山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 137-143.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2023.075

• 综述 • 上一篇    

不同术式对青光眼术后角膜散光的影响

李洋1,马萍2,张晗1,2   

  1. 1.山东大学, 山东 济南 250012;
    2.山东省立医院 眼科, 山东 济南 250021
  • 发布日期:2024-06-04
  • 通讯作者: 张晗. E-mail: zh06962023@163.com

Effect of different Glaucoma surgery on induced astigmatism

LI Yang1, MA Ping2, ZHANG Han1,2   

  1. 1. Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China2. Department of Ophthalmology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China
  • Published:2024-06-04

摘要: 越来越多手术方式应用于治疗青光眼,在有效缓解眼压的基础上,如何进一步提高患者的术后视觉质量,引起了眼科学者越来越多的关注。患者的术后视觉质量与患者的术后角膜散光的变化密切相关。不同手术方式对青光眼患者的术后角膜散光影响也不相同。就不同的青光眼手术方式,包括青光眼小梁切除术、青光眼小梁切除术联合白内障超声乳化摘除联合人工晶体植入术、超声睫状体成形术、青光眼引流器植入术、微创青光眼手术等对患者术后角膜散光影响的研究进行了归纳,并对其发生机制、影响因素及预防手段进行了总结。

关键词: 青光眼, 手术方式, 屈光状态, 散光, 视觉质量

Abstract: Trabeculectomy is the most commonly performed glaucoma operation. Various surgical techniques such as glaucoma trabeculectomy with phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, ultrasonic ciliary plasty, glaucoma drainage devices, and newer minimally invasive glaucoma surgery are also used to treat glaucoma. Despite the popularity of such procedures, the impact of glaucoma surgical techniques on astigmatism is still incompletely understood. Our review aimed to summarize the existing literature on the effect of glaucoma surgery on astigmatism.

Key words: Glaucoma, Surgical techniques, Refractive outcome, Astigmatism, Visual quality

中图分类号: 

  • R775
[1] 陶钰,张士玺,柴雪荣,等.青光眼患者生存质量及其影响因素的临床研究[J].山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报,2014,28(2): 84-86. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2014.037 TAO Yu, ZHANG Shixi, CHAI Xuerong, et al.Clinical study on glaucoma patients'quality of life and related factors[J]. 2014, 28(2): 84-86. doi: 10.6040 /j.issn.1673-3770.0.2014.037
[2] 赵家良. 改变青光眼作为首位不可逆致盲性眼病的现状[J].眼科学报, 2021, 36(6): 389-392. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-4432.2021.06.08 ZHAO Jialiang. Current status on the change of glaucoma as the first irreversible blinding disease[J]. Eye Science, 2021, 36(6): 389-392. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-4432.2021.06.08
[3] Yih-Chung Tham, Xiang Li, Tien YW, et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ophthalmology, 2014, 121(11): 2081-2090. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013
[4] 中华医学会眼科学分会青光眼学组,中国医师协会眼科医师分会青光眼学组.中国青光眼指南(2020年)[J].中华眼科杂志,2020,56(8): 573-586. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20200313-00182. Glaucoma Group of Ophthalmology Branch of Chinese Medical Association, Glaucoma Group of Chinese Ophthalmologist Association.Chinese Glaucoma Guidelines(2020)[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol, 2020, 56(8): 573-586. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20200313-00182
[5] European Glaucoma Society. European European Glaucoma society terminology and guidelines for glaucoma, 5th edition [M]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2021, 105(Suppl 1): 1-169. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-egsguidelines
[6] Chan HHL, Kong YXG. Glaucoma surgery and induced astigmatism: a systematic review[J]. Eye Vis(Lond), 2017, 17(4): 27. doi: 10.1186/s40662-017-0090-x
[7] Cairns JE.Trabeculectomy: Preliminary report of a new method[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 1968, 66(4): 673-679.
[8] Hugkulstone CE. Changes in keratometry following trabeculectomy[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 1991, 75(4): 217-218. doi: 10.1136/bjo.75.4.217
[9] Cunliffe IA, Dapling RB, West J, et al. A prospective study examining the changes in factors that affect visual acuity following trabeculectomy[J]. Eye(Lond), 1992, 6(6): 618-622. doi: 10.1038/eye.1992.133
[10] Claridge KG, Galbraith JK, Karmel V, et al. The effect of trabeculectomy on refraction, keratometry and corneal topography[J]. Eye(Lond), 1995, 8(3): 292-298. doi: 10.1038/eye.1995.57
[11] Kumari R, Saha BC, Puri LR, et al. Keratometric astigmatism evaluation after trabeculectomy[J]. Nepal J Ophthalmol, 2013, 5(10): 215-219. doi: 10.3126/nepjoph
[12] Ando W, Kamiya K, Kasahara M, et al. Effect of trabeculectomy on mean and centroid surgically induced astigmatism[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(1): 240. doi: 10.3390/jcm11010240
[13] Michael SK, Ho BK, Sang UL. Short-term effect of mitomycin-C augmented trabeculectomy on axial length and corneal astigmatism[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2001, 27(4): 518-523. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00646-5
[14] Heleen Delbeke, Ingeborg Stalmans, Evelien Vandewalle, et al. The effect of trabeculectomy on astigmatism[J]. J Glaucoma, 2016, 25(4): 308-312. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000236
[15] Gyu A K, Si HL, Sang YL. et al. Surgically induced astigmatism following trabeculectomy[J]. Eye(Lond), 2018, 32(7): 1265-1270. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0072-9
[16] 中华医学会眼科学分会青光眼学组.中国合并白内障的原发性青光眼手术治疗专家共识(2021年)[J]. 中华眼科杂志, 2021, 57(3): 166-170. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20200706-00455 Glaucoma Group of Ophthalmology Branch of Chinese Medical Association. Chinese expert consensus on surgical treatment of primary glaucoma with cataract(2021)[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol, 2021, 57(3): 166-170. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20200706-00455
[17] Sirisha Senthil, Sanket Deshmukh, Kiranmaye Turaga, et al. Surgically induced astigmatism and refractive outcomes following phacotrabeculectomy[J]. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2020, 68(4): 609-614. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_588_19
[18] Devendra Maheshwari, Ashwin Segi, Sarika Ramugade Shinde, et al. Surgically induced astigmatism following single site and twin site phacotrabeculectomy augmented with mitomycin C[J]. Eye(Lond), 2022, 36(5): 1100-1105. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01601-2
[19] Wang Q, Jiang ZX, Liao RF. Outcomes of 1.8-3.0 mm incision phacoemulsification combined with trabeculectomy for primary angle-closure glaucoma with cataract[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2020,13(2): 246-251. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2020.02.07
[20] Giacomo Savini, Michele Carbonelli, Alessandra Sbreglia, et al. Highintensity focused ultrasound procedure: the rise of a new noninvasive glaucoma procedure and its possible future applications[J]. Surv Ophthalmol, 2019, 64(6): 826-834. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.05.001
[21] Aptel F, Charrel T, Lafon C, et al. Miniaturized high-intensity focused ultrasound device in patients with glaucoma: a clinical pilot study[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2011, 52(12): 8747-8753. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8137
[22] Marques RE, Sousa DC, Vandewalle E, et al. The effect of glaucoma treatment using high-intensity focused ultrasound on total and corneal astigmatism: a prospective multicentre study[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2020, 98(8): 833-840. doi: 10.1111/aos.14467
[23] Savini G, Carbonelli M, Sbreglia A, et al. Comparison of anterior segment measurements by 3 Scheimpflug tomographers and 1 Placido corneal topographer[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2011, 37(9): 1679-1685. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.03.055
[24] Bolek B, Wylgaa A, Wylgaa E. The influence of ultrasound ciliary plasty on corneal parameters[J]. J Glaucoma. 2020, 29(10): 899-904. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001574
[25] Tzu JH, Shah CT, Galor A, et al.Refractive outcomes of combined cataract and glaucoma surgery[J]. J Glaucoma, 2015, 24(2): 161-164. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000435773.20279.56
[26] Mehta R, Tomatzu S, Cao D, et al. Refractive outcomes for combined phacoemulsification and glaucoma drainage procedure[J]. Ophthalmol Ther, 2022, 11(1): 311-320. doi: 10.1007/s40123-021-00434-2
[27] Rabkin-Mainer Z, Wolf A, Mathalone N, et al. Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma shunt versus ahmed glaucoma valve in the surgical treatment of glaucoma in pseudophakic patients[J]. J Glaucoma, 2018, 27(10): 887-892. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001050
[28] Graffi S, Tiosano B, Naftali M, et al. Short-term anterior chamber inflammation in phacoemulsification with and without Ex-Press glaucoma implant[J]. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2020, 30(3): 533-537. doi: 10.1177/1120672119839300
[29] Hammel N, Lusky M, Kaiserman I, et al. Changes in anterior segment parameters after insertion of Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma implant[J]. J Glaucoma, 2013, 22(7): 565-568. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31824d4fa1
[30] Livny E, Hammel N, Mimouni M, et al. Changes in anterior segment parameters following insertion of ExPRESS mini glaucoma implant vs. Trabeculectomy[J]. Arq Bras Oftalmol, 2020,83(4): 283-288. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20200040
[31] Konopińska J, Byszewska A, Saeed E, et al. Phacotrabeculectomy versus phaco with implantation of the Ex-PRESS device: surgical and refractive outcomes-a randomized controlled trial [J]. J Clin Med, 2021,10(3): 424. doi: 10.3390/jcm10030424
[32] Ansari E. An update on implants for minimally invasive glaucoma surgery(MIGS)[J]. Ophthalmol Ther, 2017, 6(2): 233-241. doi: 10.1007/s40123-017-0098-2
[33] 王宁利,王怀洲.新型微创抗青光眼手术推广过程中应严格掌握适应证[J].中华眼科杂志, 2021, 57(9): 641-643. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20210904-00410 WANG Ningli, WANG Huaizhou. Strictly following the indications during the promotion of micro-invasive glaucoma surgeries[J].Chin J Ophthalmol, 2021, 57(9): 641-643. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20210904-00410
[34] 张西,宋云河,高新博,等.微创青光眼手术在原发性闭角型青光眼联合手术中的应用研究进展[J].中华眼科杂志, 2022, 58(1): 63-68. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20210904-00410 ZHANG Xi, SONG Yunhe, GAO Xinbo, et al. Advances of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery in the combined treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol, 2022, 58(1): 63-68. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20210904-00410
[35] Ioannidis AS, Toteberg-Harms M, Hamann T, et al. Refractive outcomes after trabecular micro-bypass stents(iStent Inject)with cataract extraction in open-angle glaucoma[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2020, 21(14): 517-524. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S239103
[36] Seungsoo Rho, Su-Ho Lim. Clinical outcomes after second-generation trabecular microbypass stents(istent inject)with phacoemulsification in korean patients[J]. Ophthalmol Ther, 2021, 10(4): 1105-1117. doi: 10.1007/s40123-021-00412-8
[37] Tanito M, Matsuzaki Y, Ikeda Y, et al. Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism following different glaucoma operations[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2017, 28(11): 2113-2120. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S152612
[38] Matthew Hirabayashi, Gurpal Virdi, Joshua King, et al. Effect of excisional goniotomy with the kahook dual blade(KDB)on surgically induced astigmatism[J]. Clinical Ophthalmology, 2020, 8(14): 4297-4303. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S279073
[39] Katharina Bell, Bernardo de PSB, Mathabo Mofokeng, et al. Learning from the past: mitomycin C use in trabeculectomy and its application in bleb-forming minimally invasive glaucoma surgery[J]. Surv Ophthalmol, 2021, 66(1): 109-123. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.05.005
[40] Bell K, de Padua SBB, Mofokeng M, et al. Learning from the past: mitomycin C use in trabeculectomy and its application in bleb-forming minimally invasive glaucoma surgery[J]. Surv Ophthalmol, 2021, 66(1): 109-123. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.05.005
[41] 钟煜,廖智敏,段宣初.XEN微支架在青光眼手术中的应用进展[J].山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报,2023, 37(1): 145-151. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.468 ZHONG Yu, LIAO Zhimin, DUAN Xuanchu. Progress in the applications of XEN microstent in glaucoma surgery[J]. Journal of otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(1): 145-151. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.468
[42] Tan NE, Tracer N, Terraciano A, et al. Comparison of safety and efficacy between ab interno and ab externo approaches to xen gel stent placement[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2021,15: 299-305. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S292007
[43] Ichioka S, Ishida A, Takayanagi Y, et al. Roles of toric intraocular lens implantation on visual acuity and astigmatism in glaucomatous eyes treated with iStent and cataract surgery[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2022, 22(1): 487. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02707-1
[44] López-Caballero C, Sánchez-Sánchez C, Puerto B, et al. Refractive outcomes of toric intraocular lens in combined trabecular micro bypass stent implantation and cataract surgery in glaucomatous eyes[J]. Int Ophthalmol, 2022, 42(9): 2711-2718. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02259-9
[45] Ichioka S, Manabe K, Tsutsui A, et al. Effect of toric intraocular lens implantation on visual acuity and astigmatism status in eyes treated with microhook ab interno trabeculotomy[J]. J Glaucoma, 2021, 30(1): 94-100. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001705
[46] Takai Y, Sugihara K, Mochiji M, et al. Refractive status in eyes implanted with toric and nontoric intraocular lenses during combined cataract surgery and microhook ab interno trabeculotomy[J]. J Ophthalmol, 2021: 5545007. doi: 10.1155/2021/5545007
[1] 王道光,马元孝,王玉成,任梦佳,蔡可丽. AT LISA 809M双焦点及Proming A1-UV单焦点人工晶状体植入术后视功能的对照研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(1): 39-45.
[2] 丁晓敏,崔彦. 新型冠状病毒与眼科相关研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(1): 122-127.
[3] 孟素坤,张纯. 小梁消融术治疗开角型青光眼患者的长期视野缺损研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 139-148.
[4] 何梦,唐莉. 远程医疗在青光眼诊疗管理中的应用进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 187-195.
[5] 张懿,唐莉. Lowe综合征合并青光眼1例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(3): 93-97.
[6] 钟煜, 廖智敏,段宣初. XEN微支架在青光眼手术中的应用进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(1): 145-151.
[7] 孙极综述李灿审校. 白内障术后人工晶状体轴向位置预测与稳定性相关影响因素[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 7-12.
[8] 黄子彦综述 段国平审校. 高阶像差对白内障人工晶状体植入术后视觉质量的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 13-18.
[9] 黄子彦综述段国平审校. 不同类型人工晶状体植入术后倾斜和偏心影响视觉质量的研究现状[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 26-31.
[10] 于腾飞,李彦松,刘振,周维维,朱艳,朱玉广. 0.2%酒石酸溴莫尼定对连续视程人工晶体植入术后伴有光学干扰患者夜间视觉质量的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 45-50.
[11] 石博影,梁皓,李一洪,唐东永. Blau综合征成年患者抗青光眼手术后并发白内障手术治疗1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 60-65.
[12] 刘乐乐,孔香云综述申家泉审校. 睫状体分泌功能减弱性手术在青光眼治疗中的进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 123-128.
[13] 唐翡然,孔香云申家泉. 相干光层析血管成像术测量视盘旁浅层血管密度在青光眼诊疗中的作用研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(5): 77-82.
[14] 赵颖,张珊许家骏,赵静如. 热休克蛋白72在青光眼视网膜神经节细胞中的保护机制研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(5): 83-87.
[15] 代诚李宾中. 多焦点软性角膜接触镜应用研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(5): 100-105.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!