成年人扁桃体切除术三种手术方式的临床比较

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2016.401

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的比较分析成年人3种扁桃体切除术的临床应用价值。方法将90例行扁桃体切除术的患者分为等离子扁桃体切除术组(等离子组)、电刀扁桃体切除术组(电刀组)、常规扁桃体剥离术组(剥离组),各30例,记录各组手术时间、术中及术后出血量、术后咽痛程度、住院医疗费用等。结果 3组手术时间、术中出血量、术后1~4 d咽痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),其中等离子组和电刀组手术时间、术中出血量及VAS评分明显少于剥离组(P<0.001),而等离子组与电刀组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。剥离组术后见原发性出血1例,等离子组及电刀组未见术后出血发生。3组护理及检疗费、术后用药费比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);电刀组及剥离组住院总费用明显低于等离子组(P<0.001),而电刀组与剥离组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论成年人扁桃体切除术各有优势及不足,临床应根据疾病特点、患者意愿和经济能力、手术者技术水平以及医疗器械等因素选择最恰当的,从而达到最佳治疗效果。

关键词: 消融技术, 出血, 术后疼痛, 扁桃体切除术, 住院费用

Abstract: Objective To compare and analyze the clinical application value of three surgical methods in adult patients undergoing tonsillectomy. Methods Ninety patients who received tonsillectomy were divided into coblation tonsillectomy(coblation group, n=30), electrocautery tonsillectomy(electrocautery group, n=30), and conventional tonsillectomy(conventional group, n=30). The duration of the entire operation, amount of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, postoperative sore throat assessed using a visual analogue scale(VAS), and hospital costs were all recorded in three groups. Results Significant difference was shown among three groups by comparison to the operation time, amount of blood loss and the VAS scores of postoperative pain 1-4 d after surgery(P<0.001), in which the above indexes of coblation group and electrocautery group were all superior to those of conventional group(P<0.001), but there was no statistical significance between coblation group and electrocautery group(P>0.05). One patient encountered primary hemorrhage after surgery in conventional group, whereas no postoperative hemorrhage in coblation group and electrocautery group. There was no statistical significance among three groups by comparison to the nursing and examination/treatment expenses as well as postoperative charges for medicine(P>0.05). The total hospital cost in electrocautery group and conventional group was obviously lower than that in coblation group(P<0.001), but no significant difference was shown between electrocautery group and conventional group(P>0.05). Conclusion Each of the three surgical methods in adult tonsillectomy has its own advantages and disadvantages. In the clinical practice, the most appropriate surgical method should be selected so as to achieve the optimal therapeutic effect based on the disease characteristics, willingness and economic capability of patients, technical level of surgeons and medical instruments.

Key words: Tonsillectomy, Ablation techniques, Hemorrhage, Postoperative pain, Hospital costs

中图分类号:

R766.9

徐磊,朱鹃芬,程雷. 成年人扁桃体切除术三种手术方式的临床比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(6): 49-52.

XU Lei, ZHU Juanfen, CHENG Lei. Comparison of three surgical methods in adult patients undergoing tonsillectomy.[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2016, 30(6): 49-52.

参考文献

[1] 郭任重, 苏纪平, 陈平. 扁桃体切除术患者住院费用影响因素分析[J]. 中国卫生质量管理, 2014, 21(6):30-32. GUO Renzhong, SU Jiping, CHEN Ping. Analysis of influencing factors on hospitalization costs of tonsillectomy patients[J]. Chin Health Qual Manag, 2014, 21(6):30-32.
[2] Stucken E Z, Grunstein E, Haddad J Jr, et al. Factors contributing to cost in partial versus total tonsillectomy[J]. Laryngoscope, 2013, 123(11):2868-2872.
[3] Windfuhr J P, Toepfner N, Steffen G. Clinical practice guideline: tonsillitis II. Surgical management[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2016, 273(4):989-1009.
[4] 吕晨, 邹建玲, 沈淑华, 等. 视觉模拟量表和语言评价量表用于术后疼痛评估的比较[J]. 全科医学临床与教育, 2004, 2(4):214-215, 219. LÜ Chen, ZOU Jianling, SHEN Shuhua, et al. A comparison of the verbal rating scale and the visual analog scale for pain assessment in postoperative patients[J]. Clin Edu Gen Prac, 2004, 2(4):214-215, 219.
[5] de Tovar C, von Baeyer C L, Wood C, et al. Postoperative self-report of pain in children: interscale agreement, response to analgesic, and preference for a faces scale and a visual analogue scale[J]. Pain Res Manag, 2010, 15(3):163-168.
[6] 庹华为, 黄志纯, 冯旭, 等. 超声刀扁桃体切除术的临床病理研究[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2015, 22(5):261-264. TUO Huawei, HUANG Zhichun, FENG Xu, et al. Clinical research about harmonic scalpel for tonsillectomy[J]. Chin Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015, 22(5):261-264.
[7] Georgalas C C, Tolley N S, Narula A. Tonsillitis[J]. BMJ Clin Evid, 2009, 2009.pii:0503.
[8] Noordzij J P, Affleck B D. Coblation versus unipolar electrocautery tonsillectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study in adult patients[J]. Laryngoscope, 2006, 116(8):1303-1309.
[9] 项光早, 胡建文, 陈伟军. 低温等离子辅助扁桃体切除术与传统手术疗效的比较[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2013, 20(12):653-654.
[10] 张立庆, 杨翠方, 周华群, 等. 低温等离子刀、超声刀及传统方式行扁桃体切除术的比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(3):56-60. ZHANG Liqing, YANG Cuifang, ZHOU Huaqun, et al. Comparison of coblation, ultrasonic knife and conventional approach in tonsillectomy[J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2016, 30(3):56-60.
[11] Weimert T A, Babyak J W, Richter H J. Electrodissection tonsillectomy[J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1990, 116(2):186-188.
[12] Cardozo A A, Hallikeri C, Lawrence H, et al. Teenage and adult tonsillectomy: dose-response relationship between diathermy energy used and morbidity[J]. Clin Otolaryngol, 2007, 32(5):366-371.
[13] Ozkiri??塂 M, Kapusuz Z, Saydam L. Comparison of three techniques in adult tonsillectomy[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2013, 270(3):1143-1147.
[14] Hong S M, Cho J G, Chae S W, et al. Coblation vs. electrocautery tonsillectomy: a prospective randomized study comparing clinical outcomes in adolescents and adults[J]. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol, 2013, 6(2):90-93.
[15] Modi V K, Monforte H, Geller K A, et al. Histologic assessment of thermal injury to tonsillectomy specimens: a comparison of electrocautery, coblation, harmonic scalpel, and tonsillotome[J]. Laryngoscope, 2009, 119(11):2248-2251.
[16] García Callejo F J, Rincón Piedrahita I, Monzó Gandía R, et al. Factors related to post-tonsillectomy pain in adults[J]. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp, 2016, 67(1):23-32.
[17] Ragab S M. Six years of evidence-based adult dissection tonsillectomy with ultrasonic scalpel, bipolar electrocautery, bipolar radiofrequency or ‘cold steel’ dissection[J]. J Laryngol Otol, 2012, 126(10):1056-1062.
[18] Sarny S, Ossimitz G, Habermann W, et al. Hemorrhage following tonsil surgery: a multicenter prospective study[J]. Laryngoscope, 2011, 121(12):2553-2560.
[19] Neumann C, Street I, Lowe D, et al. Harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy: a systematic review of evidence for postoperative hemorrhage[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2007, 137(3):378-384.

相关文章 15

[1]	查洋,吕威,亓放,王晓巍,高志强. 上颌窦出血坏死性息肉的CT和MRI特点[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 37-42.
[2]	李延忠,张泰. 关于儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征我们面临的问题[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 1-5.
[3]	许志飞,倪鑫. 重视阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征儿童腺样体[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 9-13.
[4]	张立庆,宋圣花,王愿,刘晓静,董伟达,周涵. 低温等离子刀、超声刀及传统方式行扁桃体切除术的术后两年随访比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(5): 67-71.
[5]	张杰,陈雪梅,许安廷. 超声刀扁桃体切除术与低温等离子扁桃体切除术的对比研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(5): 95-100.
[6]	李育广,刘凤英,刘茜. 外伤性颌内动脉损伤引起严重鼻出血的诊断及治疗探讨(附12例报告)[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(5): 88-91.
[7]	张立庆,杨翠方,周华群,陆美萍,董伟达. 低温等离子刀、超声刀及传统方式行扁桃体切除术的比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(3): 56-60.
[8]	王宇,马奔. 超声引导下热消融技术尚不适用于甲状腺癌及甲状腺滤泡性肿瘤治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(2): 20-22.
[9]	胡廷保,梁健刚. 舌根腺样囊性癌大出血救治1例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(2): 106-108.
[10]	龚明杰,刘侃,张磊,闫飚,邹嘉平,李伟忠. 三种不同扁桃体切除术疗效比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(1): 70-73.
[11]	王雅丛, 耿韶辉, 李艳涛, 王玉芳, 张红, 张婷婷, 张佳佳, 张炜. Retcam-3检查足月新生儿视网膜出血分级的初步探讨[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(6): 78-81.
[12]	董世亮, 战明明. “预防性缝扎法”在扁桃体切除术中的止血效果[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(6): 90-91.
[13]	王宏梗, 陈东生, 林群, 黄方, 洪育明, 黄建强. 静脉全麻对鼻内镜手术中出血量的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(4): 62-64.
[14]	李萍. 鼻内镜下单极电凝治疗成人难治性鼻出血102例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(4): 88-89.
[15]	李军政, 高翔, 吴盖珍, 陈莎, 王洁, 田文栋, 李湘平. 超声刀在治疗儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(1): 1-4.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed