山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 100-107.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.539

• • 上一篇    下一篇

光学区直径与暗瞳直径的关系对不同程度近视患者SMILE术后视觉质量的影响

彭娇,钟定娟,陈蛟,左筠,王华   

  1. 湖南师范大学附属第一医院/湖南省人民医院 眼视光中心, 湖南 长沙 410005
  • 发布日期:2022-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 王华. E-mail:wanghuaeye@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    湖南省科技厅项目(2020SK2118)

The effect of the relationship between the diameter of the optical zone and the diameter of the dark pupil on the visual quality of patients with different degrees of myopia after SMILE

PENG Jiao, ZHONG Dingjuan, CHEN Jiao, ZUO Jun, WANG Hua   

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital/The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410005, Hunan, China
  • Published:2022-04-15

摘要: 目的 观察飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术(SMILE)后,光学区直径与暗瞳直径的关系对不同程度近视患者视觉质量的影响。 方法 回顾性分析2021年7月行SMILE手术矫治的近视及散光患者49例(96眼),18~35岁,平均(25.76±5.75)岁。依据手术光学区直径-暗瞳孔直径的差值分为3组:A组<0 mm(30眼)、B组0~1 mm(36眼)、C组>1 mm(30眼);各组内再依据术前等效球镜度(spherical equivalent refraction, SE)分为低中度近视组(<-6.00D)和高度近视组(≥-6.00D)。观察并且记录患者术前及术后3 mo裸眼视力(UCVA)、SE、角膜高阶像差、调制传递函数截止频率(MTFcutoff)、客观散射指数(OSI)、主观视觉质量问卷调查,其中角膜高阶像差包括角膜彗差、角膜球差及角膜总高阶像差。参数变化量用Δ表示,其计算方法为术后3mo参数数值-术前参数数值。 结果 术前基线三组间年龄、性别、UCVA、SE、角膜高阶像差、MTFcutoff、OSI及主观视觉质量等一般资料差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),而光学区直径、暗瞳孔直径、光学区直径-暗瞳孔直径差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。术后3个月三组间UCVA及SE差异亦均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。对于角膜彗差、球差及总高阶像差,三组间差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05),两两比较均发现A组高于B组和C组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。三组内的角膜彗差球差及总高阶像差均高于术前(均为P<0.05)。高度近视患者的Δ角膜球差组间的两两比较显示C高度近视组低于A高度近视组和B高度近视组,差异均具有统计学意义(P=0.045、0.047)。低中度近视患者的Δ角膜球差和Δ角膜总高阶像差组间的两两比较显示,A低中度近视组高于B低中度近视组,差异均具有统计学意义(P=0.003、0.006),B低中度近视组与C低中度近视组间差异均无统计学意义(P=0.464、0.962)。术后3个月时患者的MTFcutoff已经能恢复到术前水平(P>0.05),光学区直径与暗瞳孔直径差值小于0 mm时,术后3个月的散射指数较术前会有所增加(P=0.007)。A组手术前后的主观视觉质量评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),B组、C组术后的主观视觉质量评分[(7.53±3.81)分、(7.73±3.88)分]均低于术前[(9.75±4.05)、(11.00±6.35)分](P=0.002、0.003)。 结论 光学区直径大于暗瞳孔直径时,近视患者术后主观满意度明显提升,同时角膜彗差、角膜球差及角膜总高阶像差的增加均能相应减少;在此基础上,高度近视患者需要更大的光学区直径来减少术后角膜球差的增加。

关键词: 飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术, 光学区直径, 暗瞳孔直径, 近视, 角膜高阶像差, 视觉质量

Abstract: Objective The objective of this study is to observe the effect of the relationship between the diameter of the optical zone and the diameter of the dark pupil on the visual quality of patients with different degrees of myopia after small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE). Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 96 eyes from 49 myopic and astigmatic patients aged 18 to 35 years(average age of 25.76±5.75 years)who underwent SMILE surgery in our ophthalmology center in July 2021. Based on the difference between the diameter of the optical zone and the diameter of the dark pupil, they were divided into three groups: group A, <0 mm(30 eyes); group B, 0-1 mm(36 eyes); and group C, > 1 mm(30 eyes). Each group was then divided into mild to moderate myopic groups(<-6.00D)and high myopic groups(≥-6.00D)according to spherical equivalent refraction(SE). The patients' uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA), SE, high-order corneal aberration, modulation transfer function(MTF)cutoff, object scatter index(OSI), and responses to the subjective visual quality questionnaire were recorded before and 3 months after surgery. Parameter variation was represented by Δ, which was calculated by subtracting the preoperative parameter value from that obtained 3 months postoperatively. Results Preoperative baseline optical zone diameter, dark pupil diameter, and their differences were statistically significant(all P<0.01), whereas age, sex, UCVA, SE, corneal higher-order aberration, MTF cutoff, OSI, and subjective visual quality were not statistically significant(all P>0.05). There were no significant differences in UCVA and SE between the three groups at 3 months after operation(all P>0.05), whereas significant differences were noted in the corneal coma, spherical aberration, and total higher-order aberration(all P<0.05). Pairwise comparisons showed that the values in group A was higher than those in groups B and C, and the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05). Postoperative corneal aberration in all three groups were higher than that before surgery(all P<0.05). A pairwise comparison of Δspherical aberration in patients with high myopia showed that the values of group C were lower than those of groups A and B, and the differences were statistically significant(P=0.045 and 0.047, respectively). A pairwise comparison of Δspherical aberration and Δtotal high-order aberration in patients with mild to moderate myopia showed that the values of group A were higher than those of group B, with statistically significant differences(P=0.003 and 0.006, respectively), and no statistically significant differences were found between groups B and C(P=0.464 and 0.962, respectively). The patients' MTF cutoff values at 3 months after surgery were restored to the preoperative level (P>0.05). When the difference between the diameter of the optical zone and the diameter of the dark pupil was less than 0 mm, the OSI at 3 months after surgery was higher than that before surgery(P=0.007). The subjective visual quality scores of groups B and C after surgery(7.53±3.81 and 7.73±3.88, respectively)were lower than those before surgery(9.75±4.05 and 11.00±6.35, respectively)(P=0.002 and 0.003, respectively). Conclusion When the optical zone diameter was larger than the dark pupil diameter, the subjective satisfaction of myopia patients significantly improved, and the increase in comas, spherical aberration, and total high-order aberration decreased. On this basis, patients with high myopia require a larger optical zone diameter to reduce the increase in postoperative corneal spherical aberration.

Key words: Small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE), Optical zone diameter, Pupil diameter of darkroom, Myopia, Corneal high-order aberration, Visual quality

中图分类号: 

  • R779.63
[1] Oshika T, Klyce SD, Applegate RA, et al. Comparison of corneal wavefront aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 1999, 127(1): 1-7. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(98)00288-8.
[2] Li MY, Zhao J, Miao HM, et al. Mild decentration measured by a Scheimpflug camera and its impact on visual quality following SMILE in the early learning curve[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2014, 55(6): 3886-3892. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13714.
[3] Qin B, Zhao J, Li MY, et al. The comparison of visual outcomes, aberrations, and Bowman's layer micro-distortions after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction(SMILE)for the correction of high and moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2019, 19: 138. doi:10.1186/s12886-019-1135-9.
[4] 陈敬旺, 柯慧敏, 凌玲, 等. 不同程度近视患者SMILE术后有效光学区的研究[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2021, 21(11): 1968-1973. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2021.11.27. CHEN Jingwang, KE Huimin, LING Ling, et al. Study on the effective optical zone after SMILE in patients with different degrees of myopia[J]. International Eye Science, 2021, 21(11): 1968-1973. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2021.11.27.
[5] Zhou JQ, Xu Y, Li MY, et al. Preoperative refraction, age and optical zone as predictors of optical and visual quality after advanced surface ablation in patients with high myopia: a cross-sectional study[J]. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(6): e023877. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023877.
[6] Damgaard IB, Ang M, Mahmoud AM, et al. Functional optical zone and centration following SMILE and LASIK: a prospective, randomized, contralateral eye study[J]. J Refract Surg, 2019, 35(4): 230-237. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20190313-01.
[7] Bühren J, Kohnen T. Factors affecting the change in lower-order and higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia with the Zyoptix 3.1 system[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2006, 32(7): 1166-1174. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.01.098.
[8] 夏艳云, 钟定娟, 王华, 等. 高能量加速型角膜胶原交联术对圆锥角膜眼表的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(6): 42-51. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.432. XIA Yanyun, ZHONG Dingjuan, WANG Hua, et al. Effect of high-energy accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking on the ocular surface of keratoconus[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(6): 42-51.doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.432.
[9] Berry S, Mangione CM, Lindblad AS, et al. Development of the National Eye Institute refractive error correction quality of life questionnaire: focus groups[J]. Ophthalmology, 2003, 110(12): 2285-2291. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.08.021.
[10] Fraenkel G, Comaish IF, Lawless MA, et al. Development of a questionnaire to assess subjective vision score in myopes seeking refractive surgery[J]. J Refract Surg, 2004, 20(1): 10-19. doi:10.3928/1081-597x-20040101-03.
[11] 文佰伟, 兰长骏, 廖萱. 视觉质量评价方法的研究进展[J]. 眼科新进展, 2017, 37(8): 793-796. doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0201. WEN Baiwei, LAN Changjun, LIAO Xuan. Research progress on visual quality assessment methods[J]. Recent Advances in Ophthalmology, 2017, 37(8): 793-796. doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0201.
[12] Hao J, Li L, Tian F, et al. Comparison of two types of visual quality analyzer for the measurement of high order aberrations[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2016, 9(2): 292-297. doi:10.18240/ijo.2016.02.22.
[13] Chalita MR, Chavala S, Xu M, et al. Wavefront analysis in post-LASIK eyes and its correlation with visual symptoms, refraction, and topography[J]. Ophthalmology, 2004, 111(3): 447-453. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.06.022.
[14] Bellucci R, Morselli S. Optimizing higher-order aberrations with intraocular lens technology[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2007, 18(1): 67-73. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e3280121af1.
[15] Artal P, Iglesias I, López-Gil N, et al. Double-pass measurements of the retinal-image quality with unequal entrance and exit pupil sizes and the reversibility of the eye's optical system[J]. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis, 1995, 12(10): 2358-2366. doi:10.1364/josaa.12.002358.
[16] Shah R, Shah S, Sengupta S. Results of small incision lenticule extraction: all-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2011, 37(1): 127-137. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.033.
[17] Yu MR, Chen MJ, Wang BJ, et al. Comparison of visual quality after SMILE and LASEK for mild to moderate myopia[J]. J Refract Surg, 2015, 31(12): 795-800. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20151111-02.
[18] Jun I, Kang DSY, Arba-Mosquera S, et al. Clinical outcomes of mechanical and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in low myopia with a large ablation zone[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2019, 45(7): 977-984. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.02.007.
[19] Kwon Y, Bott S. Postsurgery corneal asphericity and spherical aberration due to ablation efficiency reduction and corneal remodelling in refractive surgeries[J]. Eye(Lond), 2009, 23(9): 1845-1850. doi:10.1038/eye.2008.356.
[20] Kanellopoulos AJ. Comparison of corneal epithelial remodeling over 2 years in LASIK versus SMILE: a contralateral eye study[J]. Cornea, 2018, 38(3): 290-296. doi:10.1097/ico.0000000000001821.
[21] Mok KH, Lee VWH. Effect of optical zone ablation diameter on LASIK-induced higher order optical aberrations[J]. J Refract Surg, 2005, 21(2): 141-143. doi:10.3928/1081-597x-20050301-07.
[22] Luo J, Yao PJ, Li MY, et al. Quantitative analysis of microdistortions in Bowman's layer using optical coherence tomography after SMILE among different myopic corrections[J]. J Refract Surg, 2015, 31(2): 104-109. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20150122-05.
[23] Wu Y, Huang ZP. Comparison of early visual quality in patients with moderate myopia using different optical zones in small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE)[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2021, 21(1): 46. doi:10.1186/s12886-020-01798-y.
[24] 陈仪乐, 杨雅童, 陈嘉宝, 等. SMILE手术与V4c ICL植入术治疗高度近视的客观视觉质量比较[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2020, 20(7): 1222-1225. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2020.7.23. CHEN Yile, YANG Yatong, CHEN Jiabao, et al. Comparison of objective optical quality between SMILE and V4c ICL implantation for correcting high myopia[J]. International Eye Science, 2020, 20(7): 1222-1225. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2020.7.23.
[25] 赵旸, 傅艳燕, 吴小影, 等. 中低度近视SMILE术后超早期视觉质量变化的研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(2): 42-46. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2020.015. ZHAO Yang, FU Yanyan, WU Xiaoying, et al. Changes in visual quality during the ultra-early stage of SMILE for middle and low myopia[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(2): 42-46.doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2020.015.
[1] 代诚李宾中. 多焦点软性角膜接触镜应用研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(5): 100-105.
[2] 张陶然,王薇,李明铭,黄映湘. IVR治疗mCNV患者黄斑中心凹下脉络膜厚度分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(2): 68-71.
[3] 李璟,张辉,王晶. 不同人工晶状体植入对视觉质量影响的临床研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(2): 90-95.
[4] 李莹. 重视角膜屈光手术操作规范及并发症防治[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(6): 1-6.
[5] 陈涛,李耀宇,杨马君,闫洪欣,刘光溢,翟长斌. SMILE术中主动脱吸的合理运用和被动脱吸的原因分析及处理[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(6): 20-24.
[6] 张颖,雷玉琳,马志兴,杨星花,张静,侯杰. SMILE联合快速角膜交联术后角膜光密度的早期临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(6): 52-58.
[7] 刘艺,于明坤,孙伟,邵震,胡媛媛,毕宏生. 角膜塑形术控制儿童近视有效性与安全性的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(6): 92-100.
[8] 冉宏运,蒋可可张杰. 早产儿视网膜病变患儿屈光影响因素研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(5): 118-124.
[9] 岳鹏程,杜秋萱,孔玲,乔镇涛. 未矫正近视性屈光参差患者双眼间调节力对照研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(4): 76-80.
[10] 刘凌张美霞. 近视的药物治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(4): 123-128.
[11] 魏佩佩李灿. 多焦点人工晶体植入术后的视觉质量及并发症[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(2): 141-146.
[12] 任雨馨赵博军. 病理性近视脉络膜新生血管的诊断与治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 157-162.
[13] 李莹,姜洋. 惟论近视矫正眼外与眼内手术方式的选择[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(2): 1-6.
[14] 张丰菊,李玉. 角膜屈光手术术前的筛查要点[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(2): 7-12.
[15] 苏才培,杨亚波. 飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术操作要点及并发症的预防和处理[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(2): 13-16.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 和守盰,陈 斌,殷善开,苏开明,姜 晓 . OSAHS患者UPPP手术前后上气道形态学变化[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(5): 385 -388 .
[2] 宋西成,张庆泉,夏永宏,刘鲁沂,于鲁欣,王 郜,姜秀良 . 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者的术后ICU监护[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(5): 389 -392 .
[3] 薛卫国,孙洁,金铮,石文斌,辛露,林国经,李加耘 . 盐酸左氧氟沙星滴耳液治疗中耳炎的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(4): 300 -303 .
[4] 张庆泉,李新民,王 强,王有福 . 鼻内镜下犬齿窝径路治疗上颌窦病变[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2007, 21(1): 38 -39 .
[5] 董 频,李晓艳,屠理强,孟晴虹,王 桑,谢 晋,姜 彦 . 晚期下咽癌、喉复发癌术后颈部缺损整复组织的选择[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2007, 21(5): 385 -387 .
[6] 姜绍红,朱宇宏,王 强,宋西成 . 难治性原发性鼻出血101例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2007, 21(6): 542 -544 .
[7] 王昭迪,时光刚 . 虚拟现实技术在鼻外科的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(1): 74 -77 .
[8] 雷迅1 ,刘强和1 ,孔中雨1 ,向秋2 ,耿宛平1 ,黄辉3 ,董译元1 ,刘芳贤1
. EGCG对鼻咽癌细胞株裸鼠移植瘤的放疗增敏作用以及对Survivin表达的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2009, 23(1): 6 -9 .
[9] 吴世普
. 鼻内镜下联合下鼻道开窗治疗上颌窦真菌球15例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2009, 23(2): 73 -74 .
[10] 刘伟,殷团芳,任基浩. 中耳胆脂瘤的发生及其与细胞凋亡的关系[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2010, 24(01): 29 -33 .