山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 68-70.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.034

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

CO2激光显微手术与传统显微手术切除声带息肉疗效比较

郝艳,李栋才,蓝建平   

  1. 深圳市龙岗区耳鼻咽喉医院, 深圳市耳鼻咽喉研究所, 广东 深圳 518172
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-19 出版日期:2017-12-16 发布日期:2017-12-16
  • 基金资助:
    深圳市重点实验室项目(ZDSYS201506050935272)

Comparison of the curative effect of CO2 laser microsurgery and conventional microsurgery for vocal polyp resection.

HAO Yan, LI Dongcai, LAN Jianping.   

  1. Shenzhen Longgang District Otolaryngology Hospital, Shenzhen Institute of Otorhinolaryngology, Shenzhen 518172, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2017-01-19 Online:2017-12-16 Published:2017-12-16

摘要: 目的 比较显微镜CO2激光机下与传统显微镜支撑喉镜下切除声带息肉的疗效及恢复情况。 方法 选择2013年5月至2016年9月就诊的214例声带息肉患者,按照病理情况和治疗方法不同分为四组,分别为普通CO2激光组50例,普通传统显微镜组56例,复杂CO2激光组48例,复杂传统显微镜组60例,比较两种手术方法治疗不同病理情况患者的嗓音疗效。 结果 四组患者总体疗效比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。术后普通型和复杂型声带息肉患者通过两种手术方式治疗总有效率、基频、基频微扰、振幅微扰、噪声能量、谐噪比比较均无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。 结论 显微镜CO2激光手术与传统显微镜支持喉镜手术治疗声带息肉均能取得较为满意效果,需根据患者具体病情选择最佳治疗方案、优化手术及术后恢复。

关键词: 声带息肉, 显微镜CO2激光, 传统显微镜支持喉镜, 嗓音疗效

Abstract: Objective To compare the curative effect and recovery between CO2 laser microsurgery and conventional microscope surgery for vocal polyp resection. Methods The case data of 214 patients with polyps of the vocal cords treated at our hospital between May 2013 and September 2016 were divided into the common CO2 laser group(50 cases), general traditional microscope group(56 cases), complex CO2 laser group(48 cases), and complex traditional microscope group(60 cases)according to the different pathological conditions of the patients and the treatment method. The difference in the outcomes of surgery performed using the two surgical methods for the treatment of the different pathological conditions was compared. Results There was no significant difference in the overall curative effect between the two surgical methods(P > 0.05). After surgery, there was no significant difference in the total effective rate for the two surgical methods between patients with common and complex vocal polyps. There was also no difference in the main voice parameters of the patients, including fundamental frequency, fundamental frequency perturbation, amplitude perturbation, noise energy, or harmonic noise ratio(P>0.05). Conclusion Surgical treatment of vocal cord polyps using either CO2 laser microsurgery or conventional microscope-supported laryngoscope surgery can yield satisfactory results. The best treatment plan must be selected, and surgery and postoperative recovery must be optimized according to each patients specific condition.

Key words: Microscope CO2 laser, vocal cord polyp, traditional microscope support laryngoscope, vocal effect

中图分类号: 

  • R767.4
[1] 项轩. 支撑喉镜CO2激光显微手术治疗喉肿物回顾性临床研究[D]. 济南:山东大学, 2016.
[2] 连军胜, 李玉杰, 赵春红. CO2激光手术治疗广基声带息肉61例疗效探讨[J]. 医药论坛杂志, 2015, 36(8):115-117.
[3] Woo SH, Kim RB, Choi SH, et al. Prevalence of laryngeal disease in South Korea: data from the korea national health and nutrition examination survey from 2008 to 2011[J]. Yonsei Med J, 2014, 55(2):499-507.
[4] Carroll LM, Mudd P, Zur KB. Severity of voice handicap in children diagnosed with elevated lesions[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2013, 149(4): 628-632.
[5] Pinto AG, Crespo AN, Mour(~overa)o LF. Influence of smoking isolated and associated to multifactorial aspects in vocal acoustic parameters[J]. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 2014, 80(1):60-67.
[6] 李鸿燕. 二氧化碳激光治疗慢性肥厚性喉炎的临床疗效分析[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2016.
[7] 陈文勇, 任光第, 梁艳. 不同手术方式对声带息肉术后嗓音功能的影响[J]. 广东医学,2013,8:1022-1023.
[8] 李翠娥,周涛,屈季宁,等.声带息肉患者术后声休方案探讨[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2013(15): 497-500. LI Cui'e, ZHOU Tao, QU Jining, et al. The study of the postoperative voice rest treatment for patients with vocal fold polyps[J]. J Audiol Speech Pathol, 2013, 21(5):497-500.
[9] 钟燕梅, 殷海, 冯钰, 等. CO2激光手术与常规喉镜手术治疗声带息肉的临床效果分析[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2015, 7(10):119-121. ZHONG Haiyan, YIN Mei, FENG Yu, et al. Analysis of the curative effect of CO2 laser and conventional laryngoscope operation in the treatment of polyp of vocal cord[J]. Chin J Fron Med Sci(Elec Ver), 2015, 7(10):119-121.
[10] 蔡智, 高重阳. 支撑喉镜下显微镜下二氧化碳激光治疗喉部病变的手术配合[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2014, 25(9):2088-2089.
[11] 逯思. 二氧化碳激光与常规喉显微手术治疗声带息肉的嗓音评价[D].延吉:延边大学, 2014.
[1] 陈闽琪, 彭文静, 陈舒华. 阿克森疗法对声带息肉术后嗓音恢复的疗效探讨[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(6): 61-64.
[2] 任庆,王景和. 鼻内镜引导下支撑喉镜治疗声带息肉研究(附114例)[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(4): 69-70.
[3] 杨烨 高下 陈峰. 术前使用布地奈德对声带息肉手术疗效的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2009, 23(4): 58-.
[4] 吴治钦 . 声带小结、声带息肉823例手术分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2007, 21(6): 572-573 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!