山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 28-31.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.170

• ·论著· • 上一篇    下一篇

糖皮质激素短疗程雾化吸入对嗜酸粒细胞性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉患者鼻部症状及肾上腺皮质功能的影响

黄凯丰   

  1. 安庆市第一人民医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 安徽 安庆 246004
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-19 出版日期:2018-07-20 发布日期:2018-07-20

Effect of short-term glucocorticoid inhalation on nasal symptoms and adrenocortical function in patients with eosinophilic chronic sinusitis accompanied by nasal polyps

Effect of short-term glucocorticoid inhalation on nasal symptoms and adrenocortical function in patients with eosinophilic chronic sinusitis accompanied by nasal polyps   

  1. HUANG Kaifeng
  • Received:2017-04-19 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-07-20

摘要: 目的 探讨糖皮质激素短疗程雾化吸入对嗜酸粒细胞性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉患者鼻部症状及肾上腺皮质功能的影响。 方法 将嗜酸粒细胞性慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉患者40例,以随机数字表法分为对照组(20例)和观察组(20例),分别给予糖皮质激素短疗程喷鼻和雾化吸入方案治疗。比较两组患者近期疗效,治疗前后鼻部症状VAS评分,内镜Lund-Kennedy评分,嗜酸性粒细胞绝对值(EOS)计数水平、血清皮质醇水平及随访复发率等。 结果 观察组患者治疗显效率和总有效率均高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者治疗后鼻部症状VAS评分和内镜Lund-Kennedy评分均低于对照组及本组治疗前(P<0.05);观察组患者随访3个月和6个月复发率均低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者治疗后EOS计数水平均低于对照组及本组治疗前(P<0.05);同时两组患者治疗前后血清皮质醇水平比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 相较于喷鼻方案,糖皮质激素短疗程雾化吸入方案治疗嗜酸粒细胞性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉可有效缓解鼻部症状体征,抑制嗜酸性粒细胞聚集,降低远期复发风险,且未对肾上腺皮质功能产生明显影响。

关键词: 糖皮质激素, 慢性鼻窦炎, 雾化吸入, 嗜酸性粒细胞, 鼻息肉

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of short-term glucocorticoid inhalation on nasal symptoms and adrenocortical function in patients with both eosinophilic chronic sinusitis and nasal polyps. Methods A total of 40 patients with eosinophilic chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps were enrolled from June 2013 to June 2016 in the hospital, and they were randomly divided into two groups: one control group(20 patients)with glucocorticoid treatment by nasal spray and one observation group(20 patients)with glucocorticoid treatment by inhalation. The short-term clinical efficiency, visual analogue scale(VAS)scores of nasal symptoms, Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score, eosinophil(EOS)count, and serum cortisol concentration were compared between these two groups before and after treatment. The follow-up recurrence rate in both groups was also investigated. Results The clinical excellence and overall efficiency were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05). The VAS scores of nasal symptoms and Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group after treatment, and the observation group also showed significantly decreased aforementioned scores after treatment compared with before treatment(P<0.05). The follow-up recurrence rates in 3 months and 6 months were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05). EOS count was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group after treatment, and the observation group also showed significantly reduced EOS count after treatment compared with before treatment(P<0.05). No significant differences in serum cortisol concentration were observed between these two groups both before and after treatment(P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with glucocorticoid treatment by nasal spray, glucocorticoid treatment by inhalation can significantly relieve nasal symptoms, inhibit the aggregation of eosinophils, and reduce the long-term recurrence risk, but the inhalation treatment has no significant effects on the adrenocortical function in patients with both eosinophilic chronic sinusitis and nasal polyps.

Key words: Glucocorticoid, Chronic sinusitis, Inhalation, Nasal polyps, Eosinophil

中图分类号: 

  • R765.4
[1] ElBadawey MR,Alwaa A, ElTaher M, et al. Quality of life benefit after endoscopic frontal sinus surgery[J]. Am J Rhinol Allergy, 2014, 228(5):428-432.
[2] Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, et al. EPOS 2012: European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012. A summary for otorhinolaryngologists[J]. Rhinology, 2012, 50(1):1-12.
[3] Nanayakkara JP, Igwe C, Roberts D, et al. The impact of mental health on chronic rhinosinusitis symptom scores[J]. Europ Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2013, 7(4):1361-1364.
[4] Eldaba AA, Amr YM, Albirmawy OA. Effects of tranexamic acid during endoscopic sinsus surgery in children[J]. Saudi J Anaesth, 2013, 7(3):229-233.
[5] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会鼻科组,中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会鼻科学组.慢性鼻-鼻窦炎诊断和治疗指南(2012年,昆明)[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2013,48(2):92-94. Subspecialty Group of Rhinology, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery; Subspecialty Group of Rhinology, Society of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis(2012, Kunming)[J]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2013, 48(2):92-94.
[6] Möller W, Lübbers C, Münzing W, et al. Pulsating airflow and drug delivery to paranasal sinuses[J]. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2011, 19(1):48-53.
[7] Tang X, Zou J, Liu S. Endoscopic sinus surgery for treatment of kartagener syndrome: a case report[J]. Balkan Med J, 2013, 30(2):244-247.
[8] Humayun MP, Alam MM, Ahmed S, et al. Comparative study of outcome of the endoscopic sinus surgery and conventional surgery for nasal polyposis[J]. Mymensingh Med J, 2013, 22(1):84-92.
[9] Marzban S, Haddadi S, Mahmoudi Nia H, et al. Comparison of surgical conditions during propofol or isoflurane anesthesia for endoscopic sinus surgery[J]. Anesth Pain Med, 2013, 3(2):234-238.
[10] Lee J, Kim Y, Park C, et al. Comparison between dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for controlled hypotension and recovery in endoscopicsinus surgery[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2013, 122(7):421-426.
[11] Patel ZM, Setzen M, Sclafani AP, et al. Concurrent functional endoscopic sinus surgery and septorhinoplasty: using evidence to make clinical decisions[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2013, 3(6):488-492.
[12] Deyoung K, Wentzel JL, Schlosser RJ, et al. Systematic review of immunotherapy for chronic rhinosinusitis[J]. Am J Rhinol Allergy, 2014, 28(2):145-150.
[13] Smith KA, Smith TL, Mace JC, et al. Endoscopic sinus surgery compared to continued medical therapy for patients with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhino, 2014, 4(10):823-827.
[14] Reh DD, Chan JY, Byrne PJ. Concurrentrhinoplasty and endoscopic sinus surgery: a review of the pros and cons and a template for success[J]. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am, 2012, 20(1):43-54.
[15] Chen D, Mao MF, Luisa M, et al. Increase of high mobility group box chromosomal protein 1 in eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhino, 2014, 4(6):453-462.
[16] Wang C, Lou H, Wang X, et al. Effect of budesonide transnasal nebulization in patients with eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2015, 135(4):922-929.
[1] 宋晓宇, 张宇, 李成林, 宋西成. 加速康复外科理念在慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉手术治疗中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 9-12.
[2] 乔叔芬,杨飞轮,王臻妮,李学忠. YKL-40与慢性鼻-鼻窦炎组织重构的相关性探讨[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 95-99.
[3] 黄远,巴罗,李波,余文兴,杨芳丽,杜进涛. 慢性鼻窦炎鼻息肉中转录因子NKX2-1调控嗜酸性炎症反应的作用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 17-23.
[4] 陈望兴,赵雪,刘岩,刘悦,金春顺. 鼻中隔偏曲及慢性鼻窦炎鼻息肉患者的精神心理状态调查[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 24-27.
[5] 张炜,曾昱菡,余先崧. 慢性鼻窦炎手术前后ECP、EGF、IL-6的水平变化及临床意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 63-67.
[6] 于倩倩,关鸽,张念凯,李娜,温君凤,刘婷婷,连媛媛. 鼻腔嗅裂区呼吸道上皮腺瘤样错构瘤的CT影像表现[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 76-81.
[7] 李宏梅,王兰,高照慧,王莹,薛金梅. p-ERK2及ERK2在鼻息肉组织的表达及其意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 42-46.
[8] 张劼,龚齐. 不同分型慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者外周血嗜酸性粒细胞与中性粒细胞百分比及变态反应临床差异性分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 54-57.
[9] 张俐悦,刘金兰,姚东方,李杰恩. IL-31、IL-33及其受体ST2在难治性鼻-鼻窦炎中的表达及意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 37-41.
[10] 甘彬,张永举,许安廷. BRF2在慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉发病过程中的作用研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 47-53.
[11] 李华斌, 赖玉婷. 慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的发病机制及诊疗进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 4-9.
[12] 谢洪彬,杨美娜,陈青山,刘旭阳,樊宁. IgG4相关性眼病伴继发性青光眼病例分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 99-102.
[13] 高进良,年婉清,李烁. 鼻内镜手术联合鼻用糖皮质激素治疗腺样体肥大性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 38-42.
[14] 郅莉莉,宋道亮. 嗜酸性粒细胞及IL5在上颌窦后鼻孔息肉与鼻息肉中表达的差异[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 43-46.
[15] 伦杰,张亚楠. 慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉复发的相关影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 80-83.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!