JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY) ›› 2014, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6): 68-71.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2014.164

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of visual performance after implantation of intraocular lenses: accommodative, spherical monofocal and aspheric monofocal

WANG Jing1,3, LI Bin2, BI Hong-sheng3, ZHANG Miao-miao2, LI Ying-mei2, DING Gang2   

  1. 1. Graduate Student of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250011, Shandong, China;
    2. Department of Ophthalmology, Jinan Second People's Hospital, Jinan 250001, Shandong, China;
    3. Ophthalmology Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250001, Shandong, China
  • Received:2014-05-14 Published:2014-12-16

PDF (PC)

2476

Abstract: Objective To compare the performance of accommodative, spherical monofocal and aspheric monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods In this clinical control study, 3 types of IOL were implanted in 180 eyes of 180 patients with age-related cataract who underwent phacoemulsification. Accommodative (Tetraflex), aspheric monofocal (akreos advanced optics [AO]) (ZMA00), and spherical monofocal (Akreos Adapt) IOLs were implanted. The uncorrected, best-corrected distance, contrast sensitivity, and distancecorrected intermediate and near visual acuity (UCDVA, BCDVA, CSVA, DCIVA, and DCNVA, respectively), and amplitude of pseudoaccommodation were measured at 1, 3, and 12 months after surgery. Results Differences in CSVA at all contrast degrees, UCDVA, and BCDVA among the three groups were not significant. Patients in the tetraflex group exhibited a better DCIVA and DCNVA and experienced more pseudoaccommodation compared to patients in the other two groups at 3 and 12 months after surgery (P<0.01). Conclusion All the three types of IOLs allow greater distance visual acuity; However, tetraflex IOLs produced better DCIVA and DCNVA and more pseudoaccommodation.

Key words: Accommodative, Intraocular lens, pseudoaccommodation, Contrast sensitivity

CLC Number: 

  • R776.1
[1] Richdale K, Sinnott L T, Bullimore M A, et al. Quantification of age-related and per diopter accommodative changes of the lens and ciliary musclein the emmetropic human eye[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2013, 54(2):1162-1169.
[2] Lockhart T E, Shi W. Effects of age on dynamic accommodation[J]. Ergonomics, 2010, 53(7):892-903.
[3] Findl O, Kiss B, Petternel V, et al. Intraacular lens movement caused by eiliary muscle contraction[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003, 29(4):669-676.
[4] Javitt J C, Steinert R F. Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: a multifocal clinical trial evaluating clinical, functional and quality-of-life outcomes[J]. Ophthalmology, 2000, 107(11):2040-2048.
[5] Ostrin L A, Liu Y, Choh V, et al. The role of the iris in chick accommodation[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2011, 52(7):4710-4716.
[6] Artal P, Guirao A, Berrio E, et al. Compensation of comeal abemtion by the intemal opIics in the human eye[J]. J Vis, 2001, 1(1):1-8.
[7] Smith G, Cox M J, Calver R, et al. The spherical aberration of the crystalline lens of human eye[J]. Vision Res, 2001, 41(2):235-243.
[8] Wolffsohn J S, Naroo S A, Motwani N K, et al. Subjective and objective performance of the Lenstec KH-350 accommodative intraocular lens[J]. Br J Ophthalmol,2006, 90(6):693-696.
[9] Sanders D R, Sandem M L. Visual performance results after Tetraflex accommodating intraocular lens implantation[J]. Ophthalmology, 2007, 114(9):1679-1684.
[10] Glasser A. Restoration of accommodation: surgical options for correction of presbyopia[J]. Clin Exp Optom, 2008, 91(3):279-295.
[11] Lockhart T E, Shi W. Effects of age on dynamic accommodation[J]. Ergonomics, 2010, 53(7):892-903.
[12] Bellucci R. Multifbcal intraocular lenses[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005, 16(1):33-37.
[13] Yamaguchi T, Negishi K, Ono T, et al. Feasibility of spherical aberration correction with aspheric intraocular lenses in cataract surgery based on individual pupil diameter[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2009, 35(10):1725-1733.
[14] Hashemi H, Yazdani K, Khabazkhoob M, et al. Distribution of photopic pupil diameter in the Tehran eye study[J]. Curr Eye Res, 2009, 34(5):378-385.
[1] PAN Ruolin, LIAO Xuan, LAN Changjun, TAN Qingqing, XIE Lixuan, HUANG Huan, QIN Suyun, WANG Yan. Experimental study on the influence of decentration and tilt on the optical properties of monofocal intraocular lens with different diopter [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2026, 40(1): 38-46.
[2] LIU Zhen, ZHOU Weiwei, LIU Hanjing, ZHANG Yi, ZHU Yuguang, ZHU Yan. Influence of Alpha angle of intraocular lens on visual quality after the implantation of extended depth-of-field intraocular lens [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2026, 40(1): 47-53.
[3] MA Jiling, WANG Xiaoming, LI Yan, MU Yanxiao, JIN Lin, KONG Hui, YANG Naifu, DANG Guangfu. Evaluation of three different aspheric intraocular lens tilts and decentrations in capsular bags after cataract surgery based on CASIA2 [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2024, 38(4): 76-85.
[4] WANG Daoguang, MA Yuanxiao, WANG Yucheng, REN Mengjia, CAI Keli. A controlled study of visual function after implantation of AT LISA 809M bifocal and Proming A1-UV monofocal intraocular lens [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2024, 38(1): 39-45.
[5] DUAN Lian, MENG FanlanReview,DANG GuangfuGuidance. Effect of dry eye on refractive cataract surgery [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(6): 1-6.
[6] SUN JiOverview,LI CanGuidance. Prediction and stability of axial intraocular lens position after cataract surgery [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(6): 7-12.
[7] HUANG ZiyanOverview,DUAN GuopingGuidance. Effect of higher-order aberrations on visual quality after cataract intraocular lens implantation [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(6): 13-18.
[8] HUANG ZiyanOverview,DUAN GuopingGuidance. Effects of tilt and decentration on visual quality after various intraocular lens implantations [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(6): 26-31.
[9] SUN Lu, ZHANG Shunhua, WU Yuzhou, CHEN Lulu, CAO Di, GAN Linyang. Short-term clinical outcomes of regional refractive intraocular lens implantation in patients with an angle alpha of 0.5-0.8 mm [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(6): 32-37.
[10] YU Tengfei, LI Yansong, LIU Zhen, ZHOU Weiwei, ZHU Yan, ZHU Yuguang. Effect of brimonidine tartrate 0.2% on visual quality after phaco and extended depth of focus intraocular lens implantation with dysphotopsia under mesopic condition [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(6): 45-50.
[11] REN Qing, ZHANG Feng. A case of oculocutaneous albinism combined with bilateral complicated cataract and literature review [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(6): 66-69.
[12] LI Jing, ZHANG Hui, WANG Jing. A clinical study on the effect of using different intraocular lens implants on visual quality [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(2): 90-95.
[13] LI Bin, FANG Xuejun, WU De, HUANG Min. Agreement study of implantable collamer lens based on NK and KS formulas in the early stage after surgery [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(6): 33-41.
[14] WEI Peipei,LI Can. Visual quality and complications after implantation of multifocal intraocular lens [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(2): 141-146.
[15] LI Ying, JIANG Yang. A discussion on the choice of surgical methods for correction of myopia [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(2): 1-6.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Website Copyright: Editorial Office of Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University
Address: No.27 Shanda South Road, Jinan, Shandong, China. Post code: 250100 Tel: +86-0531-88366912 Email: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd