory brainstem responsethreshold of group 1DPN significantly increased(P<0.05)compared to the control group. No apparent changes in hair cell shape, arrangement, or number were observed, but the number of ribbon synapses was statistically significant(P<0.05). With the extension of time after leaving the noisy environment, the ABR threshold and number of synapses recovered gradually. Conclusion Repeated exposure to long-term, low-intensity noise can cause hearing loss, which is reversible after leaving the noisy environment. Reduction in the number of inner hair cell ribbon synapses caused by long-term low-intensity noise exposure can restore partially while in a noise-free environment.

Key words: Ribbon synapse, Auditory brainstem response, Low intensity noise

中图分类号: 

  • R764.43
[1] Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Synaptopathy in the noise-exposed and aging cochlea: primary neural degeneration in acquired sensorineural hearing loss[J]. Hear Res, 2015, 330(Pt B):191.
[2] Lin HW, Furman AC, Kujawa SG, et al. Primary neural degeneration in the Guinea pig cochlea after reversible noise-induced threshold shift[J]. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 2011, 12(5):605-616.
[3] Shi L, Liu L, He T, et al. Ribbon synapse plasticity in the cochleae of Guinea pigs after noise-induced silent damage[J]. PloS One, 2013, 8(12):e81566.
[4] Song Q, Shen P, Li X, et al. Coding deficits in hidden hearing loss induced by noise: the nature and impacts[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6:25200.
[5] Shi L, Chang Y, Li X, et al. Coding deficits in noise-induced hidden hearing loss may stem from incomplete repair of ribbon synapses in the cochlea[J]. Fron Neuro, 2016, 10(26):231.
[6] Liu L, Wang H, Shi L, et al. Silent damage of noise on cochlear afferent innervation in guinea pigs and the impact on temporal processing[J]. PloS One, 2012, 7(11):e49550.
[7] Wan G, Corfas G. Transient auditory nerve demyelination as a new mechanism for hidden hearing loss[J]. Nature Comm, 2017, 8:14487.
[1] 陈伟,胡中南,童钊君,李湘宇,刘文君. 青中年无眩晕、心脑血管疾病病史的突发性聋患者高刺激率听性脑干反应特征分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 45-49.
[2] 刘志奇1,2,刘立思1,杨琨3 . 新生儿听力筛查11894例结果分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(2): 8-12.
[3] 曹效平,王天生,顾东胜,黄爱萍. 正常听力耳鸣患者听尼特TM检测及高刺激率听觉脑干反应结果及分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2012, 26(4): 6-9.
[4] 鄢慧琴,王海涛,周枫,黄利芬 . 正常豚鼠听性脑干反应与听性稳态反应的对比[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(3): 43-45.
[5] 余崇仙,杨克林,张晓敏,汪平. 3~4月龄及5~6月龄婴儿听性脑干反应的正常值分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2010, 24(4): 17-20.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!