山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3): 9-14.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

喉癌及喉咽癌颈部淋巴结微转移的检测及临床意义初探

钱晓云1,章宜芬2,俞晨杰1,丁小琼1,秦阳1,秦小明1,高下1   

  1. 南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院 1.耳鼻咽喉科;  2. 病理科,  南京 210008
  • 收稿日期:2010-03-29 修回日期:2010-05-19 出版日期:2010-06-16 发布日期:2010-06-16
  • 通讯作者: 高下(1964- ),男,博士,主任医师,主要从事耳科及听力学研究。 Email: xiagao213@yahoo.com.cn
  • 作者简介:钱晓云(1975- ),女,硕士,副主任医师,主要从事咽喉及头颈肿瘤方面的研究。 Email: qxy522@yahoo.com.cn
  • 基金资助:

    南京市科技局社会发展项目(编号200805012)

Detection of micrometastasis in cervical lymph nodes from laryngeal or laryngopharyngeal carcinoma and preliminary research on the clinical significance of micrometastasis

Qian Xiaoyun1, Zhang Yifen2, Yu Chenjie1, Ding Xiaoqiong1, Qin Yang1, Qin Xiaoming1, Gao Xia1   

  1. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery; 2. Department of Pathology, Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Received:2010-03-29 Revised:2010-05-19 Online:2010-06-16 Published:2010-06-16

摘要:

目的  比较半连续切片H&E染色及免疫组化染色两种方法,用于检测喉及喉咽部鳞形细胞癌患者颈部常规病理学阴性淋巴结中微转移的检出率,并初步探讨其与临床病理因素及早期复发的关系。方法  对13例喉及喉咽部鳞型细胞癌患者经常规病理检查为阴性的15侧326个淋巴结, 采用50μm半连续切片苏木精-伊红染色法及细胞角蛋白CK(AE1/ AE3)免疫组化EnVison两步法行微转移灶检测, χ2 检验用于检验两种不同方法的阳性检出率。统计所有病例的各临床病理因素(年龄、性别、临床分型、pT 分期、肿瘤分级、原发灶浸润深度),随访11~56个月(中位时间31个月),采用χ2 检验分析各临床病理因素与微转移之间的相关性以及微转移与早期复发的相关性。结果  ①全部75个蜡块经半连续切片后免疫组化和苏木精-伊红染色切片各750张,免疫组化组中经CK(AE1/ AE3) 单克隆抗体标记后,共40张切片(5.33%)分别对应5 例(38.46 %) 患者中的7 个淋巴结(2.14 %)呈阳性反应。而相应的苏木精-伊红染色切片,若不与免疫组化对照,其阳性切片数为24张(3.20%),分别对应2例患者的3个淋巴结。两组间阳性切片数的检出率差异有统计学意义(Ρ<0.05);②除年龄外的各临床病理因素与微转移之间差异无统计学意义( Ρ>0.05) ;有微转移和无微转移患者的早期复发率差异无统计学意义(Ρ>0.05) 。结论  对于喉及喉咽鳞癌的颈部淋巴结微转移,单纯的苏木精-伊红染色切片,即使是连续或半连续切片,有经验的病理科医师仍然会有一定的漏检率,而免疫组化方法可提高其检出率。微转移与临床病理因素及预后间的可能相关性尚有待大样本和长期随访资料的进一步探讨。

关键词: 喉癌; 喉咽癌;微转移; 免疫组化技术;细胞角蛋白

Abstract:

Objective  To Compare the positive detection rates of hematoxylin and eosin stain with immunohistochemical stain by semi-consecutive sectioning of  histopathologically negative cervical lymph nodes from laryngeal or laryngopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.The  relationship between micrometastasis and clinicopathological factors,  micrometastasis and early recurrences was studied primitively. Methods  Totally, 326 negative cervical lymph nodes (CLNs) from 13 patients (15 sides), with laryngeal or laryngopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, were included in this study. Two methods( H&E stain and EnVison′s two-step IHC technique with monoclonal antibody CK (AE1/ AE3)) combined with semi--consecutive sectioning(per-50μm) were applied to detect the micrometestasis . The positive detection rates of H&E and IHC were compared by Chisquare test . The clinicopathological factors, consisted of sex, age, pT stage, clinical typing, grade of differentiation,depth of primary tumor invasion, were studied and all the cases were followed-up for 11~56 months(median time 31.4 months). Further, the relationship between micrometastasis and clinicopathological factors, micrometastasis and early recurrences were analyzed with Chisquare test.  Results  1. All the paraffin specimens of 75 cases were semi-consecutively sectioned into two sets of 750 slices for H&E stain and IHC stain. In the IHC group, 40(5.33%)slices were found positive in 7 (2.14 %) lymph nodes which came from 5(38.46 %) patients Howerver, only 24(3.20%)positive slices were found in 3 lymph nodes of 2 patients in the H&E group.The positive detection rates of these two groups were statistically significant(Ρ<0.05). 2. There was no statistically significance between micrometastasis and the clinicopathological factors (Ρ>0.05) except for the age (Ρ=0.032). There was no statistically significance between micrometastasis and early recurrences. Conclusion  1. Even the experienced pathologists may miss the micrometastasis in cervical lymph nodes from laryngeal or laryngopharyngeal carcinoma if only by H&E stain,though  semi-serial or serial section was applied in those cases.While the IHC technique can obviously increace the positive detection rates. 2.The possible relationship between micrometastasis and clinicopathological factors, micrometastasis and recurrences should be verified with more samples and long-term follow-up.

Key words: Laryngeal carcinoma; Laryngopharyngeal carcinoma; Micrometastasis; Immunohistochemical technique; Cytokeratin

中图分类号: 

  • R739.65
[1] 贾传亮,王丽综述,陈秀梅,宋西成审校. T1b声门型喉癌的治疗进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2012, 26(6): 83-83.
[2] 卢国伟,王琳,孙彦,李薇,华辉,葛瑞峰. 山东东部57例喉癌人乳头状瘤病毒DNA及其亚型的检测[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2012, 26(6): 16-19.
[3] 孙睿杰,许风雷,刘大昱,雷大鹏,潘新良. 显微支撑喉镜下CO2激光手术或联合干扰素治疗复发性小儿喉乳头状瘤疗效对比[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2012, 26(6): 23-25.
[4] 陈勇,谢秀芳,刘昉,蒋刈,李瑞玉. IFN-γ转染骨髓间充质干细胞治疗喉乳头状瘤的实验研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2012, 26(3): 24-27.
[5] 张书嘉1, 李培华2, 贾文波1, 徐恒光1, 鲍凤香1,李利1. 程序性细胞死亡因子5在喉鳞状细胞癌组织中的表达及临床意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2012, 26(2): 23-26.
[6] 吴桂卿1,田军2,孙静1,陈琪1. Tiam1和MTA1在喉鳞癌组织中的表达及意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2012, 26(1): 41-43.
[7] 李大伟,董频,高尚. 喉鳞癌中P糖蛋白表达与细胞增殖、凋亡及预后的关系[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(4): 8-12.
[8] 伍红良1,高延永1,庾俊雄2, 陶赞英3,刘强和1,何晓松1,耿宛平1. 经鼻内镜鼻窦术后自控静脉镇痛对血浆IL-6、IL-10的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(4): 44-47.
[9] 温晗光,陈缪安,林忠豪,蔡志良. 喉神经内分泌癌1例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(4): 73-74.
[10] 徐宏鸣,董频,孙臻峰,王国良,王菲. 喉腔手术动物模型的初步研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(3): 15-.
[11] 伊海金1, 张宝泉2, 王春红1, 郭泓1, 倪富强1. 喉癌治疗后复发的临床因素分析及治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(3): 18-21.
[12] 李志章1,李钦2,耿玉艳3,邵阳1. TGF-β1/Smad4信号通路在喉鳞癌中的作用及意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(2): 16-.
[13] 姜绍红,宋西成,张庆泉,朱宇宏,孙岩,张华,王强. 导航鼻内镜下治疗鼻窦囊肿[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(2): 60-62.
[14] 孙岩,宋西成,张庆泉,张华,柳忠禄,王强,姜绍红,刘斐斐. 导航鼻内镜下上颌窦良性骨性病变的治疗体会[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(2): 63-.
[15] 曾志梅1,梁永辉2,杨嶷芳2, 窦晓清2, 罗碧强2,张丽卫2,陈贤明2. 巨噬细胞移动抑制因子在下咽癌中的表达[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(1): 17-19.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!