山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 43-46.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.393

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

突发性聋伴耳鸣的治疗与转归

钟晓声1,杨海弟2,郑亿庆2,*()   

  1. 1. 广州市增城区人民医院/中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院增城院区耳鼻喉科,广东 增城 511300
    2. 中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院耳鼻喉科,广东 广州 510120
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-29 出版日期:2019-07-16 发布日期:2019-07-22
  • 通讯作者: 郑亿庆 E-mail:zhengyiq@mail.sysu.edu.cn

Treatment and outcome of tinnitus in sudden deafness

Xiaosheng ZHONG1,Haidi YANG2,Yiqing ZHENG2,*()   

  1. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Zengcheng People′s Hospital, Guangzhou 511300, Guangdong, China
    2. Department of Otolaryngology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 511300, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2018-08-29 Online:2019-07-16 Published:2019-07-22
  • Contact: Yiqing ZHENG E-mail:zhengyiq@mail.sysu.edu.cn

摘要: 目的

研究分析突发性聋伴耳鸣患者的治疗与转归情况。

方法

选取突发性聋伴耳鸣患者76例,入院后常规按《突发性聋的诊断和治疗指南(2015)》治疗, 2周后分析耳鸣致残量表(THI)及视觉模拟得分表(VAS)评分变化。出院时对所有患者进行心理辅导,对未能适应耳鸣者个体化行短期药物治疗、掩蔽治疗、习服治疗、助听器治疗。随访1年,因耳鸣再次就诊者予掩蔽治疗或习服治疗,观察耳鸣的转归。

结果

76例患者治疗前后THI得分分别为(49.71±2.69)、(41.04±2.84)分,差异有统计学意义(t=3.935,P<0.001);治疗前后VAS得分分别为(5.17±0.20)、(4.22±0.25)分,差异有统计学意义(t=5.010, P<0.001)。听力有效53例,无效23例,听力有效及无效者常规治疗前后THI差值分别为(13.57±2.27)、(-2.60±4.28)分,差异有统计学意义(t=3.339,P=0.002);听力有效及无效者常规治疗前后VAS差值分别为(1.35±0.17)、(0±0.43)分,差异有统计学意义(t=2.953, P=0.006)。经心理辅导后,电话随访1年,其中有53例患者自然适应耳鸣(未因耳鸣困扰再次就诊),占69.7%,23例患者因耳鸣返院就诊,占30.3%,THI得分18~92分,平均56.6,多为3~4级严重耳鸣患者。2周时及1年后VAS得分分别为(4.22±0.25)、(3.39±0.18)分,两个时间段VAS得分比较,差异有统计学意义(t=6.362, P<0.001)。治疗2周后耳鸣消失4例,明显减轻7例,减轻11例,不变49例,加重5例,2周后耳鸣总减轻比例28.9%;治疗1年后耳鸣消失6例,明显减轻10例,减轻14例,不变42例,加重4例,耳鸣总减轻比例39.5%,治疗2周后与1年后耳鸣减轻率比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=43.978, P<0.001)。1年后,完全适应31例,基本适应40例,总适应率92.1%,难以适应6例。

结论

常规治疗、心理辅导、掩蔽治疗和习服治疗对突发性聋伴耳鸣患者均有较好效果,经个体化治疗后耳鸣转归良好。

关键词: 突发性聋, 耳鸣, 治疗结局, 转归

Abstract: Objective

To study and analyze the treatment and outcome of tinnitus in sudden deafness with tinnitus.

Methods

Seventy-six cases of sudden deafness with tinnitus were selected and treated according to the Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Sudden Deafness (2015). After 2 weeks, the tinnitus disability scale (THI) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were analyzed. All patients were provided psychological counseling at discharge. Individualized short-term medication, masking therapy, acclimatization therapy, and hearing aid therapy were provided to those who could not adapt to tinnitus. At the 1-year follow-up, patients who still experienced tinnitus were treated with masking therapy or acclimatization.

Result

Before and after 2 weeks of routine treatment, the THI scores of the 76 patients were 49.71±2.69 and 41.04±2.84, respectively (t=3.935, P < 0.001); VAS scores were 5.17±0.20 and 4.22±0.25, respectively (t=5.010, P < 0.001). Hearing was good in 53 cases and poor in 23 cases. The difference in THI before and after routine treatment in the good and poor hearing groups was 13.57±2.27 and -2.60±4.28, respectively (t=3.339, P=0.002); the VAS difference before and after routine treatment in the good and poor hearing groups was 1.35±0.17 and 0±0.43, respectively (t=2.953, P=0.006). After psychological counseling, patients were followed up for 1 year by telephone. Of these, 53 patients had adapted to tinnitus, accounting for 69.7% of patients. Twenty-three patients returned to hospital due to tinnitus, accounting for 30.3% of patients. The THI scores ranged between 18 and 92 with an average of 56.6, a mean mostly driven by scores in 3-4 patients with severe tinnitus. The VAS scores at 2 weeks and 1 year were 4.22±0.25 and 3.39±0.18, respectively. There was a significant difference in VAS scores between the two time periods (t=6.362, P < 0.001). After treatment for 2 weeks, tinnitus resolved in four patients and was significantly alleviated in seven patients, alleviated in 11 patients, unchanged in 49 patients, and aggravated in five patients. Tinnitus was reduced by 28.9%. After one year of treatment, tinnitus resolved in six patients and was significantly alleviated in 10 patients, alleviated in 14 patients, unchanged in 42 patients, and aggravated in four patients. In total, for 39.5% of patients, tinnitus was alleviated. After treatment for 2 weeks and 1 year later, there was a significant difference in the rate of tinnitus relief, (χ2=43.978, P < 0.001). After 1 year, 31 patients were completely adapted to tinnitus, and 40 patients were largely adapted; the total adaptation rate was 92.1%. Six patients found it difficult to adapt.

Conclusion

Routine treatment, psychological counseling, masking therapy, and acclimatization therapy for sudden deafness have positive effects on tinnitus. Patients with tinnitus recovered well after individualized treatment.

Key words: Sudden deafness, Tinnitus, Treatment, Outcome

中图分类号: 

  • R764.437
1 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会, 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会. 突发性聋的诊断和治疗指南(2015)[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2015, 50 (6): 443- 447.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2015.06.002
Editorial Committee of Chinese Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery , Society of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chinese Medical Association . Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Sudden Deafness (2015)[J]. Chin J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015, 50 (6): 443- 447.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2015.06.002
2 中国突发性聋多中心临床研究协作组. 中国突发性聋分型治疗的多中心临床研究[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2013, 48 (5): 355- 361.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2013.05.002
Chinese sudden hearing loss multi-center clinical study group Corresponding . Prospective clinical multi-center study on the treatment of sudden deafness with difterent typings in China[J]. Chin J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2013, 48 (5): 355- 361.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2013.05.002
3 余力生, 马鑫. 耳鸣的代偿与失代偿[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2017, 52 (8): 630- 633.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2017.08.019
YU Lisheng , MA Xin . Compensation and decompensation of tinnitus[J]. Chin J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2017, 52 (8): 630- 633.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2017.08.019
4 陈秋坚, 郑亿庆, 邱泽恒, 等. 伴感音神经性聋耳鸣的心理声学和听力学特征[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2012, 26 (10): 449- 451.
CHEN Qiujian , ZHENG Yiqing , QIU Zeheng , et al. Analysis of psychoacoustic characteristics and audiology tests of tinnitus patients with sensorineural hearing loss[J]. J Clin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2012, 26 (10): 449- 451.
5 乔晓. 耳鸣发病机制及临床分析[J]. 中华现代眼耳鼻喉科杂志, 2006, 3 (4): 333- 341.
QIAO Xiao . Pathogenesis and clinical analysis of tinnitus[J]. Chin J Modern Eye Nose Throat, 2006, 3 (4): 333- 341.
6 Jastreboff PJ , Gray WC , Gold SL . Neurophysiological approach to tinnitus patients[J]. Am J Otol, 1996, 17 (2): 236- 240.
7 杨海弟, 郑亿庆, 张志钢, 等. 主观性耳鸣的掩蔽及习服治疗效果分析[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2010, 24 (10): 442- 446.
YANG Haidi , ZHENG Yiqing , ZHANG Zhigang , et al. Analysis and comparison of the masking and TRT for patiens with subjective tinnitus[J]. J Clin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2010, 24 (10): 442- 446.
8 Newman CW , Sandridge SA , Bolek L . Development and psychometric adequacy of the screening versin of the tinitus hadicap inventory[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2008, 29 (3): 276- 281.
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31816569c4
9 钟晓声, 杨海弟, 郑亿庆. 突发性聋伴耳鸣患者耳鸣特征[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29 (4): 15- 18.
doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2015.126
ZHONG Xiaosheng , YANG Haidi , ZHENG Yiqing . Characteristics of tinnitus in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss[J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2015, 29 (4): 15- 18.
doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2015.126
[1] 张贵阳,黄河,冼志,张汉文,谢桂彩. 粉尘螨滴剂舌下含服免疫治疗对不同年龄段变应性鼻炎患者的临床效果评估[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 60-65.
[2] 赵俊英,王建明. 单侧突发性聋与椎基底动脉影像学特征的相关性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 47-51.
[3] 申宇鹏,宋琦,李晓明. 喉癌前病变的病因、分子机制和处理策略[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 25-30.
[4] 张俊军,刘海莉,刘加福,秦小奉,杜洪明,王厚慧. 糖皮质激素不同给药方式治疗突发性聋的临床疗效及安全性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 52-55.
[5] 童巧珍,赵艳,程四华. 突发性聋患者负性情绪知信行模式构建及应用效果[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 162-164.
[6] 刘鸣. 早期声门癌的内镜治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 6-9.
[7] 罗通勇,杨华清,岳胜清,贾全凡,袁龙. 帕尼单抗和紫杉醇一线治疗复发或转移性头颈肿瘤Ⅱ期患者效果观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 71-75.
[8] 王登元,陈智斌,王杪琳. 伴发梅尼埃病的良性阵发性位置性眩晕的临床特点[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(3): 61-65.
[9] 王登元, 陈智斌, 邢光前. 耳内镜微创术——耳科手术的新途径[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(3): 27-30.
[10] 郎永耀,杨云,刘晴,徐林弟,林子萍. 咽喉反流性疾病的影响因素及治疗效果分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(3): 119-123.
[11] 许明,罗兴谷,唐洪波,江青山. 儿童突发性聋的临床特征及预后相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 41-44.
[12] 廖礼兵,刘绮明,宗凌,翟锦明,张建国. 42例耳鸣伴听觉过敏患者特征分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 31-36.
[13] 朱文燕,金新,佘万东,马永驰. 突发性聋30例精神心理状况分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 50-52.
[14] 陈伟,胡中南,童钊君,李湘宇,刘文君. 青中年无眩晕、心脑血管疾病病史的突发性聋患者高刺激率听性脑干反应特征分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 45-49.
[15] 侯小兵,任同力,张毅博. 69例梅尼埃病伴耳鸣的发病特点及影响因素[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 37-40.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 林彬,王挥戈 . 功能性内镜鼻窦手术后鼻黏膜纤毛转归的研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(6): 481 -487 .
[2] 公 蕾,孙 洁,薛子超,李敬华,薛卫国 . 鼻腔鼻窦恶性肿瘤细胞周期的DNA分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 193 -195 .
[3] 陈文文 . 1例T/NK淋巴瘤17年演进[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(5): 472 -472 .
[4] 栾建刚,梁传余,文艳君,李炯 . 抑制表皮生长因子受体基因表达的pSIREN-ShuttleRNAi表达载体的构建[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 4 -8 .
[5] 马敬, 钟翠萍 . 手术治疗侵犯翼腭窝的鼻咽纤维血管瘤的方法(附5例报告)[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 30 -32 .
[6] 刘强和,罗香林,耿宛平,陈 晨,雷 迅,刘芳贤,邓 明 . 快速老化小鼠的听功能和耳蜗螺旋神经元的增龄性变化[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 215 -217 .
[7] 郑鹏凌,陈卫国,易笃友,黄清秀,卢 俊 . 耳内镜下吸引清除耳道耵聍55例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 223 -226 .
[8] 马 敬,钟翠萍,严 星,安 飞 . 耳屏软骨修补无残余软骨的鼻中隔穿孔15例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 246 -247 .
[9] 崔哲洙,严永峰,崔春莲,金顺吉 . 嗜酸性粒细胞在变应性鼻炎合并慢性鼻窦炎的分布特点[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 250 -252 .
[10] 赵鲁新,翟 洪,潘 洁 . 超声乳化吸除联合晶状体植入治疗急性闭角型青光眼伴白内障23例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 260 -262 .