山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 67-71.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.181

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

低温等离子刀、超声刀及传统方式行扁桃体切除术的术后两年随访比较

张立庆,宋圣花,王愿,刘晓静,董伟达,周涵   

  1. 南京医科大学第一附属医院 江苏省人民医院耳鼻咽喉科, 江苏 南京 210029
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-24 出版日期:2017-10-16 发布日期:2017-10-16
  • 通讯作者: 周涵. E-mail: zhouhan1979@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省卫生计生委面上课题(H201603);江苏省青年医学人才项目(QNRC2016614)

Comparison of the efficacy of coblation, ultrasonic knife operation, and conventional tonsillectomy in a 2-year postoperative follow-up.

ZHANG Liqing, SONG Shenghua, WANG Yuan, LIU Xiaojing, DONG Weida, ZHOU Han   

  1. Department of Otolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2017-04-24 Online:2017-10-16 Published:2017-10-16

摘要: 目的 通过对低温等离子刀、超声刀及传统方式行扁桃体切除术的患者进行2年随访,探讨三种手术方式的术后疗效差异。 方法 对行上述三种手术方式的86例患者在扁桃体切除术后6个月、1年及2年进行随访,观察术后扁桃体残体大小及黏膜炎症情况,并使用自制问卷调查咽部症状及满意度等信息。 结果 术后1年及2年随访时,低温等离子刀组和传统组的扁桃体上极残体评分较超声刀组要低,而低温等离子刀组和超声刀组的扁桃体下极残体评分则较传统组要低;术后6个月随访时低温等离子刀组和超声刀组的咽干症状均较传统组明显;术后2年随访时低温等离子刀组和超声刀组的患者满意度较传统组更高,而且传统组患者的咽部异物感更为明显;以上差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。另外术后1年及2年随访时,三组患者的咽干症状、扁桃体窝黏膜慢性炎症程度、咽痛频率及术后下呼吸道感染发生次数均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。 结论 相较于传统方式而言,使用低温等离子刀切除扁桃体的患者术后扁桃体残体发生率低,除短期术后易发生咽干外,中长期咽部不适症状较轻,患者满意度较高。超声刀方式优点与低温等离子刀相近,但在术中要注意对扁桃体上极的处理,防止其残留。

关键词: 扁桃体切除术, 随访, 低温等离子刀, 超声刀

Abstract: Objective To study the efficacy of coblation, ultrasonic knife operation, and conventional tonsillectomy in patients in a 2-year postoperative follow-up. Methods With respect to the above-mentioned three types of operation methods, 86 patients were followed up for 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after tonsillectomy, respectively. The postoperative tonsil residue size and mucosal inflammation, pharyngeal symptoms by assessing self-made questionnaire responses, and satisfaction information were evaluated. Result Upon 1- and 2-year postoperative follow-ups, the “superior pole of the tonsil residue” scores in the coblation and conventional groups were significantly lower than those in the ultrasonic knife operation group; and “pole of the tonsil residue” scores in the coblation and ultrasonic knife operation groups were also significantly lower than those in the conventional group. Upon 6-month postoperative follow-up, the scores of “dry pharynx” in the coblation and ultrasonic knife operation groups were more statistically significant than those in the conventional group. Upon 2-year postoperative follow-up, “satisfaction of information” scores in the coblation and ultrasonic knife groups were significantly higher than those in the conventional group, and “paresthesia pharynges” scores in the conventional group were more significant than those in the other groups. In addition, there were no significant differences among the three groups in the incidence rates of dry pharynx, mucosal inflammation, pharyngeal symptoms, sore throat, and lower respiratory tract infections upon 1- and 2-year postoperative follow-ups(P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional methods, coblation has advantages related to a low incidence of postoperative tonsillar residue. By using coblation, postoperative dry pharynx symptoms are more likely to occur in a short time, throat discomfort symptoms are mild in the mid- to long-term, and the degree of patient satisfaction is high. Ultrasonic knife operations have similar advantages as coblation, but surgeons should pay more attention to the superior poles of the tonsils during operation and prevent tonsil residues.

Key words: Coblation, Sonication, Tonsillectomy, Follow-up

中图分类号: 

  • R766.7
[1] 张立庆,杨翠方,周华群,等.低温等离子刀、超声刀及传统方式行扁桃体切除术的比较[J].山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报,2016, 30(3):56-60. ZHANG Liqing, YANG Cuifang, ZHOU Huaqun, et al. Comparison of coblation,ultrasonic knife and conventional approach in tonsillectomy[J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2016, 30(3):56-60.
[2] 陈曦. 甲状腺手术中热损伤预防[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2012,32(5):369-372. CHEN Xi.The prevention of thermal injury in thyroidectomy[J].Chin J Pract Surg, 2012, 32(5):369-372.
[3] 庹华为,黄志纯,冯旭,等. 超声刀扁桃体切除术的临床病理研究[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2015,22( 5): 261-264. TUO Huawei, HUANG Zhichun, FENG Xu, et al. The clinical pathological study of ultrasonic knife tonsillectomy[J]. Chin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2015, 22(5):261-264.
[4] Jones DT, Kenna MA, Guidi J, et al. Comparison of postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing coblation tonsillectomy versus cautery tonsillectomy?[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2011, 144(6):972-977.
[5] Owaki T, Nakano S, Arimura K, et al. The ultrasonic coagulating and cutting system injures nerve function[J]. Endoscopy, 2002, 34(7):575-579.
[6] Elbadawey MR, Hegazy HM, Eltahan AE, et al. A randomised controlled trial of coblation, diode laser and cold dissection in paediatric tonsillectomy[J]. J Laryngol Otol, 2015, 129(11):1058-1063.
[7] Pang Y, Gong J, Huang J, et al. Coblation tonsillectomy under surgical microscopy: A retrospective study[J]. J Int Med Res, 2016, 44(4):923-930.
[8] 宋昱, 王丽, 李丽娟, 等. 扁桃体切除术后中远期疗效观察[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2011,25(19):879-881. SONG Yu, WANG Li, LI Lijuan, et al. Long term observation of the effectiveness after tonsillectomy [J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surgery(China), 2011, 25(19):879-881.
[9] 余江萍. 扁桃体切除术中舌极处理的研究[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2012, 28(11):1654-1655. YU Jiangping. The treatment of tongue pole tonsil resection[J]. J Modern Med Health, 2012, 28(11):1654-1655.
[1] 李延忠,张泰. 关于儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征我们面临的问题[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 1-5.
[2] 许志飞,倪鑫. 重视阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征儿童腺样体[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 9-13.
[3] 杨微,郑莉,许志飞. 中重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征儿童无创正压[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 19-24.
[4] 张杰,陈雪梅,许安廷. 超声刀扁桃体切除术与低温等离子扁桃体切除术的对比研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(5): 95-100.
[5] 刘俊茹,高英恺,杨杨,王俊菊,刘存军. 低温等离子刀切除舌根增生性肿物40例报告[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(2): 83-84.
[6] 徐磊,朱鹃芬,程雷. 成年人扁桃体切除术三种手术方式的临床比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(6): 49-52.
[7] 张立庆,杨翠方,周华群,陆美萍,董伟达. 低温等离子刀、超声刀及传统方式行扁桃体切除术的比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(3): 56-60.
[8] 胡廷保,梁健刚. 舌根腺样囊性癌大出血救治1例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(2): 106-108.
[9] 龚明杰,刘侃,张磊,闫飚,邹嘉平,李伟忠. 三种不同扁桃体切除术疗效比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(1): 70-73.
[10] 董世亮, 战明明. “预防性缝扎法”在扁桃体切除术中的止血效果[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(6): 90-91.
[11] 李军政, 高翔, 吴盖珍, 陈莎, 王洁, 田文栋, 李湘平. 超声刀在治疗儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(1): 1-4.
[12] 苏跃, 王中亮, 曾珍. 三种手术方式在改良悬雍垂腭咽成形术中的疗效对比[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(1): 5-7.
[13] 张杰, 李进让, 刘涛. 吞咽表面肌电图评估扁桃体切除术后患者疼痛程度的可能性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(6): 57-60.
[14] 吴允刚1,刘黎明2,宋健梅3,庞太忠1,李晓瑜1,张辉1,杨欣欣1, 丁德涛1,张永红1,孙聚兴1,赵玉凤1. 全麻下单极电刀切除扁桃体90例疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(6): 74-76.
[15] 贺青卿,赵国伟,庄大勇,郑鲁明,范子义,朱见,周鹏,侯蕾,于芳,李燕宁 . 甲状腺/甲状旁腺术中Focus超声刀规范化应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(6): 1-5.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!