山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 38-41.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2013.181

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

听力筛查未通过婴幼儿的客观听力评估

余崇仙,杨克林,张晓敏,汪平   

  1. 安徽医科大学第一附属医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 合肥  230022
  • 收稿日期:2013-04-14 发布日期:2013-12-16
  • 作者简介:余崇仙。 Email:Wendy0091@126.com

Objective hearing evaluation of infants failed in hearing screening

YU Chong-xian, YANG Ke-lin, ZHANG Xiao-min, WANG Ping   

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University,  Hefei 230022,  China
  • Received:2013-04-14 Published:2013-12-16

摘要:

目的    分析听力筛查未通过婴幼儿的客观听力学特征,为早期干预提供科学依据。方法    对听力筛查未通过患儿286例进行听力诊断性检查。采用听性脑干反应(ABR)、40Hz听觉相关电位(40Hz-AERP)、畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)、声导抗进行评估。结果    286例婴幼儿中双耳听力正常95例(33.22%);听力损失者191例(66.78%),其中单耳听力损失70例(24.47%),双耳听力损失121(42.31%);传导性听力损失59例(20.63%),感音神经性听力损失132例(46.15%);轻度听力损失91例(31.82%),中度43例(15.03%),重度20例(6.99%),极重度37例(12.94%)。191例听力异常者只有16例复查,占8.38%,复查结果:听力正常2例,双耳听力损失10例,单耳听力损失4例。结论    部分听力筛查未通过婴幼儿的听力可随着听觉神经系统发育的完善恢复正常;同时中耳病变也是部分婴幼儿听力筛查未通过的影响因素;客观听力学组合测试可有效评估听力筛查未通过患儿的听力特征,为听力损失的早期诊断、早期干预提供科学依据;听力异常患儿的复查率低和失访率高仍是目前亟需解决的问题。

关键词: 听力筛查, 听觉诱发电位, 声导抗, 婴幼儿

Abstract:

Objective    To analyze the audiological characteristics in infants failed in hearing screening and provide useful information for early intervention in this population. Methods    Between January 2011 and December 2012, 286 infants who failed hearing screening in one or two ears received a full audiological test battery consisted of auditory brainstem responses(ABRs), 40Hz auditory event related potential(40Hz—AERP), distortion product otoacoustic emissions(DPOAEs)and tympanometry. Results    95(33.22%) infants were normal hearing subjects and 191(66.78%)showed hearing loss, which was either unilateral(n=70, 24.47%) or bilateral(n=121, 42.31%), including 59 cases(20.63%) of conductive hearing loss and 132 cases(46.15%) of sensorineural hearing loss. Hearing loss ranged from mild(n=91, 31.82%), moderate(n=43, 15.03%), severe(n=20, 6.99%) to profound(n=37, 12.94%). Testing  was repeated in 16(8.38%) of these 191 infants with hearing loss. The results turned out that 2 of them became normal, while 10 were bilateral loss and  4  were unilateral loss. Conclusion    The hearing level in some infants who failed hearing screening can turn into normal owing to the development of auditory system. Middle ear function may be a confusing factor in hearing screening. The audiological characteristics in infants failed in hearing screening can be evaluated by audiological test battery, which provides useful information for early identification and intervention in this population. The results of hearing screening should be interpreted appropriately. However, poor follow-up compliance is still a big problem in such efforts.

Key words: Infant, Hearing screening, Auditory evoked potentials, Tympanometry

中图分类号: 

  • R764.04
[1] 周佳蕾,孙世冰,李晓艳. 婴幼儿宽频声导抗测试[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 91-94.
[2] 周佳蕾,孙世冰,李静雨,陈芳,李晓艳. 婴幼儿自动听性脑干诱发电位不同测试时间的比较及意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 66-69.
[3] 王海,苟栋明,陈伟. 经口吹气治疗幼儿鼻腔异物45例疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(1): 61-63.
[4] 苗刚勇, 肖旭平, 谭志强. 低温等离子射频技术在婴幼儿甲状舌管囊肿手术中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(6): 52-55.
[5] 王国强, 赵春红, 霍红, 龚志云, 宋伟伟, 严丽霞, 李雪华, 王伟丽. 早产儿听力筛查结果及其听力障碍危险因素[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(4): 7-10.
[6] 周晓娓, 王跃建, 段光荣, 虞幼军. 听力诊疗网络平台的开发[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(6): 79-84.
[7] 侯东明,曹荣萍,孟国珍,程岚. 婴幼儿鼻腔先天性占位的诊断及鼻内镜手术治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(3): 36-38.
[8] 刘志奇1,2,刘立思1,杨琨3 . 新生儿听力筛查11894例结果分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(2): 8-12.
[9] 赵利敏,倪坤,吴佳丽,陈淑梅,李晓艳. 婴幼儿吸气性喉喘鸣病因分析与治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(2): 49-51.
[10] 张恩东,李大建,苗乐杰. 重症监护病房与母婴同室新生儿听力筛查比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(2): 29-31.
[11] 边致强,屈传强 综述,刘亚群 审校. 多层螺旋CT对婴幼儿先天性感音性耳聋的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2009, 23(6): 41-.
[12] 张俊瑶 朱富高 孙美红. 6159例新生儿听力筛查结果分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2009, 23(4): 38-40.
[13] 杨 琨,刘志奇,黄治物 . 正常新生儿226Hz及1000Hz探测音鼓室导抗测试[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(5): 420-423 .
[14] 曲 玲 . 243例未通过听力筛查的婴幼儿ABR结果分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(2): 189-190 .
[15] 程友,王秋萍,钱宇虹,郭梦和,王天友,李泽卿 . 脑干听觉诱发电位对脑外伤后持续植物状态评价的意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(4): 345-348 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!