经鼻内镜下泪囊鼻腔吻合手术前后结膜囊菌群变化

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2024.422

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨经鼻内镜下泪囊鼻腔吻合术前后术眼与健侧眼结膜囊菌群的变化规律,为术后内眼手术时机的选择提供理论依据。方法选取行经鼻内镜下泪囊鼻腔吻合术患者16例(32眼),并采集受试者双眼结膜囊拭子,所有患者均进行一般细菌培养,随机选取3例患者的双眼结膜囊样本进行16S rRNA测序。结果细菌培养结果显示,术眼细菌培养阳性率由术前的10/16眼(62.50%)在术后第2天下降至2/16眼(12.50%)(P=0.001);菌群数从术前的34个在术后第1天下降至20个,第2天下降至2个,并在后续随访期间保持阴性状态。16S rRNA测序结果显示,结膜囊菌群α多样性分析中,Pielou指数的时间主效应具有统计学意义(P=0.031),β多样性差异无统计学意义。结论经鼻内镜下泪囊鼻腔吻合术可有效降低术眼结膜囊的菌群丰度,对健侧眼菌群影响较小。术后术眼菌群负荷的下降有助于降低感染风险,为后续内眼手术时机的选择提供了微生物学依据。

关键词: 泪囊鼻腔吻合术, 结膜囊菌群, 16S rRNA测序

Abstract: Objective This study aimed to characterise the temporal changes in the conjunctival sac microbiota of both the operated and contralateral eyes following endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy(EN-DCR), and to provide microbiological evidence to optimise the timing of subsequent intraocular procedures. Methods This study included 16 patients(32 eyes)who underwent EN-DCR at our institution. Bilateral conjunctival sac swabs were collected from each patient and processed for conventional bacterial culture. In addition, 16S rRNA gene sequencing was conducted on samples obtained from three randomly selected patients. Results In the operated eyes, the rate of positive bacterial cultures declined significantly from 10/16(62.5%)preoperatively to 2/16(12.5%)on postoperative day 2(P=0.001). The number of bacterial species decreased from 34 preoperatively to 20 on postoperative day 1 and to 2 on day 2, and remained sterile throughout the subsequent follow-up period. 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed significant temporal changes in alpha diversity, as measured by the Pielou index(P=0.031), while β diversity remained statistically unchanged over time. Conclusions EN-DCR leads to a marked reduction in the bacterial evenness within the conjunctival sac of the operated eye, with negligible effect on the contralateral eye. The postoperative decrease in microbial load may mitigate the risk of infection and provides microbiological evidence to guide the timing of subsequent intraocular procedures.

Key words: Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy, Conjunctival sac microbiota, 16SrRNA sequencing

中图分类号:

R777.2

朱江,刘太祥,江兵. 经鼻内镜下泪囊鼻腔吻合手术前后结膜囊菌群变化[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(1): 13-20.

ZHU Jiang, LIU Taixiang, JIANG Bing. Changes in conjunctival sac microbiota before and after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2026, 40(1): 13-20.

参考文献 27

[1]	Garg P, Roy A, Sharma S. Endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: epidemiology, risk factors, and evidence on protection[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2017, 28(1): 67-72. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000326
[2]	Eshraghi B, Abdi P, Akbari M, et al. Microbiologic spectrum of acute and chronic dacryocystitis[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2014, 7(5): 864-867. doi:10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.05.23
[3]	Hiraoka T, Hoshi S, Tasaki K, et al. Assessment of conjunctival flora in eyes with lacrimal passage obstruction before and after successful dacryoendoscopic recanalisation[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2021, 105(7): 909-913. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316264
[4]	Owji N, Zareifard A. Bacterial flora of the conjunctiva one year after dacryocystorhinostomy[J]. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol, 2018, 25(1): 35-39. doi:10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_225_17
[5]	Eshraghi B, Masoomian B, Izadi A, et al. Conjunctival bacterial flora in nasolacrimal duct obstruction and its changes after successful dacryocystorhinostomy surgery[J]. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg, 2014, 30(1): 44-46. doi:10.1097/IOP.0000000000000006
[6]	Owji N, Khalili MR. Normalization of conjunctival flora after dacryocystorhinostomy[J]. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg, 2009, 25(2): 136-138. doi:10.1097/IOP.0b013e31819a4255
[7]	Eshraghi B, Alemzadeh SA, Abedinifar Z. Conjunctival bacterial flora in fellow eyes of patients with unilateral nasolacrimal duct obstruction and its changes after successful dacryocystorhinostomy surgery[J]. J Curr Ophthalmol, 2016, 29(1): 59-62. doi:10.1016/j.joco.2016.11.001
[8]	眼科检验协作组. 感染性眼病细菌学检查操作专家共识(2019)[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2019, 21(2): 81-85. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2019.02.001 Ophthalmological Examination Assistance Group. Expert consensus bacterial for examination ophthalmological the of operating ocular procedures infection(2019)[J]. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 2019, 21(2): 81-85. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2019.02.001
[9]	Deng YH, Wen XF, Hu X, et al. Geographic difference shaped human ocular surface metagenome of young Han Chinese from Beijing, Wenzhou, and Guangzhou Cities[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2020, 61(2): 47. doi:10.1167/iovs.61.2.47
[10]	Wen XF, Miao L, Deng YH, et al. The influence of age and sex on ocular surface microbiota in healthy adults[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2017, 58(14): 6030-6037. doi:10.1167/iovs.17-22957
[11]	Aragona P, Baudouin C, Benitez Del Castillo JM, et al. The ocular microbiome and microbiota and their effects on ocular surface pathophysiology and disorders[J]. Surv Ophthalmol, 2021, 66(6): 907-925. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.03.010
[12]	Mills DM, Bodman MG, Meyer DR, et al. The microbiologic spectrum of dacryocystitis: a national study of acute versus chronic infection[J]. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg, 2007, 23(4): 302-306. doi:10.1097/IOP.0b013e318070d237
[13]	Luo B, Li M, Xiang N, et al. The microbiologic spectrum of dacryocystitis[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2021, 21(1): 29. doi:10.1186/s12886-020-01792-4
[14]	Sobel RK, Aakalu VK, Wladis EJ, et al. A comparison of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy: a report by the American academy of ophthalmology[J]. Ophthalmology, 2019, 126(11): 1580-1585. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.06.009
[15]	Wu SR, Zhu LM, Wang TT, et al. Ocular microbiota types and longitudinal microbiota alterations in patients with chronic dacryocystitis with and without antibiotic pretreatment[J]. iMetaOmics, 2024, 1(1): e17. doi:10.1002/imo2.17
[16]	Bispo PJM, Ung L, Chodosh J, et al. Hospital-associated multidrug-resistant MRSA lineages are trophic to the ocular surface and cause severe microbial keratitis[J]. Front Public Health, 2020, 8: 204. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00204
[17]	Vazirani J, Wurity S, Ali MH. Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis: risk factors, clinical characteristics, and outcomes[J]. Ophthalmology, 2015, 122(10): 2110-2114. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.06.007
[18]	Imai Y, Shum C, Martin DF, et al. Emergence of drug-resistant cytomegalovirus retinitis in the contralateral eyes of patients with AIDS treated with ganciclovir[J]. J Infect Dis, 2004, 189(4): 611-615. doi:10.1086/381394
[19]	de Jonge SW, Boldingh QJJ, Solomkin JS, et al. Effect of postoperative continuation of antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of surgical site infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Lancet Infect Dis, 2020, 20(10): 1182-1192. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30084-0
[20]	Dartt DA. Tear lipocalin: structure and function[J]. Ocul Surf, 2011, 9(3): 126-138. doi:10.1016/s1542-0124(11)70022-2
[21]	Wiesner J, Vilcinskas A. Antimicrobial peptides: the ancient arm of the human immune system[J]. Virulence, 2010, 1(5): 440-464. doi:10.4161/viru.1.5.12983
[22]	Xiao YY, de Paiva CS, Yu ZY, et al. Goblet cell-produced retinoic acid suppresses CD86 expression and IL-12 production in bone marrow-derived cells[J]. Int Immunol, 2018, 30(10): 457-470. doi:10.1093/intimm/dxy045
[23]	Solomon A, Dursun D, Liu Z, et al. Pro- and anti-inflammatory forms of interleukin-1 in the tear fluid and conjunctiva of patients with dry-eye disease[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2001, 42(10): 2283-2292
[24]	Ozkan J, Nielsen S, Diez-Vives C, et al. Temporal stability and composition of the ocular surface microbiome[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 9880. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-10494-9
[25]	Wang Y, Chen H, Xia T, et al. Characterization of fungal microbiota on normal ocular surface of humans[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2020, 26(1): 123.e9-123123.e13. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2019.05.011
[26]	Miller D, Iovieno A. The role of microbial flora on the ocular surface[J]. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol, 2009, 9(5): 466-470. doi:10.1097/ACI.0b013e3283303e1b
[27]	Wiesner J, Vilcinskas A. Antimicrobial peptides: the ancient arm of the human immune system[J]. Virulence, 2010, 1(5): 440-464. doi:10.4161/viru.1.5.12983

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed