山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 78-80.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2012.225

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

视网膜静脉阻塞患者光感受器细胞层与最佳视力之间的关系

王永波,石安娜,石浔,金昱,刘维锋   

  1. 南昌大学第三附属医院眼科, 南昌 330008
  • 收稿日期:2012-07-19 发布日期:2013-02-16
  • 作者简介:永波,硕士,住院医师。 E-mail:wangyongbo11@126.com

Relationship between photoreceptor cell layer and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with retinal vein occlusion

WANG Yong-bo, SHI An-na, SHI Xun, JIN Yu, LIU Wei-feng   

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330008, China
  • Received:2012-07-19 Published:2013-02-16

摘要:

目的   探讨视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)患者的光感受器细胞层与最佳视力(BCVA)之间的关系.方法   回顾分析2008年8月至2011年8月在我院就诊的RVO患者88例(88眼)的资料,其中中央静脉阻塞28例(28眼),分支静脉阻塞60例(60眼)。采用三维频域光学相干断层扫描仪观察黄斑中心凹区光感受器细胞层连续性。根据对患者光感受器细胞内外节(IS/OS)层的检测情况分为完全连续组(36眼)、不完全连续组(40眼)、完全缺失组(12眼),比较3组最佳矫正视力的差异。结果   3组最佳矫正视力分别为0.65±0.32、0.54±0.27、0.08±0.06,完全缺失组与完全连续组和不完全连续组差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01),而完全连续组与不完全连续组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3组黄斑中心凹厚度分别为(176.00±42.00)、(165.00±34.00)、(152.00±33.00)μm,3组间差异无统计学意义(F=2.05,P>0.05)。结论   RVO患者的最佳矫正视力随自身光感受器细胞层连续性增加而提高,应注意对中心凹部光感受器细胞的保护。

关键词: 视网膜静脉阻塞, 最佳矫正视力, 光感受器细胞层, 光学相干断层扫描

Abstract:

Objective   To evaluate the relationship between photoreceptor cell layer and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with retinal vein occlusion(RVO). Methods   The data of 88 patients (88 eyes) with retinal vein occlusion were collected in our hospital from August 2008 to August 2011, including 28 patients (28 eyes) with central RVO and 60 patients (60 eyes) with branch RVO. The continuity of foveal photoreceptor cell layers was observed by 3D-OCT. According to the test result of photoreceptor cells’ IS/OS layers, the patients were divided into 3 groups: completely continuous group (36 eyes), partly continuous group (40 eyes), and completely losing group (12 eyes). Then the differences of BCVA were compared among them. Results   BCVA of the three groups was 0.65±0.32, 0.54±0.27 and 0.08±0.06 respectively. There were significant differences in BCVA between patients who was completely lack of IS/OS layers and the others whose IS/OS partly or completely existed(P<0.01). No significant difference was found between completely continuous group and partly continuous group (P>0.05). Central foveal thickness of the three groups was (176.00±42.00), (165.00±34.00) and (152.00±33.00)μm respectively, and no significant difference was found between them(F=2.05,P>0.05). Conclusion   The BCVA of patients with RVO improves when the continuity of photoreceptor cells increases, and more attention should be paid to protect foveal photoreceptor. 

Key words: Photoreceptor cell layer, Optical coherence tomography, Best corrected visual acuity, Retinal vein occlusion

中图分类号: 

  • R774.1
[1] 靳琳,潘庆敏,胡磊. 玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗治疗CSME及NCSME的临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(2): 96-98.
[2] 焦芮,韩克阳,王淑雅综述, 赵博军审校. 光学相干断层扫描技术在非动脉炎性前部缺血性视神经病变中的诊断现状[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(1): 119-122.
[3] 韩克阳,王淑雅,焦芮,于贝贝综述, 赵博军审校. 视网膜静脉阻塞的发病机制及黄斑水肿的抗-VEGF治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(1): 123-126.
[4] 严晓腾,冯军,康欣乐. 玻璃体腔注射康柏西普治疗视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(4): 105-108.
[5] 邵娜,张晗. 糖尿病患者行白内障超声乳化术后视力及眼底的变化[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(1): 83-87.
[6] 邢凯,亢泽峰. 玻璃体腔内注射康柏西普治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(1): 80-82.
[7] 汪新, 魏伟. 中药“益视合剂”辅助治疗儿童弱视[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(1): 56-59.
[8] 孙洪义, 张晗. 2型糖尿病患者超声乳化白内障摘除并人工晶体植入手术后黄斑区光学相干断层扫描改变[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(6): 72-76.
[9] 张秋露,王永华,李颖,王玥,柳静,胡雅斌,徐雯,郑燕,刘倩,翟长斌. 飞秒激光Ziemer FEMTO LDV “Classic”和“Crystal Line” 制作LASIK角膜瓣的评估[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(3): 75-79.
[10] 李昊,周芳. 特发性黄斑裂孔的形态与预后分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(2): 81-83.
[11] 张爱慧1,朱灵1,张金枝1,张伟2. 白内障超声乳化人工晶体植入术与年龄相关性黄斑变性的相关性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(5): 77-83.
[12] 翟长斌1,郝颖娟2,易省平2,杨庆松1,张晶1,周跃华1. 鹰视飞秒FS200与Moria M2110微型角膜板层刀制作的角膜瓣厚度及形态观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(4): 21-25.
[13] 郝颖娟1,杨庆松2,周跃华2,易省平1,翟长斌2. 飞秒激光在薄瓣LASIK手术中制作的角膜瓣厚度形态观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(4): 26-31.
[14] 冉莉莉1,2,原公强2,董晓光2. 继发性黄斑前膜的病因分析及手术疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(3): 47-49.
[15] 陈凯1,韩旭光2,刘健2,徐湘辉2,张玉光2. 应用眼前节OCT观察膨胀期白内障继发青光眼手术前后的房角变化[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2012, 26(6): 65-66.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!