山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 42-51.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.432

• • 上一篇    下一篇

高能量加速型角膜胶原交联术对圆锥角膜眼表的影响

夏艳云,钟定娟,王华,李孟婷,李前,陈蛟,何书喜   

  1. 湖南师范大学附属第一医院/湖南省人民医院 眼视光中心, 湖南 长沙 410005
  • 发布日期:2021-12-10
  • 通讯作者: 何书喜. E-mail:shuxi9918@163.com;王华. E-mail:wanghuaeye@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    湖南省创新性省份建设项目(2020SK2118)

Effect of high-energy accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking on the ocular surface of keratoconus

XIA Yanyun, ZHONG Dingjuan, WANG Hua, LI Mengting, LI Qian, CHEN Jiao, HE Shuxi   

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410005, Hunan, China
  • Published:2021-12-10

摘要: 目的 探讨圆锥角膜患者角膜胶原交联术前后眼表的变化规律。 方法 选取诊断为圆锥角膜符合纳入、排除标准,且知情同意后接受行高能量加速型角膜交联术的患者42例(60眼)。以眼为单位,根据Kmax分3个组(轻度圆锥角膜组、中度圆锥角膜组、重度圆锥角膜组);根据K2与K1差值即散光分为3个组,A组(0≤K2-K1≤2.5D),B组(2.5D5D),追踪观察并且记录患者角膜交联术前、术后1mo、3mo角膜最大曲率(Kmax)、K1和K2、角膜厚度与散光、泪膜破裂时间、泪河高度等相关参数的变化规律及特点。采用 SPSS 26. 0 软件对数据进行统计学分析,对比术前及术后不同时间点各参数是否有差异,检验水准为α=0.05,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。 结果 (1)根据Kmax分组,术前基线角膜厚度、K1、K2均具有统计学意义(P<0.001),年龄、散光、泪河高度、泪膜破裂时间均无统计学意义(P=0.35、0.22、0.63、0.57),3个组手术前后不同时间点的角膜厚度、Kmax、泪河高度、K1、K2总体比较差异均具有统计学意义(F时间=52.725.223.305.065.25, P<0.05;F组别=9.2538.28,P<0.05,2.48,P>0.05,13.37,P<0.05,6.28,P>0.05), 3个组手术前后不同时间点的泪膜破裂时间总体比较差异无统计学意义(F时间=1.001,P=0.38;F组别=0.953,P=0.40);(2)根据散光分组,术前基线Kmax、K1、K2均具有统计学意义(P=0.0010.02、<0.001),年龄角膜厚度泪河高度泪膜破裂时间均无统计学意义(P=0.13、0.43、0.96、0.11),3个组手术前后不同时间点的角膜厚度、Kmax、泪河高度、K1、 K2总体比较差异均具有统计学意义(F时间=45.916.614.065.198.4,P<0.05; F组别=0.530.60.751.19,P>0.05,7.63,P<0.05);3个组手术前后不同时间点的泪膜破裂时间总体比较差异无统计学意义(F时间=1.103,P =0.34;F组别=1.121,P=0.34);(3)将眼表泪液参数泪河高度及泪膜破裂时间的值与角膜形态参数Kmax、K1、K2、散光的值进行术前、术后1月、3月的相关性分析,术后3个月泪河高度与散光呈负相关(P=0.04),术前及术后1个月泪河高度与散光无相关(P=0.880.13),术后1个月泪膜破裂时间与散光呈负相关(P=0.03),其他各时间点与散光无相关(P=0.130.29)结论 高能量加速型角膜交联术早期对泪膜稳定性无不良影响;高能量加速型角膜交联术早期使泪液分泌量发生轻度下降;高能量加速型角膜交联术早期泪液分泌量下降,以散光程度严重者为甚。

关键词: 高能量加速型角膜交联术, 圆锥角膜, 眼表, 泪膜破裂时间, 泪河高度

Abstract: Objective To study the changes in ocular surface before and after corneal collagen cross-linking in patients with keratoconus. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 42 patients(60 eyes)diagnosed with keratoconus at the Ophthalmology Center of Hunan Provincial People's Hospital from November 2020 to May 2021 who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and received high-energy accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking after providing informed consent. Based on corneal maximum curvature(Kmax), the patients were divided into the following three groups: mild, moderate, and severe. Further, the patients were divided into three groups according to the difference between flat keratometry(K1)and steep keratometry(K2), namely astigmatism: group A(0≤K2-K1≤2.5D), group B(2.5D < K2-K1≤5D), and group C(K2-K1>5D). The changes and characteristics of Kmax, K1, K2, corneal thickness, astigmatism, tear breakup time, tear meniscus height at 1 and 3 months before and after corneal collagen, and cross-linking were recorded. SPSS 26.0 software was used for statistical analysis to determine any difference in parameters at different time points before and after surgery. The test level was considered as α=0.05, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results For the Kmax group, preoperative baseline corneal thickness, K1, K2 showed statistical significance(P<0.001), whereas age, astigmatism, tear meniscus height, and tear breakup time did not(P=0.35、0.22、0.63、0.57). Significant differences were noted in corneal thickness, Kmax, tear meniscus height, K1, and K2 at different time points before and after surgery among the three groups(Ftime=52.72, 5.22, 3.30, 5.06, 5.25, respectively, P<0.05; Fgroup=9.25,38.28,P<0.05,2.48,P>0.05,13.37,P<0.05,6.28,P>0.05). There were no significant differences in tear breakup time at different time points before and after surgery among the three groups(Ftime=1.001,P=0.38;Fgroup=0.953,P=0.40). For the astigmatism group, preoperative baseline Kmax, K1, K2 were statistically significant(P=0.001、0.02、<0.001), whereas age, corneal thickness, tear meniscus height, and tear breakup time were not(P=0.13、0.43、0.96、0.11). Significant differences were noted in corneal thickness, Kmax, tear meniscus height, K1, and K2 at different time points before and after surgery among the three groups(Ftime=45.91, 6.61, 4.06, 5.19, 8.4, P<0.05; Fgroup =0.53,0.6,0.75,1.19,P>0.05,7.63,P<0.05). There were no significant differences in tear breakup time among the three groups at different time points before and after surgery(Ftime=1.103,P=0.34;Fgroup=1.121,P=0.34). Correlation analysis was conducted between the tear meniscus height and tear breakup time of ocular surface parameters and the values of corneal topography parameters Kmax, K1, K2 and astigmatism before, 1 and 3 months after surgery. The tear meniscus height was negatively correlated with astigmatism 3 months after surgery(P=0.04), while there was no correlation between the tear meniscus height and astigmatism before and 1 month after surgery(P=0.88、0.13). The tear break up time 1 month after operation was negatively correlated with astigmatism(P=0.03), but there was no correlation with astigmatism at other time points(P=0.13、0.29). Conclusion High-energy accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking has no adverse effect on tear film stability in the early stage; it can affect the amount of tear secretion and cause a slight decrease in the amount of tear secretion in the early stage. In the early stage of high-energy accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking, the amount of tear secretion decreased, especially in severe astigmatism.

Key words: High-energy accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking, Keratoconus, Ocular surface, Tear breakup time, Tear meniscus height

中图分类号: 

  • R772.2
[1] Kabza M, Karolak JA, Rydzanicz M, et al. Multiple differentially methylated regions specific to keratoconus explain known keratoconus linkage loci[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2019, 60(5): 1501. doi:10.1167/iovs.18-25916.
[2] Kobashi H, Rong SS. Corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus: systematic review[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2017, 2017: 8145651. doi:10.1155/2017/8145651.
[3] Uysal BS, Akcay E, Kilicarslan A, et al. Tear function and ocular surface changes following corneal collagen cross-linking treatment in keratoconus patients: 18-month results[J]. Int Ophthalmol, 2020, 40(1): 169-177. doi:10.1007/s10792-019-01161-1.
[4] Touboul D, Efron N, Smadja D, et al. Corneal confocal microscopy following conventional, transepithelial, and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking procedures for keratoconus[J]. J Refract Surg Thorofare N J, 2012, 28(11): 769-776. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20121016-01.
[5] Guber I, McAlinden C, Majo F, et al. Identifying more reliable parameters for the detection of change during the follow-up of mild to moderate keratoconus patients[J]. Eye Vis, 2017, 4(1): 1-7. doi:10.1186/s40662-017-0089-3.
[6] Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus[J]. Surv Ophthalmol, 1998, 42(4): 297-319. doi:10.1016/S0039-6257(97)00119-7.
[7] Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2003, 135(5): 620-627. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(02)02220-1.
[8] O'Brart DP, Patel P, Lascaratos G, et al. Corneal cross-linking to halt the progression of keratoconus and corneal ectasia: seven-year follow-up[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2015, 160(6): 1154-1163. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2015.08.023.
[9] Hersh PS, Greenstein SA, Fry KL. Corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: One-year results[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2011, 37(1): 149-160. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.030.
[10] 高芯, 王旭. 角膜胶原交联术治疗感染性角膜疾病研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019,33(5): 153-157. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.314. GAO Xin, WANG Xu. A review of corneal collagen cross-linking for the treatment of infectious corneal disease[J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2019,33(5): 153-157. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.314.
[11] 赖钟祺, 李维娜, 李惠娜. Keratograph 5M眼表综合分析仪观察小梁切除术后泪膜的早期变化[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2015,15(7): 1282-1284. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2015.7.50. LAI Zhongqi, LI Weina, LI Huina. Observation of the early tear film changes after trabeculectomy with Keratograph 5M[J]. Int Eye Sci, 2015,15(7): 1282-1284. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2015.7.50.
[12] Koh S, Ikeda C, Watanabe S, et al. Effect of non-invasive tear stability assessment on tear Meniscus height[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2015, 93(2): e135-e139. doi:10.1111/aos.12516.
[13] 张晓, 姜良柱, 徐艳云, 等. 等渗与低渗核黄素诱导的角膜交联术治疗圆锥角膜的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016,30(2): 87-90.doi:10.6040 /j.issn.1673-3770.0.2015.483. ZHANG Xiao, JIANG Liangzhu, XU Yanyun, et al. The result of riboflavin/UVA corneal collagen cross-linking with isotonic riboflavin solution and hypotonic riboflavin solution in the treatment of keratoconus[J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2016,30(2): 87-90. doi:10.6040 /j.issn.1673-3770.0.2015.483.
[14] Ozgurhan EB, Kara N, Cankaya KI, et al. Accelerated corneal cross-linking in pediatric patients with keratoconus: 24-month outcomes[J]. J Refract Surg, 2014, 30(12): 843-849. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20141120-01.
[15] Medeiros CS, Giacomin NT, Bueno RL, et al. Accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking: Technique, efficacy, safety, and applications[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2016, 42(12): 1826-1835. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.11.028.
[16] 张惜雪. Avedro快速角膜交联术治疗圆锥角膜的短期临床疗效与转归 [D].杭州:浙江大学, 2017.
[17] Hashemi H, Seyedian MA, Miraftab M, et al. Corneal collagen cross-linking with riboflavin and ultraviolet A irradiation for keratoconus: long-term results[J]. Ophthalmology, 2013, 120(8): 1515-1520. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.012.
[18] Tomita M, Mita M, Huseynova T. Accelerated versus conventional corneal collagen crosslinking[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2014, 40(6): 1013-1020. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.12.012.
[19] Spoerl E, Wollensak G, Seiler T. Increased resistance of crosslinked cornea against enzymatic digestion[J]. Curr Eye Res, 2004, 29(1): 35-40. doi:10.1080/02713680490513182.
[20] Mazzotta C, Traversi C, Baiocchi S, et al. Corneal healing after riboflavin ultraviolet-A collagen cross-linking determined by confocal laser scanning microscopy in vivo: early and late modifications[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2008, 146(4): 527-533.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.05.042.
[21] Jordan C, Patel DV, Abeysekera N, et al. In vivo confocal microscopy analyses of corneal microstructural changes in a prospective study of collagen cross-linking in keratoconus[J]. Ophthalmology, 2014, 121(2): 469-474. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.09.014.
[22] Kalkan Akçay E, Kilicarslan A, Uysal BS, et al. Tear function and ocular surface alterations after accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking in progressive keratoconus[J]. Eye Contact Lens: Sci Clin Pract, 2017, 43(5): 302-307. doi:10.1097/icl.0000000000000268.
[23] Recalde JI, Acera A, Rodríguez-Agirretxe I, et al. Ocular surface disease parameters after collagen cross-linking for keratoconus[J]. Cornea, 2017, 36(2): 148-152. doi:10.1097/ico.0000000000001085.
[24] Kontadakis GA, Kymionis GD, Kankariya VP, et al. Effect of corneal collagen cross-linking on corneal innervation, corneal sensitivity, and tear function of patients with keratoconus[J]. Ophthalmology, 2013, 120(5): 917-922. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.10.012.
[25] Jumblatt MM, McKenzie RW, Jumblatt JE. MUC5AC mucin is a component of the human precorneal tear film[J].Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,1999,40(1):43-49.
[26] Watanabe H. Significance of mucin on the ocular surface[J]. Cornea, 2002, 21: S17-S22. doi:10.1097/00003226-200203001-00005.
[27] Dogru M, Karakaya H, Ozçetin H, et al. Tear function and ocular surface changes in keratoconus[J]. Ophthalmology, 2003, 110(6): 1110-1118. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(03)00261-6.
[1] 王传玉,牟国营. 圆锥角膜合并K-F环1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(5): 58-62.
[2] 黄天泽,陈迪,李莹. 机器学习在眼表疾病诊断及角膜手术中的应用进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(6): 13-19.
[3] 赵良慧,蔡涛,杜显丽. 圆锥角膜家系中ZEB1基因突变的致病性分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(2): 98-104.
[4] 张斌, 李威, 何伟. 大气泡法辅助深板层角膜移植治疗圆锥角膜的临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(1): 92-94.
[5] 严槟,周怀胜,皮柳青,段虎成,晏世刚. 斜视患者术后佩戴角膜绷带镜的临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 87-90.
[6] 张晓,姜良柱,徐艳云,牟国营. 等渗与低渗核黄素诱导的角膜交联术治疗圆锥角膜的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(2): 87-90.
[7] 张春晓, 李志伟, 徐文文, 李凤娇, 陶祥臣, 牟国营. 核黄素/UVA诱导的角膜交联术治疗晚期圆锥角膜的安全性和有效性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(2): 86-88.
[8] 王 旭,张 华,吕丽萍,崔 磊,李 淼 . 济南市上网青少年泪膜质量调查[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 265-268 .
[9] 闫 蕊,朱淋洁 . 翼状胬肉显微手术切除后角膜干细胞移植[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2007, 21(3): 243-244 .
[10] 胡 明,李招娜,李云杰,陶祥臣 . 硬性透气性角膜接触镜对圆锥角膜的塑形作用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2007, 21(2): 171-173 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张晗,黄一飞 . 抗角膜移植排斥的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 84 -87 .
[2] 牛善利,柴茂文,李振秀 . 鼻内镜下鼻甲成形术治疗慢性肥厚性鼻炎60例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 16 -18 .
[3] 孟庆国,卢永田,范献良 . 杀伤细胞免疫球蛋白样受体基因多态性与鼻咽癌的关联性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 196 -199 .
[4] 马玉起,孔祥春 . 先天性双侧下唇窦道1例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 199 -199 .
[5] 万俐佳,鲁海涛,姜义道,刘 辉,李 琴,佘腊枝 . 改良腭咽成形术治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征41例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 204 -205 .
[6] 于青青 ,王跃建 . 硬质耳内镜的临床应用进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 222 -224 .
[7] 吉晓滨,邓家德,臧林泉,王 磊,谢 军 . 豚鼠变应性鼻炎模型血清组胺的测定[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 228 -230 .
[8] 向登,卢永田,孙焕吉 . 鼻内镜下修补脑脊液鼻漏19例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 234 -236 .
[9] 邱恩惠,李志春,方文旭 . 嗅觉障碍的中西医治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 253 -257 .
[10] 殷国华,钟 笑 . 激光减容术治疗舌扁桃体肥大的远期疗效[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 280 -282 .