Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 100-107.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.539

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The effect of the relationship between the diameter of the optical zone and the diameter of the dark pupil on the visual quality of patients with different degrees of myopia after SMILE

PENG Jiao, ZHONG Dingjuan, CHEN Jiao, ZUO Jun, WANG Hua   

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital/The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410005, Hunan, China
  • Published:2022-04-15

Abstract: Objective The objective of this study is to observe the effect of the relationship between the diameter of the optical zone and the diameter of the dark pupil on the visual quality of patients with different degrees of myopia after small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE). Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 96 eyes from 49 myopic and astigmatic patients aged 18 to 35 years(average age of 25.76±5.75 years)who underwent SMILE surgery in our ophthalmology center in July 2021. Based on the difference between the diameter of the optical zone and the diameter of the dark pupil, they were divided into three groups: group A, <0 mm(30 eyes); group B, 0-1 mm(36 eyes); and group C, > 1 mm(30 eyes). Each group was then divided into mild to moderate myopic groups(<-6.00D)and high myopic groups(≥-6.00D)according to spherical equivalent refraction(SE). The patients' uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA), SE, high-order corneal aberration, modulation transfer function(MTF)cutoff, object scatter index(OSI), and responses to the subjective visual quality questionnaire were recorded before and 3 months after surgery. Parameter variation was represented by Δ, which was calculated by subtracting the preoperative parameter value from that obtained 3 months postoperatively. Results Preoperative baseline optical zone diameter, dark pupil diameter, and their differences were statistically significant(all P<0.01), whereas age, sex, UCVA, SE, corneal higher-order aberration, MTF cutoff, OSI, and subjective visual quality were not statistically significant(all P>0.05). There were no significant differences in UCVA and SE between the three groups at 3 months after operation(all P>0.05), whereas significant differences were noted in the corneal coma, spherical aberration, and total higher-order aberration(all P<0.05). Pairwise comparisons showed that the values in group A was higher than those in groups B and C, and the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05). Postoperative corneal aberration in all three groups were higher than that before surgery(all P<0.05). A pairwise comparison of Δspherical aberration in patients with high myopia showed that the values of group C were lower than those of groups A and B, and the differences were statistically significant(P=0.045 and 0.047, respectively). A pairwise comparison of Δspherical aberration and Δtotal high-order aberration in patients with mild to moderate myopia showed that the values of group A were higher than those of group B, with statistically significant differences(P=0.003 and 0.006, respectively), and no statistically significant differences were found between groups B and C(P=0.464 and 0.962, respectively). The patients' MTF cutoff values at 3 months after surgery were restored to the preoperative level (P>0.05). When the difference between the diameter of the optical zone and the diameter of the dark pupil was less than 0 mm, the OSI at 3 months after surgery was higher than that before surgery(P=0.007). The subjective visual quality scores of groups B and C after surgery(7.53±3.81 and 7.73±3.88, respectively)were lower than those before surgery(9.75±4.05 and 11.00±6.35, respectively)(P=0.002 and 0.003, respectively). Conclusion When the optical zone diameter was larger than the dark pupil diameter, the subjective satisfaction of myopia patients significantly improved, and the increase in comas, spherical aberration, and total high-order aberration decreased. On this basis, patients with high myopia require a larger optical zone diameter to reduce the increase in postoperative corneal spherical aberration.

Key words: Small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE), Optical zone diameter, Pupil diameter of darkroom, Myopia, Corneal high-order aberration, Visual quality

CLC Number: 

  • R779.63
[1] Oshika T, Klyce SD, Applegate RA, et al. Comparison of corneal wavefront aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 1999, 127(1): 1-7. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(98)00288-8.
[2] Li MY, Zhao J, Miao HM, et al. Mild decentration measured by a Scheimpflug camera and its impact on visual quality following SMILE in the early learning curve[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2014, 55(6): 3886-3892. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13714.
[3] Qin B, Zhao J, Li MY, et al. The comparison of visual outcomes, aberrations, and Bowman's layer micro-distortions after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction(SMILE)for the correction of high and moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2019, 19: 138. doi:10.1186/s12886-019-1135-9.
[4] 陈敬旺, 柯慧敏, 凌玲, 等. 不同程度近视患者SMILE术后有效光学区的研究[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2021, 21(11): 1968-1973. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2021.11.27. CHEN Jingwang, KE Huimin, LING Ling, et al. Study on the effective optical zone after SMILE in patients with different degrees of myopia[J]. International Eye Science, 2021, 21(11): 1968-1973. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2021.11.27.
[5] Zhou JQ, Xu Y, Li MY, et al. Preoperative refraction, age and optical zone as predictors of optical and visual quality after advanced surface ablation in patients with high myopia: a cross-sectional study[J]. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(6): e023877. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023877.
[6] Damgaard IB, Ang M, Mahmoud AM, et al. Functional optical zone and centration following SMILE and LASIK: a prospective, randomized, contralateral eye study[J]. J Refract Surg, 2019, 35(4): 230-237. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20190313-01.
[7] Bühren J, Kohnen T. Factors affecting the change in lower-order and higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia with the Zyoptix 3.1 system[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2006, 32(7): 1166-1174. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.01.098.
[8] 夏艳云, 钟定娟, 王华, 等. 高能量加速型角膜胶原交联术对圆锥角膜眼表的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(6): 42-51. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.432. XIA Yanyun, ZHONG Dingjuan, WANG Hua, et al. Effect of high-energy accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking on the ocular surface of keratoconus[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(6): 42-51.doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.432.
[9] Berry S, Mangione CM, Lindblad AS, et al. Development of the National Eye Institute refractive error correction quality of life questionnaire: focus groups[J]. Ophthalmology, 2003, 110(12): 2285-2291. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.08.021.
[10] Fraenkel G, Comaish IF, Lawless MA, et al. Development of a questionnaire to assess subjective vision score in myopes seeking refractive surgery[J]. J Refract Surg, 2004, 20(1): 10-19. doi:10.3928/1081-597x-20040101-03.
[11] 文佰伟, 兰长骏, 廖萱. 视觉质量评价方法的研究进展[J]. 眼科新进展, 2017, 37(8): 793-796. doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0201. WEN Baiwei, LAN Changjun, LIAO Xuan. Research progress on visual quality assessment methods[J]. Recent Advances in Ophthalmology, 2017, 37(8): 793-796. doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0201.
[12] Hao J, Li L, Tian F, et al. Comparison of two types of visual quality analyzer for the measurement of high order aberrations[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2016, 9(2): 292-297. doi:10.18240/ijo.2016.02.22.
[13] Chalita MR, Chavala S, Xu M, et al. Wavefront analysis in post-LASIK eyes and its correlation with visual symptoms, refraction, and topography[J]. Ophthalmology, 2004, 111(3): 447-453. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.06.022.
[14] Bellucci R, Morselli S. Optimizing higher-order aberrations with intraocular lens technology[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2007, 18(1): 67-73. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e3280121af1.
[15] Artal P, Iglesias I, López-Gil N, et al. Double-pass measurements of the retinal-image quality with unequal entrance and exit pupil sizes and the reversibility of the eye's optical system[J]. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis, 1995, 12(10): 2358-2366. doi:10.1364/josaa.12.002358.
[16] Shah R, Shah S, Sengupta S. Results of small incision lenticule extraction: all-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2011, 37(1): 127-137. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.033.
[17] Yu MR, Chen MJ, Wang BJ, et al. Comparison of visual quality after SMILE and LASEK for mild to moderate myopia[J]. J Refract Surg, 2015, 31(12): 795-800. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20151111-02.
[18] Jun I, Kang DSY, Arba-Mosquera S, et al. Clinical outcomes of mechanical and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in low myopia with a large ablation zone[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2019, 45(7): 977-984. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.02.007.
[19] Kwon Y, Bott S. Postsurgery corneal asphericity and spherical aberration due to ablation efficiency reduction and corneal remodelling in refractive surgeries[J]. Eye(Lond), 2009, 23(9): 1845-1850. doi:10.1038/eye.2008.356.
[20] Kanellopoulos AJ. Comparison of corneal epithelial remodeling over 2 years in LASIK versus SMILE: a contralateral eye study[J]. Cornea, 2018, 38(3): 290-296. doi:10.1097/ico.0000000000001821.
[21] Mok KH, Lee VWH. Effect of optical zone ablation diameter on LASIK-induced higher order optical aberrations[J]. J Refract Surg, 2005, 21(2): 141-143. doi:10.3928/1081-597x-20050301-07.
[22] Luo J, Yao PJ, Li MY, et al. Quantitative analysis of microdistortions in Bowman's layer using optical coherence tomography after SMILE among different myopic corrections[J]. J Refract Surg, 2015, 31(2): 104-109. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20150122-05.
[23] Wu Y, Huang ZP. Comparison of early visual quality in patients with moderate myopia using different optical zones in small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE)[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2021, 21(1): 46. doi:10.1186/s12886-020-01798-y.
[24] 陈仪乐, 杨雅童, 陈嘉宝, 等. SMILE手术与V4c ICL植入术治疗高度近视的客观视觉质量比较[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2020, 20(7): 1222-1225. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2020.7.23. CHEN Yile, YANG Yatong, CHEN Jiabao, et al. Comparison of objective optical quality between SMILE and V4c ICL implantation for correcting high myopia[J]. International Eye Science, 2020, 20(7): 1222-1225. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2020.7.23.
[25] 赵旸, 傅艳燕, 吴小影, 等. 中低度近视SMILE术后超早期视觉质量变化的研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(2): 42-46. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2020.015. ZHAO Yang, FU Yanyan, WU Xiaoying, et al. Changes in visual quality during the ultra-early stage of SMILE for middle and low myopia[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(2): 42-46.doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2020.015.
[1] DAI ChengOverview,LI BinzhongGuidance. Advances in multifocal soft corneal contact lens research [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(5): 100-105.
[2] ZHANG Taoran, WANG Wei, LI Mingming, HUANG Yingxiang. Subfoveal choroidal thickness changes following intravitreal ranibizumab treatment in choroidal neovascularization due to pathological myopia [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(2): 68-71.
[3] LI Jing, ZHANG Hui, WANG Jing. A clinical study on the effect of using different intraocular lens implants on visual quality [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(2): 90-95.
[4] LI Ying. Importance of standardized methods in corneal refractive surgery and the prevention of complications [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(6): 1-6.
[5] ZHANG Ying, LEI Yulin, MA Zhixing, YANG Xinghua, ZHANG Jing, HOU Jie. Early clinical observation of corneal densitometry after SMILE combined with rapid corneal cross-linking [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(6): 52-58.
[6] LIU Yi, YU Mingkun, SUN Wei, SHAO Zhen, HU Yuanyuan, BI Hongsheng. The effectiveness and safety of orthokeratology on controlling myopia of children: a meta-analysis [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(6): 92-100.
[7] RAN Hongyun, JIANG KekeOverview,ZHANG JieGuidance. Analysis of underlying factors of refractive errors in infants with retinopathy of prematurity [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(5): 118-124.
[8] YUE Pengcheng, DU Qiuxuan, KONG Ling, QIAO Zhentao. A controlled Study of the accommodative parameters of eyes with uncorrected myopic anisometropia [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(4): 76-80.
[9] LIU LingOverview,ZHANG MeixiaGuidance. Drug therapy for myopia [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(4): 123-128.
[10] WEI PeipeiOverview,LI CanGuidance. Visual quality and complications after implantation of multifocal intraocular lens [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(2): 141-146.
[11] Pathologic myopia(PM)is a major cause of vision loss worldwide, particularly in Asian countries. Choroidal neovascularization(CNV)is a severe complication of PM, which can cause macular disorders, leading to central scotoma, metamorphopsia, visual field loss, and finally blindness if not treated. The advents of optical coherence topography(OCT), OCT angiography, and fundus fluorescein angiography are helpful in diagnosing CNV due to PM, which can show the position and size of CNV, whether active or passive. For the treatment, photodynamic and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(anti-VEGF)therapies are widely applied. In recent years, administering the intravitreal anti-VEGF injection has become the first-line treatment for CNV secondary to PM. Many clinical studies have indicated that intravitreal anti-VEGF injections affect antagonizing neovascularization and reduce macular edema, thereby contributing to visual improvements and better long-term outcomes. This article provides an overview of the current diagnosis and treatment options for myopic CNV.. Diagnosis and treatment of choroidal neovascularization in pathologic myopia [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(5): 157-162.
[12] Ying LI,Yang JIANG. A discussion on the choice of surgical methods for correction of myopia [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(2): 1-6.
[13] Fengju ZHANG,Yu LI. Key criteria for screening before corneal refractive surgery [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(2): 7-12.
[14] Bo WAN,Donghui LI,Yan LUO,Ying LI. Lens vault changes and associated factors after implantation of implantable collamer lenses with central flow [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(2): 36-41.
[15] Yang ZHAO,Yanyan FU,Xiaoying WU,Yewei YIN,Aiqun XIANG,Ying LU,Kaixuan DU,Yuanjun LI,Tu HU,Xingli LI,Dan WEN. Changes in visual quality during the ultra-early stage of SMILE for middle and low myopia [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(2): 42-46.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] HE Shou-huan,CHEN Bin,YIN Shan-kai,SU Kai-ming,JIANG Xiao . Morphological changes of the upper airway in OSAHS patients with UPPP
[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(5): 385 -388 .
[2] SONG Xi-cheng,ZHANG Qing-quan,XIA Yong-hong,LIU Lu-yi, YU Lu-xin,WANG Gao,JIANG Xiu-liang . Post-operative ICU monitoring and nursing for patients with OSAHS[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(5): 389 -392 .
[3] XUE Wei-guo,SUN Jie,JIN Zheng,SHI Wen-bin,XIN Lu,LIN Guo-Jing,LI Jia-yun . [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2006, 20(4): 300 -303 .
[4] ZHANG Qing-quan,LI Xin-min,WANG Qiang,WANG Yong-fu . Some experience of the endoscopy treatment of maxillary sinus lesion with the canine tooth fossa approach[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2007, 21(1): 38 -39 .
[5] DONG Pin,LI Xiao-yan,TU Li-qiang,MENG Qing-hong,WANG Sang,XIE Jin,JIANG Yan . Reconstruction for advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma and laryngeal recurrent carcinoma[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2007, 21(5): 385 -387 .
[6] JIANG Shao-hong,ZHU Yu-hong,WANG Qiang,SONG Xi-cheng . Intractable primary epistaxis: a report of 101 cases[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2007, 21(6): 542 -544 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2008, 22(1): 74 -77 .
[8] LEIXun, LIU Qianghe, KONG Zhongyu, XIANG Qiu, GENG WANping, HUANG Hui, DONG Yiyuan, LIU Fangxian. ARelationship between expression of Survivin and radiosensitization effect of EGCG in xenotransplanted nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2009, 23(1): 6 -9 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2009, 23(2): 73 -74 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2010, 24(01): 29 -33 .