山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 143-146.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2018.047

• 护理园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

医护一体化营养管理模式在全喉切除术后的应用

高俊芳,刘萍()   

  1. 南京医科大学第一附属医院 江苏省人民医院耳鼻咽喉科,江苏 南京 210029
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-14 修回日期:2019-04-17 出版日期:2019-05-20 发布日期:2019-08-07
  • 通讯作者: 刘萍 E-mail:13851729138@163.com

Application of the integration of doctors′ and nurses′ nutrition management model after total laryngectomy

Junfang GAO,Ping LIU()   

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2018-12-14 Revised:2019-04-17 Online:2019-05-20 Published:2019-08-07
  • Contact: Ping LIU E-mail:13851729138@163.com

摘要: 目的

探讨医护一体化营养管理模式在全喉切除术后的应用效果,观察患者的恢复情况,提升护理工作能力。

方法

将2017年4月至2018年9月共68例行全喉切除术喉癌患者,随机分为医护一体化营养管理干预组及对照组,每组34例,医护一体化营养管理干预组由医生与护士共同参与,每日由护士根据患者的身高、体质量、基础代谢率,计算患者的每日目标营养量,根据目标营养量采用肠内营养泵经鼻胃管每日给予肠内营养制剂,并且全程营养管理干预,进行质量控制;对照组给予常规模式营养干预,采用注射器经鼻胃管给予普通流质。观察患者术后1周血清前蛋白、白蛋白及BMI的变化,对术后住院时间和生活自理能力的影响,以及并发症和不良反应的发生情况。

结果

医护一体化营养管理干预组患者术后1周血清前蛋白、白蛋白及BMI均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。医护一体化营养管理干预组患者术后的生活自理能力提高明显,术后住院时间缩短,且并发症和不良反应的发生率明显降低,与对照组相比,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

全喉切除术后采用医护一体化营养管理干预可显著改善患者的营养状况,提高生活自理能力,缩短住院时间,减少并发症和不良反应的发生。

关键词: 喉切除术, 医护一体化, 营养支持, 护理估计

Abstract: Objective

To explore the effects of the application of the integration of doctors′ and nurses′ nutrition management model after total laryngectomy, observe the recovery of patients, and improve nursing services.

Methods

From April 2017 to September 2018, 68 patients with laryngeal cancer undergoing total laryngectomy were randomly divided into nutrition management intervention and control groups. Each group included 34 patients. The nutrition management intervention group was attended by doctors and nurses. Nurses calculated the daily target nutrition according to the patients′ height, weight, and basal metabolic rate. According to the target nutrition, enteral nutrition preparation was administered daily through a nasogastric tube by an enteral nutrition pump, and nutrition management intervention was carried out throughout the course of quality control. The control group was offered routine nutritional intervention, and a syringe was used to administer normal fluids through a nasogastric tube. Changes in serum prealbumin, albumin, and body mass index (BMI) were observed one week after the surgery. Postoperative hospital stay, self-care ability, complications, and the incidence of adverse reactions were evaluated.

Results

The level of serum prealbumin, level of albumin, and BMI in the integration of doctors′ and nurses′ nutrition management intervention group were higher than those in the control group one week after the surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Patients in the nutrition management intervention group had better self-care ability, shorter hospital stays, and a lower incidence of complications and adverse reactions compared with those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Application of the integration of doctors′ and nurses′ nutrition management intervention after total laryngectomy can significantly improve the nutritional status of patients, improve self-care ability, shorten hospital stay, and through careful nursing observation and treatment, can reduce complications and adverse reactions.

Key words: Laryngectomy, Integration of doctors and nurses, Nutritional support, Nursing assessment

中图分类号: 

  • R473.76

表1

两组患者术前一般情况比较"

指标对照组医护一体化营养管理干预组t /χ2P
男/女(n31/333/10.520.302
年龄(xˉ±s,岁)64±1563±180.250.804
BMI(xˉ±s21.8±2.720.9±2.21.510.137
血清前蛋白(xˉ±s,g/L)0.20±0.070.21±0.050.680.500
血清白蛋白(xˉ±s,g/L)37.1±3.836.7±4.70.390.701

表2

术后1周两组患者营养指标比较(xˉ±s)"

指标对照组医护一体化营养管理干预组tP
血清前蛋白(g/L)0.19±0.040.22±0.052.730.008
血清白蛋白(g/L)32.60±2.7034.4±2.82.700.009
BMI18.60±1.6020.3±2.43.440.001
1 刘红兵, 刘月辉, 罗英, 等. 喉癌的手术方式选择及远期疗效的分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2015, 25(2): 145-149. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-3939.2015.02.014.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3939.2015.02.014
LIUHongbing, LIUYuehui, LUOYing, et al. Analysis of surgical methods and clinical analysis of its long-term effect of laryngeal carcinoma[J]. China Oncology, 2015, 25(2): 145-149. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-3939.2015.02.014.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3939.2015.02.014
2 付玉贵, 王海兰, 孙德重, 等. 保留部分环状软骨环的喉全切除术[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 73-75. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.061.
doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.061
FUYugui,WANGHailan, SUNDechong, et al. Total laryngectomy with partial preservation of the ericoid cartilage ring[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2017, 31(4): 73-75. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.061.
doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.061
3 付春艳, 卢仲明. 出院发音功能训练指导对于喉癌术后患者喉功能重建的效果研究[J]. 护理管理杂志, 2016, 16(1): 55-57.
FUChunyan, LUZhongming. The effectiveness of pronunciation functiond trairdng on the laryngeal function reconstruction in laryngeal canter postoperative patients[J]. Journal of Nursing Adminstration, 2016, 16(1): 55-57.
4 马倩, 刘欣梅, 李笑雨, 等. 喉癌术后气道湿化液及观察指标的研究进展[J]. 护理学杂志, 2014, 29(4): 95-97. doi:10.3870/hlxzz.2014.04.095.
doi: 10.3870/hlxzz.2014.04.095
QianMA , LIUXinmei, LIXiaoyu, et al. Airway humidification fluids and their effect measures after laryngectomy: a review[J]. Journal of Nursing Science, 2014, 29(4): 95-97. doi:10.3870/hlxzz.2014.04.095.
doi: 10.3870/hlxzz.2014.04.095
5 任秀芹, 薛贵芝, 董琼玉, 等. 电话随访对喉癌术后保留气管套管患者遵医行为及健康行为的影响[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2015, 21(32): 3904-3905,3906. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2015.32.020.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2015.32.020
6 陈叶香, 钱广兴, 刘贵远, 等. 新营养管理模式在胃肠手术快速康复中的应用[J]. 肠外与肠内营养, 2013, 20(2): 96-98. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-810X.2013.02.011.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-810X.2013.02.011
CHENYexiang, QIANGuangxing, LIUGuiyuan, et al. Application of a novel nutrition management mode in fast track gastrointestinal surgery[J]. Parenteral & Enteral Nutrition, 2013, 20(2): 96-98. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-810X.2013.02.011.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-810X.2013.02.011
7 宋西成. 加速康复外科理念在头颈肿瘤手术的应用价值[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 1-4. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2018.010.
doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2018.010
SONGXicheng. Application value of enhanced recovery after surgery in head and neck cancer surgery[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2018, 32(5): 1-4. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2018.010.
doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2018.010
8 张敏, 陈蕾. 心脏外科术后患者早期心脏康复营养管理模式的初探[J]. 中西医结合心血管病电子杂志, 2018, 6(21): 15-16. doi:10.16282/j.cnki.cn11-9336/r.2018. 21. 008.
doi: 10.16282/j.cnki.cn11-9336/r.2018. 21. 008
9 黎介寿. 肠衰竭: 概念、营养支持与肠粘膜屏障维护[J]. 肠外与肠内营养, 2004, 11(2): 65-67. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-810X.2004.02.001.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-810X.2004.02.001
10 杨庆海. 浅谈肠外营养的常见并发症和相应措施[J]. 中国保健营养, 2016, 26(5): 265.
11 KaidoT, MoriA, OguraY, et al. Impact of enteral nutrition using a new immuno-modulating diet after liver transplantation[J]. Hepatogastroenterology,2010, 57(104): 1522-1525.PMID: 21443114
12 崔久嵬, 卓文磊, 黄岚, 等. 肿瘤免疫营养治疗指南[J]. 肿瘤代谢与营养电子杂志, 2016, 3(4): 224-227,228. doi:10.16689/j.cnki.cn11-9349/r.2016.04.007.
doi: 10.16689/j.cnki.cn11-9349/r.2016.04.007
13 MoyaP, MirandaE, Soriano-IrigarayL, et al. Perioperative immunonutrition in normo-nourished patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(11): 4946-4953. doi:10.1007/s00464-016-4836-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4836-7
14 王怡. 医院肠内营养液应用分析[J]. 中国医药, 2015, 10(9): 1377-1381. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4777.2015.09.036.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4777.2015.09.036
WANGYi. Clinical study of enteral nutrition at hospital[J]. China Medicine, 2015, 10(9): 1377-1381. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4777.2015.09.036.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4777.2015.09.036
15 田梓蓉, 朱晓雪, 梁晶, 等. 集束化鼻饲护理预防喉切除患者胃部不适[J]. 护理学杂志, 2017, 32(24): 45-47. doi:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2017.24.045.
doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2017.24.045
16 TIANZirong, ZHUXiaoxue, LIANGJing, et al. Nasogastric feeding care bundles prevent stomach discomfort for patients undergoing laryngectomy[J]. Journal of Nursing Science, 2017, 32(24): 45-47. doi:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2017.24.045.
doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2017.24.045
[1] 姚慧,万文锦. 同伴支持教育在全喉切除术后患者延续护理中的应用效果分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(3): 138-142.
[2] 万文锦,闫玉洁,黎娜,郭人毓,袁慧. 综合护理干预对鼻内镜鼻窦手术后口干症的改善效果观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(3): 134-137.
[3] 付玉贵,王海兰,孙德重,杨佩珍,陈彦林,陈志鹏. 保留部分环状软骨环的喉全切除术[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 73-75.
[4] 王守玺, 刘荷珍. 声门上水平喉部分切除术中舌骨去留对误咽的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(4): 45-47.
[5] 高英恺, 刘清明, 杨丽萍, 张凤英, 王树勇, 陈淑萍, 游会增, 刘存军, 赵延祥. 喉全切除术后发音钮的研制及临床应用115例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(6): 50-52.
[6] 刘荷珍. 甲状软骨外膜和胸骨舌骨肌用于声门型喉癌切除喉重建临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(4): 49-51.
[7] 王晓彬1,潘新良2,卢永田1,魏明辉1,孙焕吉1,苗北平1. 早期声门区癌的手术治疗及疗效评估[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(4): 53-58.
[8] 伊海金1, 张宝泉2, 王春红1, 郭泓1, 倪富强1. 喉癌治疗后复发的临床因素分析及治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(3): 18-21.
[9] 李庆丰,张中祥,张国奎,李强. 前联合上喉室入路在声门上型喉癌中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2010, 24(4): 13-15.
[10] 王 琳,孙 彦,陈志俊,李 薇,孙文海 . 7例喉癌术后患者耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的临床特点和治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(2): 127-129 .
[11] 孙 彦,陈志俊,孙文海,李 薇 . 会厌瓣在声门癌术后喉呼吸功能不良整复中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2007, 21(6): 488-490 .
[12] 朱肇峰,王跃建,梁玉颜,陈伟雄,陈瑞开 . 早期声门型喉癌激光术后发音功能的客观声学分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2007, 21(4): 352-354 .
[13] 刘大昱,潘新良,雷大鹏,许风雷,张立强,栾信庸 . 梨状窝内侧壁癌的手术治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2007, 21(1): 8-11 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 林彬,王挥戈 . 功能性内镜鼻窦手术后鼻黏膜纤毛转归的研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(6): 481 -487 .
[2] 张晗,黄一飞 . 抗角膜移植排斥的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 84 -87 .
[3] 张玉光,韩旭光,张华,王旭,徐湘辉 . 改良穿透性角膜移植术治疗真菌性角膜炎[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 94 -95 .
[4] 毕景云 . 鼻中隔矫正术后血肿的处理[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 90 -91 .
[5] 谢治年 综述,姬长友 审校 . RNA干扰及其在喉鳞癌研究中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 200 -203 .
[6] 王宗峰,张志莉,李建东,李剑弋 . 控制性降压对鼻内镜手术视野及脑血流变化的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 239 -241 .
[7] 白广平,李 俊,董 频 . 鼻内镜下手术治疗慢性鼻窦炎、鼻息肉180例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 242 -243 .
[8] 崔哲洙,严永峰,崔春莲,金顺吉 . 嗜酸性粒细胞在变应性鼻炎合并慢性鼻窦炎的分布特点[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 250 -252 .
[9] 王端华 . 耳部丛状神经纤维瘤病1例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 275 -275 .
[10] 李 响,徐志坚,彭解人 . 颈部异位甲状腺13例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 285 -285 .