山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 67-71.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.181

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

低温等离子刀、超声刀及传统方式行扁桃体切除术的术后两年随访比较

张立庆,宋圣花,王愿,刘晓静,董伟达,周涵   

  1. 南京医科大学第一附属医院 江苏省人民医院耳鼻咽喉科, 江苏 南京 210029
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-24 出版日期:2017-10-16 发布日期:2017-10-16
  • 通讯作者: 周涵. E-mail: zhouhan1979@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省卫生计生委面上课题(H201603);江苏省青年医学人才项目(QNRC2016614)

Comparison of the efficacy of coblation, ultrasonic knife operation, and conventional tonsillectomy in a 2-year postoperative follow-up.

ZHANG Liqing, SONG Shenghua, WANG Yuan, LIU Xiaojing, DONG Weida, ZHOU Han   

  1. Department of Otolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2017-04-24 Online:2017-10-16 Published:2017-10-16

摘要: 目的 通过对低温等离子刀、超声刀及传统方式行扁桃体切除术的患者进行2年随访,探讨三种手术方式的术后疗效差异。 方法 对行上述三种手术方式的86例患者在扁桃体切除术后6个月、1年及2年进行随访,观察术后扁桃体残体大小及黏膜炎症情况,并使用自制问卷调查咽部症状及满意度等信息。 结果 术后1年及2年随访时,低温等离子刀组和传统组的扁桃体上极残体评分较超声刀组要低,而低温等离子刀组和超声刀组的扁桃体下极残体评分则较传统组要低;术后6个月随访时低温等离子刀组和超声刀组的咽干症状均较传统组明显;术后2年随访时低温等离子刀组和超声刀组的患者满意度较传统组更高,而且传统组患者的咽部异物感更为明显;以上差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。另外术后1年及2年随访时,三组患者的咽干症状、扁桃体窝黏膜慢性炎症程度、咽痛频率及术后下呼吸道感染发生次数均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。 结论 相较于传统方式而言,使用低温等离子刀切除扁桃体的患者术后扁桃体残体发生率低,除短期术后易发生咽干外,中长期咽部不适症状较轻,患者满意度较高。超声刀方式优点与低温等离子刀相近,但在术中要注意对扁桃体上极的处理,防止其残留。

关键词: 扁桃体切除术, 随访, 低温等离子刀, 超声刀

Abstract: Objective To study the efficacy of coblation, ultrasonic knife operation, and conventional tonsillectomy in patients in a 2-year postoperative follow-up. Methods With respect to the above-mentioned three types of operation methods, 86 patients were followed up for 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after tonsillectomy, respectively. The postoperative tonsil residue size and mucosal inflammation, pharyngeal symptoms by assessing self-made questionnaire responses, and satisfaction information were evaluated. Result Upon 1- and 2-year postoperative follow-ups, the “superior pole of the tonsil residue” scores in the coblation and conventional groups were significantly lower than those in the ultrasonic knife operation group; and “pole of the tonsil residue” scores in the coblation and ultrasonic knife operation groups were also significantly lower than those in the conventional group. Upon 6-month postoperative follow-up, the scores of “dry pharynx” in the coblation and ultrasonic knife operation groups were more statistically significant than those in the conventional group. Upon 2-year postoperative follow-up, “satisfaction of information” scores in the coblation and ultrasonic knife groups were significantly higher than those in the conventional group, and “paresthesia pharynges” scores in the conventional group were more significant than those in the other groups. In addition, there were no significant differences among the three groups in the incidence rates of dry pharynx, mucosal inflammation, pharyngeal symptoms, sore throat, and lower respiratory tract infections upon 1- and 2-year postoperative follow-ups(P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional methods, coblation has advantages related to a low incidence of postoperative tonsillar residue. By using coblation, postoperative dry pharynx symptoms are more likely to occur in a short time, throat discomfort symptoms are mild in the mid- to long-term, and the degree of patient satisfaction is high. Ultrasonic knife operations have similar advantages as coblation, but surgeons should pay more attention to the superior poles of the tonsils during operation and prevent tonsil residues.

Key words: Coblation, Sonication, Tonsillectomy, Follow-up

中图分类号: 

  • R766.7
[1] 张立庆,杨翠方,周华群,等.低温等离子刀、超声刀及传统方式行扁桃体切除术的比较[J].山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报,2016, 30(3):56-60. ZHANG Liqing, YANG Cuifang, ZHOU Huaqun, et al. Comparison of coblation,ultrasonic knife and conventional approach in tonsillectomy[J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2016, 30(3):56-60.
[2] 陈曦. 甲状腺手术中热损伤预防[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2012,32(5):369-372. CHEN Xi.The prevention of thermal injury in thyroidectomy[J].Chin J Pract Surg, 2012, 32(5):369-372.
[3] 庹华为,黄志纯,冯旭,等. 超声刀扁桃体切除术的临床病理研究[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2015,22( 5): 261-264. TUO Huawei, HUANG Zhichun, FENG Xu, et al. The clinical pathological study of ultrasonic knife tonsillectomy[J]. Chin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2015, 22(5):261-264.
[4] Jones DT, Kenna MA, Guidi J, et al. Comparison of postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing coblation tonsillectomy versus cautery tonsillectomy?[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2011, 144(6):972-977.
[5] Owaki T, Nakano S, Arimura K, et al. The ultrasonic coagulating and cutting system injures nerve function[J]. Endoscopy, 2002, 34(7):575-579.
[6] Elbadawey MR, Hegazy HM, Eltahan AE, et al. A randomised controlled trial of coblation, diode laser and cold dissection in paediatric tonsillectomy[J]. J Laryngol Otol, 2015, 129(11):1058-1063.
[7] Pang Y, Gong J, Huang J, et al. Coblation tonsillectomy under surgical microscopy: A retrospective study[J]. J Int Med Res, 2016, 44(4):923-930.
[8] 宋昱, 王丽, 李丽娟, 等. 扁桃体切除术后中远期疗效观察[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2011,25(19):879-881. SONG Yu, WANG Li, LI Lijuan, et al. Long term observation of the effectiveness after tonsillectomy [J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surgery(China), 2011, 25(19):879-881.
[9] 余江萍. 扁桃体切除术中舌极处理的研究[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2012, 28(11):1654-1655. YU Jiangping. The treatment of tongue pole tonsil resection[J]. J Modern Med Health, 2012, 28(11):1654-1655.
[1] 王尧,陈静怡,杨颖超,苏开明. 先天性纤维蛋白原缺乏症儿童的扁桃体腺样体切除病例分析1例及文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(3): 77-80.
[2] 常换换,党攀红,胡春燕,王洁. 儿童腺样体切除术后寰枢椎半脱位6例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 110-116.
[3] 罗露,周恩,肖旭平,林志强,方志杰,吕晓虹. 等离子点状激发技术在儿童OSA扁桃体腺样体切除术联合围手术期快速康复中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 26-30.
[4] 朱慧涛,陈丽倩,陶艳丽. 扁桃体术后口干发生机制及防治研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 131-135.
[5] 何梦,唐莉. 远程医疗在青光眼诊疗管理中的应用进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 187-195.
[6] 马志强,宋惠芸,于海玲. 扁桃体、腺样体切除术对语音及嗓音影响研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(1): 120-123.
[7] 张丰珍, 王桂香, 魏沄沄, 张亚梅, 赵靖, 王华, 李宏彬, 李晓丹, 张杰. 合并轻度出血性疾病的扁桃体和(或)腺样体切除术患儿围手术期管理[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(4): 66-72.
[8] 曾宪廷,王广科,孙占伟,武天义,李世超,王卫卫. 伴咽喉反流的难治性鼻窦炎术后应用质子泵抑制剂的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 189-194.
[9] 喻超,陈敬国,米白冰,祝康,夏翠,高天喜,张燕妮,孙斌,任晓勇. 基于REDCap嗅觉障碍患者交互式电子数据库的设计[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(2): 15-19.
[10] 师晓丽, 牟鸿. 多学科联合诊治重度儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征并发肺动脉高压1例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 116-119.
[11] 沈倪美,钱茂华,金加欣,秦阳,王军,吴莺,高刚. 超声刀在扁桃体肿瘤切除术中的应用体会[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(5): 62-66.
[12] 冯晨,郭瑞祥,王岩. 等离子射频消融术在儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停中的应用和进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(2): 16-21.
[13] 沈瑶,周成勇. 低温等离子辅助下儿童扁桃体全切除与部分切除的比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(2): 22-27.
[14] 田天捷,张自雄,杨飞,周意. 缝合腭弓对扁桃体术后出血影响的临床研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(1): 82-85.
[15] 吴兆坤,朱新华. 腺样体扁桃体切除术治愈儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征的偏误研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 148-152.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!