山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 56-60.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2019.004

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

突触囊泡蛋白2A在大鼠中枢听觉系统的差异表达

刘鹏利,张璐,李晓璐()   

  1. 南京医科大学第一附属医院 江苏省人民医院耳鼻咽喉科,江苏 南京 210029
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-01 修回日期:2019-03-16 出版日期:2019-05-20 发布日期:2019-08-07
  • 通讯作者: 李晓璐 E-mail:lixlnj@qq.com

Differential expression of synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A in central auditory system of rats

Pengli LIU,Lu ZHANG,Xiaolu LI()   

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2019-01-01 Revised:2019-03-16 Online:2019-05-20 Published:2019-08-07
  • Contact: Xiaolu LI E-mail:lixlnj@qq.com

摘要: 目的

研究SD大鼠中枢听觉系统中各个亚区突触囊泡蛋白2A(SV2A)的差异表达,寻找区域特异性蛋白。

方法

采用Western blot和免疫组化对SD大鼠的下丘(IC)、耳蜗核(CN)、上橄榄核复合体(SOC)、剩余脑组织包括大脑和小脑(Rest)这4个区域中SV2A表达量进行检测,然后比较各组之间SV2A表达量的差异。

结果

Western blotting结果显示SV2A表达量,CN与Rest、IC、SOC各组相比差异有统计学意义(P=0.006、P=0.019、P=0.013),而IC与Rest(P=0.802)、SOC与Rest(P=0.928)、IC与SOC(P=0.99)相比,尚不能认定有差异,根据实验数据可判定SV2A在CN的表达量高于Rest、IC、SOC各组。免疫组化结果同样显示SV2A表达量,CN与Rest、IC、SOC各组相比差异有统计学意义(P=0.003、P=0.016、P<0.001),而IC与Rest(P=0.94)、SOC与Rest(P=0.863)、IC与SOC(P=0.536)相比,尚不能认定有差异,根据实验数据可判定SV2A在CN的表达量高于Rest、IC、SOC各组。因此表明SV2A为CN区域特异性蛋白。

结论

SV2A在大鼠中枢听觉核团CN中高表达,SV2A可作为CN区域特异性蛋白,推测SV2A可能在CN的听觉信息处理过程中发挥重要作用,这为进一步在分子水平探索CN的生理功能和CAPD病因提供了新的线索。

关键词: 突触囊泡蛋白2A, 蛋白质, 耳蜗核, 中枢听觉处理

Abstract: Objective

To study the differential expression of synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) in various subregions of the central auditory system (CAS) of SD rats and to search for region-specific proteins.

Methods

Western blotting and immunohistochemistry were used to detect the expression of SV2A in the inferior colliculus (IC), cochlear nucleus (CN), superior olivary nucleus complex (SOC), and the remaining brain tissues including brain and cerebellum (Rest) of SD rats. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the differences in protein expression between the groups.

Results

The results of western blotting showed that the expression of SV2A in CN was higher than that in Rest, IC, and SOC, and the differences were statistically significant (P = 0.006, P = 0.019, and P = 0.013, respectively). However, there were no statistically significant differences between IC and Rest (P = 0.802), SOC and Rest (P = 0.928), and IC and SOC (P = 0.99). The immunohistochemistry results also indicated that the expression of SV2A in CN was higher than that in Rest, IC, and SOC, and the differences were statistically significant (P = 0.003, P = 0.016, and P<0.001, respectively). However, there were no statistically significant differences between IC and Rest (P = 0.94), SOC and Rest (P = 0.863), and IC and SOC (P = 0.536). Therefore, SV2A can be considered as a region-specific protein of CN.

Conclusion

The high expression of SV2A in CN of rats suggests that SV2A may be involved in the processing of auditory information in the CN, which provides a new clue for further exploring the physiological function of CN and the etiology of central auditory processing disorder (CAPD) at the molecular level.

Key words: Synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A, Protein, Cochlear nucleus, Central auditory processing

中图分类号: 

  • R764.35

图1

Western blot显示SV2A在IC、CN、SOC和Rest各区域的表达"

图2

免疫组化显示SV2A在CAS各区域的表达(×400)A:Rest; B:IC; C:CN; D:SOC"

1 DelphiM, ZamiriA F. Dichotic training in children with auditory processing disorder[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2018, 110: 114-117.doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2018. 05. 014
doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018. 05. 014
2 李宛桐, 徐莹, 李晓璐, 等. 听觉传导通路下丘区域特异性蛋白分析[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2016, 23(6): 331-334. doi:10.16066/j.1672-7002.2016.06.007.
doi: 10.16066/j.1672-7002.2016.06.007
LIWantong, XUYing, LIXiaolu, et al. Analysis of inferior colliculus region typical proteins in auditory pathway[J]. Chinese Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2016, 23(6): 331-334. doi:10.16066/j.1672-7002.2016.06.007.
doi: 10.16066/j.1672-7002.2016.06.007
3 徐莹, 李宛桐, 李晓璐. 大鼠上橄榄复合体中枢听觉信息处理相关蛋白的研究[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 36(9): 1068-1071,1078. doi: 10.7655/NYDXBNS20160909.
doi: 10.7655/NYDXBNS20160909
XUYing, LIWantong, LIXiaolu. A study on the proteins of superior olivary complex related to central auditory processing in SD rats[J]. Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Nanjing, 2016, 36(9): 1068-1071,1078. doi: 10.7655/NYDXBNS20160909.
doi: 10.7655/NYDXBNS20160909
4 KaltwaßerB, SchulenborgT, BeckF, et al. Developmental changes of the protein repertoire in the rat auditory brainstem: a comparative proteomics approach in the superior olivary complex and the inferior colliculus with DIGE and iTRAQ[J]. J Proteomics, 2013, 79: 43-59. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2012.11.018.
doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.11.018
5 PanneseA, GrandjeanD, FrühholzS. Subcortical processing in auditory communication[J]. Hear Res, 2015, 328: 67-77. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2015.07.003.
doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.07.003
6 NothwangHG. Evolution of mammalian sound localization circuits: A developmental perspective[J]. Prog Neurobiol, 2016, 141: 1-24. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016. 02.003.
doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016. 02.003
7 RobertsPD, PortforsCV. Responses to social vocalizations in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of mice[J]. Front Syst Neurosci, 2015, 9: 172. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00172.
doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00172
8 SaylesM, StasiakA, WinterIM. Neural segregation of concurrent speech: effects of background noise and reverberation on auditory scene analysis in the ventral cochlear nucleus[J]. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2016, 894: 389-397. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25474-6_41.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-25474-6_41
9 PironeA, KurtS, ZuccottiA, et al. α2δ3 is essential for normal structure and function of auditory nerve synapses and is a novel candidate for auditory processing disorders[J]. J Neurosci, 2014, 34(2): 434-445. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3085-13.2014.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3085-13.2014
10 张璐, 李晓璐, 李宛桐, 等. Gal-1, ANXA2和PRPH在SD大鼠耳蜗核的表达[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 37(5): 575-579. doi: CNKI:SUN:NJYK.0.2017-05-012.
doi: CNKI:SUN:NJYK.0.2017-05-012
ZHANGLu, LIXiaolu, LIWantong, et al. Expression of Gal-1, ANXA2 and PRPH in cochlear nucleus on SD rats[J]. Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Nanjing(Natural Science), 2017, 37(5): 575-579. doi: CNKI:SUN:NJYK.0.2017-05-012.
doi: CNKI:SUN:NJYK.0.2017-05-012
11 CrèvecœurJ, FoerchP, DoupagneM, et al. Expression of SV2 isoforms during rodent brain development[J]. BMC Neurosci, 2013, 14: 87. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-14-87.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-14-87
12 Lynch BA, MatagneA, BrännströmA, et al. Visualization of SV2A conformations in situ by the use of Protein Tomography[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2008, 375(4): 491-495. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.07.145.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.07.145
13 JanzR, GodaY, GeppertM, et al. SV2A and SV2B function as redundant Ca2+ regulators in neurotransmitter release[J]. Neuron, 1999, 24(4): 1003-1016. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81046-6.
doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81046-6
14 MadeoM, KovácsAD, PearceDA. The human synaptic vesicle protein, SV2A, functions as a galactose transporter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae[J]. J Biol Chem, 2014, 289(48): 33066-33071. doi:10.1074/jbc.C114.584516.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.C114.584516
15 SurgesR, Volynski KE, WalkerMC. Is levetiracetam different from other antiepileptic drugs? Levetiracetam and its cellular mechanism of action in epilepsy revisited[J]. Ther Adv Neurol Disord, 2008, 1(1): 13-24. doi:10.1177/1756285608094212.
doi: 10.1177/1756285608094212
16 TokudomeK, OkumuraT, TeradaR, et al. A missense mutation of the gene encoding synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) confers seizure susceptibility by disrupting amygdalar synaptic GABA release[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2016, 7: 210. doi:10.3389/fphar.2016.00210.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00210
17 刘鹏利, 李晓璐. 与中枢听觉处理障碍相关的下丘功能及机制探讨[J]. 国际耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2017, 41(6): 316-321. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4106.2017.06.002.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4106.2017.06.002
LIUPengli, LIXiaolu. Function and mechanism of the inferior colliculus associated with central auditory processing disorder[J]. International Journal of Dermatology and Venereology, 2017, 41(6): 316-321. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4106.2017.06.002.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4106.2017.06.002
18 LiuJH, WangC, XiaoZJ, et al. Changes of response patterns to excitatory stimuli of different intensities: a model-based study of cochlear nucleus neurons[J]. Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao, 2014, 34(3): 291-294. PMID: 24670436.
19 Mendoza-TorreblancaJG, Vanoye-CarloA, Phillips-FarfánBV, et al. Synaptic vesicle protein 2A: basic facts and role in synaptic function[J]. Eur J Neurosci, 2013, 38(11): 3529-3539. doi:10.1111/ejn.12360.
doi: 10.1111/ejn.12360
20 LöscherW, GillardM, SandsZA, et al. Synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A ligands in the treatment of epilepsy and beyond[J]. CNS Drugs, 2016, 30(11): 1055-1077. doi:10.1007/s40263-016-0384-x.
doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0384-x
21 MuñozLJ, Carballosa-GautamMM, YanowskyK, et al. The genetic audiogenic seizure hamster from salamanca: the GASH: sal[J]. Epilepsy Behav, 2017, 71(Pt B): 181-192. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.03.002.
doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.03.002
22 StockburgerC, MianoD, BaeumlisbergerM, et al. A mitochondrial role of SV2a protein in aging and alzheimer′s disease: studies with levetiracetam[J]. J Alzheimers Dis, 2016, 50(1): 201-215. doi:10.3233/JAD-150687.
doi: 10.3233/JAD-150687
23 MattheisenM, MühleisenTW, StrohmaierJ, et al. Genetic variation at the synaptic vesicle gene SV2A is associated with schizophrenia[J]. Schizophr Res, 2012, 141(2/3): 262-265. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2012.08.027.
doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.08.027
24 BartholomeO, Van den AckervekenP, Sánchez GilJ, et al. Puzzling out synaptic vesicle 2 family members functions[J]. Front Mol Neurosci, 2017, 10: 148. doi:10.3389/fnmol.2017.00148.
doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00148
25 de WitE, van DijkP, HanekampS, et al. Same or different: the overlap between children with auditory processing disorders and children with other developmental disorders: a systematic review[J]. Ear Hear, 2018, 39(1): 1-19. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000479.
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000479
26 MuresanV, Ladescu MuresanZ. Shared molecular mechanisms in alzheimer′s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: neurofilament-dependent transport of sAPP, FUS, TDP-43 and SOD1, with endoplasmic reticulum-like tubules[J]. Neurodegener Dis, 2016, 16(1/2): 55-61. doi:10.1159/000439256.
doi: 10.1159/000439256
27 CaiZX, LiSY, MatuskeyD, et al. PET imaging of synaptic density: A new tool for investigation of neuropsychiatric diseases[J]. Neurosci Lett, 2019, 691: 44-50. doi:10. 1016/j.neulet.2018.07.038.
doi: 10. 1016/j.neulet.2018.07.038
[1] 张健, 吴建. 蛋白质组学技术在鼻腔良性病变研究中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(5): 95-98.
[2] 陈敏,李娜. 变应性鼻炎和鼻息肉病患者血清蛋白质的差异表达[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(2): 41-44.
[3] 陈志俊,牟莹心,王 萍 . 头颈肿瘤患者术前血C-反应蛋白水平测定的临床意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2007, 21(4): 357-359 .
[4] 孙余才,胡国华,朱 江 . 喉癌组织中核转录因子NF-kB的定量检测[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2007, 21(2): 141-143 .
[5] 於子卫,Amanda Psyrri,董频,李晓艳,Paul Weinberger,Clarence Sasaki . Rb基因信号通路相关因子的定量表达和对口咽鳞癌预后的价值[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(5): 391-396 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 林彬,王挥戈 . 功能性内镜鼻窦手术后鼻黏膜纤毛转归的研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(6): 481 -487 .
[2] 张晗,黄一飞 . 抗角膜移植排斥的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 84 -87 .
[3] 邓基波,孙奉乾,许安廷 . 大前庭导水管综合征[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(2): 116 -118 .
[4] 马敬, 钟翠萍 . 手术治疗侵犯翼腭窝的鼻咽纤维血管瘤的方法(附5例报告)[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 30 -32 .
[5] 毕景云 . 鼻中隔矫正术后血肿的处理[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 90 -91 .
[6] 谢治年 综述,姬长友 审校 . RNA干扰及其在喉鳞癌研究中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 200 -203 .
[7] 刘 艳,刘新义,王金平,李大健 . 后鼓室解剖结构测量观察及临床意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 218 -221 .
[8] 杨淑娟,袁 英,刘付星,秦海平 . 美宝湿润烧伤膏联合蛋膜贴补治疗外伤性鼓膜穿孔40例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 227 -227 .
[9] 林峰,梁勇,卢永田,万丽霞 . 鼻内翻性乳头状瘤临床分型和术式选择[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 231 -233 .
[10] 吉晓滨,邓家德,臧林泉,王 磊,谢 军 . 豚鼠变应性鼻炎模型血清组胺的测定[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 228 -230 .