前庭康复对老年良性阵发性位置性眩晕患者后遗头晕的疗效

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.290

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨前庭康复训练对老年良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)患者后遗头晕的疗效。方法选择BPPV患者耳石成功复位治疗眼震消失3 d仍后遗头晕患者86例,按照随机表法分为观察组43例与对照组43例。对照组采用甲磺酸倍他司汀治疗,观察组在对照组基础上结合前庭康复训练,两组疗程均为7 d。比较两组治疗疗效、治疗前后BBS评分、VSI评分及DHI量表评分。结果观察组总有效率(95.35%)高于对照组(72.09%)(P<0.05)。观察组治疗前BBS评分为7.39±1.24,治疗后为49.81±4.56;对照组治疗前BBS评分为7.61±1.27,治疗后为39.62±3.21,观察组治疗后高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组治疗前VSI评分为32.78±2.41,治疗后为24.87±3.28;对照组治疗前VSI评分为32.54±2.39,治疗后为28.46±2.80,观察组治疗后低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组治疗前DHI量表总分为76.44±6.57,治疗后为30.81±3.24;对照组治疗前DHI量表总分为76.36±5.82,治疗后为42.36±4.67,观察组治疗后低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论前庭康复训练对老年BPPV患者后遗头晕疗效显著。

关键词: 前庭康复, 良性阵发性位置性眩晕, 后遗头晕, 疗效

Abstract: Objective To examine the therapeutic effect of vestibular rehabilitation on residual dizziness after successful canalith repositioning maneuvers in elderly patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo(BPPV). Methods Between January 2015 and December 2017, we treated 86 patients with nystagmus that resolved within 3 days after successful canalith repositioning maneuvers and 86 patients with residual dizziness after treatment. Using a random table method, patients with residual dizziness were divided into 43 cases in an observation group and 43 in a control group. Both groups were treated with dioxetine mesylate, and the observation group also received vestibular rehabilitation training. Both groups were treated for 7 days. The curative effect was compared, using The Berg Balance Scale(BBS)score, the Vestibular Symptom Index(VSI)score, and the Dizziness Handicap Inventory(DHI)score. Results The efficacy rate in the observation group(95.35%)was higher than that in the control group(72.09%)(P<0.05). The BBS score in the observation group before treatment was 7.39±1.24 and increased to 49.81±4.56 after treatment. The BBS score in the control group before treatment was 7.61±1.27 and increased to 39.62±3.21 after treatment. The score in the control group was higher than that in the control group(P<0.05). The VSI score in the observation group before treatment was 32.78±2.41 and decreased to 24.87±3.28 after treatment. The VSI score in the control group before treatment was 32.54±2.39 and decreased to 28.46±2.80 after treatment. The score in the control group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05). The DHI score in the observation group before treatment was 76.44±6.57 and decreased to 30.81±3.24 after treatment. The DHI score in the control group before treatment was 76.36±5.82 and decreased to 42.36±4.67 after treatment. The score in the control group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Vestibular rehabilitation is effective for residual dizziness in elderly patients with BPPV.

Key words: Vestibular rehabilitation, Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, Residual dizziness, Therapeutic effect

中图分类号:

R764.34

丁剑,刘艺鸣. 前庭康复对老年良性阵发性位置性眩晕患者后遗头晕的疗效[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(6): 64-68.

DING Jian, LIU Yiming. Effect of vestibular rehabilitation on residual dizziness in elderly patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2018, 32(6): 64-68.

参考文献

[1] Von B M, Bertholon P, Brandt T, et al. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: Diagnostic criteria[J]. J Vestib Res, 2015, 25(3-4):105-107.
[2] Von M B, Bertholon P, Brandt T, et al. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: Diagnostic criteria Consensus document of the Committee for the Classification of Vestibular Disorders of the Bárány Society[J]. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp, 2017, 68(6):349-360.
[3] 王玉琳, 秦旭旭, 刘佳,等. 针刺治疗后半规管型良性阵发性位置性眩晕经Epley法复位后的残余头晕[J]. 针灸临床杂志, 2016, 32(5):14-16. WANG Yulin, QIN Xuxu, LIU Jia, et al. Acupuncture in the treatment of residual dizziness of PC-BPPV after Epley method[J]. Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion, 2016, 32(5):14-16.
[4] 朱祖福, 徐静泓, 张慧萍,等. Brandt-Daroff习服训练联合手法复位治疗良性阵发性位置性眩晕疗效观察[J]. 海南医学, 2016, 27(2):297-298.
[5] von Brevem M, Bertholon P, Brandt T, et al. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo:diagnostic criteria[J]. J Vestib Res, 2015, 25(3-4):105-117.
[6] 田军茹.眩晕诊治[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2015:316-379.
[7] 郑筱萸. 中药新药临床研究指导原则(试行)[S]. 北京:中国医药科技出版社, 2002:89-94.
[8] Shim DB, Ko KM, Lee JH, et al. Natural history of horizontal canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo is truly short[J]. J Neurol, 2015, 262(1):74-80.
[9] Shan X, Peng X, Wang E. Efficacy of computer-controlled repositioning procedure for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo[J]. Laryngoscope, 2015, 125(3):715-719.
[10] 贾庆霞, 孙慧, 王艳,等. 良性阵发性位置性眩晕患者抑郁焦虑状态评估[J]. 中华临床医师杂志:电子版, 2015, 9(18):17-20. JIA Qingxia, SUN Hui, WANG Yan, et al. Evaluation of depression and anxiety in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo[J].Chin J Clinicians(Electronic Edit), 2015, 9(18):17-20.
[11] Tsai K L, Cheng Y Y, Leu H B, et al. Investigating the role of Sirt1-modulated oxidative stress in relation to benign paroxysmal positional vertigo and Parkinson's disease[J]. Neurobiol Aging, 2015, 36(9):2607-2616.
[12] 黄成林, 郭中成, 郭海霞,等. 手法复位治疗良性阵发性位置性眩晕[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2016, 23(3):177-178.
[13] Talaat HS, Kabel AM, Khaliel LH, et al. Reduction of recurrence rate of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo by treatment of severe vitamin D deficiency[J]. Auris Nasus Larynx, 2016, 43(3):237-241.
[14] Pisani V, Mazzone S, Di MR, et al. A survey of the nature of trauma of post-traumatic benign paroxysmal positional vertigo[J]. Int J Audiol, 2015, 54(5):329-333.
[15] Kim SY, Han SH, Kim YH, et al. Clinical features of recurrence and osteoporotic changes in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo[J]. Auris Nasus Larynx, 2016, 44(2):156-161.
[16] 王纪彪. 手法复位治疗良性阵发性位置性眩晕患者后复发的影响因素分析[J]. 神经损伤与功能重建, 2016, 11(2):141-144. WANG Jibiao. Analysis of influencing factors on recurrence of Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo after repositioning maneuver[J].Neural Injury Funct Recons, 2016, 11(2):141-144.
[17] Yetiser S, Ince D. Demographic analysis of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo as a common public health problem[J]. Ann Med Health Sci Res, 2015, 5(1):50-53.
[18] 孙利兵, 郑智英, 王斌全,等. 前庭康复训练对良性阵发性位置性眩晕复位后残余症状的疗效分析[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2017, 5(12):897-900. SUN Libing, ZHENG Zhiying, WANG Binquan, et al. Curative effect analysis of the vestibular rehabilitation training on residual dizziness after successful canalith repositioning maneuvers in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo[J]. J Clin Otorhinolarygol Head Neck Surg(China), 2017, 5(12):897-900.
[19] Kim EJ, OH SY, Kim JS, et al. Persistent otolith dysfunction even after successful repositioning in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo[J]. J Neurol Sci, 2015, 358(1-2):287-293.
[20] Han BI, Song HS, Kim JS. Vestibular rehabilitation therapy:review of indications,mechanisms,and key exercises[J]. J Clin Neurol, 2011, 7(4):184-196.

相关文章 15

[1]	周庆,刘雄光,吴昌林,叶小武. 耳内镜下耳屏软骨环-软骨膜修补术治疗鼓膜穿孔40例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(6): 69-72.
[2]	孟立新,李健,韦善文. 鼓膜微管置入术治疗中耳不张76例临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 61-65.
[3]	吴湘萍. 患者管理方式对变应性鼻炎舌下含服粉尘螨滴剂疗效的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 68-72.
[4]	鄢慧琴,王豪. 难治性良性阵发性位置性眩晕的临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 86-88.
[5]	李桂芳,王春华,张淑贞. 体位限制对手法复位后良性阵发性位置性眩晕的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(6): 42-45.
[6]	郝艳,李栋才,蓝建平. CO₂激光显微手术与传统显微手术切除声带息肉疗效比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(6): 68-70.
[7]	鞠骏,李进让,邹世桢,贾曼玉. 创伤后良性阵发性位置性眩晕的临床特点及近期疗效研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(5): 57-61.
[8]	周学义,李一鸣,王美菊,张苑苑,张历浊. 25+微创玻璃体视网膜手术治疗孔源性视网膜脱离的临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(5): 92-94.
[9]	张晓莉,于泓,韩冬梅,杨瑞民,戚伟. 泪道激光联合引流管植入治疗泪道阻塞的临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 84-86.
[10]	刘学升,李筱瑜,邓玮. DHM阴性的非典型PSC-BPPV诊断策略探讨[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(1): 88-90.
[11]	屠燕怡,史丽,赵莉,金鹏,訾晓雪,李昂,金义炫,郅莉莉. 尘螨疫苗皮下注射治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效和安全性评估[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(4): 50-55.
[12]	苏怡,谢景华,潘晓李,曾国庆. 慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴或不伴鼻息肉患者鼻内镜手术的疗效及影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(4): 86-89.
[13]	傅云春. 咽异感症患者心理因素评析及心理干预疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(6): 47-49.
[14]	孙新成, 卢国华, 陈晨, 谢阳. 顶端巩膜覆盖在羟基磷灰石义眼座植入术中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(4): 87-89.
[15]	王学海，张建新，孟昭进，刘秀玲. 上半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕41例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(3): 47-50.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed