山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 65-67.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.258

• ·论著· • 上一篇    下一篇

负压引流防治腮腺术后涎瘘112例

刘义平,林远超   

  1. 巴中市中心医院耳鼻喉头颈外科, 四川 巴中 636000
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-08 出版日期:2018-07-20 发布日期:2018-07-20
  • 通讯作者: 刘义平. E-mail:34116398@qq.com

Use of negative pressure drainage for prevention of salivary fistula after parotidectomy: an analysis of 112 cases

LIU Yiping, LIN Yuanchao   

  1. Department of Otolaryngology &Head and Neck Surgery, Bazhong Central Hospital, Bazhong 636000, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2017-06-08 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-07-20

摘要: 目的 探讨负压引流技术作为防治腮腺术后涎瘘方案的可行性。 方法 腮腺良性疾病患者112例,手术后放置负压引流管引流3 d,拔管后短时间加压包扎3 d,观察涎瘘情况并对症治疗。 结果 104例切口一期愈合; 7 例发生轻度涎瘘,局部搔刮后加压包扎1周后治愈;1例术后术腔积血并Ⅲ级涎瘘,术后3 d发现,经处理后术后2周治愈。 结论 负压引流可以预防腮腺涎瘘发生,缩短加压包扎时间,传统加压包扎对术后涎瘘治疗作用肯定。

关键词: 预防, 涎瘘, 治疗, 腮腺切除, 加压包扎

Abstract: Objective To analyze the clinical factors related to post-parotidectomy salivary fistula, and to prevent and treat the complications of parotid gland surgery. Methods From January 2010 to June 2016, 112 patients with parotid diseases were treated using surgical procedures; a negative pressure drainage tube was placed in the wound on the first 3 postoperative days, and compression bandage was used for a short while after extubation for 3 days. The patients were followed up for development of salivary fistula, and symptomatic treatment was administered where necessary. Results Of the 112 patients, 104 healed without infection; 7 developed a mild salivary fistula,, and 1 experienced postoperative cavity hemorrhage and salivary fistula which resolved with therapy. Conclusion Negative pressure drainage can effectively prevent the occurrence of parotid fistula and shorten the period of application of compression bandage, and the postoperative therapeutic effect of traditional compression bandage on the salivary fistula can be confirmed.

Key words: Parotidectomy, Prevention, Sialosyrinx, Treatment, Compression bandage

中图分类号: 

  • R782.7
[1] 彭歆,俞光岩,黄敏娴,等.负压引流与腮腺术后涎瘘[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2001,11(19):455-456. PENG Xin, YU Guangyan, HUANG Minxian, et al. Suction drain and post-parotidectomy fistula[J]. J Modern Stomatol, 2001, 11(19):455-456.
[2] 江瑾,卜令学,袁荣涛,等.腮腺部分切除术后单纯负压预防涎瘘的效果[J].青岛大学医学院学报,2015,51(2):187-188. JIANG Jin, BU Lingxue, YUAN Rongtao, et al. The application of simple negative after partial parotidectomy to prevent salivary fistula[J]. Acta Academiae Med Qingdao Univ, 2015, 51(2):187-188.
[3] 李志强,艾伟健,刘曙光.加压包扎时间对腮腺术后涎瘘发生的影响研究[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2012,3(5):173-174. LI Zhiqiang, AI Weijian, LIU Shuguang. Influence of different time of pressure bandage on the parotid salivary fistula after parotid operation[J].Chin J Pract Stomatol, 2012, 3(5):173-174.
[4] 王涛,符志勇.负压引流预防腮腺术后涎瘘的作用[J].江西医学院学报,2009,49(6):79-81. WANG Tao, FU Zhiyong. The effect of suction drain to prevent post-parotidectomy salivary fistula[J]. Acta Academiae Med Jiangxi, 2009, 49(6):79-81.
[5] 姜山,邱建忠,王霞,等.不同术式对腮腺良性肿瘤术后持续加压包扎时间的影响[J].潍坊医学院学报,2016,38(5):397-398. JIANG Shan, QIU Jianzhong, WANG Xia, et al. Effect of different surgical methods on parotid benign tumor postoperative continuous pressure dressing time[J]. J Weifang Med College, 2016, 38(5):397-398.
[6] 郭晓川,徐和甜,刘鹏.持续负压吸引结合弹性加压包扎在腮腺术后的应用[J].中国医药科学,2014,11(4):172-176. GUO Xiaochuan, XU Hetian, LIU Peng. Application of continuous negative pressure aspiration and elastic bandage pressure dressing to the healing of post-parotidectomy[J]. Chin Med Pharmacy, 2014,11(4):172-176.
[7] 孙军,李春洁,李博,等.负压引流预防腮腺术后并发症的系统评价[J].上海口腔医学,2014,6(23):362-366. SUN Jun, LI Chunjie, LI Bo, et al.Closed suction drainage to prevent postoperative complications after parotidectomy: a systematic review[J]. Shanghai J Stomatol, 2014, 6(23):362-366.
[8] 李凤君.负压引流在腮腺手术中的应用[J]. 中国药物经济学,2014,5(1):124-125.
[9] 江瑾,贾暮云,蔡圳,等.腮腺浅叶切除术后单纯负压加压预防涎瘘的效果评价[J].上海口腔医学,2014,12(23):759-762. JIANG Jin, JIA Muyun, CAI Zheng, et al. The effect evaluation of suction drainage to prevent fistula after superficial parotidectomy[J].Shanghai J Stomatol, 2014, 12(23):759-762.
[10] 董希银,张文忠,朱学芬,等.应用负压引流结合区域弹性加压包扎术预防腮腺术后涎瘘的临床研究[J].口腔医学,2016,36(8):714-716. DONG Xiyin, ZHANG Wenzhong, ZHU Xuefen, et al. Use o negative pressure drainage combined with regional elastic compression dressing in preventing postoperative salivary fistula[J]. Stomatology, 2016, 36(8):714-716.
[11] Utiashvili NI, Sipkin AM, Misikov VM, et al. Intraparotid injections of botulinum toxin type A for the prevention of salivary fistula formation after surgery on the parotid glands[J]. Toxicon, 2016, 123(1):81-82.
[12] Mandrekar JN, Mandrekar SJ. Systematic reviews and metaanalysis of published studies: an overview and best practices[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2011, 6(8):1301-1303.
[1] 王坛,武珂,李连庆,宫丽丽. 皮下免疫治疗注射后出现全身不良反应的伴发因素及处理[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 71-74.
[2] 吴静,刘业海. 头颈部鳞状细胞癌的靶向治疗研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 97-102.
[3] 沈勤峰,沈小燕,朱荣强,蒋斐斐,郎军添. 鼻内镜下中鼻甲功能性部分切除治疗慢性鼻窦炎76例分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 82-85.
[4] 代亚错,李靖,万保罗,臧艳姿,黄颖铭. 个体化治疗咽喉部海绵状血管瘤二例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 110-112.
[5] 陈鸣,俞雪飞. 浅谈伴有变应性鼻炎的慢性鼻窦炎的治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 18-22.
[6] 张桂敏,林鹏. 慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的内在型:从基础到临床[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 14-17.
[7] 覃纲,梁灼萍. 变应性真菌性鼻-鼻窦炎免疫治疗现状[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 23-26.
[8] 吴湘萍. 患者管理方式对变应性鼻炎舌下含服粉尘螨滴剂疗效的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 68-72.
[9] 高进良,年婉清,李烁. 鼻内镜手术联合鼻用糖皮质激素治疗腺样体肥大性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 38-42.
[10] 王仙,李颖,赵博军. 息肉样脉络膜血管病变诊疗进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 103-106.
[11] 吕丹,李明霞,马兰枝,张馨元,肖浩,陈飞,刘均,李珍. 累及纵膈的头颈部丛状I型神经纤维瘤病两例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(1): 82-86.
[12] 陈红,曹慧玲,窦鑫,高下. 右侧鼻腔小细胞神经内分泌癌一例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(1): 89-92.
[13] 孙滨,郭伯敏,康杰,邓先兆,伍波,樊友本. 甲状腺未分化癌的规范化治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(6): 16-20.
[14] 敬尚林. 儿童上气道咳嗽综合征临床诊疗现状[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(6): 87-91.
[15] 张玉波,岳丽艳,尹晓妍,吕哲,单春光. 耳鸣治疗仪联合银杏叶提取物注射液治疗突聋伴耳鸣的疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(5): 50-53.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!