山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 21-24.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2020.111

• • 上一篇    下一篇

加速康复外科在鼻中隔偏曲矫正术围手术期的应用效果

徐建慧,李欣,寸晶晶,叶飞   

  1. 中山市人民医院/中山大学附属中山医院 耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 广东 中山 528400
  • 发布日期:2021-02-01
  • 通讯作者: 叶飞. E-mail:394085097@qq.com

Effect of enhanced recovery after surgery in the perioperative period of endoscopic septoplasty

XU Jianhui, LI Xin, CUN Jingjing, YE Fei   

  1. Department of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Zhongshan city people's hospital/Zhongshan hospital affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University, Zhongshan 528400, Guangdong, China
  • Published:2021-02-01

PDF (PC)

207

摘要： 目的 探讨在鼻内镜下鼻中隔偏曲矫正术围手术期实施加速康复外科(ERAS)理念的效果。 方法 前瞻性选取中山市人民医院行鼻内镜下鼻中隔偏曲矫正术的40例患者纳入研究。随机分为常规组和ERAS组,每组20例。常规组给予常规围手术期处理措施,ERAS组给予ERAS方案。比较两组术后鼻部疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、术后住院时间、术后恢复质量-15(QoR-15)评分及术后并发症。 结果 ERAS组术后24 h、48 h鼻部疼痛VAS评分分别为2(1,3)分和1(1,1.75)分,均低于常规组5(4.25,6.75)分和3(2.25,4)分(均P<0.001)。ERAS组术后住院时间为2(2,2)d,比常规组为4(4,5)d缩短,差异具有统计学意义(Z=-5.400,P<0.001)。术前ERAS组和常规组QoR-15评分分别为(141.6±3.5)分和(141.9±3.7)分,差异无统计学意义(t=-0.308,P=0.760)。术后24 h、48 h ERAS组QoR-15评分为(138.8±3.8)分和(141.8±2.9)分,均高于常规组(103.5±8.5)分和(126.2±8.6)分,差异具有统计学意义(t=16.841,P<0.001;t=7.689,P<0.001)。两组并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.360,P=0.548)。 结论 ERAS方案用于鼻中隔偏曲围手术期安全有效,可缩短住院时间,提高生活质量。

关键词: 鼻中隔偏曲, 鼻中隔成形术, 加速康复外科, 围手术期, 生活质量

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)in the perioperative period of endoscopic septoplasty. Methods Forty patients undergoing endoscopic septoplasty from July 2017 to October 2019 were prospectively selected for the study, and were randomly divided into the routine group(20 patients)and ERAS group(20 patients). The routine group was given routine perioperative treatment measures, while the ERAS group was given the ERAS program. The visual analog score(VAS)for postoperative nasal pain, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative recovery quality-15(QoR-15), and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results The VAS scores 24 and 48 hours after the operation in the ERAS group were 2(1,3)and 1(1,1.75), respectively. These were lower than those in the routine group 5(4.25,6.75)and 3(2.25,4), respectively; P<0.001. The postoperative hospitalization time in the ERAS group was 2(2,2)days, which was shorter than that in the routine group 4(4,5)days. This difference was statistically significant(Z=-5.400,P<0.001). The preoperative ERAS group and routine group QoR-15 scores were 141.6±3.5 and 141.9±3.7, respectively, which was not statistically significant(t=-0.308,P=0.760). The QOR-15 scores of the ERAS group, 24(138.8±3.8)and 48(141.8±2.9)hours after the operation were higher than those of the routine group(103.5±8.5 and 126.2±8.6, respectively). This difference was statistically significant(t=16.841,P<0.001;t=7.689,P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups(χ2=0.360,P=0.548). Conclusion ERAS is safe and effective in the perioperative period of endoscopic septoplasty, it can shorten hospitalization time and improve quality of life.

Key words: Nasal septum, Septoplalty, Enhanced recovery after surgery, Perioperative period, Quality of life

中图分类号: 

  • R765.3+1
[1] Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation[J]. Br J Anaesth, 1997, 78(5): 606-617. doi:10.1093/bja/78.5.606.
[2] Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review[J]. JAMA Surg, 2017, 152(3): 292-298. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952.
[3] Keil DS, Schiff LD, Carey ET, et al. Predictors of admission after the implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for minimally invasive gynecologic surgery[J]. Anesth Analg, 2019, 129(3): 776-783. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000003339.
[4] Vukovic N, Dinic L. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in major urologic surgery[J]. Front Med(Lausanne), 2018, 5: 93. doi:10.3389/fmed.2018.00093.
[5] Segelman J, Nygren J. Best practice in major elective rectal/pelvic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)[J]. Updates Surg, 2017, 69(4): 435-439. doi:10.1007/s13304-017-0492-2.
[6] Parks L, Routt M, De Villiers A. Enhanced recovery after surgery[J]. J Adv Pract Oncol, 2018, 9(5): 511-519. PMID: 31086687.
[7] 宋晓宇, 张宇, 李成林, 等. 加速康复外科理念在慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉手术治疗中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 9-12. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2018.012. SONG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Yu, LI Chenglin, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2018, 32(5): 9-12. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2018.012.
[8] Garzaro M, Dell'Era V, Brucoli M, et al. Endoscopic septoplasty as a routine approach: Our experience on 647 patients[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2019, 47(10): 1530-1534. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.018.
[9] Shah J, Roxbury CR, Sindwani R. Techniques in septoplasty: traditional versus endoscopic approaches[J]. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 2018, 51(5): 909-917. doi:10.1016/j.otc.2018.05.007.
[10] 中华医学会外科学分会, 中华医学会麻醉学分会. 加速康复外科中国专家共识暨路径管理指南(2018)[J].中华麻醉学杂志, 2018, 38: 8-13. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1416.2018.01.003.
[11] Chazapis M, Walker EM, Rooms MA, et al. Measuring quality of recovery-15 after day case surgery[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2016, 116(2): 241-248. doi:10.1093/bja/aev413.
[12] Dort JC, Farwell DG, Findlay M, et al. Optimal perioperative care in major head and neck cancer surgery with free flap reconstruction: a consensus review and recommendations from the enhanced recovery after surgery society[J]. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2017, 143(3): 292-303. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2981.
[13] Hong CJ, Monteiro E, Badhiwala J, et al. Open versus endoscopic septoplasty techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Am J Rhinol Allergy, 2016, 30(6): 436-442. doi:10.2500/ajra.2016.30.4366.
[14] 王磊, 袁英, 于学民, 等. 鼻中隔连续贯穿缝合技术在鼻中隔偏曲矫正术中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 73-75. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.390.
[15] Vandenbroeck S, Jorissen M. Endoscopic septoplasty: literature review, surgical techniques and retrospective analysis at the University Hospitals Leuven[J]. J Laryngol Otol, 2019, 133(4): 262-268. doi:10.1017/S0022215119000665.
[16] 于湛, 刘玉龙, 贾宏光, 等. 改良缝合法在鼻中隔偏曲手术中的应用[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2019, 33(11): 1036-1039. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2019.11.007. YU Zhan, LIU Yulong, JIA Hongguang, et al. The clinical study of modified transseptal suturing after septoplasty[J]. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2019, 33(11): 1036-1039. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2019.11.007.
[17] 李惠春, 郑磊磊, 滕建荣. 综合性医院住院患者焦虑和抑郁状况分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2003, 32(4): 342-344, 348. doi: CNKI:SUN:ZJYB.0.2003-04-018. LI Huichun, ZHENG Leilei, TENG Jianrong. Study on anxiety and depressive disorder of inpatients in general hospital[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Medical Sciences), 2003, 32(4): 342-344, 348. doi: CNKI:SUN:ZJYB.0.2003-04-018.
[18] 陈望兴, 赵雪, 刘岩, 等. 鼻中隔偏曲及慢性鼻窦炎鼻息肉患者的精神心理状态调查[J].山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018,32(4): 24-27. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.081. CHEN Wangxing, ZHAO Xue, LIU Yan, et al. Psychological status of patients with deviated nasal septum or chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2018, 32(4): 24-27. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.081.
[1] 李丹凤,陈福权,石力,王剑,许敏. 三维影像处理结合影像导航技术在进修医生鼻科围手术期教学中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(5): 113-118.
[2] 倪璟滋,万文锦,程雷. 变应性鼻炎健康相关生活质量研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 110-115.
[3] 王菲,刘钰莹,肖麒祎,丁健,高尚,毛薇. 住院医师精神心理因素与变应性鼻炎的相关性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(5): 28-31.
[4] 王赫,宋西成. 加速康复外科在甲状腺围手术期的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(4): 101-107.
[5] 孙笑晗,李娜,陈凯璇,陈敏,闫舒,车飞. ROE量表在外鼻畸形合并鼻中隔偏曲患者手术前后生存质量评估中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(3): 87-91.
[6] 郑桂彬, 张国军, 马驰, 韦树建, 孙海清, 吴国长, 郭雅文, 郑海涛, 宋西成. 经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺手术在甲状腺乳头状癌中的安全效用分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(3): 58-63.
[7] 马驰,郑桂彬,孙海清,吴国长,郭雅文,孔杨,宋西成,郑海涛. 加速康复外科理念应用于甲状腺癌手术100例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(3): 107-110.
[8] 陈凯, 王君, 唐玥玓. 鼻畸形矫正同期鼻中隔偏曲矫正术治疗严重外伤性鼻畸形一例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(1): 121-124.
[9] 王海英. 鼻内镜下二线减张鼻中隔矫正术43例临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 166-168.
[10] 张小平,杨登权,王少新,黄小明. 连续性院外管理对喉癌患者术后生活质量的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 169-174.
[11] 王俊,邢奋丽,朱萍,孙亚萍,汤翠菊. 鼻咽癌放疗期间两种鼻腔冲洗方法的应用效果比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(2): 60-63.
[12] 宋西成. 加速康复外科理念在头颈肿瘤手术的应用价值[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 1-4.
[13] 吴喜福, 孔维封, 王玮豪, 徐惠清, 戚敏, 杨钦泰. QoR-15在加速康复外科改善慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉围手术期生活质量评估中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 5-8.
[14] 宋晓宇, 张宇, 李成林, 宋西成. 加速康复外科理念在慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉手术治疗中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 9-12.
[15] 戚敏, 李红, 王倩, 涂翠芳, 杨钦泰, 徐惠清. 加速康复外科理念在功能性内镜鼻窦手术围手术期护理的初步应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 13-18.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 邓基波,孙奉乾,许安廷 . 大前庭导水管综合征[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(2): 116 -118 .
[2] 周子宁,金国威 . 喉气管狭窄的预防和治疗进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(5): 462 -465 .
[3] 周斌,李滨 . 鼻内窥镜下鼻窦鼻息肉手术75例疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 24 -26 .
[4] 徐赛男,杨雷 . 红霉素促进鼻息肉上皮细胞凋亡的实验研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 27 -29 .
[5] 张玉光,韩旭光,张华,王旭,徐湘辉 . 改良穿透性角膜移植术治疗真菌性角膜炎[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 94 -95 .
[6] 刘联合 . 颈深部脓肿37例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(2): 180 -181 .
[7] 谢治年 ,姬长友 . RNA干扰及其在喉鳞癌研究中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 200 -203 .
[8] 乔 艺,倪关森,陈文文 . 改良悬雍垂腭咽成形术联合鼻腔手术治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征38例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 206 -208 .
[9] 汪晓锋,林 昶,程金妹 . 不同龄小鼠内耳中ABAD的表达及临床意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 207 -211 .
[10] 凡启军,黄治物,梅 玲,肖伯奎 . 荧光定量PCR测定水杨酸钠作用后大鼠耳蜗基因的表达[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 212 -214 .
网站版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》编辑部　
地址：山东省济南市山大南路27号（250100）电话：+86-0531-88366912 E-mail: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发