山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 26-29.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.214

• 论著 • 上一篇    

吸入麻醉在儿童电子鼻咽喉镜检查中的应用效果及安全性评价

伊同英,王雪妮,韩旭东,白彩颖,吴岐珍   

  1. 甘肃省妇幼保健院 儿童支气管镜中心, 甘肃 兰州 730050
  • 发布日期:2023-02-06
  • 通讯作者: 吴岐珍. E-mail:wuqizhen8397@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省卫生健康行业科研项目(GSWSHL2021-018)

Application effect and safety evaluation of inhalation anesthesia in children's electronic rhinopharyngeal endoscopy

YI Tongying, WANG Xueni, HAN Xudong, BAI Caiying, WU Qizhen   

  1. Children Bronchoscope Center, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-Care Hospital, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China
  • Published:2023-02-06

摘要: 目的 比较七氟醚吸入麻醉和表面局部麻醉在电子鼻咽喉镜检查过程中的应用效果。 方法 选择行电子鼻咽喉镜检查的1 006例患儿作为研究对象。在遵循个人意愿的基础上使用随机数字表法将患儿分为吸入麻醉组和局部麻醉组,每组503例。比较两组患儿内镜检查的FLACC疼痛评分、黏膜损伤发生率、不良反应发生率、医生操作感受评分、完成检查所需时间及二次进镜率。 结果 吸入麻醉组患儿行电子鼻咽喉镜检查其疼痛感受、黏膜损伤发生率低于局部麻醉组(P=0.002,P<0.001),且两组均未发生严重不良反应。吸入麻醉组医生操作感受及检查时间也优于局部麻醉组(P=0.042,P=0.026)。 结论 在儿童电子鼻咽喉镜检查过程中,吸入麻醉优于局部麻醉效果。

关键词: 儿童, 电子鼻咽喉镜, 吸入麻醉

Abstract: Objective This study aimed to compare the application effects of sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia and topical local anesthesia in electronic rhinopharyngeal endoscopy. Methods A total of 1 006 children who underwent electronic rhinopharyngeal endoscopy were selected. The participants were divided into two groups depending on the type of anesthesia(inhalational vs. local)they received. Next, a random number table was created, with 503 participants added in each group. The FLACC pain score, the incidence of mucosal injury, the incidence of adverse reactions, the doctor's experience score, the time needed to complete the examination and the rate of second entry were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence of pain and iatrogenic injury among the children in the inhalation anesthesia group was significantly lower than that in the local anesthesia group(P=0.002,P<0.001). No severe adverse reactions were noted in both groups. Additionally, the doctor's experience and examination time in the inhalation anesthesia group were significantly better than those in the local anesthesia group(P=0.042,P=0.026). Conclusion For children undergoing electronic rhinopharyngeal endoscopy, inhalation anesthesia is more beneficial than local anesthesia.

Key words: Children, Electronic rhinopharyngoscope, Inhalation anesthesia

中图分类号: 

  • R762
[1] 林川耀, 陆玲, 张标, 等. 电子喉镜在咽喉部肿物活检中的临床应用及病理分析[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2018, 24(9): 1-6. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2018.09.001 LIN Chuanyao, LU Ling, ZHANG Biao, et al. Clinical application of electronic laryngoscope in biopsy of throat and pathological analysis[J]. China Journal of Endoscopy, 2018, 24(9): 1-6. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2018.09.001
[2] 姜岩, 高静. 单纯鼻腔表面麻醉在电子喉镜检查中的效果[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2020, 26(11): 61-64. doi:10.12235/E20200114 JIANG Yan, GAO Jing. Clinical effect of single nasal topical anesthesia in electronic laryngoscopy[J]. China Journal of Endoscopy, 2020, 26(11): 61-64. doi:10.12235/E20200114
[3] Morray JP, Geiduschek JM, Ramamoorthy C, et al. Anesthesia-related cardiac arrest in children: initial findings of the Pediatric Perioperative Cardiac Arrest(POCA)Registry[J]. Anesthesiology, 2000, 93(1): 6-14. doi:10.1097/00000542-200007000-00007
[4] Brennan LJ. Modern day-case anaesthesia for children[J]. Br J Anaesth, 1999, 83(1): 91-103. doi:10.1093/bja/83.1.91
[5] Tamvaki E, Efstratiou F, Nteli C, et al. Validation of the Greek version of comfort-B, FLACC, and BPS scales in critically ill children and their association with clinical severity[J]. Pain Manag Nurs, 2020, 21(5): 468-475. doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2019.10.004
[6] Matsuishi Y, Hoshino H, Shimojo N, et al. Verifying the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability(FLACC)Behavioral Scale[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(3): e0194094. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194094
[7] 梁程程, 王欣, 雷大鹏. 电子鼻咽喉镜诊治27 400例临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 107-110. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.579 LIANG Chengcheng, WANG Xin, LEI Dapeng. Electronic nasopharyngoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of otorhinolaryngologic diseases: a retrospective study of 27,400 cases[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2019, 33(5): 107-110. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.579
[8] 幸华兰. 护理干预在儿童电子鼻咽喉镜检查中的应用效果分析[J]. 赣南医学院学报, 2016, 36(3): 474-475. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5779.2016.03.051
[9] Jöhr M, Berger TM. Paediatric anaesthesia and inhalation agents[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2005, 19(3): 501-522. doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2005.01.001
[10] 王燕, 顾建腾. 七氟醚的临床应用及代谢机制[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 30(8): 81-86. doi:103969/j.Issn.1674-8425(z).2016.08.013 WANG Yan, GU Jianteng. Clinical application status of sevoflurane and metabolic mechanism[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Natural Science), 2016, 30(8): 81-86. doi:103969/j.Issn.1674-8425(z).2016.08.013
[11] Nathan N, Vial G, Benrhaiem M, et al. Induction with propofol target-concentration infusion vs. 8% sevoflurane inhalation and alfentanil in hypertensive patients[J]. Anaesthesia, 2001, 56(3): 251-257. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01717-2.x
[12] Abu-Shahwan I. Is sevoflurane and remifentanil induction of anesthesia safe in children with severe dilated cardiomyopathy? [J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2008, 22(5): 744-745. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2007.06.002
[13] Shirley PJ, Johnston G. Sevoflurane induced atrioventricular block[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2001, 11(1): 125-126. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.0618e.x
[14] 陈宇, 熊利泽. 努力成为舒适化医疗的主导学科[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2018(4): 385-386 CHEN Yu, XIONG Lize. Striving to become the leading speciality of comfort medicine[J]. Chinese Journal of Anesthesilolgy, 2018(4): 385-386
[15] 李天佐, 米卫东, 黄宇光, 等. 把握历史机遇加速麻醉学科发展[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2018(9): 1028-1030 LI Tianzuo, MI Weidong, HUANG Yuguang, et al. Seizing historic opportunity and enhancing development of the Anesthesiology[J]. Chinese Journal of Anesthesilolgy, 2018(9): 1028-1030
[16] 郭潇雅. 儿童舒适化医疗的昆明样本[J]. 中国医院院长, 2019,348(13): 70-71
[1] 冯琰琰,张丹旭,张康大,王林雨,王焕亮. 耳大神经阻滞对人工耳蜗植入术后患儿苏醒期谵妄的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(1): 15-19.
[2] 张丰珍, 王桂香, 魏沄沄, 张亚梅, 赵靖, 王华, 李宏彬, 李晓丹, 张杰. 合并轻度出血性疾病的扁桃体和(或)腺样体切除术患儿围手术期管理[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(4): 66-72.
[3] 林一杭,李幼瑾. 肠道微生态在儿童变应性鼻炎中的研究现状[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 116-122.
[4] 李琳,高正文,崔楠,孙健平,黄贤明,崔静. 儿童慢性鼻窦炎基因表达谱的生物信息学分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 171-180.
[5] 鹿伟理,姜涛,李宪华. 多重致敏儿童变应性鼻炎患者sIgE特征分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 260-265.
[6] 杨扬, 王晓旭, 张杰. 儿童中耳胆脂瘤诊治进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 1-6.
[7] 高信忠, 林宗通, 沈翎, 刘平凡, 林兴, 许杨杨. 咽鼓管球囊扩张联合腺样体切除术治疗儿童分泌性中耳炎疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 7-12.
[8] 马宁, 陈敏, 刘薇, 杨扬, 邵剑波, 郝津生, 刘冰, 张晓, 段晓岷, 张祺丰, 张杰. 儿童颞骨骨折临床特点和治疗策略[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 13-19.
[9] 胡春燕, 党攀红, 张睿, 樊孟耘. 儿童单侧感音性听力损失的听力学及影像学特征149例分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 31-36.
[10] 党攀红, 张睿, 胡春燕, 王洁, 樊孟耘. 儿童乳突-颞下迷路外面神经减压术8例临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 37-42.
[11] 刘珊珊, 韩书婧, 王晓旭, 李艳红, 倪鑫, 张杰. 儿童细菌性脑膜炎后听力损害危险因素的系统评价与Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 48-54.
[12] 焦雪梅,杨扬,李春凤,张晓琳. 鼓膜置管对分泌性中耳炎患儿咽鼓管功能的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 60-63.
[13] 王蓬鹏,葛文彤,唐力行,杨小健,张薇,肖潇,韩阳. 开放性鼻整形切口治疗儿童先天性鼻中线囊肿及瘘管4例及文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 64-69.
[14] 李孟辉,郅莉莉,戚凯文,王珊珊,高倩,步美玲,姜荷云,冯绛楠,王金荣. 皮下免疫治疗对单一尘螨和合并霉菌过敏儿童哮喘的临床研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 75-80.
[15] 赵海涛, 王亚芳, 赫莉, 陈文静, 邢民者, 郑文娟,阎玉彦,刘晓峰. 可视喉镜在先天性舌根囊肿患儿手术麻醉中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 106-110.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!