山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 70-72.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2013.019

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

阿司匹林耐受不良三联征肺通气功能的改变及哮喘病情控制情况

张弢1,张治军1,滕磊1,王琼琳2   

  1. 上海中医药大学附属曙光医院 1.耳鼻喉科; 2.呼吸科, 上海 201203
  • 收稿日期:2013-01-17 发布日期:2013-08-16
  • 作者简介:张弢。 Email:zhangtao.1339@163.com

Aspirin intolerance triad and its impact on pulmonary function and asthma control

ZHANG Tao1, ZHANG Zhi-jun1, TENG Lei1, WANG Qiong-lin2   

  1. 1. Department of Otolaryngology; 2. Department of Aspiration, Shanghai Shuguang Hospital  Affiliated with  Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China
  • Received:2013-01-17 Published:2013-08-16

摘要:

目的    观察阿司匹林耐受不良三联征对肺通气功能的改变及哮喘控制情况。方法    收集2007年1月至2012年10月住院的阿司匹林三联征患者36例(AIT组),收集合并变应性鼻炎的支气管哮喘患者和一般的支气管哮喘患者各35例(鼻炎合并哮喘组和哮喘组)。比较三组用力肺活量(FVC)、第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、第1秒用力呼气容积占用力肺活量的百分比(FEV1%FVC)、呼气峰流速(PEF)、哮喘控制测试(ACT)、哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)。结果    AIT组FVC、FEV1、FEV1%FVC、PEF均低于哮喘组,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。AIT组与鼻炎合并哮喘组比较,FVC、FEV1、PEF差异无统计学意义,但两组FEV1%FVC差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。AIT组ACT评分为14.2±4.5,ACQ评分为2.7±1.5,与哮喘组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),与鼻炎合并哮喘组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论    AIT患者有较严重的气道炎症和较高的气道反应性,其肺功能明显下降且对哮喘控制不佳。FEV1%FVC是一个有效、灵敏的观察指标用来检测和评价AIT。

关键词: 哮喘, 哮喘控制问卷, 哮喘控制测试, 变应性鼻炎, 肺功能, 阿司匹林耐受不良三联征

Abstract:

Objective    To investigate the impact of aspirin intolerance triad on pulmonary function and asthma clinical control. Methods    106 patients with asthma alone or with asthma in combination with allergic rhinitis or patients with aspirin intolerance triad were divided into the asthma group(n=35), the asthma combined with allergic rhinitis(AR) group(n=35) and the aspirin intolerance triad(AIT) group(n=36) at Shanghai Shuguang Hospital. Forced vital capacity(FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second(FEV1), forced expiratory volume in one second/ forced vital capacity(FEV1% FVC),peak expiratory flow(PEF), the Asthma Control Test(ACT) score and the Asthma Control Questionnaire(ACQ)score were evaluated respectively among the asthma alone group ,the asthma combined with AR group and the AIT group. Results    Patients in the AIT group had significantly(P<0.05) lower FVC, FEV1, FEV1% FVC and PEF than the asthma alone group. However patients in the AIT group had the same FVC, FEV1 and PEF as those in the asthma combined with AR group except for FEV1% FVC. The ACT score(14.2±4.5) and the ACQ score(2.7±1.5) in patients with AIT were significantly different with the asthma alone group, but were not significantly different with the asthma combined with AR group. Conclusion    AIT patients have serious airway inflammation and high airway resistance, and their lung functions and level of asthma control are bad. FEV1% FVC may be an effective and sensitive index to diagnose or evaluate AIT.

Key words: Aspirin intolerance triad, Allergic rhinitis, Pulmonary function, Asthma control questionnaire, Asthma, Asthma control test

中图分类号: 

  • R765.21
[1] 王坛,武珂,李连庆,宫丽丽. 皮下免疫治疗注射后出现全身不良反应的伴发因素及处理[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 71-74.
[2] 卢汉桂,林歆胜,姚丹勉,魏永新,李创伟. 变应性鼻炎大鼠IL-35的表达及对辅助性T细胞免疫调节的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 66-70.
[3] 浦洪波,杜晓东. 无锡地区2 000例变应性鼻炎变应原检测结果分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 105-107.
[4] 陈鸣,俞雪飞. 浅谈伴有变应性鼻炎的慢性鼻窦炎的治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 18-22.
[5] 吴湘萍. 患者管理方式对变应性鼻炎舌下含服粉尘螨滴剂疗效的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 68-72.
[6] 刘杰,曲辉,鹿道温,辛华秀,郭艳丽. 青岛市西部城区春季花粉症调查分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 70-72.
[7] 李松,王宗贵,杨景朴,张竹萍. 鼻内镜下翼管神经切断术进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(1): 72-76.
[8] 郅莉莉,宋道亮. 嗜酸性粒细胞及IL5在上颌窦后鼻孔息肉与鼻息肉中表达的差异[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 43-46.
[9] 万文锦,王文,程雷. 尘螨变应性鼻炎皮下免疫治疗与舌下免疫治疗的荟萃分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 103-108.
[10] 朱新华. 变应性鼻炎冲击免疫治疗的临床应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 13-17.
[11] 史丽,赵莉,张红萍. 变应性鼻炎的长期抗炎治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 9-12.
[12] 刘静. 基于整体观念变应性鼻炎的中医辨证论治[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 28-30.
[13] 程雷,钱俊俊,田慧琴. 变应性鼻炎研究的若干进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 1-3.
[14] 许昱,陶泽璋. 重视变应性鼻炎药物治疗的规范化和个体化[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 4-8.
[15] 刘英,叶小静,赵春丽,季青,黄谦. 季节性变应性鼻炎预防性治疗观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 37-40.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!